Brawl breaks out between pro-Damascus, Kurdish rallies in Germany's Dusseldorf
Rubio tells Sudani important to pay KRG salaries 'consistently'
US encourages Iraq to end tensions with Kurdistan Region
US orders return of Baghdad embassy, Erbil consulate staff
US says attacks on Kurdistan Region 'unacceptable'
A+ A-
ERBIL, Kurdistan Region - Five police officers were injured Sunday in a brawl between pro-Syrian and pro-Kurdish demonstrators outside the central station in Germany's western city of Dusseldorf, according to local police.
'A brawl involving several hundred participants triggered a large-scale police operation yesterday afternoon. Former participants of two different assemblies (pro-Syrian and pro-Kurdish) had clashed on the forecourt of the main train station,' Dusseldorf police said in a statement on Monday.
During efforts to contain the violence, bottles and stones were thrown at officers, leaving five lightly injured. Police said they made several arrests and filed around 20 criminal charges for offenses including breach of the peace, dangerous bodily harm, and property damage.
Participants from both demonstrations had crossed paths at Konrad-Adenauer-Platz in the city center Sunday afternoon. After an exchange of insults, violence broke out, the statement added. Police are aware of at least one injured civilian.
According to the regional daily Rheinische Post, roughly 500 people had joined the pro-Kurdish demonstration, while about 200 took part in the pro-Syrian interim government rally. The Kurdish march was attacked by at least 50 people.
The motive behind the attack remains unclear, and police told the newspaper it is not yet confirmed whether the attackers were directly linked to the earlier Syrian demonstration, though 'a connection is possible.'
According to Rudaw's reporter on the ground, the Kurdish rally was organized by Kurds from northeast Syria (Rojava) and southeast Turkey, though most participants were from Rojava. The demonstrators expressed solidarity with Syria's minorities, including Alawites, Christians, and the Druze, and called for an end to hate speech targeting Kurds in Syria and the US-backed, Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), the de facto army in Rojava.
Investigations are ongoing.
The new authorities in Syria - who toppled Bashar al-Assad in December - have come under repeated criticism by minorities for neglecting their rights and steering the country towards Islamic rule.
Recent sectarian clashes in the southern Druze-majority Suwayda province have left over 1,000 dead and displaced over 128,000. The fighting started last Sunday between Druze militants and the Sunni Muslim fighters. Damascus has been accused of siding with the Sunni tribes.
Three ceasefires between the Druze community and the new government in Damascus have collapsed, and although the latest one - brokered by Washington - appears to be holding, it remains fragile.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Memri
2 hours ago
- Memri
For Jolani, The Kurds Are Next
Eight months after the fall of the Assad regime, Syria has plunged further into sectarian and ethnic violence. The U.S. policy of legitimizing and supporting the Syrian Interim Government with the intention of stabilizing the country, has so far failed; it has instead enabled the militias to carry out numerous massacres with full impunity and no accountability. The chaos resulting from the attack against the Alawite and Druze minorities by the government has now spread across Syria. Minorities are being systematically targeted with thousands of civilians killed, women abused, and forced into sexual slavery, and hundreds of thousands of people displaced. Children massacred by Al-Nusra front, led by Ahmed Al-Sharaa, August 5, 2013 After Alawites And The Druze, The Kurds Are Next Recent remarks by Tom Barrack, U.S. ambassador to the Republic of Turkey and special envoy for Syria, in which he likened Al-Sharaa – a former ISIS and Al-Qaeda member – to George Washington,[1] and rejected federalism for Kurds and other minorities,[2] have been interpreted by the Syrian government as a green light to attack Syria's minorities. After deadly attacks against the Alawites, Druze, and Christians, the Kurds are now the next target of Syrian government backed by Turkey. Since Assad's fall, Turkish proxy forces have launched several large-scale attacks against the Kurds, committing unspeakable atrocities against civilians including massacres, rape, and sexual slavery. If the U.S. pressures the Kurds to disarm, they will face mass killings at the hands of Syrian government forces and Turkish-backed militias. The Kurds have been the most reliable ally of the U.S. in Syria for over a decade; they lost more than 11,000 fighters in the fight against ISIS. Kurdish forces are guarding approximately 9,000 battle-hardened ISIS terrorists in detention facilities, described as a "ticking time bomb" and "a terrorist army in detention" by U.S. officials.[3] There is no guarantee that the Syrian government would keep these terrorists imprisoned. If the Kurds lose control over Northeast Syria, the U.S. will not only lose a loyal partner in the fight against terrorism, but also risk an ISIS resurgence. "There Is No God But Allah, Kurds Are The Enemies Of Allah" Ahmed Al-Sharaa and his militia groups have a long history of takfiri[4] jihad against the Kurds in Syria, guided not by religious difference, as the majority of Kurds are Sunni Muslims, but by their ethnic prejudices against the Kurds, who are not ethnically Arab. In 2013, sheikhs of the Al-Nusra Front led by Al-Sharaa (then Abu Muhammed Al-Jolani) issued the following fatwa against Kurds: "Kurds are kuffar [unbelievers] and killing Kurds, taking their women, plundering their property, and destroying their homes is just and fair."[5] In the first half of 2013, Al-Nusra Front, allied with ISIS and supported by Turkish forces, carried out brutal attacks across Kurdish regions. They burned Kurdish homes, killed civilians indiscriminately, and continued to kidnap many Kurds on a daily basis throughout Syria's Kurdish region, all with Turkish military support on the ground. Al-Nusra carried out numerous massacres of Kurds including approximately 450 people, mainly women and children in Tal Abyad, Tal Hassil, and Tal A'ran. Al-Nusra massacred 120 children and 330 men and women in the district of Tal Abyad on August 5, 2013. More than 1,200 Kurds, men and women, were abducted during this period.[6] In 2018-2019, Al-Sharaa's Hay'at Tahrir Al-Sham (HTS) militia (formerly Al-Nusra) participated in the ethnic cleansing of nearly 500,000 Kurds in northern Syria, particularly Afrin and Serekaniya, in systematic ethnic cleansing campaigns carried out by Turkey to change the demography of the region by settling Arabs, Turkmens, and families of foreign fighters in place of displaced Kurds.[7] Since Al-Sharaa declared himself president of Syria, a calculated and coordinated hate campaign has been launched against Kurds by Syrian media affiliated with the government and Turkish media, with the aim of fueling hatred and inciting violence against the Kurds. "Lā ilāha illā Allāh, a-l-Kurdī ʿaduw Allāh [There is no god but Allah, the Kurd is the enemy of Allah]" has become a popular sectarian and racist slogans chanted by supporters of Al-Sharaa.[8] Ethnic discrimination policies against Kurds have reached alarming levels. On July 21, 2025, Kurdish youths were arrested in Damascus for speaking Kurdish in public.[9] Between July 19-22, 2025, at least 25 Kurds, including underage girls, were abducted by Syrian government forces.[10] These anti-Kurd campaigns are widely seen as a preparatory stage for a military attack against the Kurds. By portraying Kurds as foreigners, saboteurs, Zionist agents, and enemies of the state, Syria and Turkey seek to rally around Arab and Turkic takfiri groups. Declaring Kurds "enemies of God" provides religious legitimacy for their murder and sexual enslavement. If the Syrian regime forces manage to occupy the Kurdish region, a full-scale genocide of Kurds and Christians is to follow in northern Syria. Turkey's Neo-Ottoman Ambitions: "The Road to Jerusalem Goes Through Damascus" The fall of Assad has effectively eliminated the influence of Iran and Russia in Syria, but it has conversely opened the door for Turkey to take control of the country and implement its neo-Ottoman colonial policies. Turkey's end goal is not a peaceful and prosperous Syria, but rather a centralized regime controlled by Ankara, which it can use as a launchpad to target Israel and destabilize the Middle East. While the Shiite "Axis of Resistance" led by Iran has been largely weakened, a new Sunni "Axis of Resistance" led by Turkey and funded by Qatar is emerging in Syria, which is, in the long run, anti-American, anti-Western, and anti-Israeli. Before the fall of Assad, the Kurdish forces were a major obstacle to IRGC expansionism in Syria due to their geographical position. Similarly, they are now a major obstacle for Turkey and Qatar's ambitions to form a Sunni coalition hostile to American and Israeli interests. Conclusion: Kurds And Other Minorities Demand Federalism In a recent interview U.S. Special Envoy to Syria Tom Barrack claimed, "I think all of the minority communities are smart enough to say, 'We're better off together, centralized.'"[11] This statement contradicts the consistent demands from minorities – Kurds, Alawites, Druzes, and Christians – for a decentralized, federal system, and an end to authoritarianism. Al-Sharaa's reliance on sectarian, extremist policies, have led to bloodbaths in large parts of Syria. As president of Syria, he has failed to meet U.S. expectations: Rather than guiding the country toward stability, his government has intensified repression against minorities and increased sectarian violence across Syria. Therefore, a new U.S. Syria policy is needed to prevent further sectarian and ethnic bloodshed, to prioritize a federal system that gives communities control over their regions. On top of that, Turkey must be prevented from dominating Syria and use it a staging ground to destabilize the region and undermine U.S. interests. The U.S. must continue to support the Kurds in Northern Syria who control around 30 percent of the country. If the U.S. abandons the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) coalition, it will not only betray a loyal partner, it will also lose its foothold in Syria and risk the creation of an anti-American Sunni "Axis of Resistance." *Himdad Mustafa is special advisor to MEMRI's Kurdish Studies Project.
Iraqi News
2 hours ago
- Iraqi News
Iraq's Al-Sudani, Rubio discuss oil attacks and militia reform bill
Baghdad ( – Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio held a phone conversation to address ongoing security challenges, regional developments, and energy cooperation. Al-Sudani condemned the recent attacks on vital oil infrastructure in northern Iraq, including in Kirkuk, and Salah al-Din, linking them to efforts aimed at disrupting Iraq's economy. He noted the strikes came shortly after new agreements were signed with U.S. energy firms to develop oil fields in those areas. Iraq's security forces, Al-Sudani said, are coordinating with the international coalition to identify those behind the attacks. Rubio urged swift action to prevent further incidents and emphasized the protection of U.S.-linked facilities. Rubio also pressed Baghdad to resume crude exports via the Iraq–Turkey pipeline and ensure consistent salary payments to public employees in Iraq's Kurdistan Region. The two leaders also discussed the draft law on the Popular Mobilization Commission (PMC). Al-Sudani described it as part of Iraq's broader security restructuring. However, Rubio voiced concern that the bill could legitimize armed groups aligned with Iran, potentially threatening Iraq's sovereignty. The call reflected both countries' ongoing efforts to manage security risks, stabilize the energy sector, and maintain cooperation amid regional tensions.
Shafaq News
5 hours ago
- Shafaq News
IHEC's ink decision reopens wounds in Iraq's electoral trust
Shafaq News The Independent High Electoral Commission's (IHEC) decision to abolish the use of indelible ink in Iraq's upcoming November 2025 elections has ignited sharp criticism from key political forces, especially in Kirkuk. While the commission frames the move as a modernization step toward a fully biometric system, its political ramifications point to a deeper crisis of confidence in Iraq's fragile democratic institutions. A Symbol of Integrity Removed For years, indelible ink has served as a visible assurance that each voter casts only one ballot. Commonly used in many developing democracies—including India, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Indonesia, and Nigeria—it offers a low-tech but highly symbolic method of deterring voter fraud. Iraq, like Egypt and other transitional democracies, has historically relied on the "ink step" to build credibility in elections marred by factional competition and institutional weakness. While advanced democracies often dispense with ink—relying on secure digital registries, ID systems, or mail-in voting—the Iraqi context differs starkly. In a system burdened by disputed voter rolls, weak oversight in peripheral regions, and contested ethnic territories, the ink is more than an anti-fraud measure; it is a public demonstration of electoral fairness. Biometric Promise Meets Political Skepticism IHEC justifies the ink's removal on technical grounds. According to commission officials, the biometric voter cards—complete with fingerprint and facial recognition—make manual safeguards redundant. These cards are meant to verify voters electronically, ensuring each person votes only once and only in their designated station. Yet this rationale has not convinced everyone, particularly in volatile areas. The Unified Iraqi Turkmen Front and the Arab Council in Kirkuk issued swift condemnations, arguing that the ink's elimination could pave the way for renewed manipulation, especially in provinces like Kirkuk, where past elections have been marred by allegations of demographic engineering and vote tampering. According to Mohammed al-Saadoon, a specialist in electoral affairs, the concerns voiced by Arab and Turkmen communities in Kirkuk stem from previous incidents in which individuals were reportedly able to vote at multiple stations or centers. This, he notes, has fueled widespread suspicion of fraud, particularly in the absence of rigorous and independent auditing of voter registries by a specialized committee. Kirkuk's Fragile Balance Kirkuk's history of ethnopolitical contention further complicates the issue. As a province disputed between Kurds, Arabs, and Turkmen, every electoral mechanism is intensely scrutinized. The ink's removal has reignited long-standing fears among Turkmen and Arab communities of demographic manipulation—specifically, the claim that thousands of Kurdish voters were registered in the province after 2003 to tilt electoral balances. These fears have been exacerbated by what some describe as IHEC's reluctance to enforce Federal Court decisions mandating a comprehensive audit of voter lists in Kirkuk. Al-Saadoon emphasizes that such demands for audit and reform are not new but are persistently raised because Kirkuk represents a focal point of competition among its three main communities. Arabs and Turkmen, he says, view the verification of voter registries as a necessary step toward restoring faith in the electoral process. On the other side, Kurdish parties reject accusations of voter inflation, asserting that any increase in Kurdish voter numbers reflects the return of previously displaced families to Kirkuk under earlier government decisions—not an attempt to engineer the province's demographics. At stake is the perceived legitimacy of Iraq's electoral system in regions where politics remains zero-sum and where the loss of a seat could mean the erosion of community rights or federal funding. In such contexts, visible anti-fraud mechanisms carry enormous symbolic weight. Their removal, especially without extensive stakeholder consultation, may deepen already festering doubts in the democratic process.
