logo
China Protests Modi's Message and Official Celebrations on Dalai Lama's 90th Birthday

China Protests Modi's Message and Official Celebrations on Dalai Lama's 90th Birthday

The Wire7 days ago
This is the latest in a series of statements China has issued over the past week, beginning after the Dalai Lama publicly announced that his successor would be recognised solely by a trust affiliated with his office.
New Delhi: Escalating its rhetoric, China on Monday said it had lodged a formal protest with India over Prime Minister Narendra Modi's birthday greetings to the 14th Dalai Lama and the presence of Indian officials at celebrations marking his 90th birthday.
The protest was confirmed by Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning during her regular press briefing in Beijing, where she restated Beijing's longstanding position on the Dalai Lama and described him as a separatist.
'India needs to be fully cognizant of the sensitivity of issues related to Xizang, see clearly the anti-China and separatist nature of the 14th Dalai Lama, honour the commitments India has made to China on issues related to Xizang, act prudently, and stop using those issues to interfere in China's internal affairs. China has protested to India regarding its actions,' she said.
Referring to Tibet by its official Chinese designation, Mao repeated that Beijing's position was 'consistent and clear'.
'As is widely known, the 14th Dalai Lama is a political exile who has long engaged in anti-China separatist activities and seeks to separate Xizang from China under the cloak of religion,' she said.
The question at the press briefing came from a reporter affiliated with a Chinese state-run tabloid, who asked for China's reaction to Modi's birthday message and the attendance of Indian ministers at the official celebration organised by the Tibetan government-in-exile.
China's protest is the latest in a series of statements issued over the past week, beginning after the Dalai Lama publicly announced that his successor would be recognised solely by a trust affiliated with his office.
On July 4, Union minister of minority affairs Kiren Rijiju had backed the proposal and asserted that 'nobody else has the right to decide' on the succession besides the Tibetan Buddhist spiritual leader.
Ambassador Xu had first posted on that day that the next Dalai Lama must be selected through what Beijing calls the 'Golden Urn lottery procedure'.
The next day, the Chinese foreign ministry weighed in with spokesperson Mao Ning, issuing a sharper response.
'India should exercise caution in its words and actions, stop interfering in China's internal affairs with Xizang-related issues, and avoid impact on the improvement and development of the China-India relationship,' she said at a regular press briefing on July 5.
Later, Rijiju clarified that his remarks were made in a personal capacity. 'I spoke as a follower and a devotee,' he said.
India's Ministry of External Affairs also distanced itself from the remarks. 'We have seen reports relating to the statement made by His Holiness the Dalai Lama about the continuation of the Dalai Lama institution,' said MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal on July 5.
'Government of India does not take any position or speak on matters concerning beliefs and practices of faith and religion. Government has always upheld freedom of religion for all in India and will continue to do so,' he added.
On Sunday, Modi posted a message on social media extending 'warmest wishes' to the Dalai Lama on behalf of the Indian people. He described the Tibetan Buddhist spiritual leader as an 'enduring symbol of love, compassion, patience and moral discipline.'
At the official birthday celebrations in McLeodganj, Rijiju and his cabinet colleague Rajiv Ranjan Singh, Minister of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, were present as chief guests.
Later that night, Chinese ambassador to India Xu Feihong tweeted that the reincarnation process was strictly an internal matter of China and must take place within Tibet.
The latest episode of friction between India and China comes at a time when both countries have been talking about normalising bilateral ties following the military standoff in eastern Ladakh, which formally concluded last year after four years of tension.
Senior level engagement between the two sides has increased in recent months, and Union external affairs minister S. Jaishankar is likely to be travelling in July to Beijing to take part in the SCO foreign ministers meeting.
The first group of Indian pilgrims are also permitted to undertake the Mansarovar Yatra after a hiatus since 2019. The pilgrimage had been suspended due to the COVID-19 pandemic and later, owing to border tensions.
However, the brief military exchange between India and Pakistan following the Pahalgam terror attack in April added a fresh complication, with Indian officials accusing China of providing real-time satellite intelligence to Pakistan during the hostilities.
Asked about this claim on Monday, Mao Ning said, 'I'm not sure how that allegation came about. Different people may have different perspectives. What I can say is, China-Pakistan relations do not target any third party. This is China's policy. On India-Pakistan relations, we support the two sides in properly addressing differences through dialogue and consultation and jointly keeping the region peaceful and stable.'
She noted that China's bilateral relations with India are at a 'crucial stage of improvement and development'. 'We stand ready to work with India to move bilateral relations forward on a sound and steady track,' the spokesperson added.
The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Air India catastrophe should catalyse deep structural reform in the country
The Air India catastrophe should catalyse deep structural reform in the country

Mint

time28 minutes ago

  • Mint

The Air India catastrophe should catalyse deep structural reform in the country

Next Story Vikas Dimble , Prachi Mishra The aviation tragedy in Ahmedabad calls for economic introspection. India needs to ponder questions of public versus private ownership, market concentration versus competition and diversified versus focused conglomerates. Our take-off for Viksit Bharat may depend on getting the answers right. The Ahmedabad tragedy should serve as more than a moment of grief, it should catalyse the deeper structural reforms necessary for India's sustainable development. Gift this article The tragic Ahmedabad air crash shook the nation, but beyond the immediate grief lies a deeper call for introspection. This isn't about assigning blame, but rather about examining structural questions. The tragic Ahmedabad air crash shook the nation, but beyond the immediate grief lies a deeper call for introspection. This isn't about assigning blame, but rather about examining structural questions. The timing is significant—this accident occurred soon after Air India transitioned from public to private ownership, highlighting three fundamental challenges on India's runway toward developed nation status: How should we balance public and private sector roles? What is the optimal level of market concentration versus competition? And should India Inc embrace specialization or continue with diversified conglomerates that span multiple industries? These questions go beyond aviation, touching the very foundation of India's economic strategy. Yet, aviation provides a perfect case study for examining these broader challenges. Let us start with the public versus public ownership. Also Read: Digital twins of aircraft: A big leap for civil aviation? India is conspicuous with a disproportionately large public sector, compared to other emerging and advanced economies. India's stock market is heavily dominated by state-owned enterprises. But our aviation sector, which has undergone complete privatization, offers a contrast. Globally, aviation ownership models vary dramatically. West Asian carriers remain fully government-owned, Chinese airlines are government-dominated and some European carriers maintain partial government stakes—25% of British Airways' parent company, for instance, is owned by Qatar Airways. Meanwhile, the US mirrors India's approach of minimal government ownership. The privatization of Air India is considered one of the Indian government's most successful divestments. As the private sector takes control, the need for robust regulation becomes critical. The question is not a binary whether or not to privatize, but how to regulate businesses effectively, especially in industries where lives are at stake. The government's role must evolve from owner-operator to an ever more vigilant regulator in both public perception and reality. Also Read: A tale of two sectors: Aviation soars while railways crawl Coming to the dilemma of competition versus concentration, India's economy has long been marked by the outsized influence of family-owned business groups. Remarkably, several of the largest groups from the 1950s still dominate, with the composition of the top 25 largely unchanged since 2010. At their peak in 2012, these groups generated revenues equivalent to 20% of India's GDP. While their dominance has declined somewhat since then, in 2020 that figure was still over 15%—higher than in 2001. The aviation sector typifies these trends. In India, the combined market share of its top two airlines is larger than in other markets globally, far exceeding the share seen in the US, UK, China or Brazil. IndiGo and Air India, both privately owned, carried over 90% of air travellers last year. The US airline industry is also privately owned but its market has much more competition. While larger firms benefit from economies of scale and greater clout, extreme concentration can also stifle innovation and harm consumer interests. Indian policymakers have been on top of this challenge. The sector has been opened to fresh competition repeatedly, but the industry has shown high business mortality, with a long list of airlines declared bankrupt or close to it; Sahara, Jet Airways, SpiceJet, Kingfisher and Go First tell a sobering tale of a harsh market. Why has competition withered in this sector? Is market size the determining factor (America's air traffic is five times that of India), or are there policy or market failures? Cost and efficiency determine survival, but consumer choices matter. Notably, both Air India and IndiGo rank low in global service standards. The transition from a state monopoly to private oligopoly outlines a delicate balance. While India needs stronger regulation in critical sectors, the broader economic imperative often calls for less onerous regulation; theEconomic Survey highlighted calls for greater deregulation and for government to get 'out of the way." Coming to the third issue of specialization versus diversification, economic theory suggests that countries should specialize in industries where they have comparative advantage. We can illustrate this through Bollywood: If Shah Rukh Khan, an economics graduate, specialized in economics, he would have been a successful economist. But even if he were to become the world's best economist, his 'opportunity cost' of missing a career as an actor would be too high, given the low wages he would earn compared to his earnings from cinema. Even with an absolute advantage in economics, his comparative advantage would lie in cinema. Specialization versus diversification represents a distinct strategic choice from concentration versus competition. Firms can maintain high market concentration while remaining either specialized or diversified. The jury is certainly out on this. Global trends reveal fascinating patterns. While emerging-market conglomerates are increasingly diversifying, those in advanced economies, particularly the US, are moving towards specialization. Emerging-market giants like the Tata Group in India (spanning salt to aviation), Samsung in South Korea and Fosun in China have expanded their sectoral reach dramatically, often doubling or tripling their presence across industries. Conversely, developed-market leaders like General Electric, Siemens and Johnson & Johnson have undergone significant consolidation or strategic splits. Most now operate as publicly traded entities with focused business models. So what is the path forward? What does it imply for India's aviation landscape—a three-way combination of private ownership, extreme concentration and the diversified nature of controlling conglomerates? This combination makes the sector distinctive globally but also potentially vulnerable. The stakes couldn't be higher. Markets often face efficiency versus equity trade-offs. Beyond that, there are efficiency and public safety trade-offs, at least in perception. Ultimately, there are no concrete recipes for success. That said, these questions are pertinent. As India marches towards Viksit Bharat, we must find appropriate answers. Our aviation sector's future—and by extension our broader economic strategy—depends on getting many balances right. The Ahmedabad tragedy should serve as more than a moment of grief. It should catalyse the deeper structural reforms necessary for India's sustainable development. Only through such introspection can we build an economy that is both dynamic and safe, competitive and responsible. The authors are, respectively, operations director, Ashoka Isaac Center for Public Policy (ICPP); and professor of economics, and director of ICPP, Ashoka University. Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.

'Unable To Understand...': Jitan Ram Manjhi On Chirag Paswan Questioning Bihar's Law And Order
'Unable To Understand...': Jitan Ram Manjhi On Chirag Paswan Questioning Bihar's Law And Order

News18

time29 minutes ago

  • News18

'Unable To Understand...': Jitan Ram Manjhi On Chirag Paswan Questioning Bihar's Law And Order

Former Bihar CM Jitan Ram Manjhi praised Chirag Paswan as a "good leader" of the NDA but criticised his lack of understanding of Bihar's situation. Jitan Ram Manjhi, former Bihar chief minister and Union Minister, called his ally Chirag Paswan a 'good leader" of the NDA but said he is unable to understand the situation in the state. Manjhi's remarks come after Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas) chief Paswan's repeated attacks on CM Nitish Kumar over the law and order situation in the wake of a series of murders in the state. 'Sometimes, even trustworthy people are unable to understand the situation and make statements on it. Chirag Paswan is a good leader of the NDA… The person whose name you are taking has some shortcomings, and before making any statement, it is important to understand the entire situation by looking at the past, present and future… He has some shortcomings, due to which fingers are being raised at the NDA," he said. #WATCH | Delhi | Union Minister Jitan Ram Manjhi says, '…Sometimes even trustworthy people are unable to understand the situation and make statements on it. Chirag Paswan is a good leader of the NDA… The person whose name you are taking definitely has some shortcomings, and… — ANI (@ANI) July 14, 2025 Paswan is a part of the NDA government at the Centre, and his LJP is a junior partner in the Nitish Kumar government. He has expressed his wish to contest the upcoming assembly election in the state. Gandhi also asserted that in the upcoming assembly polls, the vote will not be just to change the government, but to save the state. The leader of opposition in the Lok Sabha shared on X screenshots of media reports pointing to 31 murders in 11 days and on the 'contract killing industry" in the state. In his post in Hindi on X, Gandhi said, 'Bihar has become the 'crime capital of India' — fear in every alley, unease in every home! Unemployed youth are being turned into killers by 'GuNDA raj'." 'The CM is busy saving his seat, while BJP ministers are raking in commissions. I'm repeating again – this time, the vote is not just to change the government, but to save Bihar," he said. (with inputs from ANI, PTI) view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

India exports to US to be more competitive after duty hike on China, others
India exports to US to be more competitive after duty hike on China, others

Business Standard

time29 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

India exports to US to be more competitive after duty hike on China, others

Indian exports to the US will become more competitive following imposition of higher tariffs by the Trump administration on countries, including China, Canada, and Mexico, Niti Aayog said in a report on Monday. The Aayog in its third edition of 'Trade Watch Quarterly', said there will be significant opportunities for India in the US markets both in terms of the number of products and volume of the US market. "India is expected to gain competitiveness in 22 out of the top 30 categories (HS 2 level), representing a market size of $2,285.2 billion," the Aayog said. It further explained that China, Canada, and Mexico are the leading exporters to the US in these categories, therefore higher tariffs on these countries at 30 per cent, 35 per cent, and 25 per cent, respectively, will enhance India's competitiveness. The Aayog said India's competitiveness will remain unchanged in 6 out of 30 categories, amounting for 32.8 per cent exports to the US and 26 per cent of the US total imports, amounting to $26.5 billion. While for six product categories at HS 2 level, India faces a higher average tariff(between 1-3 per cent) which can be negotiated with the US, the Aayog said, "In 78 products, accounting for 52 per cent of India's exports and 26 per cent share in total US imports, India is expected to gain competitiveness." For 17 products (accounting for 28 per cent of India's export to the US) out of the top 100 products at the HS-4 level, the Aayog said India's competitiveness remains unchanged due to no change in tariff differential. The Aayog also pointed out that "India stands to gain in sectors with high tariff gaps vs China, Canada and Mexico -- minerals and fuels, apparel, electronics, plastics, furniture, and seafoods in a $1,265-billion market". Meanwhile, an Indian commerce ministry team has reached Washington for another round of talks on the proposed bilateral trade agreement (BTA), which will begin on Monday. Chief negotiator of India and special secretary in the department of commerce Rajesh Agrawal will join the team on Wednesday. The four-day talks will end on Thursday. India's deputy chief negotiator for the proposed BTA has reached Washington for the talks on the first phase of the BTA, the official said. The visit assumes significance as both sides have to iron out issues in sectors like agriculture and automobiles. It is also important as the US has further postponed the imposition of additional tariffs on several countries, including India, until August 1. Earlier this month, the Indian team was in Washington for talks, with negotiations taking place from June 26 to July 2. The team has once again reached the US for negotiations. India has hardened its position on the US demand for duty concessions on agri and dairy products. New Delhi has, so far, not given any duty concessions to any of its trading partners in a free trade agreement in the dairy sector. India is seeking the removal of this additional tariff (26 per cent). It is also seeking the easing of tariffs on steel and aluminium (50 per cent) and the auto (25 per cent) sectors. Against these, India has reserved its right under the WTO (World Trade Organization) norms to impose retaliatory duties. US President Donald Trump announced heavy tariffs on a number of countries, including India, on April 2. However, it was soon postponed for 90 days until July 9 and later to August 1. From July 7, the Trump administration has issued tariff letters to a number of its trading partners, including Bangladesh, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, South Africa, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cambodia, Kazakhstan, Laos, Serbia, and Tunisia. The US wants duty concessions on certain industrial goods, automobiles, especially electric vehicles, wines, petrochemical products, and agri goods, like dairy items, apples, tree nuts, and genetically modified crops. On the other hand, India is seeking duty concessions for labour-intensive sectors, such as textiles, gems and jewellery, leather goods, garments, plastics, chemicals, shrimp, oil seeds, grapes, and bananas in the proposed trade pact. The two countries are looking to conclude talks for the first tranche of the proposed bilateral trade agreement (BTA) by fall (September-October) this year. Before that, they are looking for an interim trade pact. India's merchandise exports to the US rose 21.78 per cent to $17.25 billion in April-May this fiscal year, while imports rose 25.8 per cent to $8.87 billion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store