logo
Critical Ukraine coverage at risk as Trump slashes Radio Free Europe funding

Critical Ukraine coverage at risk as Trump slashes Radio Free Europe funding

Yahoo17-03-2025

The U.S. decision to cut off funding for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty came as a surprise for the outlet's newsroom, a source in the RFE/RL's Ukrainian Service told the Kyiv Independent.
'We understood that the U.S. president, to put it mildly, does not like us,' the source said on March 17. 'But there is bipartisan support, there is approved funding, and we had an (approved) budget at least until the end of this fiscal year. No one expected that they would cut off funding in the middle of the year like that.'
U.S. President Donald Trump eliminated seven federal agencies on March 14, including the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), which oversees RFE/RL and Voice of America (VoA). The decision terminated the Congress-authorized grant that funded RFE/RL, while the Voice of America's employees were put on administrative leave.
The move seeks to effectively end over seven decades of work of the U.S.-sponsored media outlets, launched to promote democracy and counter propaganda in authoritarian countries.
The decision was welcomed by Russian propagandists, who took to Russian state TV to praise it.
In Ukraine, the decision comes as a yet another blow to the country's media, which has already suffered greatly from the freeze of the USAID programs in January. The freeze left many Ukrainian independent media outlets, including local front-line newsrooms and investigative projects, without funding. Now, Ukraine's media landscape may risk to lose the robust local RFE/RL bureau.
For years, RFE/RL has been one of the most reliable sources for millions of Ukrainians. Around 14% of Ukrainians regularly tuned into the RFE/RL's coverage, according to a Gallup World Poll, conducted in July 2023. The same poll showed that '95% of the audience' trusted the Radio's coverage.
As of late 2024, the company employed a team of more than 100 people in Ukraine, said Maryana Drach, RFE/RL's Ukrainian Service director.
For the Kyiv-based bureau, the halt would bring an end to several prominent projects, including investigations of corruption and Russian aggression, front-line coverage, and coverage of Ukraine's occupied territories.
The team in Kyiv continues work, reportedly hoping to restore or replace the lost funding.
'Everyone is in a waiting mode,' the source told the Kyiv Independent. 'Today we heard at one of the meetings with the management that they keep fighting.'
The RFE/RL's Ukrainian Service began operation on Aug. 16, 1954, in Munich under the initial name Radio Liberation, becoming one of the view free media outlets reachable by the citizens of the Soviet Union.During the Cold War, RFE/RL faced surveillance, provocations, and even terrorist attacks. In 1981, a bomb was planted at the headquarters of RFE/RL in Munich, injuring six people.
In modern Russia, Radio Free Europe has witnessed a similar fate.
In 2017, Russia labeled Voice of America and Radio Free Europe 'foreign agents.' Five years later, Moscow added RFE/RL to the list of 'undesirable' organizations. The registries have been widely used to target and silence groups and individuals who are critical of the government, including independent journalists, activists, and NGOs.
RFE/RL President and CEO Stephen Capus said that the cancelation of the organization's funding 'would be a massive gift to America's enemies.'
'The Iranian Ayatollahs, Chinese communist leaders, and autocrats in Moscow and Minsk would celebrate the demise of RFE/RL after 75 years. Handing our adversaries a win would make them stronger and America weaker,' he said.
Read also: US foreign aid transformed Ukraine. Its suspension threatens decades of work
In Ukraine, the funding freeze risks ending several projects that were a long-time staple of local journalism, including coverage of occupied territories and investigations unveiling top-level corruption.
Since its launch in 2014, the Schemes investigative journalism program, a unit of the Radio's Kyiv bureau, has been investigating corruption and wrongdoing of Ukrainian elites. They have not shunned from investigating oligarchs and sitting presidents, having published investigations featuring President Volodymyr Zelensky and his predecessor, Petro Poroshenko.
After the start of Russia's full-scale invasion, the Schemes project started investigating Russian war crimes and Russian officials, while also continuing to uncover corruption in Ukraine.
The other two trademark projects of RFE/RL in Ukraine — Crimea Realities and Donbas Realities — served as the key sources of information about the Russian-occupied territories.
Ukrainian journalist Artem Lysak worked as a reporter for Crimea Realities from 2016 to 2019. He used to visit the Russian-occupied peninsula undercover. He covered the persecution of Crimean Tatars and the illegal construction of the Crimean Bridge.
'The Crimea Realities project is as important now as it was from the beginning of (Russia's) invasion (of Crimea). Since we know that there is practically no freedom of speech in Crimea, just like in Russia,' Lysak told the Kyiv Independent.
'It remains one of the media outlets that constantly monitors the situation and gives at least some kind of true picture for the people in Crimea. There are no other projects like Crimea Realities in Ukraine, unfortunately,' he said.
During his reporting trips, Lysak faced interrogations and surveillance by Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB) in Crimea. When his lawyer suspected that a criminal case might be fabricated against the journalist, Lysak decided to leave the peninsula.
For their work, RFE/RL's journalists have repeatedly faced persecution by the Kremlin.
Mykola Semena, a former observer of Crimea Realities, faced Russia's trumped-up charges for his journalism in Crimea in January 2016. He was able to leave the peninsula in 2020.
Another Ukrainian RFE/RL journalist, Vladyslav Yesypenko, was illegally detained in Crimea by Russia in 2021 and remains behind bars to this day.
Writer and former journalist Stanislav Aseyev, who worked for RFE/RL, said that he was tortured in Russian-occupied Donetsk for being affiliated with Radio Liberty.
'I once was electrocuted only for writing for Radio Liberty: I was told that it was 'a CIA structure and an enemy of Russia,' and for that reason alone I was already guilty,' Aseyev wrote.
The writer was abducted by Russian proxies in 2017 and jailed in the infamous Izolyatsia prisoner camp in Donetsk. He was released in December 2019 in a prisoner exchange.
'Now, the 'enemy of Russia' is being destroyed by America itself, and my torture seems in vain,' Aseyev said.
Days after the U.S. decision, Ukrainian journalists of RFE/RL continue their work, although the service's future remains unclear.
The source in RFE/RL's Ukrainian Service told the Kyiv Independent that there's funding through the end of March.
'The management hopes to get support from (U.S.) Congress, other organizations. There is hope that we will use this time effectively and will be able to somehow return back. There is an expectation that there will be some dissatisfaction in Congress, or maybe we can somehow, so to speak, cancel President (Trump's) decision,' the source said.
According to the source, support from the European Union is also considered as an alternative source of funding.
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said EU foreign ministers discussed the functioning of RFE/RL at a meeting in Brussels on March 17. The bloc cannot automatically fund Radio Free Europe, she said, adding that the EU will look into potential options.
Czech Foreign Minister Jan Lipavsky did not rule out that the European Union can buy Radio Free Europe from the U.S.
Lysak said, citing his colleagues, that the Ukrainian Service has in the meantime parted ways with its freelance journalists.
The RFE/RL source confirmed to the Kyiv Independent that contracts with all freelancers have been terminated, adding that the decision, however, was made about a week ago. This move was made to save money amid the U.S. budget uncertainty.
'If a week ago we were wondering where to get money to pay back the freelancers, now the question arises whether the service will work at all,' they said.
Read also: Who is to gain more from a ceasefire — Russia or Ukraine?
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Live updates: Israel and Iran trade strikes; Tehran energy facilities hit
Live updates: Israel and Iran trade strikes; Tehran energy facilities hit

Washington Post

time24 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Live updates: Israel and Iran trade strikes; Tehran energy facilities hit

Israel and Iran exchanged strikes into the early hours of Sunday. Iranian state media reported Israeli strikes on energy facilities, including the Shahran oil depot and natural gas installations. In Israel, missiles and projectiles launched from Iran killed at least seven people, according to Israeli authorities. The barrages — which represent the most sustained, direct attacks between the adversaries — have derailed nuclear talks between Washington and Tehran, with Iran accusing the United States of being complicit in Israel's attacks. In a social media statement, President Donald Trump said the U.S. 'had nothing to do with the attack on Iran, tonight.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio previously denied U.S. involvement in Israel's initial airstrikes against Iranian nuclear and military facilities. BAT YAM, Israel — A strike here Sunday killed at least four people and injured dozens more, according to the city's mayor and Magen David Adom, Israel's emergency services. Two women, a boy and a girl were among the dead, MDA said in a statement. At least 99 people were injured in the attack, it said, with four in serious condition. Despite the fighting between Israel and Iran, the United States remains committed to negotiations and hopes Iran 'will come to the table soon,' said one senior U.S. official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive negotiations. That sentiment was echoed in a White House statement calling on Iran to give up its nuclear weapons program.

A scrambled G7 agenda as world leaders scramble to de-escalate the Israel-Iran conflict
A scrambled G7 agenda as world leaders scramble to de-escalate the Israel-Iran conflict

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A scrambled G7 agenda as world leaders scramble to de-escalate the Israel-Iran conflict

The return on Donald Trump to the G7 was always going to be unpredictable. That it is happening against the backdrop of an escalating conflict in the Middle East makes it even more so. Expectations had already been low, with the Canadian hosts cautioning against the normal joint communique at the end of the summit, mindful that this group of leaders would struggle to find consensus. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney carefully laid down an agenda that was uncontroversial in a bid to avoid any blow-ups between President Trump and allies, who of late have been divided like never before - be it over tariffs and trade, Russia and Ukraine, or, more recently Israel's conduct in Gaza. But discussions around critical minerals and global supply chains will undoubtedly drop down the agenda as leaders convene at a precarious moment. Keir Starmer, on his way over to Canada for a bi-lateral meeting in Ottawa with PM Carney before travelling onto the G7 summit in Kananaskis, underscored the gravity of the situation as he again spoke of de-escalation, while also confirmed that the UK was deploying more British fighter jets to the region amid threats from Tehran that it will attack UK bases if London helps defend Israel against airstrikes. Really this is a G7 agenda scrambled as world leaders scramble to de-escalate the worst fighting between Tel Aviv and Tehran in decades. President Trump has for months been urging Israel not to strike Iran as he worked towards a diplomatic deal to halt uranium enrichment. Further talks had been due on Sunday - but are now not expected to go ahead. All eyes will be on Trump in the coming days, to see if the US - Israel's closest ally - will call on Israel to rein in its assault. The US has so far not participated in any joint attacks with Tel Aviv, but is moving warships and other military assets to the Middle East. Sir Keir, who has managed to strike the first trade deal with Trump, will want to leverage his "good relationship" with the US leader at the G7 to press for de-escalation in the Middle East, while he also hopes to use the summit to further discuss the further the interests of Ukraine with Trump and raise again the prospects of Russian sanctions. "We've got President Zelenskyy coming so that provides a good opportunity for us to discuss again as a group," the PM told me on the flight over to Canada. "My long-standing view is, we need to get Russia to the table for an unconditional ceasefire. That's not been really straightforward. But we do need to be clear about what we need to get to the table and that if that doesn't happen, sanctions will undoubtedly be part of the discussion at the G7." But that the leaders are not planning for a joint communique - a document outlining what the leaders have agreed - tells you a lot. When they last gathered with Trump in Canada for the G7 back in 2018, the US president rather spectacularly fell out with Justin Trudeau when the former Canadian president threatened to retaliate against US tariffs and refused to sign the G7 agreement. Since then, Trump has spoken of his desire to turn Canada into the 51st state of the US, a suggestion that helped catapult the Liberal Party beyond their Conservative rivals and back into power in the recent Canadian elections, as Mark Carney stood on a ticket of confronting Trump's aggression. With so much disagreement between the US and allies, it is hard to see where progress might be made over the next couple of days. But what these leaders will agree on is the need to take down the temperature in the Middle East and for all the unpredictability around these relationships, what is certain is a sense of urgency around Iran and Israel that could find these increasingly disparate allies on common ground.

Trump's ‘gold card' visa scheme is pure gilded nonsense
Trump's ‘gold card' visa scheme is pure gilded nonsense

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's ‘gold card' visa scheme is pure gilded nonsense

President Donald Trump announced, back on February 25, that his administration would soon debut a 'gold card,' an immigration program that would allow wealthy foreigners, for the low, low price of $5 million, to become lawful permanent residents of the United States. At the time, Trump touted the program as a 'great' and 'fantastic' revenue generation strategy that would help reduce the national deficit, which approached $2 trillion during the most recent fiscal year. Shopify just killed UX design 'No Kings Day' map, speakers, cities: Everything to know about today's protests Ram Trucks fires up a near-perfect brand apology ad 'Wealthy people will be coming into our country by buying this card, they'll be wealthy and they'll be successful, and they'll be spending a lot of money and paying a lot of taxes and employing a lot of people,' Trump said. He told reporters that gold card buyers would not be required to pay tax on their income outside the United States; that the program was 'totally legal' and 'all worked out from the legal standpoint'—and that he expected it to go live within two weeks. 'Two weeks,' confirmed Department of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, standing behind Trump in the Oval Office. When Trump estimated that the government could raise an easy $5 trillion by selling 'maybe a million' gold cards, Lutnick was unable to suppress a chuckle of delight. 'Wow!' he said. Today, though, anyone hoping to relocate to a budding police state where riot cops might shoot you point-blank for looking at them is still waiting for the chance to cut a check. In mid-March, Lutnick said during a podcast interview that gold cards would be available in 'about two weeks,' and claimed he'd presold 1,000 already. (I assume these sales, to the extent they exist, are handshake deals, since the alternative would involve the Secretary of Commerce personally collecting $5 billion and stashing it God knows where.) On April 3, Trump showed reporters a physical gold card bearing his scowling face and seismogram signature, and (again) said it would be out in 'less than two weeks.' But the delays kept coming. On April 11, Lutnick announced that gold cards would be available 'within a week and a half.' On May 21, he moved the goalposts even further, revealing that a website where 'people can start to register' for gold cards would be online in 'about a week.' On Thursday—three weeks after that update, for those keeping score— at last went live. Trump celebrated the launch on Truth Social as a way to 'ride a beautiful road in gaining access to the Greatest Country and Market anywhere.' On Fox Business, Lutnick claimed to have logged 25,000 sign-ups in 15 hours. But he also acknowledged that these are waiting list spots, and that the administration is still 'getting everything set up.' The website itself most closely resembles an especially lazy phishing attempt; its only content is a contact submission form assuring prospective buyers that the gold card is 'coming,' and urging them to provide their email addresses to 'get notified the moment access opens.' The White House's struggles to get this initiative off the ground demonstrate just how unprepared Trump is for the basic work of governing, on the rare occasions that he expresses any interest in engaging in it. A key part of his pitch to voters has always been that, as an outsider to politics, only he has the Business Guy Mindset necessary to transform the federal government from a bureaucratic morass into a slickly branded, profitable enterprise. But fulfilling his more ambitious promises is always harder than he expects. As a result, an idea that Trump once suggested would single-handedly wipe out this country's $36 trillion national debt is, four months later, still taking the form of a bare-bones website that looks like it is soliciting interest in a new over-the-counter erectile dysfunction medication. At the announcement earlier this year, Trump explained that gold cards would replace the existing EB-5 visa program, which allows immigrants to obtain green cards if they invest at least $800,000 (and usually more) in a new business, and create at least 10 full-time jobs in the United States. In a Cabinet meeting, Lutnick clarified that the gold card program would technically 'modify' the EB-5 visa program, allowing buyers to obtain a 'license' from the Department of Commerce that would entitle them to make a 'proper' EB-5 investment. In response to a question from reporters, Trump asserted that the program does not require legislation because it allows buyers to obtain lawful permanent resident status and a 'very strong path to citizenship,' but does not directly confer U.S. citizenship. In news I am sure will astonish you, Trump and his handlers do not appear to have a firm grasp on the legal intricacies here. Congress, not the president, has the authority to create, modify, or end visa programs like EB-5. Federal law limits EB-5 visas to around 10,000 per year, which is of course nowhere near the million units Trump and Lutnick imagine selling in short order. The amount of the required capital investment, too, is set by statute, and nothing in the law would allow Trump to increase it to $5 million just because he feels like it. His distinction between programs that confer citizenship and programs that only confer lawful permanent resident status is nonsensical, as is Lutnick's reference to a 'license' from the Department of Commerce. Depending on what he has in mind, Trump's promise that gold card holders will enjoy some form of VIP treatment—'green card privileges plus,' he called it—probably also hinges on Congress's willingness and ability to pass a law to that effect. Absent congressional action, Trump's best bet for making this work might involve using his statutory authority to allow gold card buyers to enter the United States on the grounds that doing so entails a 'significant public benefit,' since a willingness to fork over $5 million to the Treasury Department arguably qualifies as such. But this status—the product of a legal process known as parole—is typically temporary, and is not even considered a form of 'admission' to the United States. It also would not make gold card buyers lawful permanent residents or give them a path to citizenship, which are things that people who pay that much would reasonably expect to get in return. Given that the Trump administration has spent the last several months gleefully repudiating the very concept of parole, I understand not wanting to pay seven figures for the right to be in the country for as long as Stephen Miller feels like allowing it. The lingering uncertainty around the program's specifics has resulted in a gold card market that is likely cooler than Trump might have imagined. Earlier this month, NPR interviewed several immigration attorneys who said they'd fielded inquiries from wealthy foreigners who are eager to pay up—which is, to be fair, exactly what I would say if I were an immigration lawyer contacted by a national publication for comment about a program aimed at potential clients who have at least $5 million in cash. Other experts, though, told NPR they anticipate sales in the low thousands; one explained that callers often lose interest once they find out that the $5 million is not an EB-5-style investment that they might recoup, but a de facto donation to the U.S. government. (As London School of Economics professor Kristin Surak points out, if you're a rich person looking to pick up another passport, why pay $5 million for a glorified green card when you can buy Maltese citizenship, and thus the right to live anywhere in the European Union, for about a fifth of the cost?) Nuri Katz, a Canada-based immigration consultant, told Bloomberg that he would expect a grand total of '50 to 200' applicants for Trump gold cards; more recently, in Forbes, he hypothesized that the White House is 'backpedaling' on the proposal because it realized it would 'have to expend a lot of political capital in order to get this done.' Perhaps there was a time when more than a handful of people might have been interested in ponying up for 'green card privileges plus,' whatever that may entail. But regardless of the legal form that Trump gold cards eventually take, the basic challenge of selling them will be that that they are branded with the face of an unabashed xenophobe whose administration is waging a global trade war, trying to bar foreign-born students and academics from entering the country, torpedoing international educational exchange programs, attempting to end birthright citizenship, and snatching noncitizens (and sometimes citizens) off the streets. Chances are that if you are privileged enough to be able to pay $5 million for the right to live in the United States, you are wise enough to decide that that money is better spent on something else. This post originally appeared at to get the Fast Company newsletter: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store