U.S. stocks inch higher despite credit rating downgrade
NEW YORK, May 19 (Xinhua) -- U.S. stocks were little changed on Monday, as markets reacted to mounting concerns over the country's fiscal outlook following a credit rating downgrade and the advancement of a controversial tax-and-spending bill.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 137.33 points, or 0.32 percent, to 42,792.07. The S&P 500 added 5.22 points, or 0.09 percent, to 5,963.6. The Nasdaq Composite Index increased 4.36 points, or 0.02 percent, to 19,215.46.
Seven of the 11 primary S&P 500 sectors ended in green, with health and consumer staples leading the gainers by adding 0.96 percent and 0.42 percent, respectively. Meanwhile, energy and consumer discretionary led the laggards by losing 1.55 percent and 0.27 percent, respectively.
Late Friday, Moody's Ratings downgraded the U.S. credit rating, stripping its last triple-A credit rating, citing persistent fiscal deficits and rising interest costs as key factors. Those concerns intensified after the House Budget Committee approved U.S. President Donald Trump's tax-and-spending bill late Sunday. Moody's cited "persistent, large fiscal deficits" for its downgrade.
"We do not believe that material multi-year reductions in mandatory spending and deficits will result from current fiscal proposals under consideration," the agency wrote, referring to the tax and spending bill making its way through Congress. U.S. financial health is likely to deteriorate as the government's debt and interest burden increase.
Experts seem not to worry about the long-term sustainability of U.S. finances. "There are no signs of any serious deficit restraint at this stage," noted Jim Reid, a strategist at Deutsche Bank.
"The Moody's downgrade of U.S. debt doesn't tell investors anything they don't already know about the U.S.'s fiscal woes," wrote Bank of America analysts in a note on Monday.
However, the downgrade and fiscal developments contributed to volatility in the bond market. The 10-year Treasury yield briefly climbed to 4.56 percent, its highest level in over a month, before pulling back to 4.45 percent as of 4:10 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.
Trump added to the tensions over the weekend by criticizing Walmart for signaling price increases tied to tariffs. Walmart slumped 0.12 percent on Monday.
The Federal Reserve, which has held interest rates steady this year, remains cautious due to the uncertainty surrounding tariffs and fiscal policy. New York Fed President John Williams noted Monday that the economic outlook remains murky and that monetary policy direction may not become clearer for months.
Tech stocks, which have driven much of the recent market rally, traded mixed on Monday. Tesla dropped 2.25 percent after a 17 percent gain last week, while Apple lost about 1.17 percent. Nvidia also slipped, while Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta and Broadcom posted some gains.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
16 minutes ago
- The Star
Asian stocks climb, FX steady as US-China trade talks set to continue
Stock markets in Asia climbed on Tuesday and regional currencies were little changed against a steady U.S. dollar, as investors monitored the second day of trade negotiations between the United States and China. Representatives from Beijing and Washington met in London on Monday, just days after U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping held their first post-inauguration call to address an escalating trade dispute. Trump said he had received "good reports" from officials engaged in the talks, which are expected to extend into Tuesday. "The response in markets today, though, looks mixed," Maybank analysts said in a research note, adding that they would continue to monitor the situation. MSCI's broadest index of Asia Pacific shares outside Japan rose as much as 0.7% to its highest level since January 21, 2022. DBS analysts said that the second day of trade talks might see the U.S. relaxing restrictions on tech exports in exchange for China resuming rare-earths mineral shipments. The tech-heavy Taiwanese index jumped 2.1% to a two-week high, with chip giant TSMC surging 4%. South Korean equities rose 0.3% and Indonesian shares gained 1.2%. Malaysian stocks added 0.1%. Analysts at United Overseas Bank noted that the country's foreign portfolio inflows in May hit their highest level since March 2016 as signs of tariff de-escalation improved risk appetite. Regional currencies were largely unchanged. The absence of concrete outcomes from Monday's discussions between the world's two largest economies kept currency markets subdued, with traders hesitant to take on big positions. The Malaysian ringgit, Singapore dollar each inched 0.1% lower, while the Taiwanese dollar and Thai baht edged 0.1% higher. The South Korean won fell 0.5%. The U.S. dollar index was up 0.2% as investors awaited U.S. inflation data which is due on Wednesday. The inflation report is among the final key data points ahead of the U.S. Federal Reserve's June 17-18 meeting, where it is widely expected to keep rates unchanged. HIGHLIGHTS: ** Taiwan May exports hit record on AI demand and ahead of U.S. tariffs ** Investors eye Latin America as they diversify away from Wall Street ** India May inflation likely cooled to 3% as food price pressure eases - Reuters
The Star
16 minutes ago
- The Star
Cambodia approves investment projects worth US$4.2bil in January-May period
PHNOM PENH: Cambodia attracted fixed-asset investment of US$4.2 billion in the first five months of 2025, up 52 per cent compared to the same period last year, said a Council for the Development of Cambodia (CDC)'s report released on Tuesday (June 10). The country approved 290 investment projects during the January-May period this year, up 89 per cent from 153 projects in the same period last year, generating roughly 203,000 jobs, the CDC said. China remained the top foreign investor in the kingdom, accounting for 62.27 per cent of the total investment amount, the CDC said. Cambodian Ministry of Commerce's Secretary of State and spokesperson Penn Sovicheat (pic) said the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) agreement and Cambodia's bilateral free trade agreements with China, South Korea, and the United Arab Emirates are major factors in attracting foreign direct investment. "These free trade pacts are magnets for foreign investors to Cambodia," he told Xinhua. Sovicheat said new investments would bring new capital, technologies and job opportunities for Cambodian people. - Xinhua
The Sun
18 minutes ago
- The Sun
Repeated shocks risk global trade
DISCUSSION around the consequences of President Donald Trump's economic policies – most notably the increased tariffs on all countries, especially China – has centred on economic costs. These costs affect both businesses and consumers, manifesting as higher prices for traded goods, a shift in production to less efficient locations and reduced consumer choices when goods are no longer produced or traded. The focus on economic costs neglects a more impactful and troubling development: a shift in global trade governance and the exchange of goods under it. The US has gone from being the establisher and leader of international trade institutions to being the single greatest threat to their continuation. Multinational enterprises that have prospered under this system face unprecedented uncertainty and increasingly stark choices between upholding the system and being undercut by competitors forced to circumvent it. Businesses engaging in international trade and investment have long relied upon rules, principles and norms established under the General Agreement of Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in 1948 and deepened under the stewardship of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) since 1995. The international system under GATT and WTO supports trade through the elimination of trade barriers including tariffs, quotas and subsidies, by establishing principles of equal treatment and by providing mechanisms to manage disputes between nations and companies. Continuing business faith in multilateral trade rules and liberalisation is increasingly at odds with the positions of nation-states. The global financial crisis in 2007 to 2008, China's rapid rise to dominant global manufacturer since joining WTO in 2001 and legitimate concerns with the distribution of trade benefits within countries have contributed to popular backlash against freer trade. The rise of powerful global corporations that pursue profits rather than sovereign interests has also played on the fears of nation-states that, through liberalisation, have ceded much regulatory autonomy. Against this backdrop is a world besieged by increasingly frequent major shocks – of human and natural origin. Businesses and nation-states are navigating trade wars, disease outbreaks, military conflicts and intensifying weather events – individually and in tandem. Discourse typically bundles these shocks together to paint an overall picture of instability, lower confidence and temporary disruption to economic activity. But to appreciate the sustained consequences for trade, the stepwise influence of each major shock deserves further examination. The first Trump administration's trade war from 2018 provided the first substantial and symbolic shift from trade liberalisation to restriction. It delivered an initial blow to the 'made in China, sold in America' model, prompting conversations in global boardrooms around the need to reduce dependence on production in China. However, investors were largely unwilling to forgo China's cost competitiveness with the re-export of goods via third countries, particularly in Southeast Asia, being the dominant response. Trade continued within the bounds of international governance. The Covid-19 pandemic from early 2020 created more substantive fractures between businesses and governments on trade governance. International institutions proved incapable of mobilising an effective and coordinated health and economic response, with business disruption amplified under diverging sovereign measures. China's draconian response delivered a goal for its reputation as a reliable production location. While economists and businesses marvelled at the adaptability of global supply chains, governments saw vulnerabilities requiring intervention on national security grounds. Russia's invasion of Ukraine in early 2022 poured salt into the open wound, sharply highlighting the divergence between corporate interests and those of nation-states. US-led sanctions on trade with Russia sought to divide markets along geopolitical lines with little regard for business impacts. The ability of businesses from Russia, China, India and elsewhere to circumvent inadequately enforced sanctions exposed the limits of international and national governance to uphold trade restrictions. Companies from America, Europe and elsewhere had to choose between supporting sanctions and sustaining profits, with many becoming circumventers. That markets did a better job of navigating sanctions and war than governments did of implementing sanctions reinforced the pandemic fracture between businesses and governments, significantly eroding trust in international trade governance. It is in this context that Trump 2.0 must be seen as an existential threat to prospects for restoring faith in the system. The US is now the primary source of economic policy uncertainty and lead antagonist undermining international institutions, imposing and threatening smaller countries with tariffs and hollowing out WTO. Businesses conditioned by pandemic-induced disruptions and ineffectual sanctions face another choice between wearing tariff costs and being undercut by less scrupulous competitors. Maintaining support for formal, rules-based and ethical international trade means contending with an increasingly formidable global network of informal actors and activities that outmatch the enforcement efforts of trade regulators. After all, border processes that have been streamlined and deregulated over decades to encourage seamless and trusted trade cannot be instantly and effectively converted to a punitive enforcement stance. And neither Trump nor the countries he threatens appear willing to plough resources into tighter trade regulation or have a vision for what enforcement looks like. Arresting the decline of trade institutions may seem insurmountable in the current geopolitical environment but the alternative is trending towards a future in which governments everywhere cede control of effective trade regulation. In such a world, the ability of international institutions and nation-states to uphold product standardisation and safety, supply chain resilience and ethical practices is compromised. Government capacity to raise revenue and manage the macroeconomy is further weakened by growing informality while businesses and consumers pay for the additional risk embodied in less-regulated trade. The world sans the US must act quickly to reinforce the international system, strengthening international institutions, including WTO. Space for greater leadership from large emerging economies must be created to forge a collective governance approach for countries across the development spectrum. Tackling systemic destruction is far greater and more economically consequential than addressing the immediate impact of Trump tariffs. A world in which trade operates outside of good governance frameworks would leave everyone poorer. Dr Stewart Nixon is the deputy director of research at the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (Ideas). The views expressed in this article are solely those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of Ideas Malaysia.
