Angie Motshekga named acting president of South Africa
Minister of Defence and Military Veterans Angie Motshekga will serve as South Africa's Acting President from 17 to 19 June 2025, the Presidency confirmed this week.
Her appointment comes as both President Cyril Ramaphosa and Deputy President Paul Mashatile embark on international trips – Ramaphosa to Canada for the G7 Summit and Mashatile to Moscow for a diplomatic visit.
The decision falls under Section 90(1)(b) of the Constitution, which permits the president to designate an acting head of state during periods of absence.
This is not Angie Motshekga's first time in the role.
The veteran politician, born in Soweto, has previously served as acting president on several occasions, including in 2019, 2021, and most recently, in August 2024.
Her temporary leadership continues to mark a historic precedent for women in South African politics.
Best known for her long tenure as Minister of Basic Education, Motshekga played a key role in managing the sector through challenges such as the Covid-19 pandemic.
Her recent transition to the defence portfolio placed her at the heart of national security during a period of heightened global uncertainty.
Her latest appointment reflects her growing stature within the government as South Africa strengthens its diplomatic ties abroad.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Downgrading of Israeli embassy ‘right thing to do'
Lamola confirms Israel's embassy will remain downgraded due to Gaza conflict. A member of the South African Communist Party (SACP) protests outside the Embassy of Isreal in solidarity with Palestine and condemn the ongoing airstrikes in Gaza, 20 May 2021, Pretoria. Picture: Jacques Nelles There was not much happening at the Israeli embassy after International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola confirmed it would remain downgraded, following the ongoing attacks on Hamas. The downgrade was implemented as a direct response to Israel's continued occupation of Palestinian territories, Lamola said during his address to the National Council of Provinces on Tuesday. Lamola said the downgraded embassy only facilitated the normal processes of visa applications and travelling of civilians between the two countries. Downgrading Israeli embassy the right thing to do – analyst Political analyst Piet Croucamp said downgrading the embassy was the right thing to do. 'Whether we will make new enemies and reiterate old enemies like [US President] Donald Trump, [remains to be seen],' he said. ALSO READ: What Israel–Iran conflict means for South African economy 'It might not be the right time now but, politically, it was the right thing to do.' Another political analyst, Rene Oosthuizen, said the South African government's decision to downgrade the embassy was complex and reflects 'our nation's historical solidarity with the oppressed and the profound moral dilemmas of our present societies'. Issue complex and reflects SA's 'historical solidarity with the oppressed' Oosthuizen said while 'one cannot ignore the suffering of innocent civilians in any conflict, the breaking of diplomatic ties can close off avenues for mediation and humanitarian engagement'. Senior political lecturer at North-West University Benjamin Rapanyane said the move to downgrade the embassy in 2023 marked a shift in foreign policy aimed at conveying solidarity with the Palestinian people.
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
SA Water Polo has the right to exist, judge rules in a blow to Swimming SA's interdict bid
South African Water Polo could very well become the governing body of the sport after a vital court ruling. The breakaway South African Water Polo (SAWP) organisation has won the legal right to exist and could even evolve into the sport's national federation, according to a judgment handed down by the Western Cape Division of the High Court against Swimming South Africa (SSA). In a strong ruling after an urgent application brought by SSA for a final interdict against SAWP, Judge Judith Cloete found that SSA 'does not have an exclusive right in perpetuity to govern or administer the sport of water polo in South Africa'. It's a huge blow for SSA, whose years of well-documented poor governance could be coming to an end – in water polo at least. The court ruling will also come with a heavy bill, estimated to be around R1-million after SSA was ordered to pay costs. SSA, as the currently recognised national federation for aquatic disciplines including water polo, by both the National Sport and Recreation Act (NSRA) and World Aquatics, sought to prevent SAWP from attempting to administer or govern water polo in South Africa and from interfering in SSA's affairs. Judge Cloete found this to be against both the framework established in (or by) the NSRA and against South Africa's Constitution. 'The definition of 'national federation' in the NSRA makes no mention of only one national governing body being permitted to qualify as such in South Africa,' Judge Cloete said in her judgment. 'Although the definition refers to 'a national governing body' it does not necessarily follow that there can be only one such body for all aquatic disciplines in this country. 'The applicant (SSA) cannot seriously suggest that the respondents (SAWP) do not have the constitutionally entrenched right to freedom of association contained in section 18 of the Bill of Rights, and that the same applies to any individual water polo player wishing to join the respondents. 'The Constitutional Court has made clear that freedom of association is a fundamental right which protects against coercion, enables individuals to organise around particular areas of concern, and to hold both public and private bodies to account. 'The right has dual content in that it allows for a person to freely associate (the positive element) as well as to decide not to associate at all (the negative element). 'In addition, section 16 of the Bill of Rights entrenches the right to freedom of expression subject to certain exclusions, none of which are applicable in the present matter.' SAWP's mandate SAWP was established on simple principles to grow and improve the sport of water polo in the country. SSA applied to the court for an urgent interdict against SAWP to prevent it from 'interfering' in its mandate to govern and administer water polo in SA. SAWP was formed in early 2025, after many senior coaches, referees, administrators and players, including Olympians and world champions from around South Africa, lost faith in SSA to represent the interests of the sport. They decided to join under the banner of a new body, which would be built on the principles of transparency and sporting excellence. SSA argued this was illegal on several grounds and initially sought broad interdictory relief, including preventing SAWP from 'passing off' as having the authority to govern water polo. That line of argument was abandoned owing to lack of evidence. The remaining accusations forming the basis for the interdict were that SAWP was: Purporting to carry out the administration or governance of water polo in South Africa. SSA argued that SAWP's name ('South African Water Polo NPC') implied it was the responsible entity and that an open letter from SAWP outlined steps relating to administration and governance, which SSA claimed fell solely under its authority since 1992; Interfering with the affairs of SSA, specifically by directing or encouraging persons or entities to boycott or avoid participating in events held under SSA's auspices; Dissuading or discouraging people from participating in local or international water polo events organised by SSA; Interfering with SSA's communications to its water polo membership (by encouraging members to ignore communications or fail to pass them on); and Securing sponsorships or raising funds ostensibly to fund the administration of water polo and teams organised by SAWP to represent South Africa abroad. In its responding papers, SAWP argued that the SSA 'has no right to suppress criticism and stand in the way of SAWP (and its members) from acting lawfully, in the interests of its members, and with the utmost good faith'. SAWP argued that 'in response to Swimming South Africa's systematic and well-documented failures over the last three decades, SA Water Polo seeks, in the short term, to organise and unite clubs, players, coaches and referees, and to develop high-performance programmes for its members; and in the longer-term, to apply for membership with World Aquatics in order to ensure that SA Water Polo teams can compete at the highest international level'. 'Misconceived right' SSA's accusations were dismissed by Judge Cloete as she sided with SAWP in that it has the legal right to exist. 'The applicant's case is that it has a clear statutory right worthy of protection because in South Africa there are currently no separate bodies governing various disciplines of aquatic sports,' the judge noted. 'In its words, the South African regulation of sports exists within an international framework and not within a vacuum. 'To my mind the applicant has misconceived the nature of its right. It is correct that at present it is the only national federation for aquatic disciplines recognised by World Aquatics. 'However, SAWP is not purporting to hold itself out as a national federation. That is the only right which the applicant has which is worthy of protection. 'I agree with the respondents that the applicant does not have an exclusive right in perpetuity to govern or administer the sport of water polo in South Africa. 'Accordingly, it has no right to prevent the respondents from taking steps to legally acquire that right in due course (including by establishing its legitimacy in the wider stakeholder community by creating the appropriate organisational structures in the interim). 'This may ultimately result in the applicant having the authority to govern or administer water polo in South Africa in future, but this is nothing more than an incidence of our constitutionally entrenched democracy. 'It does not confer with it a legal right of the applicant worthy of interdictory protection.' Following the judgment, SAWP interim CEO Robbie Taylor said: 'This win is important validation of the local water polo community's mission to restore purpose and world-class excellence to the sport we love so much. 'For the first time in a long time, the polo community is truly excited about the future again. We're ready to put South Africa back on the map as a water polo-playing country with teams that are well prepared and are given every possible opportunity to succeed. 'Our first major event will be a highly competitive and exciting Winter League to be held in August 2025 in Nelson Mandela Bay.' SSA claims a victory of sorts? In an emailed response to Daily Maverick requesting reaction to the outcome, SSA sent a statement, which was not attributed to any leadership figure at SSA. 'Swimming South Africa (SSA) acknowledges the judgment handed down on 18 June 2025 by Judge Cloete in the matter concerning the governance of aquatic sports in South Africa,' the statement read. 'As the officially recognised national federation responsible for swimming, water polo, artistic swimming, diving and open water swimming, SSA is currently reviewing the full implications of the ruling in consultation with our legal team. The federation will determine its next steps after due deliberation at board level. 'The judgment affirms the constitutional right to freedom of association, a principle embedded in the Bill of Rights. At the same time, the court unequivocally confirmed that Swimming South Africa remains the authoritative governing body for aquatic sports in the country. 'Importantly, the ruling recognises that Water Polo South Africa (WPSA) [sic], a private entity, does not seek nor hold any formal recognition from the South African government, Sascoc, or the international governing body, World Aquatics. 'While we respect the outcome of the judicial process, we are disappointed that our application to interdict activities which we believe compromise the structure, order, and integrity of the sport was not granted. Nonetheless, SSA remains steadfast in our mandate to regulate and grow aquatics responsibly and inclusively. 'To be absolutely clear: Water Polo South Africa [sic] is not affiliated to Swimming South Africa, nor is it authorised to organise competitions under our name. Claims that it may issue provincial or national colours, or facilitate international representation, are both misleading and unfounded. 'This responsibility lies exclusively with Swimming South Africa and is governed by our constitution and operational protocols, which do not provide for dual membership at any level of the sport.' Interestingly, SSA's post-judgment statement infers that SAWP (whom they misname as WPSA despite clear wording in the judgment, finding affidavits and other correspondence, adding to the general sense of incompetence) are passing themselves off as the governing body. It's an accusation that SSA themselves withdrew and that Judge Cloete found baseless. DM
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Final warning for water polluters – we will act, we will prosecute and we will expose you
As Deputy Minister of Water and Sanitation, I carry the delegated responsibility to address the impact of water pollution and protect the integrity of our country's water resources. Few challenges illustrate this duty more starkly than the state of the Vaal River today. It bears the scars of years of municipal mismanagement and wastewater system failure. Raw sewage, discharges from malfunctioning wastewater treatment works and decaying infrastructure have turned parts of this iconic river into a national warning sign and disaster. It is a crisis we can no longer ignore, and it is far from isolated. As such, the Vaal River Anti-Pollution Forum, which we have since established, now brings together municipalities, industries and civil society to coordinate emergency interventions and enforce accountability. But this work cannot succeed unless these municipalities themselves step up fully, consistently and with urgency. Serious decline The 2023 Green Drop Watch Report reinforces what communities have long known: that our wastewater infrastructure is in serious decline. Of the 850 treatment systems audited nationally, 334 were flagged as being in a critical state, with performance scores below 31%. These are not remote systems in distant municipalities. Many serve urban centres and densely populated towns. In provinces like Limpopo (78%), Free State (67%), and Northern Cape (76%), more than two-thirds of wastewater systems are critically dysfunctional. These failures are not just engineering issues, they represent a profound threat to public health, environmental integrity and constitutional rights. The root causes are not a mystery. The report points to underfunding, lack of skilled staff, inadequate planning, infrastructure vandalism and in some cases, municipal inaction or non-cooperation. Municipalities were required to submit Corrective Action Plans within 60 days of the 2022 Green Drop Report, yet only 50% complied. Of those, just 10% had begun implementation by the time of the 2023 audit. This is a crisis of both capacity and governance. While the national government is fulfilling its mandate through enforcement, funding and support, the Constitution is clear that the day-to-day operation and maintenance of wastewater systems is the responsibility of local government. This is not about apportioning blame; it is about clarifying responsibility. Action and accountability As a department, we are taking action. We have initiated 172 enforcement interventions, placed 307 systems under active monitoring, and begun holding municipal officials and institutions accountable through legal channels. The R160-million fine imposed on Dipaleseng Local Municipality in November 2024 for persistent sewage discharges into rivers and communities is a landmark case and a clear indication that failure will no longer be tolerated. And let me be absolutely clear. Those who knowingly pollute our water systems, whether in public office or private industry, will be pursued. If you are dumping waste into rivers, ignoring infrastructure failure or failing to comply with directives, your days of hiding behind red tape and apathy are numbered. There will be prosecutions. There will be financial penalties. And there will be public accountability. But enforcement alone is not the solution. We are also building support structures. The Green Drop Support Plan, developed in collaboration with the Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs, the South African Local Government Association and the Municipal Infrastructure Support Agent, is helping municipalities implement improvements. Maintenance programmes are creating jobs and technical capacity. And performance incentives are being tied directly to Green Drop outcomes. Attitude change Still, none of this will be enough without a change in mindset. Infrastructure maintenance is not an optional extra, it is the foundation of service delivery, and you cannot build new systems on a collapsing base. You cannot promise dignity while sewage flows through the streets and homes of residents, and you cannot lead without taking responsibility for what you have been entrusted to manage. The real test of municipal leadership today is not how much new infrastructure is built, it is how well the existing systems are operated, maintained, and protected. The Green Drop Report is more than just an audit. It is a barometer of whether local governance is working, and it tells us where risks are accumulating, where communities are being let down, and where leadership is absent. There are examples of what success can look like. In Laingsburg and Matjiesfontein in the Western Cape, a failing conservancy system was replaced with a modern membrane bio-reactor treatment plant. The facility now not only complies with regulations, but it also recycles water, supports housing development and creates local employment. Local leadership That success was made possible through intergovernmental collaboration. But it was driven by local leadership that understood its responsibility and rose to the occasion. South Africa stands at a crossroads. We have the policy frameworks, the regulatory systems and the investment channels. What we need now is a shift from crisis response to systemic maintenance. That means every mayor, every municipal manager and every councillor must treat wastewater infrastructure as a matter of strategic priority and moral obligation. To communities, you are not powerless. Report pollution and refrain from polluting. Demand performance and hold your councils accountable. Water is not just a resource; it is your right. When rivers run black with sewage, it is not only nature that is violated. It is your dignity, your health and your children's future put at risk. To polluters, whether through action or neglect, this is your final warning. We will act, we will prosecute and we will expose you. The time of excuses is over. The era of accountability has begun. To lead today is to maintain, and this is precisely how municipalities will be judged, not by what they promise, but by what they preserve. If we fail to protect our water systems, the cost will not only be ecological or economic, but it will also be deeply human. DM
