
Why is more not being done to arrest the demise of the Dukes ball?
This rigmarole has become a tedious feature of each Test between England and India this summer. Fielding sides' desperation to change the ball acknowledges a truth: batting in England has gone from one of the most treacherous challenges in Test cricket to one of the most gentle.
From 2018-21, the average runs per wicket in a Test in England was just 27.5. Since 2022, the average in England has soared to 32.7. Over a full four-innings match, the change equates to an extra 208 runs scored. In this period, the average runs per wicket in England has been higher than all countries to host Tests, bar Pakistan and Sri Lanka.
While England are batting much better since 2022, their improvements only explain some of the rise in run-scoring. Touring teams in England also average 60 runs more per two innings since 2022 than in 2018-21.
This rise reflects easier batting conditions. A series of hot summers, and a higher proportion of England Tests being scheduled in July, have abetted batsmen. Insiders believe that improvements in drainage systems at grounds mean that less moisture remains on the pitch, reducing the amount of seam movement. Some boundaries have become smaller too: at Edgbaston in the second Test, the size of the boundaries was scarcely above the minimum mandated by the International Cricket Council.
These shifts have also impacted the ball. 'The game has changed,'observes Dilip Jajodia, the owner of Dukes, who has worked in developing cricket balls for 52 years. 'People are hitting the ball harder. They're hitting it into the stands more often, when it's getting cluttered against all sorts of hard objects.' Drier outfields also lead the ball to soften more quickly, and potentially fail the ring test.
'It has to expand a lot for it to fail the big ring test,' Jajodia says. 'But occasionally it does, because mostly it's been smashed out of shape.'
Late last decade, particularly in 2018 and 2019, the Dukes ball was instrumental in batsmen struggling in England. The seam movement offered in 2018 was such that England requested that the 2018 batch be used in the 2019 Ashes, to provide home advantage.
A cricket ball is expected to change over 80 overs: the shift can help spin bowling and reverse swing. But, this summer, the ball continually goes soft, rendering it essentially impossible for any bowler to extract significant assistance.
No more spit and polish
The ban on saliva being applied to the ball, introduced for hygiene reasons in 2020, has contributed to less swing, Jajodia believes. ICC research when the ban was enforced suggested that saliva did not make swing more likely; in any case, fielders can still apply sweat to the ball. But even if the science is not clear, the saliva ban has added to the perception that bowlers in England now have a less friendly ball to contend with.
This has led to wildly oscillating cricket: bowlers initially rampant, and then nullified until the second new ball. In their first innings at Edgbaston, England were 108 for five after 25 overs, and then 376 for five after 80. At Lord's, India were 82 for seven after 25 overs of their run chase, yet reached 170 all out; the last three wickets survived 50.1 overs.
Overall this series, batting teams average 33.7 in the first 25 overs. This soars to 65.5 from the 26th over until the end of the 80th. From floundering against the new ball, teams are plundering the old.
A contrast with 2021, when England hosted India for four Test matches, is instructive. In the first 25 overs in those Tests, batting teams averaged 32.6 runs per wicket. From the 26th to the 80th overs, they averaged 34.1, almost exactly the same.
Variability is wired into the Dukes ball. While each ball adheres to a British standard, every one is the product of leather from a different cow, and then hand-stitched for four hours.
'No two cows are the same,' Jajodia explains. 'And then you've got the human factor. So if any one of those things in the mix are not quite right, it affects the product.
'The number of balls we throw out is just unbelievable. We believe in giving the consumer the very best result.'
Yet changes in the industry in recent years have made Jajodia's work trickier.
'People say 2018 was a great year. In the olden days, I could specify, I want Angus Heights – can't do that any more. A lot of slaughterhouses have closed down. The tannery could insist that they got a certain breed of animal. These days, you're lucky if you get what you're asking for, a certain thickness of height. Those are day-to-day problems which we have to cope with.
'Since Covid, there was a big disruption to production. Some of these boys who work in the industry have got a lot of stuff in their head. And I keep asking 'has it all been passed on?' It may be, if there is a problem with the leather, we have to get the old boys back to look at it, out of retirement.'
At the very same time as the Dukes in England are being criticised for doing too little, those in the Caribbean are being criticised for doing too much. In last week's Test in Jamaica with the pink Dukes ball, West Indies were bowled out for 27 against Australia, the second lowest total in Test history. A new ball is by definition new; as such, there is inherent uncertainty in how any ball in a Test match will behave.
After the Test series, Dukes will review every aspect of the ball, from materials to production. As is customary, there will also be a review of how the balls performed during the county season, with balls in each game marked by umpires and captain. The company will also discuss potential solutions with the England and Wales Cricket Board.
'It's been a nightmare,' Jajodia admits of the focus on the balls during the England-India series. 'They keep asking, 'what's wrong with the balls?' As though we're just sitting around, deliberately making balls that are wrong.
'I'm very happy with the balls when I supply them. What happens to them in the meantime, if there's something is being affected – I have to get to the bottom of it, and that can only happen after an extensive look, cutting the balls open, seeing where we think the problem is.'
In the past, Jajodia has even floated a radical suggestion: allowing the second new ball to be taken earlier. But this would risk nullifying spin. In the 1948 Ashes, when a new ball was allowed after 55 overs, spin was almost irrelevant.
Yet questions about the ball are not restricted to matches involving the Dukes. Indeed, the use of the Kookaburra ball – the same as that used in Australia – for four rounds this County Championship season has been heavily criticised for destroying any semblance of balance between bat and ball.
In the last round when the Kookaburra was used, Surrey amassed 820 for nine declared against Durham, the top score in the championship for 18 years. The overall average per wicket in matches using the Kookaburra this year is 44.2, 12 runs higher than for games using the Dukes. The contrast is particularly striking because it inverts the pattern in Test cricket in the past four years, when averages have been four runs higher in England than Australia.
'We've had mixed feedback – obviously, there's been some championship games where probably the balance was not right,' says Brett Elliot, the managing director of Kookaburra Sport. 'The pitch and weather conditions also contribute to this.'
Elliot cautions against simple solutions. For instance, it is sometimes suggested that a harder ball would not deteriorate in the same way.
'Increasing the hardness of a cricket ball could have significant consequences against fielders. Getting hit by a ball that's 20 per cent harder could be fatal. So we just need to make sure that we stick within the proven and tight criteria of ball specifications.'
The ball is perhaps the most important essential component to ensuring a compelling balance between bat and ball. Yet while billions of pounds are spent on watching cricket worldwide every year, those running the sport continue to pay strikingly little attention to the ball itself.
When teams are successful in requesting a replacement ball, for instance, there is little science to how it is chosen. The potential replacements are provided by each individual ground, rather than the host board. Umpires then select a replacement ball based on how it feels, and how old it seems to be – not how old it actually is. Sometimes, replacements transform the game. At the Oval in 2023, the replacement ball offered far more swing and seam than the old ball, contributing to Australia's collapse on the final day.
Like a series of cricket's perennial issues – time-wasting and over-rates, the use of substitute fielders for tactical reasons, debates about pitches – questions about the ball reflect the ICC's broader failure to regulate the game. The ICC's regulations for international cricket are clear about the weight and size of the ball, yet are vague about how the ball should play.
The regulations state that 'umpires shall periodically and irregularly inspect the state of the ball' to consider whether it needs to be replaced. The ICC was also initially ignorant about how the character of the white Kookaburra ball, used in all international limited-overs cricket, changed markedly from the end of 2020 to offer new-ball bowlers greater assistance.
Baseball, the world's second-most popular bat-and-ball game, hints at an alternative approach. In 2018, Major League Baseball spent $395 million on buying Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, the league's ball-manufacturer.
This purchase recognised the importance of the ball in shaping the quality of the game that spectators watch. Yet administrators in cricket, a game equally dependent on the quality of the ball, have shown no interest in doing the same.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Inevitable' Michelle Agyemang has left Lionesses with one choice for Euro 2025 final
At some point, Michelle Agyemang may start playing a game for England when they are not behind. It could even be on Sunday in the Euro 2025 final. But for now, it is hard to think of anyone at this tournament who has a clearer understanding of their exact role and the impact they can make than the 19-year-old striker who began it with just one international appearance for her country, and who has now saved them from the brink twice in two games. 'She feels inevitable right now,' said Leah Williamson, and, somehow, so do England. But the only moments where England have felt as if they've had any sort of momentum behind them in their extraordinary escapes against Sweden and now Italy came when the youngest member of the squad was on the pitch; the teenager was a Wembley ball-girl for the Lionesses just four years ago, but has now helped fire them into a third consecutive major tournament final. Could Agyemang now start it? Wiegman almost certainly ruled that out, insisting her hand wouldn't be forced, but the England manager underlined why there was such belief surging through her team thanks to Agyemang's latest intervention. 'She brings something special and she has something special,' a stunned Wiegman said. 'She's only 19 years old, she's very mature, she knows exactly what she has to do.' The problem for everyone else at the Euros is they don't know what to do about Agyemang. From the instant impact on her debut against Belgium in April to the equalisers in the quarter-finals and the semi-finals, everyone is now aware that the moment of Agyemang's arrival moves a match into its own unique phase. 'You see it when she comes on,' Lucy Bronze said. 'Defenders are petrified of her.' Part of it is the element of the unknown; opposition teams could study Agyemang but it would require delving into her minutes on loan at Brighton last season, which feels another world away now. Even then, they can't prepare for Agyemang's physicality or aggression or the effectiveness of her hold-up play. But with Agyemeng there is also what the opposition can't see: the humbleness to learn and improve and the hunger to show the world what she can do. It is, quite simply, the reason England are into another final. Once again, as the Lionesses finally gave up on attempting to play well and accepted that their only route to survival was rolling the dice and launching it forward, it was Agyemang who kept her head in the chaos. When England were hurried, and with their Euros on the line, she found the touch that appeared to slow down time itself. England were desperate but Lauren Hemp discarded all of her previous wasteful deliveries and found the cross that stretched Italy's defence. England had so often got caught waiting in the box but there was Beth Mead, darting across the front post. Suddenly, there was Agyemang with the ball at her feet, and with no one near her. Does that make the pressure even worse? Having all that time? An extra moment to potentially realise the magnitude how often this second in time will be replayed forever? The Italian wall that has withstood England for so long has finally retreated and Agyemang, if she dared to look up, has three towering obstacles in front of her. It would be an exaggeration to suggest that Agyemang's career had been building up to this moment; her journey in football, after all, is only just lifting off the ground. And perhaps this is how Agyemang managed to pause, to keep her head clear and over the ball, to maintain the technique that saw her drill the finish low and hard, piercing through the bodies. It's no accident, either. 'She has such awareness of where she needs to be in the box,' said Esme Morgan. 'She's just such an incredibly intelligent player to know what spaces to pick up and then such a composed finisher when she gets the opportunity. She's an incredible person to be able to rely on.' Chloe Kelly, who lacks no amount of her own self-belief, said the introduction of Agyemang 'gave us confidence'. And what Agyemang delivered was also the complete opposite of what England had produced up until the 95th minute. England, again, were seconds from going home, and this team were doing some seriously strange things, the kind of choices players make when they are physically and mentally exhausted, the legs weary and the mind fogged in the face of the nightmare unfolding in front of them. Agyemang rescued England but then played with the clarity to provide exactly the right runs, to know what loose balls to chase down, and to find the energy that the Lionesses so desperately lacked. She did it with a flourishing confidence, too, as displayed by her= volleyed shot from the angle crashing against the crossbar. Down an inch and it would have sent England through. 'She was going on by herself,' Bronze said. 'She had two or three good runs in extra time where she was like, I'm going to take this team to the final. I think that gives the rest of the team confidence.' The Lionesses are being pushed forward by the fearlessness of their youth. 'What a future the kid's got ahead of her,' Bronze remarked. It is Agyemang's present, though, that is now accelerating beyond her wildest imagination. 'I was just a kid, throwing the ball to these girls,' Agyemang reflected. 'To do this, at this level, it's more than I could've wished for. Most of these girls I've not known for more than two months, to see them celebrate with me, it'll live in my heart forever.' There may yet be the fairytale ending. On Sunday, one of Spain or Germany will know that England have a powerful card in their back pocket, even if they are ahead in the Euro 2025 final. It's why, for all of the changes that Wiegman needs to make to rectify the slow starts England keep drifting into, Agyemang will not be 'forcing' Wiegman into a decision: England's back-up plan has become their greatest weapon.
-vies-with-Englands-forward-07-Lauren-James.jpeg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C1582%2C2300%2C1869%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)

The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Chelsea winger in doubt for Women's Euro 2025 final
Lauren James is a major doubt for England 's Women's Euro 2025 final after sustaining an ankle injury during the semi-final against Italy. The Chelsea winger was replaced at half-time, having been seen with ice around her ankle as she limped towards the bench. England secured a dramatic comeback victory against Italy, with Michelle Agyemang equalising in the 96th minute and Chloe Kelly scoring from a penalty rebound in the 119th minute. Lionesses manager Sarina Wiegman confirmed James "hurt her ankle" and her condition will be assessed over the coming days. England will face either Spain or Germany in the final at St. Jakob-Park, Basel, on Sunday.


The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
The sass, swagger and dark times behind Chloe Kelly's unbreakable confidence
England were seconds away from going home. Losing 1-0 to Italy in the Euro 2025 semi-finals, the Lionesses needed a hero. Up stepped Chloe Kelly, raising her arms as she prepared to deliver an inswinging corner from the left. But as the England fans behind the goal prayed for a moment of inspiration, it was immediately clear that something was wrong: Kelly dragged her cross straight out of play. It landed, horribly, into the side-netting. 'Obviously it wasn't the plan,' Kelly grimaced. Neither was it the plan to miss a penalty with the chance to send England through to the Euro 2025 final, but Kelly's response to both the failed corner and saved spot-kick remained the same. 'The reaction is as important as the action,' Kelly explained. 'For me, it was important to not dwell on the moment.' Instead, she followed up her penalty miss by scoring the rebound, telling everyone to 'chill' as they lost their minds. For Kelly, the 119th-minute winner in Geneva is the latest in a long line of iconic moments in England shirt, to go alongside Wembley, Brisbane and Zurich. When the pressure is at its highest, Kelly has been able to rise above it and deliver, time and time again. 'She thrives in those moments where all eyes are on her and she knows she needs to produce, and she's just go this belief in herself,' said England defender Esme Morgan. 'She has always been like that. Chloe just doesn't care what other people think. She's her own person and she works hard. She knows what she's brilliant at. So when there's a moment to execute what she's brilliant at, she just feels 10 feet tall and ready to take it.' Right now, if you could bottle and sell what Kelly has, you would earn yourself a fortune. 'Chloe's just attitude, sass, confidence,' said Lucy Bronze. As if to illustrate this, when asked after England's win where her confidence and self-belief came from, Kelly simply replied: 'Myself'. No one in world football is taking on the game in the way Kelly is, from her high-stepping penalty run-up to her viral wedding photo shinpads and her grin before taking the penalty to keep England at the Euros during the quarter-finals. Yet it was only a few months ago that the 27-year-old was questioning her her love for the sport and future in it. She was, she said, in a 'dark place'. Frozen out at Manchester City, Kelly was at risk of dropping out of Sarina Wiegman 's England squad. Her place at the Euros hinged on the success of her loan move to Arsenal but it was on her move back to north London that Kelly's smile returned. Working alongside Renee Slegers at Arsenal, Kelly was told to be herself. She began to play with joy again and finished the season as a Champions League winner. That version of Kelly has shone through in Switzerland. Three years ago, Kelly was only just recovering from an ACL injury when she seized her opportunity to score England's winning goal in the Euro 2022 final. Three years later, Kelly is playing with the same determination to take nothing for granted, but with her self-belief at an all-time high. 'When she's on the pitch, no matter what, she's going to push her shoulders back, big up her chest and she's going to go for it,' Bronze said. At Euro 2025, Kelly's instructions from Wiegman are the same as they were in Euro 2022: to go on and change the game for England. She has now made 11 consecutive appearances as a substitute between both tournaments but her approach has remained consistent. 'Take the opportunity when it comes,' Kelly explained. 'We've got 23 amazing players in the squad and we're all ready.' England's super-sub has made yet another devastating impact off the bench at a major tournament. But above all, missing a penalty only to go again and convert the rebound was a way of encapsulating an entire career, illustrating that the biggest successes often come from bouncing back. 'The moments in January when I felt like giving up football, makes you grateful for these moments here today,' Kelly reflected. 'Confidence comes from within but from around you as well. The players I stand side by side with on the pitch, [we] breed confidence in each other. The people you surround yourself with, my family is really important to me and will breed a lot of confidence within me.' Bronze may have briefly stood over the penalty spot when England were awarded their last-minute penalty against Italy but there was no question who was going to take; no doubt, either, that Kelly would slow herself down, spin the ball on its mark, take a deep breath, and lift up her left leg to begin her run-up. The surprise was the save but the response was never in doubt. The initial celebration amid the chaos, as Kelly pushed her hands towards the ground, told its own story: 'It was more like, 'Chill out, I was going to score! Chill out, it was OK!'' Kelly laughed. Then came the second celebration, one that will go down well in north London, with her arm on the corner flag waiting and admiring the view like Thierry Henry. The message? Don't worry, England, I've got this.