logo
Wood heater pollution is a silent killer. Here's where the smoke is worst

Wood heater pollution is a silent killer. Here's where the smoke is worst

Every year the winter cold brings an ambient haze of wood heater smoke to the suburbs, streets and houses of southern Australia.
This smoke can aggravate asthma, divide neighbours and drive people inside.
Now, new modelling gives a clearer picture of its toll on the nation's health.
The Centre for Safe Air at the University of Tasmania estimates long-term exposure to wood-heater smoke causes 729 premature deaths every year in Australia, which is more than the deaths attributable to emissions from the national fleet of 20 million vehicles, or from energy generation, or even bushfires.
Along with this figure, the Centre has built the first national map of wood-heater emissions and deaths attributable to these emissions, with a resolution that can pick out clusters of suburbs most at risk.
Cost-of-living pressures, power price hikes and a wood-heater sales boom during COVID may mean more houses are burning wood than ever before.
Meanwhile, Australians are increasingly aware the smoke is a risk to their health.
Neighbourly bust-ups over the issue appear to be on the rise.
Here's where the smoke is worst, and where long-term exposure is costing the most lives.
The Centre for Safe Air combined particulate pollution readings from around Australia with surveys of wood heater use to generate its national map of wood heater pollution.
Let's focus on the cities in the south-east corner of Australia, which has the highest concentration of wood heaters.
The map below shows total wood heater emissions by kilograms per year in 2015.
As you might expect, the wood smoke is generally thickest in regional areas.
Towns like Armidale in NSW or Devonport in Tasmania have well-documented smoke problems.
"In small communities where every second person has a wood heater, you do get that pall of smoke and it's really dense," Fay Johnston, lead investigator at the Centre, said.
But wood heater smoke is not solely a regional issue.
In fact, when we look at its public health impact, or how wood smoke affects the population as a whole, we find wood smoke causes more harm in capital cities than in regional areas.
Every morning, Lisa checks her neighbour's chimney for white smoke.
The young mother, who asked to remain anonymous, realised there was a wood-smoke problem soon after moving with her family to Sydney's Sutherland Shire.
"[The neighbour] runs the wood heater most weekday evenings and throughout the weekend, so we can't open our windows, can't access our backyard," she said.
"Our other neighbour says their cat smells of smoke."
She said she was forced to keep her toddler inside on bad smoke days, worried about his health.
When she politely raised the issue with the wood-burning neighbours, she said they responded defensively: "They said 'We've been doing this for 20 years and no-one else has complained.'"
Wood smoke contains tiny airborne particles that can be trapped in our lungs. Long-term exposure can cause heart- and lung disease.
Short-term exposure can aggravate asthma or worsen pre-existing heart conditions.
Even a low background exposure to wood smoke can have a measurable public health impact.
Wood heaters are so polluting, it only takes a relatively small number of homes burning wood to expose millions of people in a city to pollution, Professor Johnston from the Centre for Safe Air said.
By combining this measured effect of wood smoke on health with the estimate of wood heater emissions in different parts of the country, the Centre created a second national map, showing the public health impact of wood smoke.
The map below shows estimated earlier-than-expected deaths per 100,000 people due to exposure to wood-heater smoke. The top regions are in south-east Australia.
The public health impact of wood smoke squarely falls hardest on the relatively heavily populated cities, even though the concentration of wood smoke may be lower than in some regional towns.
And there's one city where the public health impact is greatest.
Perhaps surprisingly, given their cooler climates, it's not Hobart or Melbourne.
A higher proportion of people die earlier in Lisa's home city of Sydney than expected due to wood-heater pollution than other parts of south-east Australia.
This is partly due to its topography, with the harbour and surrounding land forming a bowl that traps smoke.
"Our topography definitely lends itself to trapping air pollutants within the Sydney basin," Peter Irga, an expert in air quality at the University of Technology Sydney, said.
"Other than Launceston, the other major cities don't have that basin topography."
Within this bowl, "middle suburbs" such as Parramatta or Marrickville have a combination of high population density, freestanding homes with chimneys, and access to relatively cheap firewood.
About 5 per cent of homes in Sydney own a wood heater, but the Centre for Safe Air's modelling suggests these relatively few emitters cause more than 300 earlier-than-expected deaths in the city every year.
"The modelled estimate of deaths attributable to wood heater particulate pollution are higher than that those attributable to motor vehicle particulate pollution," Professor Johnston said.
"Wood heaters really punch above their weight when it comes to putting pollution into the atmosphere, relative to the benefit they give us in terms of heat.
But these maps don't tell the full story.
The modelling relies on air-quality measurement stations dotted around the country that don't capture the emissions for those directly downwind of wood heater chimneys.
It's here, at the very local scale, that smoke can be thickest.
And where there's smoke, there's often angry neighbours.
Arabella Daniel, a Melbourne-based community organiser against wood heater pollution, said it was "a neighbour against neighbour issue".
Ms Daniel, who once took legal action against a neighbour over wood smoke, runs the My Air Quality Australia Facebook page, which has 3,000 members.
"We've really had a surge in members in the last 12 months," she said.
About 10 per cent of households use wood heaters as their primary source of heat, but millions breathe the smoke these heaters produce.
It's this disparity that makes wood-heater smoke a prime source of neighbourly conflict.
Members of the Facebook group share stories of complaints to councils and heated arguments with neighbours.
"There's a lot of suffering. People are silent because to complain about wood smoke means you're dobbing in your neighbour," Ms Daniel said.
Members of the group who spoke to the ABC asked to remain anonymous.
Max in Thirroul, just south of Sydney, has sealed windows and doorways and installed air purifiers to protect his 11-year-old asthmatic son from wood smoke.
"Soon as it gets cold, around 4pm, the wood smoke becomes so bad you can't go outside."
He said his air-quality monitors regularly clocked particulate readings of more than 50 micrograms per cubic meter, which was considered unhealthy with prolonged exposure.
Amber, in Canberra, fell out with neighbours over wood smoke she said was giving her and her family sinus headaches.
"We were initially really good friends with them … Our whole roof is covered in soot from their chimney."
Several members feared a complaint would lead to their neighbour burning more wood — a practice known in the group as "revenge burning".
Many said complaints to local and state governments have gone nowhere.
These were common stories, Professor Johnston from the Centre for Safe Air said.
"It's a really knotty neighbourhood problem for which we don't have particularly good tools."
Wood smoke pollution was the responsibility of local councils, which were either reluctant to deal with the problem or not resourced to police chimney smoke, she said.
Wood heater sales (which don't include open fireplaces, fire pits, pizza ovens or other outdoor wood-burners) increased 40 per cent between 2008 and 2021, according to industry group, the Home Heating Association.
Sales dropped after the pandemic, but there's no sign of a long-term decline.
Dr Irga from UTS said cost-of-living pressures and higher electricity prices were driving more Australians to burn wood for heat, including — in some cases — toxic construction materials.
Meanwhile, new air quality monitoring and mapping technologies are making wood smoke harder to ignore.
On July 6, 2025, a combination of cold and calm weekend weather in Melbourne saw wood smoke emissions spike in some areas of the city.
The night-time event was captured by a relatively new network of low-cost, real-time air quality monitors, many of them privately owned by households.
Called "Purple Air", the data from these monitors is shared to a publicly accessible online database.
On July 6, around 7.30pm, Purple Air sensors around Melbourne showed levels of particulate pollution considered unhealthy for sensitive groups, even for short-term exposure.
As the night wore on, pollution readings peaked. Heater-owners preparing for bed often close heater vents to stop oxygen flow, leading to incomplete combustion causing wood to smoulder, and produces large amounts of smoke that spreads into the surrounding properties.
The pollution spike was also visible on Google Maps, which introduced an air quality overlay earlier this year based on data from government monitoring stations.
New maps may be helping some groups like My Air Quality Australia keep tabs on pollution, but there's little sign they're changing attitudes more widely.
Surveys show Australians are fairly relaxed about wood smoke, despite having one of the highest asthma rates in the world.
Health bodies such as Asthma Australia and the Australian Medical Assocation want state and territory governments to ban new wood heater installs and phase out out the existing ones in residential areas.
But governments appear reluctant to impose such a ban.
On Facebook pages like My Air Quality Australia, there's a mounting sense of outrage.
Even as Australia leads the world in rooftop solar uptake, many rooftops continue to host a much less advanced technology: the smoky chimney.
After the July 6 pollution spike, one user observed that about 10 per cent of the 5 million people who live in Melbourne suffer from asthma, which is aggravated by wood smoke.
"That's 500,000 people and it still feels like no-one cares. How is that even possible?"
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What's the difference between the cold, flu and RSV?
What's the difference between the cold, flu and RSV?

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

What's the difference between the cold, flu and RSV?

When we're talking about winter illnesses, people use general terms like cold and the flu as if they're the same thing. But while they both tend to make us feel pretty rubbish, there are some key differences between them. At the same time, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is also circulating in the community, causing similar symptoms. Here are the differences between the common cold, the flu and RSV. It's a generic term for an infection that generally affects a person's nose and throat. There are more than 200 viruses that can cause a common cold, most of them being either a type of rhinovirus or coronavirus, Australia's public health information service, Healthdirect, says. "The symptoms of a cold are usually mild," the service's website says. "In most cases, you can treat the symptoms of a mild cold yourself. "Most people will get better by themselves within seven to 10 days without any treatment." The flu is a nickname for influenza. While you may hear people use cold and flu interchangeably, they're actually different diseases. And the flu can be much worse than a cold, Health Direct says. People at risk of developing a severe illness include young children, people over 65 years old and Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people. Pregnancy is also a risk factor for a serious bout of the flu. In serious cases, the flu can lead to pneumonia, breathing difficulties and death. "[But] most people will get better by themselves within seven to 10 days and without any treatment," Healthdirect's website says. RSV stands for respiratory syncytial virus. While it can affect people of all ages, it's most serious for infants, young children and older adults with chronic health conditions, Health Direct says. It can lead to serious respiratory illnesses like bronchitis and pneumonia. "There is no specific treatment for RSV, but having lots of rest and drinking plenty of fluids will help you recover," Healthdirect's website says. "Most people recover from RSV in about 10 days." They might sound the same, but there are specific differences between the three. Here's how Health Direct breaks it down: However, Healthdirect says that sometimes symptoms can differ and overlap. Healthdirect has an online service called Symptom Checker that helps you work out if you should see a doctor or treat yourself at home. It asks you a few questions about your symptoms and gives you general advice. It can also help you find a healthcare provider. But, as a guide, Healthdirect has this advice on its flu website: See your doctor if you: While many people won't need specific medical treatment for mild respiratory illnesses, some cases can become quite serious. Healthdirect says people should call triple-0 if someone is having severe difficulty breathing or turning blue. Here are some more warnings on the service's website: "If your baby is younger than 3 months old and has a fever above 38°Celsius, take them to the nearest hospital emergency department immediately, or call triple zero (000) and ask for an ambulance." "If your child is having difficulty breathing, is turning blue, is grunting or is lethargic, call triple zero (000) and ask for an ambulance." The service also has these specific warnings about the common cold on its website: See your doctor urgently if you (or your child) have had cold or flu-like symptoms and you: The COVID-19 pandemic had many of us used to the idea that we needed to test ourselves to understand what was causing our illness. We asked Gemma Saravanos, a registered nurse and infectious diseases epidemiologist from the University of Sydney, if there was much point in that now. "Knowing the specific pathogen causing your respiratory illness may not provide a benefit [for treatment], particularly if you have a mild illness and no risk factors for severe disease," Dr Saravanos said. However, there are a lot of benefits to testing. "Home testing kits, or testing in healthcare services such as general practice, can guide our decision-making around infection prevention practices," Dr Saravanos says. "Testing is also important for those who may be eligible for influenza or COVID-19 antiviral medication. "Lastly, testing also serves a public health function. It helps us to understand what pathogens are circulating in the community and this can inform public health advice and research, such as vaccine effectiveness studies." "There are no clear guidelines for respiratory testing in the community," Dr Saravanos says. And it's not always easy — or cheap — to get tested. "Testing may not always be available depending on access and affordability of home testing kits, and laboratory services," Dr Saravanos says. "Without testing, it is very difficult to know what pathogen is causing a respiratory infection, so it's important to be guided by symptoms and modify our behaviours accordingly to avoid spreading infection. "What feels like a mild cold for you may result in a severe illness for another person." So knowing what you have might help you make better choices about where you go and what you do when you're sick. "It's good to know because, for example, I've got parents in their 90s and if I've got a mild cold I might go and see them with a mask," Patrick Reading, director of the WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, said. "But if I've got influenza, that could be really life-threatening to them." "Most respiratory infections can be safely managed at home with rest, hydration and over-the-counter analgesics (such as paracetamol)," Dr Saravanos says. "We do have antivirals to treat COVID-19 and influenza and these are recommended for older adults and those with certain risk factors." We asked Dr Saravanos what sorts of foods people should eat if they wanted to speed up their recovery. But there doesn't appear to be a magic formula. "There is little evidence that foods or supplements will speed up recovery," she says. "Be guided by your symptoms," Dr Saravanos says. "If you are feeling unwell or have active symptoms, it is best practice to stay home, especially in the first few days of illness. "This supports recovery and also reduces the risk of passing the infection on to others." "This depends on a range of factors, including severity of illness and individual characteristics such as immune function and fitness," Dr Saravanos says. "A week may be sufficient for some people, however others will need more time for recovery."

Bloody Good Tour aims to save lives and beat blood donation record
Bloody Good Tour aims to save lives and beat blood donation record

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

Bloody Good Tour aims to save lives and beat blood donation record

Simon Braun is out for blood. Quite literally. The father of three has spent the past year driving around the country with his kids, visiting the nearly 80 Lifeblood centres across Australia. "Simmo" said he hoped to enlist more than 33,000 new blood donations, donating plasma himself about every fortnight. But tens of thousands of kilometres in a caravan, distance education, and regular donations have not drained him. "Donating blood energises me," he said. Donating blood has been a constant bright spot through Mr Braun's challenges. He recalled sitting in the donor chair during a "dark time" in his life, and feeling "genuinely happy" for the first time in a long time. He joined the dots. There have long been barriers to blood donation for many people. This month, Lifeblood relaxed its rules around sexual activity and donation. Gay and bisexual men and transgender women who have sex with men were allowed to donate plasma. Lifeblood said it was working towards similar changes for whole blood and platelet donation. In 2022, people who were in the UK during the "mad cow disease" outbreak were allowed to donate again after a 22-year ban. Lifeblood researcher Rachel Thorpe said while safety for donors and recipients was the priority, the organisation hoped to get as many people as possible in the blood donation chair. "Ultimately we would like more people to be eligible to donate blood," she said. Being in the regions has also stopped people donating, with Lifeblood centres concentrated in cities. WA has no permanent centres north of Perth, and the NT's only permanent centre is in Darwin. There are pop up centres in some regional towns, and Lifeblood also has mobile "blood buses" to allow country people to donate. But ultimately, cities and regional centres have the most potential with 90 per cent of Australians living within half an hour of a donor centre. And for people who could not regularly donate, Dr Thorpe said having people such as Mr Braun start the conversation was a big help. "A lot of people don't really talk about blood donation, it's one of the big barriers to donating blood," she said. Dr Thorpe said common "misunderstandings" often stopped people donating. One of those was people believing they were too old to donate — a myth Dr Thorpe was keen to bust. Australians can be a first-time donor until they are 75, and if they have already donated in the past, there is no upper age limit. Fear of needles has been another common setback. But Mr Braun said that was not necessarily a bad problem to have. "It's actually quite a privilege to be able to, with courage, face your fear head-on," he said. He encouraged nervous donors to keep recipients front of mind. "Maybe that's the five-year-old with leukaemia who doesn't get a choice about whether they get the needle or not," he said. But in the thousands of conversations Mr Braun has had about blood donation in the past year, the common theme was not fear, or lack of information, or distance. It was time. "Everybody's busy these days," he said. "In fact, you ask someone how they are and they say 'busy'." His answer to the dilemma was simple. "A blood donation takes maybe seven minutes with a needle in the arm for whole blood, and you're in and out in half an hour," he said. Mr Braun and his family have been documenting each leg of their journey on The Bloody Good Tour website. The culmination of the tour will be a national record attempt on July 31. Mr Braun will be donating in Sydney, where the tour wraps up. But he has asked people from all over the country to sign up to his donor team, to reach the most donations in a single day by one team. The number to beat is 523: a record set by Commonwealth Bank employees in May. "With a bit of cheek, we can't let a bank hold the record," Mr Braun said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store