GE2025: How the main political parties address economic concerns in their manifestos
SINGAPORE: As global uncertainties persist, concerns over the economy and job security have emerged as key issues in the upcoming General Election.
The International Monetary Fund this week lowered its global growth forecast for this year to 3.3 per cent from 2.8 per cent amid rising trade tensions. Singapore, on its part, has also downgraded its growth forecast for 2025 to 0 per cent to 2 per cent.
This has largely been due to the impact of US President Donald Trump's tariff measures on all countries and his ongoing trade war with China.
Against this backdrop, political parties contesting GE2025 have laid out a range of proposals in their manifestos to strengthen economic resilience and support businesses and workers.
CNA takes a look at some of the key proposals of the five parties fielding the largest number of candidates and which have also released their manifestos. The People's Alliance for Reform (PAR), which is contesting the joint-fourth highest number of seats, has not published its manifesto. PEOPLE'S ACTION PARTY (PAP) Help businesses manage rising costs through tax rebates and schemes like the Progressive Wage Credit Scheme, while enhancing Workfare for lower-wage workers and expanding Progressive Wages to more sectors.
Provide more support for PMETs (professionals, managers, executives and technicians) and adopt new technology - such as artificial intelligence - faster, and help companies expand into new markets.
Raise the re-employment age for seniors, increase senior worker CPF contribution rates and co-fund wages to encourage employers to hire and retain seniors.
Help Singaporeans reskill and upskill and provide support for those who have lost their jobs through the SkillsFuture Jobseeker Support Scheme. WORKERS' PARTY (WP) Recognise, measure and value unpaid labour in households, as excluding this in national income statistics gives the wrong perception that these workers are less valuable than those who undertake paid work.
Provide better support to build up leadership in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), and help these companies better attract talent.
Abolish the statutory retirement age to let older workers continue working if they choose to do so.
Refine Central Provident Fund (CPF) policies, such as by enabling the co-investing of CPF savings with GIC, Singapore's sovereign wealth fund. RED DOT UNITED (RDU) Support SMEs by ensuring fairer procurement policies, tackling late payments, moderating rents and making grants more accessible.
Provide a 'Citizen's Dividend' or an 'unconditional cash transfer' to serve as a financial safety net for Singaporeans and ensure "a reliable income floor" for everyone.
Provide financial support to workers in times of job scarcity and underemployment. PROGRESS SINGAPORE PARTY (PSP) Exempt retrenched employees from non-compete clauses that make it difficult for them to find new jobs and be entitled to legally binding retrenchment benefits.
Give Singaporeans more work-life balance by reducing the statutory working hours, increasing minimum paid annual leave and having more public holidays.
Provide equal parental leave for fathers and mothers. SINGAPORE DEMOCRATIC PARTY (SDP) Legislate a national minimum wage to reduce income inequality.
Provide involuntarily unemployed workers with retrenchment insurance, paid out of their CPF savings while they look for re-employment.
Abolish the CPF Minimum Sum Scheme and return members' savings to them when they retire, allowing retirees to pay for their living expenses.
Have an alternative indicator of economic progress other than gross domestic product (GDP) growth, such as one that draws on the genuine progress indicator methodology. GE2025 tariffs economy People's Action Party
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Top banker vows loyalty to DEI at Tokyo Pride parade as Trump's pushback rages
Some Japanese firms have sought to bolster the pool of available workers by becoming more inclusive of different gender and sexual minorities. PHOTO: EPA-EFE TOKYO – The head of one of Japan's largest investment banks used the Tokyo Pride parade to strike a rare public stance on pushing ahead with diversity initiatives, as US President Donald Trump seeks to abolish such policies. Few Japanese corporate executives have taken a clear position on US efforts to roll back the diversity, equity and inclusion policies that had become common at global corporations, though many firms appear to have quietly maintained their initiatives. 'Even if the US has adopted an anti-DEI policy, Japan should press ahead and make up for lost time rather than following suit,' said Mr Akihiko Ogino, president and chief executive officer of Daiwa Securities Group Inc, before the start of the Tokyo Pride parade near the bustling Shibuya area. He was speaking on June 8 at his first visit to the Tokyo iteration of the global event that organisers describe as 'advocating LGBTQ+ rights and dignity'. Faced with a rapidly ageing and shrinking population, some Japanese firms have sought to bolster the pool of available workers by becoming more inclusive of different gender and sexual minorities, as well as women. Major financial firms including Nomura Holdings, Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank are also among the sponsors of the event, according to its website. Companies around the world that do business in the US have faced a dilemma in dealing with the abrupt about-face on the issue. Mr Trump has vowed to stamp out diversity policies across the board, saying they are illegal and have disastrous consequences. In response, Citigroup withdrew its ambitious DEI goals and other US financial firms have made adjustments. Mr Ogino said he doesn't necessarily oppose the anti-DEI movement in the US, but that he thinks it's 'important to recognise that there are people with different viewpoints and work together within an organisation'. 'I believe we should acknowledge such diversity, recognise the differences between ourselves and others, and work together while respecting each other,' he said. Daiwa earned less than 7 per cent of its ordinary profit last fiscal year through businesses in the Americas as a whole. Japanese carmakers Nissan and Toyota rolled back some initiatives in the US in 2024 after pressure from conservative activists like Robby Starbuck. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group erased references to DEI from its American websites, but the Japanese company left its international websites untouched, describing the US changes as part of a global digital restructure 'after many months of planning'. A survey by the Mainichi newspaper published in March found 83 per cent of Japanese companies who responded agreed that DEI initiatives are necessary to secure talent. Bloomberg Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump rewarding loyalists with pardon spree
US President Donald Trump is doling out pardons 'that look like they're almost quid pro quo for financial donations', said a law professor. PHOTO: REUTERS WASHINGTON - Reality TV stars. Former lawmakers. A sheriff. A nursing home executive. A drug kingpin. What do they have in common? They are among the Americans convicted of crimes who have received pardons from President Donald Trump since he took office in January. And while US presidents have doled out questionable pardons in the past, Mr Trump is doing so 'in a bigger, more aggressive way with sort of no sense of shame,' said Professor Kermit Roosevelt, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania. 'The pardon power has always been a little bit problematic because it's this completely unconstrained power that the president has,' Professor Roosevelt told AFP. 'Most presidents have issued at least some pardons where people look at them and they say: 'This seems to be self-serving' or 'This seems to be corrupt in some way.'' But Mr Trump is doling out pardons 'that look like they're almost quid pro quo for financial donations,' Professor Roosevelt said. Among those receiving a pardon was Mr Paul Walczak, a nursing home executive convicted of tax crimes and whose mother attended a US$1-million-per-plate (S$1.28 million) fund-raising dinner at Mr Trump's Mar-a-Lago home in April. Other beneficiaries of Trump pardons include reality TV stars Todd and Julie Chrisley, who were serving lengthy prison sentences for bank fraud and tax evasion. Their daughter, Ms Savannah, is a prominent Trump supporter and gave a speech at 2024's Republican National Convention. More than half a dozen former Republican lawmakers convicted of various crimes have also received pardons, along with a Virginia sheriff sentenced to 10 years in prison for taking US$75,000 in bribes. On his first day in office, Mr Trump pardoned more than 1,500 supporters who stormed the US Capitol on Jan 6, 2021 as they sought to prevent congressional certification of Democrat Joe Biden's 2020 election victory. The next day, Mr Trump pardoned Mr Ross Ulbricht, who had been serving a life sentence for running the 'Silk Road' online marketplace that facilitated millions of dollars of drug sales. 'Just another deal' Ms Barbara McQuade, a former prosecutor who now teaches law at the University of Michigan, said Mr Trump is not the first president to be accused of 'allowing improper factors to influence their pardon decisions'. Former US president Gerald Ford's pardon of Richard Nixon, Mr Bill Clinton's pardon of a commodities trader whose wife was a major Democratic donor and Biden's pardon of his son, Mr Hunter, and other family members all drew some criticism. '(But) Trump is in a class by himself in both scope and shamelessness,' Ms McQuade said in a Bloomberg opinion column. 'To him, pardons are just another deal. 'As long as a defendant can provide something of value in return, no crime seems too serious,' she said. Democratic lawmaker Jamie Raskin, in a letter to Mr Ed Martin, Mr Trump's pardon attorney at the Justice Department, asked what criteria are being used to recommend pardons. 'It at least appears that you are using the Office of the Pardon Attorney to dole out pardons as favours to the President's loyal political followers and most generous donors,' Mr Raskin wrote. Mr Martin for his part has made no secret of the partisan nature of the pardons recommended by his office. 'No Maga left behind,' Mr Martin said on X after the pardon of the bribe-taking Virginia sheriff, a reference to Mr Trump's 'Make America Great Again' slogan. Professor Lee Kovarsky, a University of Texas law professor, said Mr Trump's 'pardon spree' opens up a 'menacing new frontier of presidential power' that he calls 'patronage pardoning'. By reducing the penalty for misconduct, Mr Trump is making a 'public commitment to protect and reward loyalism, however criminal,' Professor Kovarsky said in a New York Times opinion piece. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Money, mining and marine parks: The big issues at UN ocean summit
Fishermen separate freshly caught fish from plastic waste in a fishing net at a beach in Galle, Sri Lanka, in 2024. PHOTO: REUTERS NICE, France - France is hosting world leaders to confront what the United Nations calls a global 'emergency' in the oceans – but what is expected, and can the summit make a difference? There is pressure on the UN Ocean Conference starting June 9 in Nice to show that countries can unite and deliver more than just talk for the world's ailing and neglected seas. Here are some of the key issues. Plundered parks Several countries are expected to announce the creation of new marine conservation zones within their national waters, though how protected they really are will come under scrutiny. Some countries impose next to no rules on what is forbidden or permitted in marine zones. France and other EU states, for example, allow bottom trawling, a damaging fishing practice, in protected waters. This means just three per cent of oceans are considered truly safe from exploitation, far short of a global target to place 30 per cent under conservation by 2030. High seas Key to achieving this goal is enacting the high seas treaty, a landmark global pact signed in 2023 to protect marine life in the vast open waters beyond national control. France had pinned success at Nice on delivering the 60 ratifications necessary to bring the treaty into force, saying the conference would be a failure without it. But it could not get the required number, drumming up roughly half ahead of the summit. Those outstanding will be pushed to explain when they intend to do so. Uncharted waters France will be leading diplomatic efforts in Nice to rope more countries into supporting a moratorium on deep-sea mining, a contentious practice opposed by 33 nations so far. Bolstering those numbers would send a rebuke to US President Donald Trump, who wants to allow seabed mining in international waters despite concerns over how little is understood about life at these depths. But it would also carry weight ahead of a closely watched meeting in July of the International Seabed Authority, which is haggling over global rules to govern the nascent deep-sea mining sector. Actions not words At the summit's close, nations will adopt a pre-agreed political statement that recognises the crisis facing oceans, and the global need to better protect them. Critics slammed the language in the eight-page document as weak or – in the case of fossil fuels – missing altogether, but others cautioned against reading too much into it. 'The end declaration from here isn't really the only output. It's much more important, actually, what governments commit to, and what they come here to say on an individual basis,' said Peter Haugan, policy director at the Institute of Marine Research in Norway. Money matters The conference is not a COP summit or a UN treaty negotiation, and any decisions made between June 9 and 13 in Nice are voluntary and not legally binding. But countries will still be expected to put money on the table in Nice to plug a massive shortfall in funding for ocean conservation, said Pauli Merriman at WWF International. 'What we lack – what we still lack – is the ambition, the financing and the delivery needed to close the gap,' she told reporters. 'It's not enough for governments to show up to Nice with good intentions.' AFP Find out more about climate change and how it could affect you on the ST microsite here.
