‘He stood on the mayor's foot': How the Liverpool Council chaos turned physical
The discord between the elected officials is among matters under the spotlight of the NSW Office of Local Government's public inquiry into Liverpool City Council, which is examining councillors' conduct as well as its handling of finances, property purchases, staff employment and more than $150 million in state government grants for infrastructure projects.
Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig announced the public inquiry in July last year after a report detailed serious allegations of dysfunction and maladministration at the western Sydney council.
In the month prior, the council had sensationally ousted its 10th chief executive in eight years, John Ajaka, the former president of the NSW Legislative Assembly, after a falling out with Mannoun.
Counsel assisting the inquiry Trish McDonald, SC, said in her opening address on Monday the inquiry would consider whether the functioning body of the council – which oversees dozens of suburbs earmarked for significant growth – was operating effectively.
Loading
To that end, McDonald said the hearings would examine the 'long history on the council' and 'antagonism' between Mannoun, a Liberal, and Ristevski, a former Liberal councillor who returned as an independent in the local government elections in September.
The pair appeared to have 'a troubled relationship which seems to be spilling in, or affecting, the operation of council', the inquiry was told.
The inquiry was told about one alleged incident on February 20, when Mannoun met councillors and external recruiters to discuss the appointment of a new chief executive officer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
6 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
A rapist and bully but beloved by Boomers: The turbulent history of Gareth Ward
In the aftermath of the March 2023 state election, Berry business owner Kate Dezarnaulds posed a powerful question on social media. How could the voters of Kiama, in good conscience, return an MP to parliament with serious sexual assault charges hanging over his head? 'What is wrong with my community,' Dezarnaulds asked, 'when multiple victims of sexual assault are disbelieved by half our residents? What is wrong with my community when having a member who is unable to enter their place of work or cast a vote on our behalf is good enough for half of our residents?' Dezarnaulds was referring to the now convicted rapist and former MP Gareth Ward. Ward re-contested Kiama as an independent after being forced to quit the Liberal Party in 2021 and move to the crossbench while he awaited his trial for historical sexual assault charges. For almost two years, he was barred from parliament after a successful suspension motion, and while his margin in the once-safe seat was slashed in 2023, he was returned as the MP for Kiama. The response to Dezarnaulds' post was swift, but not from Kiama voters. Rather, Ward called in RMB Lawyers, his go-to firm on the South Coast when people dared to criticise him. Ward threatened to sue Dezarnaulds for defamation. Dezarnaulds printed the apology demanded from Ward's lawyers, insisting she did not intend to suggest he was guilty of anything. Dezarnaulds went on to contest the May federal election as a Climate 200-backed independent in the seat of Gilmore. Ward continued his attacks on her during the election campaign, including lodging a complaint with the Australian Electoral Commission about her how-to-vote cards. The commission took no action. RMB Lawyers, by all accounts, has done well thanks to Ward's litigious streak. Dezarnaulds estimates he has sent concerns notices, the first step in signalling defamation proceedings, to dozens of people across the South Coast. In one case, he threatened to sue former Greens candidate and academic Tonia Gray. Gray did not want to comment, preferring to never think about Ward again. But after his conviction for the indecent and sexual assault of two young men, and his subsequent refusal to resign from parliament, Gray posted on Facebook: 'I'm speechless about the audacity of this man. We know he is a bully, we have been on the receiving end of his attacks.' (The Herald also received a concerns notice from Ward via RMB Lawyers after writing that he had made calls supporting the preselection of his friend and ex-Liberal colleague Rory Amon ahead of the 2023 election. Amon's political career ended up being short-lived, and he has since quit parliament after being charged with child sexual assault, which he denies. Ward's legal threat against the Herald went nowhere.)
The Age
6 hours ago
- The Age
A rapist and bully but beloved by Boomers: The turbulent history of Gareth Ward
In the aftermath of the March 2023 state election, Berry business owner Kate Dezarnaulds posed a powerful question on social media. How could the voters of Kiama, in good conscience, return an MP to parliament with serious sexual assault charges hanging over his head? 'What is wrong with my community,' Dezarnaulds asked, 'when multiple victims of sexual assault are disbelieved by half our residents? What is wrong with my community when having a member who is unable to enter their place of work or cast a vote on our behalf is good enough for half of our residents?' Dezarnaulds was referring to the now convicted rapist and former MP Gareth Ward. Ward re-contested Kiama as an independent after being forced to quit the Liberal Party in 2021 and move to the crossbench while he awaited his trial for historical sexual assault charges. For almost two years, he was barred from parliament after a successful suspension motion, and while his margin in the once-safe seat was slashed in 2023, he was returned as the MP for Kiama. The response to Dezarnaulds' post was swift, but not from Kiama voters. Rather, Ward called in RMB Lawyers, his go-to firm on the South Coast when people dared to criticise him. Ward threatened to sue Dezarnaulds for defamation. Dezarnaulds printed the apology demanded from Ward's lawyers, insisting she did not intend to suggest he was guilty of anything. Dezarnaulds went on to contest the May federal election as a Climate 200-backed independent in the seat of Gilmore. Ward continued his attacks on her during the election campaign, including lodging a complaint with the Australian Electoral Commission about her how-to-vote cards. The commission took no action. RMB Lawyers, by all accounts, has done well thanks to Ward's litigious streak. Dezarnaulds estimates he has sent concerns notices, the first step in signalling defamation proceedings, to dozens of people across the South Coast. In one case, he threatened to sue former Greens candidate and academic Tonia Gray. Gray did not want to comment, preferring to never think about Ward again. But after his conviction for the indecent and sexual assault of two young men, and his subsequent refusal to resign from parliament, Gray posted on Facebook: 'I'm speechless about the audacity of this man. We know he is a bully, we have been on the receiving end of his attacks.' (The Herald also received a concerns notice from Ward via RMB Lawyers after writing that he had made calls supporting the preselection of his friend and ex-Liberal colleague Rory Amon ahead of the 2023 election. Amon's political career ended up being short-lived, and he has since quit parliament after being charged with child sexual assault, which he denies. Ward's legal threat against the Herald went nowhere.)
The Advertiser
6 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Former MP's win against $40,000 fine for Facebook posts
Former Liberal MP Andrew Laming has won a High Court case against a $40,000 fine imposed over three illegal campaign messages posted on social media. He was the Liberal MP for Bowman, in southeast Queensland, when he posted on the "Redland Hospital: Let's fight for fair funding" Facebook page ahead of the 2019 federal election. The posts between December 2018 and May 2019 were found to have not been properly authorised with his name and area of residence, as required for political communication by candidates. Dr Laming was initially fined $20,000 by the Federal Court for three contraventions of federal election law. But the Australian Electoral Commission appealed, arguing the former MP contravened the law 28 times - equal to the number of people who saw the Facebook posts. The Full Court of the Federal Court agreed and doubled the fine to $40,000, so Dr Laming took the fight to the High Court. On Wednesday, the court ruled the contraventions occurred when the posts were created, rather than when they were seen. Dr Laming welcomed the decision as an end to the years-long legal tussle. "I'm satisfied with the result and I hope it will lead to a sensible conclusion of the matter," he told AAP. The electoral commission was ordered to pay Dr Laming's legal bill for his successful appeal to the High Court. The commission has been contacted for comment. Although the majority of the judges agreed, Justice James Edelman dissented and called on parliament to clarify the relevant section of the Electoral Act in relation to digital communication. Unless an amendment was made, he said, there would be a "radical change" in the digital equivalent of the treatment of a campaigner who committed 1000 contraventions by distributing as many pamphlets. "The political campaigner of today will commit only a single contravention by an electronic message transmitted and received by 1000, 10,000, 100,000 or 1,000,000 unique (social media) profiles," Justice Edelman wrote. Dr Laming retired from politics in 2022 after a series of controversies, including a $10,000 travel expenses scandal. Former Liberal MP Andrew Laming has won a High Court case against a $40,000 fine imposed over three illegal campaign messages posted on social media. He was the Liberal MP for Bowman, in southeast Queensland, when he posted on the "Redland Hospital: Let's fight for fair funding" Facebook page ahead of the 2019 federal election. The posts between December 2018 and May 2019 were found to have not been properly authorised with his name and area of residence, as required for political communication by candidates. Dr Laming was initially fined $20,000 by the Federal Court for three contraventions of federal election law. But the Australian Electoral Commission appealed, arguing the former MP contravened the law 28 times - equal to the number of people who saw the Facebook posts. The Full Court of the Federal Court agreed and doubled the fine to $40,000, so Dr Laming took the fight to the High Court. On Wednesday, the court ruled the contraventions occurred when the posts were created, rather than when they were seen. Dr Laming welcomed the decision as an end to the years-long legal tussle. "I'm satisfied with the result and I hope it will lead to a sensible conclusion of the matter," he told AAP. The electoral commission was ordered to pay Dr Laming's legal bill for his successful appeal to the High Court. The commission has been contacted for comment. Although the majority of the judges agreed, Justice James Edelman dissented and called on parliament to clarify the relevant section of the Electoral Act in relation to digital communication. Unless an amendment was made, he said, there would be a "radical change" in the digital equivalent of the treatment of a campaigner who committed 1000 contraventions by distributing as many pamphlets. "The political campaigner of today will commit only a single contravention by an electronic message transmitted and received by 1000, 10,000, 100,000 or 1,000,000 unique (social media) profiles," Justice Edelman wrote. Dr Laming retired from politics in 2022 after a series of controversies, including a $10,000 travel expenses scandal. Former Liberal MP Andrew Laming has won a High Court case against a $40,000 fine imposed over three illegal campaign messages posted on social media. He was the Liberal MP for Bowman, in southeast Queensland, when he posted on the "Redland Hospital: Let's fight for fair funding" Facebook page ahead of the 2019 federal election. The posts between December 2018 and May 2019 were found to have not been properly authorised with his name and area of residence, as required for political communication by candidates. Dr Laming was initially fined $20,000 by the Federal Court for three contraventions of federal election law. But the Australian Electoral Commission appealed, arguing the former MP contravened the law 28 times - equal to the number of people who saw the Facebook posts. The Full Court of the Federal Court agreed and doubled the fine to $40,000, so Dr Laming took the fight to the High Court. On Wednesday, the court ruled the contraventions occurred when the posts were created, rather than when they were seen. Dr Laming welcomed the decision as an end to the years-long legal tussle. "I'm satisfied with the result and I hope it will lead to a sensible conclusion of the matter," he told AAP. The electoral commission was ordered to pay Dr Laming's legal bill for his successful appeal to the High Court. The commission has been contacted for comment. Although the majority of the judges agreed, Justice James Edelman dissented and called on parliament to clarify the relevant section of the Electoral Act in relation to digital communication. Unless an amendment was made, he said, there would be a "radical change" in the digital equivalent of the treatment of a campaigner who committed 1000 contraventions by distributing as many pamphlets. "The political campaigner of today will commit only a single contravention by an electronic message transmitted and received by 1000, 10,000, 100,000 or 1,000,000 unique (social media) profiles," Justice Edelman wrote. Dr Laming retired from politics in 2022 after a series of controversies, including a $10,000 travel expenses scandal. Former Liberal MP Andrew Laming has won a High Court case against a $40,000 fine imposed over three illegal campaign messages posted on social media. He was the Liberal MP for Bowman, in southeast Queensland, when he posted on the "Redland Hospital: Let's fight for fair funding" Facebook page ahead of the 2019 federal election. The posts between December 2018 and May 2019 were found to have not been properly authorised with his name and area of residence, as required for political communication by candidates. Dr Laming was initially fined $20,000 by the Federal Court for three contraventions of federal election law. But the Australian Electoral Commission appealed, arguing the former MP contravened the law 28 times - equal to the number of people who saw the Facebook posts. The Full Court of the Federal Court agreed and doubled the fine to $40,000, so Dr Laming took the fight to the High Court. On Wednesday, the court ruled the contraventions occurred when the posts were created, rather than when they were seen. Dr Laming welcomed the decision as an end to the years-long legal tussle. "I'm satisfied with the result and I hope it will lead to a sensible conclusion of the matter," he told AAP. The electoral commission was ordered to pay Dr Laming's legal bill for his successful appeal to the High Court. The commission has been contacted for comment. Although the majority of the judges agreed, Justice James Edelman dissented and called on parliament to clarify the relevant section of the Electoral Act in relation to digital communication. Unless an amendment was made, he said, there would be a "radical change" in the digital equivalent of the treatment of a campaigner who committed 1000 contraventions by distributing as many pamphlets. "The political campaigner of today will commit only a single contravention by an electronic message transmitted and received by 1000, 10,000, 100,000 or 1,000,000 unique (social media) profiles," Justice Edelman wrote. Dr Laming retired from politics in 2022 after a series of controversies, including a $10,000 travel expenses scandal.
