Trump freezes $200 million in UCLA science, medical research funding, citing antisemitism
The decision to pull funding comes after Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Justice Department said this week that UCLA would pay a 'heavy price' for acting with 'deliberate indifference' to the civil rights of Jewish and Israeli students who complained of antisemitic incidents since the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel, Israel's ensuing war in Gaza and campus protests the events spurred last year.
The cancellation of grants is the first large-scale targeted funding claw-back against UCLA under the Trump administration. Until now, the White House has largely focused its attempts to remake higher education on elite East Coast schools such as Columbia, Brown and the University of Pennsylvania. Each has reached deals with the government in recent weeks over issues including admissions, Jewish student life, student discipline, antisemitism training and gender identity in sports.
In a letter to UCLA Chancellor Julio Frenk dated Wednesday, the National Science Foundation wrote that it was terminating grants because 'the University of California – Los Angeles continues to engage in race discrimination including in its admissions process, and in other areas of student life.'
An estimated 300 NSF grants totaling $180 million have been canceled. About half of the funds were already distributed. Before the letter was released Thursday, researchers were expecting the other half to follow.
In a letter to the university community Thursday, Frenk wrote that the canceled grants are from NSF, NIH and other federal agencies, but he did not give a dollar amount or list the other agencies. A partial list of terminated grants reviewed by The Times added up to roughly $200 million. The list was provided by a source who was not authorized to share the information.
Frenk called the government's decision 'deeply disappointing' and 'a loss for Americans across the nation whose work, health, and future depend on the groundbreaking work we do.'
'In its notice to us, the federal government claims antisemitism and bias as the reasons,' Frenk wrote. 'This far-reaching penalty of defunding life-saving research does nothing to address any alleged discrimination.'
Spokespeople for the NSF and NIH did not immediately reply to requests for comment Thursday.
The federal government's decision to cut UCLA off from significant federal funds follows a similar playbook to its dealings with Ivy League institutions.
The Trump administration this spring canceled billions of dollars in federal grants to Harvard, which has sued in federal court to reverse the terminations and stop a Trump move to rescind its ability to host international students. Harvard is separately in negotiations with the White House to end the legal fight.
Columbia University this month agreed to pay more than $200 million to the federal government to resolve investigations over alleged antisemitism amid its response to 2024 pro-Palestinian protests. On Wednesday, Brown University also came to a $50 million agreement with the White House. The Brown payment will go toward Rhode Island workforce development programs.
The Department of Justice said this week that it had found UCLA guilty of violating the civil rights of Jewish and Israeli students. The department also indicated that it wanted to the university to enter into negotiations to avoid a federal lawsuit.
The department gave UCLA a Tuesday deadline to communicate its desire to negotiate. If not, the DOJ said, it was ready to sue by Sept. 2.
The University of California, in a statement, was unclear on whether it would settle or go to court.
'UCLA has addressed and will continue to address the issues raised in [the] Department of Justice notice,' Stett Holbrook, Associate Director, Strategic and Critical Communications, wrote in a statement Wednesday. He cited a $6.45 million settlement the university reached with Jewish students who had sued over claims that the 2024 encampment had discriminated against them.
'We have cooperated fully with the Department of Justice's investigation and are reviewing its findings closely,' Holbrook wrote.
In his Thursday letter, Frenk shot back against the cuts.
'Let me be clear: Federal research grants are not handouts. Our researchers compete fiercely for these grants, proposing work that the government itself deems vital to the country's health, safety and economic future,' he wrote.
'Grants lead to medical breakthroughs, economic advancement, improved national security and global competitiveness — these are national priorities,' Frenk wrote, adding that 'we are actively evaluating our best course of action. We will be in constant communication as decisions move forward.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
19 minutes ago
- Axios
Federal judge defers ruling on Alina Habba's legal authority
A federal judge on Friday deferred ruling on Alina Habba's legal authority as a prosecutor after President Trump tapped her to lead the U.S. attorney's office for New Jersey. The big picture: A lawyer sought to get a criminal case in New Jersey dismissed by questioning Habba's legitimacy to lead the U.S. attorney's office in the state and arguing that the way the Trump administration restored her authority over the office was "unconstitutional." Catch up quick: In March, Trump appointed his then-presidential counselor Habba to serve as interim U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey. That allowed her to work in an acting capacity for 120 days while awaiting Senate confirmation. With Habba's confirmation stalled, the local district court appointed a new prosecutor to serve until the vacancy was filled. Attorney General Pam Bondi terminated the appointment hours later. Trump then withdrew Habba's nomination as the U.S. attorney so that she could be appointed to the position of first assistant U.S. attorney, making her the acting leader of the office. Driving the news: Judge Matthew Brann of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania wrote in the opinion that the motion to dismiss the case is both denied in part and deferred in part. The defendant, Julien Giraud Jr. who is facing charges in a drug and gun-related case, is entitled to injunctive relief "precluding Ms. Habba from participating in their prosecution if they are correct that she was appointed in violation of statute or the Constitution." That injunctive relief, the judge wrote, should extend to Assistant United States Attorneys "purporting to operate pursuant to Ms. Habba's authority." The judge added, "Because relief will be available to them if they are correct, the court should reach the merits of the Girauds' claims," Brann added. Context: Attorney Thomas Mirigliano asked the court to dismiss the indictment or stop Habba and any other attorney acting under "her purported authority" from prosecuting the case.
The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Who is Erika McEntarfer, the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner fired by Trump?
WASHINGTON (AP) — The head of the agency that compiles the closely watched monthly jobs report usually toils in obscurity, but on Friday, the current holder of that job was loudly fired by the president of the United States. Erika McEntarfer, a longtime government employee, bore the brunt of President Donald Trump's unhappiness with Friday's jobs report, which showed that hiring had slowed in July and was much less in May and June that previously estimated. He accused her without evidence of manipulating the job numbers and noted she was an appointee of President Joe Biden. McEntarfer, a longtime government worker who had served as BLS head for a year and a half, did not immediately respond to a request for comment by The Associated Press. But her predecessor overseeing the jobs agency, former co-workers and associates have denounced the firing, warning about its repercussions and saying McEntarfer was nonpolitical in her role. Here's what to know about Erika McEntarfer: McEntarfer has a strong background on economics McEntarfer, whose research focuses on job loss, retirement, worker mobility, and wage rigidity, had previously worked at the Census Bureau's Center for Economic Studies, the Treasury Department's Office of Tax Policy and the White House Council of Economic Advisers in a nonpolitical role. She has a bachelor's degree in Social Science from Bard College and a doctoral degree in economics from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. She was confirmed as BLS head on a bipartisan vote McEntarfer was nominated in 2023 to serve as BLS head, and the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions recommended that her nomination go to the full Senate for a vote. She was confirmed as BLS commissioner in January 2024 on a bipartisan 86-8 Senate vote. Among the Republican senators who voted to confirm her included then-Sen. JD Vance of Ohio, who is now Trump's vice president, and then-Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, who is now Trump's secretary of state. Before her confirmation hearing, a group called the Friends of the BLS, made up of former commissioners who served in both Democratic and Republican administrations, members of statistical associations and credentialed economists, said McEntarfer's background made her a great choice for the job. 'The many reasons to quickly confirm Dr. McEntarfer as the new BLS Commissioner all boil down to this: the agency, like the entire statistical system, is undergoing an intense, significant period of change and Dr. McEntarfer's wealth of research and statistical experience have equipped her to be the strong leader that BLS needs to meet these challenges,' Friends of the BLS wrote. Her former associates and co-workers decry her firing William Beach, who was appointed BLS commissioner in 2019 by Trump and served until 2023 during President Joe Biden's administration, called McEntarfer's firing 'groundless' and said in an X post that it 'sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau.' Former Labor Department chief economist Sarah J. Glynn, who received regular briefings from McEntarfer about BLS findings, said McEntarfer was generous with her time explaining what conclusions could or couldn't be reached from the data. If the data didn't support something an administration official was saying, McEntarfer would say so, Glynn said. She also never weighed in on how the administration should present or interpret the data, Glynn said — she would simply answer questions about the data. 'She had a sterling reputation as someone who is concerned about the accuracy of the data and not someone who puts a political spin on her work,' Glynn said. Heather Boushey, a senior research fellow at Harvard University, served with McEntarfer on the White House Council of Economic Advisers and said McEntarfer never talked politics at work. 'She showed up every day to focus on the best analysis and the best approach to her field and not get political. That is what I saw from her time and again. She is brilliant and well-respected among labor economists generally,' Boushey said. 'She wasn't coming into my office to talk politics or the political implications of something. She definitely wasn't engaging on that side of things.'
Politico
20 minutes ago
- Politico
Businesses got some clarity on Trump's trade deal. They aren't reassured.
That's a reference to the fact that Trump's much-hyped trade agreements were verbal — there hasn't been any documentation backing up what the two sides agreed to. Already, major trading partners like the European Union and Japan have cast doubt on whether they could meet their investment and purchasing pledges, and Vietnam has not even publicly confirmed it agreed to the terms Trump announced in their supposed deal inked in early July. 'I think the lens has become a little clearer' in terms of tariff rates, said Stephen Lamar, the president of American Apparel and Footwear association, which represents brands like J Crew and L.L. Bean that rely heavily on imports from countries like China and Vietnam. Lamar predicted that many of those duties 'are probably going to be it for a while,' but added, 'We don't yet have enough information to make the kinds of long term decisions that need to be made right now, and even the shorter term decisions of, 'how I'm going to price my spring collection?'' The White House has largely dismissed complaints from business warnings that the tariffs will drive up costs for importers and, ultimately, American consumers. Trump has singled out specific companies, like Wal-Mart, demanding that they 'eat the tariffs' and has repeatedly suggested to business leaders that they should avoid the duties by shifting production to the U.S. 'President Trump's trade deals have unlocked unprecedented market access for American exports to economies that in total are worth over $32 trillion with 1.2 billion people,' said Kush Desai, a White House spokesperson. 'As these historic trade deals and the Administration's pro-growth domestic agenda of deregulation and The One Big Beautiful Bill's tax cuts take effect, American businesses and families alike have the certainty that the best is yet to come.' The administration also claims economists overestimated how much the tariffs would affect the economy, pointing to the fact that inflation is still largely meeting its targets and that there has yet to be a recession, like some economists predicted. 'I think they are looking at the current numbers as support for the lack of impact of these tariffs,' said Greg Ahearn, the president and CEO of the Toy Association, whose members are largely small and mid-sized businesses that have a harder time absorbing higher duties. 'But I think most people believe wholeheartedly that the impact of these tariffs is going to be felt in the months ahead. And the reason why is that production and manufacturing and the goods as they flow through the supply chain takes time.' Ahearn pointed to Friday's weak jobs report, including signs that there were actually fewer new jobs created in May and June than previously estimated, as evidence the impact of Trump's trade policies are just starting to show up in the data. There are already signs that the tariffs have begun driving up prices on purchases such as furniture, apparel and toys, which helped push up the inflation rate in June. And Lamar warned that, 'Once those prices go up, they have a hard time coming down.' Many business leaders fear that this week's worrying economic numbers are only the beginning of a more sustained downturn. 'Inflation and price increases are coming,' Ahearn said. 'Layoffs have already been occurring. And supply is going to be lower as we head into the holiday season. These are all happening.'
