Broadcasters have to pay both service, luxury taxes: Supreme Court
The
Supreme Court
on Thursday held that
broadcasters
are liable to pay both
service tax
and
entertainment tax
on the broadcasting activity for the purpose of entertainment of the subscriber as both Parliament and the state legislatures have the legislative competence to levy the taxes.
The two taxes are different aspects of the same activity which enable two different legislatures to impose tax under distinct taxation entries in two different Lists, the apex court said.
A bench of Justices B.V. Nagarathna and N.K. Singh said that in the instant case, the Parliament under the Finance Act, 1994 and its amendments is not imposing a tax on entertainment. Such a tax is being imposed by the state legislatures as entertainment is a luxury within the meaning of Entry 62 - List II, it said.
Play Video
Pause
Skip Backward
Skip Forward
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
0:00
Loaded
:
0%
0:00
Stream Type
LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
1x
Playback Rate
Chapters
Chapters
Descriptions
descriptions off
, selected
Captions
captions settings
, opens captions settings dialog
captions off
, selected
Audio Track
default
, selected
Picture-in-Picture
Fullscreen
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text
Color
White
Black
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Text Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Transparent
Caption Area Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Transparent
Semi-Transparent
Opaque
Font Size
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
200%
300%
400%
Text Edge Style
None
Raised
Depressed
Uniform
Drop shadow
Font Family
Proportional Sans-Serif
Monospace Sans-Serif
Proportional Serif
Monospace Serif
Casual
Script
Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values
Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Conheça o óculos militar que os homens 40+ querem
Óculos Max
Saiba Mais
Undo
'In the same way, the Finance Act along with its amendments seeks to impose a tax on the service rendered by the broadcasting agency which is imposed under Entry 97 List – I. In the same vein, under Entry 62 List – II, the state governments are not imposing any service tax on the assesses,' the top court said.
It further stated that there is no overlapping in fact or in law, inasmuch as different aspects of the same activity are being taxed under two different legislations by two different legislatures. 'This is because the activity of broadcasting is a service and liable to service tax imposed by the Parliament (Entry 97 – List I of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution) and the activity of entertainment is a subject falling under Entry 62 - List II and therefore, the assessees herein are liable to pay entertainment tax as well. Hence, the State Legislatures as well as the Parliament, both have the legislative competence to levy entertainment tax as well as service tax respectively on the activity carried out by the assessees herein,' the judgment stated.
Live Events
According to it, no entertainment can be presented to the viewers unless the broadcaster transmits the signals for instantaneous presentation of any performance, film or any programme on their television. 'Thus, there are two aspects in this activity; the first is the act of transmission of signals of the content to the subscribers. The second aspect here concerns not only the content of the signals, but the effect of the decryption of the signals by the Set-Top Boxes and the viewing cards inside these boxes provided by the assessees to the subscribers, which is providing and receiving of entertainment through the television. Without the apparatus provided for by the assessees to decrypt the signals, the subscriber would not be able to watch the content that is transmitted, the content being for the purpose of entertainment,' Justice Nagarathna, writing for the bench, said in her 321-page judgment.
The television entertainment provided by them through broadcasting, is a luxury within the meaning of Entry 62 - List II. The assessees who are engaged in the activity of providing entertainment are liable to pay service tax on the activity of broadcasting under the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 read with relevant amendments and are also liable to pay entertainment tax in terms of Entry 62 - List II as being a specie of luxuries, the court added.
The apex court was hearing a batch of cases from different high courts (lead case being Kerala vs Asianet Satellite Communications) in which entertainment tax was charged from broadcasters by various states. The broadcasters claimed that they were not liable to pay entertainment tax (or
luxury tax
) under the respective state enactments. They submitted that since they were engaged in broadcasting of signals through television channels to subscribers, hence, were possibly liable to pay only service tax to the Central government.
It set aside the Kerala High Court's 2012 judgment that had held that exemption given to cable operators from luxury tax while making DTH operators to pay the same is a case of discriminatory levy of luxury tax merely because of technological differences in the system of delivery of entertainment in both the services.
The top court said that the 2012 judgment, which declared the levy and collection of luxury tax on cable television operators with connections of 7,500 or more as unconstitutional for being discriminatory was "incorrect".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
9 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bengaluru stampede an intelligence failure: JD(S)
Mysuru: Calling the Bengaluru stampede an intelligence failure, JD(S) working president S R Mahesh on Friday asked the govt to initiate action against the intelligence ADGP Hemanth Nimbalkar, home secretary, and chief secretary. He also urged the withdrawal of the suspension of honest police officers. Mahesh accused the CM of sparing the intelligence wing ADGP because his wife, Anjali Nimbalkar, is a former Congress MLA. "What was the intelligence ADGP doing? Didn't he report to the CM about the tragedy? And what was the home department secretary doing?" Mahesh claimed that after an intelligence report, why was permission given for celebrations at both places. The chief secretary is also responsible, he accused. Mahesh questioned CM Siddaramaiah if his action of suspending five police officers satisfied his conscience and said why use a powerful weapon on a sparrow by sparing those at the helm. Mahesh urged the CM to withdraw the suspension of Bengaluru commissioner B Dayanand and DCP central HT Shekar. Mahesh stated that all those on the stage were equally responsible for the incident. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Promoções imperdíveis de voos baratos Voos | Anúncios de Pesquisa Saiba Mais Undo "The Bengaluru stampede was an accident, but negligence is evident. During this time of grief, political mudslinging is not right. Hence, we didn't discuss the matter immediately," he said. Mahesh also questioned the need to invite family members to the govt-organised event when there was a huge gathering of fans, and he also urged the central govt to recall the governor, who too took part in the celebration at Vidhana Soudha. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Prayagraj admin tightens security arrangements for Bakrid
1 2 Prayagraj: City cops on Friday intensified security arrangements for Bakrid, to be celebrated on Saturday and deployed adequate police forces at 60 static locations. The cops have also divided city areas into five zones and ten sectors with the objective of maintaining peace during the festival. In addition to making elaborate security arrangements, the cops are also coordinating with other govt departments like power, PMC, Jal Sansthan, etc., to ensure peaceful festivities. Senior cops reviewed security arrangements for old city areas and intensified vigilance in mixed populated areas. Additional DCP (City) Abhijeet Kumar told TOI, "Elaborate security arrangements have been made for the city, and PAC battalions were also called in from neighbouring districts to maintain law and order. Cops are conducting foot marches in vulnerable and hotspot areas, and a close watch is being maintained. " On the directives of top police officials, the cops implemented a multi-layered strategy aimed at preventing communal tension, ensuring public order, and maintaining religious harmony. Key focus areas include enhanced patrolling, community outreach, a crackdown on banned animal sacrifices, and real-time social media monitoring. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Over 70 peace committee meetings with religious leaders, civil society members and local administrators were already held to maintain peace. Authorities identified 60 sensitive spots across district and deployed adequate forces. Foot patrols were intensified, while UP-112 emergency response vehicles were rerouted and briefed for rapid deployment. Strict surveillance is also underway to counter rumour-mongering and inflammatory content on social media, with legal action promised against those spreading communal hatred. Meanwhile, city markets, including Chowk, Bahadurganj, Johnstonganj Crossing, Ghanta Ghar, Kareli, Sulemsarai, and adjoining areas, witnessed a heavy flow of shoppers a day ahead of the festival. A rush was also noticed at the prime goat market in Hatia, with people seen making their last-minute purchases. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Canada introduces a bill to lift restrictive citizenship by descent norms; Indian diaspora to benefit say experts
This is an AI-generated image, used for representational purposes only. Canada's immigration minister, Lena Metlege Diab, on Thursday night introduced legislation that will extend citizenship by descent beyond the first-generation. This news has been welcomed by several immigrants, including the Indian diaspora. The Citizenship Act was amended in 2009 to add a 'first-generation limit' to citizenship by descent. This meant that a Canadian citizen parent could pass on citizenship to a child born outside Canada only if the parent was either born in Canada or naturalised before the birth of this child. However, as a result of the first-generation limit, Canadian citizens who were born outside Canada could not in turn pass on citizenship to their child, if the child was also born outside Canada. Nor could they apply for a direct grant of citizenship for a child adopted from outside Canada. The first-generation limit can be illustrated: Mrs. A was born in India and was its former citizen. Subsequently, after migrating, she acquired Canadian citizenship. On her return to India, she bore a child – 'B'. Now, 'B' was eligible to be a Canadian citizen through descent. However, subsequently, 'B' (a Canadian citizen) could not under the first-generation limit rule, pass on citizenship to her child (let's name him C) if C was also born outside Canada. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo 'As a result of the first-generation limit to citizenship by descent for individuals born abroad, most Canadian citizens who are citizens by descent cannot pass on citizenship to their child born or adopted outside Canada. The current first-generation limit to citizenship no longer reflects how Canadian families live today—here at home and around the world—and the values that define our country,' states Immigration Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) in its release. The proposed amendment comes in the wake of a court ruling last year, which held the first- generation limit to be unconstitutional. TOI, in its edition of January 23, 2024, had reported that the Canadian government would not appeal against this order. While this legislation was also introduced by Marc Miller, former immigration minister, last March, it could not be passed, resulting in its reintroduction. Read also: Canada will not appeal court order that widened passing down of citizenship to children born abroad The proposed bill, 'C-3' would: automatically give Canadian citizenship to any person who would be a citizen today were it not for the first-generation limit or certain outdated provisions of previous citizenship legislation. It would also establish a new framework for citizenship by descent going forward that would allow for access to citizenship beyond the first generation based on a Canadian parent's substantial connection to Canada, demonstrated by at least 1,095 cumulative days (three years) of physical presence in Canada prior to their child's birth or adoption. Speaking to TOI, Ken Nickel-Lane, managing director of an immigration services firm, said, 'While Bill C-3 certainly addresses and rectifies a fault, or faults in the current Citizenship Act which certainly is warranted and just, it may face challenges given current public opinion towards immigration. He cautions that the bill could take away a volume of the spots meant for temporary foreign workers, which are vital for infrastructure and housing projects. IRCC sums up by stating that 'If the bill passes both Houses of Parliament and receives Royal Assent, we will work as quickly as possible to bring these changes into effect.'
