Niger miners say output will continue at nationalised uranium mine
DAKAR, June 23 (Reuters) - Niger's main mine workers' union has thrown its support behind the military government's planned nationalisation of Somair, one of the world's largest uranium mines, saying output will continue, despite tensions with French operator Orano.
Niger, which seized the Somair mine in December, announced its plan to nationalise it last week, accusing Orano of taking a disproportionate share of production.
Its action follows measures by other West African governments to increase earnings from their natural resources.
French state-owned Orano did not respond to a request for comment on the allegations that it has taken more than its fair share.
It has previously said it opposes Niger's plan and that it reserves the right to take legal action.
The National Union of Niger Mine Workers, or SYNTRAMIN, said in a statement on Saturday that it backed the "sovereign decision" by Niger's military rulers, who seized power in a coup in 2023.
"For more than 50 years... the benefits of this strategic wealth have never fairly benefited Niger," it added, denouncing "decades of pillaging organised for the benefit of foreign interests," without providing evidence.
Orano holds a 63% stake in Somair, while Niger's state-owned Sopamin owns the remainder. The government said last week that Orano had taken 86.3% of production between 1971, when the mine was launched, and 2024, without elaborating.
SYNTRAMIN also pledged to "mobilise to ensure the continuity of production and optimal valorisation of our resources" under new state management.
Niger is the world's seventh-largest uranium producer and Somair plays a critical role in global nuclear fuel supply chains.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Opinion: Truth about Iran's nuclear arsenal we missed
On Sunday, US President Donald Trump claimed to have taken the bomb 'right out of Iran 's hands'. But this startling image suggests Iran may just have smuggled it out from under his nose. The satellite image – published by US defence contractor Maxar Technologies – shows 16 trucks leaving Iran's Fordow nuclear facility on June 19, three days before Operation Midnight Hammer: the American bombing campaign that struck three of Iran's largest nuclear facilities. If Shamkhani and other Iranian sources are to be believed, the trucks were loaded with 408kg of 60 per cent enriched uranium, not far from the 90 per cent purity required to be considered 'weapons grade'. Each truck could easily carry 80kg of uranium. In other words, 16 trucks is ample to remove all of Iran's enriched metal and still have room for other vital nuclear components including computer hardware and the enormous steel cylinders – built to withstand significant changes in temperature and pressure – in which uranium is stored and transported in powder form. If those trucks did remove Iran's stockpiles, then where is the uranium now, and – perhaps more importantly – what does Iran's increasingly desperate leader plan to do with it? The satellite that took this remarkable image would have been unable to follow the trucks. Either it would have had its camera fixed on the site, or – more likely – it would have been filming set co-ordinates related to its orbit around the earth. In other words, the moment the trucks pulled out of Fordow, the satellite lost visuals. Iran would have known that Israeli and US intelligence were aware of their activity so the trucks themselves would almost certainly have dispersed, making them more difficult to track, while also using diversion tactics such as doubling back and driving through areas with heavy traffic. It is unlikely the trucks will have gone to any of any of the mullahs' other known nuclear facilities. The Islamic Republic would have known that any impending US strike would have targeted multiple facilities, and, indeed, US B-2 stealth bombers and cruise missiles struck not only Fordow but the Natanz and Isfahan sites as well. But could Iran have further – hitherto unknown – nuclear facilities? It would not be alone if so. Pakistan and North Korea both covertly developed a nuclear bomb while apparently under tight US surveillance. The Islamic Republic has always claimed its nuclear programme is entirely for civilian purposes, notably renewable energy production. But it is entirely plausible that the theocratic regime has developed secretive laboratories with sophisticated centrifuges to quickly enrich uranium and develop it into a weapons-grade nuclear bomb. If this is true, then it could be just weeks before the Ayatollah launches a bomb aimed towards Israel – or even US and UK bases in the Middle East. This is, by far, the most alarming scenario. However, let's be clear, it is not the most likely. I would personally hedge that the smuggled uranium from Fordow has been dispersed across a number of pre-existing civilian industrial sites – such as telecoms facilities or some of Iran's enormous hydrocarbon plants – where it can be covertly stored without raising suspicion. No doubt, the regime will have elected sites within major cities. Although Israel has shown itself to be unmoved by civilian casualties, the US is unlikely to drop tomahawk bombs on a major city such as the sprawling capital of Tehran, home to more than 10million people. Thankfully, however, these pre-existing industrial sites – although effective for covert storage – are unsuitable for building a bomb. This is because the centrifuges required to enrich uranium are highly sensitive and would be extremely difficult to transport in working shape, certainly not to cities under aerial bombardment. While Iran may well have had up to 3,000 centrifuges across its three primary nuclear sites, they are likely to have been partially destroyed and buried deep beneath the rubble thrown up by US bunker-buster bombs. That, of course, is assuming that Israeli intelligence services are still struggling to track down the trucks. Mossad is often cited as one of the most sophisticated intelligence agencies in the world, targeting Iranian commanders with razor-sharp precision when it launched its first strike on the country earlier this month. Despite officials' silence, the hunt for the missing uranium may already be over. But that's not to say the threat is any weaker. When Saddam Hussein vowed to give up his WMD infrastructure in 1995, he did so fully aware that he had the institutional knowledge to resume his WMD programme in due course. Iran will likely be doing the same, safe in the knowledge that China and Russia will veto any UN attempts to initiate an inspectorate on the ground in Iran in the coming years. The major difference is that, unlike Saddam's Iraq, Iran knows America has no appetite for a land invasion. If the mullahs can weather the bombs being dropped from the sky, their nuclear dream remains within reach. With typical bravado, President Trump told reporters that Operation Midnight Hammer had been a 'spectacular success' and a historic display of US military might. 'Key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated,' he announced. This may well be the case. But enrichment facilities are only one part of the puzzle. Iran is a wounded beast but still possesses the scientific know-how and a greater motive than ever to build a bomb. The threat is not dead yet.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
World Bank grants South Africa a $1.5B loan for infrastructure upgrade and green energy transition
The World Bank granted South Africa a $1.5 billion loan to upgrade transportation infrastructure and help it transition toward a low-carbon economy, the country's National Treasury said Monday. Deteriorating rail systems, jammed ports and frequent blackouts have hindered vital industries like mining and auto manufacturing in South Africa, contributing to slow economic growth over the last decade in Africa's most developed economy. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa and his coalition government have pledged to tackle corruption and decades of poor management as well as pursue reforms to get the country out of its economic rut and ease its extremely high unemployment rate. While it did not give specifics, the South African government said it expects the World Bank loan will enable inclusive economic growth and job creation by assisting in the removal of important infrastructure bottlenecks, especially in the energy and freight transportation sectors. 'This agreement reinforces the strong and constructive collaboration between the World Bank and the government of South Africa,' said the National Treasury. 'This partnership marks a significant step toward addressing South Africa's pressing economic challenges of low growth and high unemployment." Additionally, because the financing has better conditions than conventional borrowing, such as a three-year grace period, it should reduce escalating debt-service expenses, it added. South Africa's 2025-26 budget has allocated over R1 trillion over the next three years toward critical transportation, energy, water and sanitation infrastructure while improving access to basic services. However, real gross domestic product was revised downward to 1.4% in 2025 from 1.9% previously projected by the Finance Ministry projected in March because of the worsening global outlook and the persistence of logistics constraints and higher borrowing costs. Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana said government debt is projected to stabilize at 77.4% of GDP in 2025/26. Earlier this year, the dismantling of USAID by the Trump administration cut around $436 million in annual funding to South Africa for HIV treatment and prevention, putting the program and thousands of health care jobs on the line. Godongwana said the country doesn't have the funds to cover the more than $430 million shortfall caused by the Trump administration's cuts in foreign aid, which have threatened the vast network of support for one of the world's largest HIV-positive populations. ___
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
S.Africa's state-owned PIC partners with UK DFI on African infrastructure
JOHANNESBURG, June 23 (Reuters) - South Africa's state-owned Public Investment Corporation and UK development financier British International Investment have formed a partnership to boost investment in African infrastructure, the organizations said on Monday. Financial terms were not disclosed. The partnership will mobilize private capital in Africa at scale to expand climate funding and boost the rise of private credit as a new asset class, said Leslie Maasdorp, CEO of BII, the UK government's development finance institution. Under the memorandum of understanding, PIC, Africa's biggest fund manager, and BII will create a framework to jointly explore co-investment opportunities across Africa. Priorities include small and medium enterprise financing, financial inclusion, green economy transitions and infrastructure in countries in Southern, Eastern and Western Africa, PIC said. Investment opportunities will be considered on a case-by-case basis, a PIC spokesperson said in an email. Africa faces an annual infrastructure and climate finance gap of more than $100 billion, according to the African Development Bank. Many bilateral donors are pulling back due to domestic fiscal and political pressures. PIC manages three trillion rand ($166.72 billion) in assets. BII has an Africa portfolio of $5.6 billion. ($1 = 17.9940 rand)
