Land owner's nod not needed for projects of public interest: HC
The bench of Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad observed that while Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited (CSPTCL) is required to inform the petitioner before entering his land, prior consent is not mandated by Electricity Act, 2003, or Telegraph Act, 1885. It said CSPTCL would not claim ownership of the land where the tower is situated.
Justice Prasad ordered CSPTCL and other respondents to provide adequate compensation to the petitioner, a 94-year-old farmer.
He owns over 8.7 acres of farmland in Korbi village in Baloda tehsil of Janjgir-Champa district. He alleged that CSPTCL had dug 16 large pits and begun construction of transmission towers on his land without notice, consent, or compliance with mandatory conditions of the approval order dated March 11, 2024, issued by state govt.
The Petitioner's Side
The petitioner sought a court direction to immediately stop the construction work, arguing that the permission granted by Chhattisgarh govt had become void due to non-compliance with its conditions by CSPTCL.
He also sought restoration of his land to its original condition, removal of erected structures, and exemplary damages for mental harassment.
The petitioner submitted that over 4.8 acres (55.7%) of his land had been "illegally encroached upon and disturbed" as 16 pits were dug initially, followed by eight more on March 8, 2025, despite statutory requirements mandating prior identification of affected land in the landowner's presence, payment of compensation, and formal permission from the competent authority upon objection.
The petitioner had raised objections through a legal notice dated Dec 31, 2024, which he said were disregarded by the authorities.
He alleged that 'arbitrary compensation notices' were issued without site inspection or his presence, and no compensation was provided for Khasra Nos. 730/5 and 658/8.
The State's Side
Counsel for the respondents argued that the claim of sanction order being cancelled due to non-compliance was baseless.
They said compensation had been duly calculated and offered to the petitioner on June 24, 2024, and Jan 22, 2025, but he refused to accept it. They emphasised that under the law, consent from landowner is not a requisite for erecting transmission lines, as it is a project of national importance.
The respondents' counsel cited a previous HC order, which, in similar circumstances and for the same project, granted landowners liberty to raise grievances before appropriate forums.
They also highlighted a govt notification of Dec 13, 2006, which authorises CSPTCL officers to act as 'telegraph authority' for laying electricity transmission lines.
Court Cites SC Rulings
In its order, HC referenced Supreme Court rulings, which underscore the necessity of unobstructed access for laying electricity transmission lines in larger public interest for national development. The court noted that Chhattisgarh serves as a power hub, and electricity generation and supply from the state are of paramount importance. The bench asked the petitioner not to obstruct construction of electricity transmission towers, and directed authorities to disburse the compensation within 60 days.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
HC upholds order based on account of man with 98% burns
1 2 Kolkata: Even with 98% burn injuries, if a victim's multiple dying declarations were consistent and coherent, they alone could be the basis of conviction, the Calcutta High Court said on Thursday, upholding the life sentence of a man convicted in the murder of a Beleghata resident, who was set on fire after being doused in kerosene, in 2017. The division bench of Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj and Justice Apurba Sinha Ray held: "Even if there are multiple dying declarations, the court should consider whether they are consistent or not. If inconsistent, the court should ask for corroboration. Otherwise, if the dying declarations, due to their coherence and unblemished nature, can inspire confidence... they can be relied upon by court without further corroboration. " In this case, convict Avijit Chatterjee alias Abhijit Chatterjee alias Ramu's fate depended on proving the dying declarations by victim Sanjoy Halder as the actual evidence. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata | Gold Rates Today in Kolkata | Silver Rates Today in Kolkata Halder sold toys at Sarkar Bazar near Phoolbagan. On Jan 21, 2013, his wife Jharna and one of their two sons found him unconscious and burnt at a pond near their home. The family claimed he attempted suicide but their statements were ruled out as they did not see whether Halder self-immolated or if three persons doused him in kerosene and set him ablaze, as he claimed in his dying declarations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Great news for Malaysians who need an early payout! iOS Credit Read More Undo Halder gave two dying declarations: one to the doctor, to whom he mentioned the oil being poured on him and another to police, whom he told the culprits' names—Madhu, Phuchka and Avijit. He also told police about an altercation that had led to the incident. "To rely upon a dying declaration, the court has to ascertain whether the victim was mentally fit and alert… It is true that in the second declaration, there is no certificate that the victim was conscious and alert to make such a statement, but as the doctor, a few minutes back, had noted the down patient's mental alertness, the non-recording of the mental condition in the second declaration cannot be treated as a serious lacuna in the prosecution case," the HC held. The court added to ascertain from a dying declaration, courts have to find out whether or not the patient was conscious and alert to make such a statement. Halder could mention his name, father's name, age and address, showing he was mentally alert. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Independence Day wishes , messages , and quotes !
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Bail on medical grounds meant for emergencies, not for attending social galas: SC
Bengaluru: The Supreme Court observed that actor Darshan, accused number 2 in the Renukaswamy murder case, had obtained bail on misrepresentation of medical grounds. "The bail order dated 13 Dec 2024, passed by the Karnataka high court, was granted primarily on the basis of the alleged urgent medical condition of the 1st respondent/A2. However, a bare perusal of the medical records and subsequent conduct of the accused reveals that the medical plea was misleading, vague, and grossly exaggerated," a bench comprising Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan observed. Contrary to the impression created before the high court, Darshan made multiple public appearances, including participation in high-profile social events, was seen in fine health and mobility, and did not undergo any surgery or serious medical procedure post his release. This establishes that he abused the liberty of bail, which was obtained on a false and misleading premise, the bench added. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru | Gold Rates Today in Bengaluru | Silver Rates Today in Bengaluru The Supreme Court consistently held that the bail granted on medical grounds must be based on credible, specific, and urgent need, not on general or future apprehensions, as seen in the State of UP vs Amarmani Tripathi and Dinesh MN vs State of Gujarat cases. The discharge summary dated Nov 28, 2024, issued by the hospital, mentions that Darshan is a patient with a history of diabetes, hypertension, and prior cardiac issues, and that he may require a CABG (coronary artery bypass grafting) surgery in future. However, the report does not indicate any current emergency or need for immediate medical intervention, any life-threatening condition warranting urgent release, or any inability of the prison medical system to manage his current state. Thus, there is no compelling medical necessity for the grant of bail, the bench added. In the Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs Rajesh Ranjan case, this court cautioned that "bail on medical grounds can be granted only in exceptional cases where the medical condition is serious, cannot be treated in custody, and necessary facilities are not available in jail." The burden to prove such necessity lies on the accused. In the present case, the accused failed to demonstrate that the jail hospital was incapable of managing his condition or that adequate treatment could not be given in judicial custody. Instead, the high court proceeded to grant bail without recording a definitive finding on the urgency, seriousness, or inadequacy of treatment in custody. This results in a perverse and legally unsustainable bail order, liable to be cancelled as per the principles laid down in Puran and Samarendra Nath Bhattacharjee vs State of West Bengal, the top court observed while setting aside the bail granted by the high court single bench judge Justice S Vishwajith Shetty to Darshan. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Independence Day wishes , messages , and quotes !
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
HC questions identical statements of 7 cops in Laxman case
1 2 Hyderabad: Telangana high court, hearing a petition filed by Rajya Sabha MP K Laxman seeking to quash a criminal case registered against him during the Huzurnagar by-election, Thursday sought an explanation from the state on the identical statements of police personnel examined as witnesses in the case. Not just the statements, but each line, every word, and the number of lines on each page are identical, pointed out the court, while posting the matter to August 22 for further hearing. "There are statements of seven independent witnesses in the case and all are identical. The state is directed to explain the identical contents word by word in all these statements," Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya said, while hearing the matter. The state counsel informed the judge that the statements could be identical as they were being translated from Telugu to English and assured to explain the concerns raised by the judge during the next hearing. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad | Gold Rates Today in Hyderabad | Silver Rates Today in Hyderabad Earlier, Laxman's counsel argued that during the campaign for the by-election held in 2019, authorities had granted them permission to hold a rally with not more than 150 persons. However, a case was registered on the allegations of unlawful assembly with around 50 persons and also obstruction of traffic movement and forceful restraint. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These Are The Most Beautiful Women In The World Undo "But cops do not produce any photo or video evidence to support their allegations. They also allege violations of the Model Code of Conduct, but there is no specific detail of the alleged violations," the counsel argued. The BJP MP's counsel further argued that the case was politically motivated without any evidence and vague allegations and urged the court to quash the case. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Independence Day wishes , messages , and quotes !
