Mob Vandalises Rabindranath Tagore's Ancestral Home In Bangladesh Over Parking Dispute
Eyewitnesses reported that the confrontation began when a visitor, accompanied by family, was allegedly confined and assaulted by staff after an argument over motorcycle parking
A mob stormed and vandalised Rabindranath Tagore's ancestral home in Bangladesh's Shahzadpur in Sirajganj district on Wednesday following a dispute between a visitor and museum staff over a parking fee, raising concerns over the protection of historical sites in the country.
Eyewitnesses told bdnews24.com that the confrontation began when a visitor, accompanied by family, was allegedly confined and assaulted by staff after an argument regarding motorcycle parking. News of the altercation quickly spread through the local community, prompting residents to stage a protest outside the historic property.
What began as a peaceful demonstration escalated rapidly. A group of protesters forcibly entered the Rabindra Kachharibari premises—known for its association with the Nobel laureate—and damaged property, including the museum's auditorium. One of the institution's directors was also reportedly assaulted during the attack.
News agency BSS reported that in the wake of the violence, the Department of Archaeology formed a three-member inquiry committee and ordered a report within five days. The site has since been closed to visitors. Md Habibur Rahman, the custodian of the museum, confirmed the closure, citing security concerns and 'unavoidable circumstances".
The incident has drawn widespread condemnation, particularly given the cultural and historical significance of the site. Tagore spent time at the Shahzadpur home during the 1890s and penned several notable works there, including Sonar Tori and Chaitali.
Authorities are continuing their investigation, and security has been tightened at the site. As of now, no arrests have been confirmed.
According to local media reports, the mob included members allegedly affiliated with the Jamaat-e-Islami and Hefazat-e-Islam who also raised slogans against Tagore.
The incident comes in the backdrop of escalating unrest directed at the interim government headed by Mohammad Yunus. In an effort to maintain control, the Dhaka Metropolitan Police (DMP) has imposed an indefinite ban on public gatherings in key parts of the capital. Meanwhile, Yunus's official residence, the Jamuna Guest House, has been sealed off as protests continue to intensify.
First Published:
June 12, 2025, 08:20 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Butter, repeat
Flattery may be a sin, but in a Trumpian world it gets the job done. Although it doesn't always work. How did so much European butter get past White House's gates untariffed on Monday? Between them, Merz, Macron, Starmer, Meloni and others beamed and flattered enough to fill a pantry while ensuring 'daddy' Trump didn't throw Ukraine under Putin's bus. Did they say 'daddy'? No, but Nato secretary general Mark Rutte, who was with them, did when he buttered up Trump after the bunker-busting in Iran. After all, it's no state secret that Trump loves being buttered up. And he isn't the first leader to skate on false praise. Emperors, dukes, presidents and prime ministers, cops and judges, and even Goldsmith's village schoolmaster, have been susceptible to it: 'Full well they laugh'd with counterfeited glee/At all his jokes, for many a joke had he…' But what sets Trump apart is his unlimited appetite for flattery. Like he told a gathering of African premiers, who had been buttering him up over lunch in July: 'This is great. We could do this all day long.' Generally, though, flattery is off-putting because it's insincere and motivated. Psychologists say the vast majority of people feel uncomfortable when they're flattered, and take a dim view of sycophants. The sliminess of Uriah Heep in David Copperfield is illustrative. So are most synonyms – lickspittle and bootlicker, for example. Dante took such a dim view of flatterers that he put them in a hotter part of hell than murderers. There's also some evidence that flattery directed upward – from smaller to bigger entity, for example Asim Munir to Trump – risks inviting contempt. It only works when the recipient is willing to be deceived. Like the Evil Queen in Snow White crying, 'mirror, mirror on the wall…' Or the current Potus, who, instead of crying 'whoa', receives Bibi's endorsement for a peace Nobel with a 'wow'. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
Hindustan Times
15 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
You Can't Break the Laws of Economics
Nearly every week, someone writing for a major news outlet argues that economics has failed. Our models are too abstract. Our predictions are always wrong. President Trump's recent firing of Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer is the latest notable example of this anti-economics sentiment. Let me make what appears to have become a radical argument: Simple economics is surprisingly good at making real-world predictions. When Mr. Trump imposed steel and aluminum tariffs in 2018, the University of Chicago surveyed dozens of top economists. These weren't partisan hacks; they included Nobel laureates and advisers to both parties. Not one of them thought that Americans would be better off because of the tariffs. Seven years later, what have we learned? Study after study—using customs data, retail prices and scanner data from stores—has found that American businesses and consumers bore virtually 100% of the tariff burden. The economists were right: As consumers, Americans weren't better off. Americans were also hurt as workers. Economists have discovered that about half of U.S. imports are used as inputs in the production of other goods. Aluminum goes into beer cans. If the price of aluminum rises, beer companies will buy fewer cans. Fewer cans mean fewer workers. Researchers found that because of the 2018 tariffs, downstream American industries—the companies that use aluminum to make everything from beer cans to car parts—lost jobs, swamping any gains to aluminum producers. Tariffs intended to protect American workers destroyed more jobs than they created. Empirical studies confirm a basic idea from economics: If you tax something, the price rises, and people use less of it. We don't need fancy statistics to see the predictive power of simple supply and demand. Take the recent controversy over egg prices. After egg prices roughly doubled at the start of this year, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) urged the Justice Department to investigate price gouging. Alvaro Bedoya of the Federal Trade Commission called for a probe into 'anticompetitive conduct' in the egg industry. Their theory mostly involved blaming Big Egg. But the boring story proved more accurate. The supply side collapsed when avian flu killed more than 100 million birds. When supply shrinks and consumers aren't very price-sensitive (there aren't many other options for your morning omelette), the price will rise significantly. That's a textbook case of supply and demand. The power of economics comes from using supply and demand to predict what happens next. We know that a high price for eggs is an incentive to do two things: import eggs and rebuild the supply of chickens. The latter can't happen immediately. Farmers who lose flocks wait months for new chicks to mature before they begin laying new eggs. But understanding this process provides a time frame for when prices will fall again. Economists' prediction of recovery through imports and restocking has come true, with egg prices falling in recent months. No model captures everything. Sometimes, supply and demand aren't the only factors at play. When Russia invaded Ukraine, a simple supply-and-demand model wasn't enough to predict what would happen. But even with something as uncertain as war, the basics went a long way. To predict what would happen, economist Rüdiger Bachmann and colleagues constructed a model to map how gas flowed through Europe's economy. The model was intricate, but its foundations came straight from Economics 101: When prices rise, people and businesses economize. The feared catastrophe never materialized. European gas storage filled ahead of schedule, and the Continent avoided the worst outcomes. Markets didn't erase the pain, but they softened it, as many economists had predicted. The simple economic idea in these examples is that prices change, and those changes in turn change people's behavior. Supply and demand give us the tools to understand those price changes. Understanding economics helps not only with prediction but also with designing policies. When the late Nobel laureate Ronald Coase first proposed auctioning the electromagnetic spectrum to the highest bidder instead of giving it away, a member of the Federal Communications Commission asked, 'Is this all a big joke?' Coase prevailed. Since then, U.S. spectrum auctions have generated more than $200 billion while accelerating wireless innovation. More recently, New York City's congestion-pricing scheme confirmed that pricing scarce road space reduces traffic and improves commute speeds—as economics predicts. Rather than abandoning economics because it's politically inconvenient, we should celebrate its remarkable ability to explain how the world works. There's always more to learn. But the basics aren't broken; they're underappreciated. Mr. Albrecht is chief economist of the International Center for Law and Economics and cowrites the newsletter 'Economic Forces.'
The Wire
20 hours ago
- The Wire
Viswa-Bharati Denies Permission for a Lecture on Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen
After the lecture was delivered at another venue, the university issued a notification removing the chairperson of the A.K. Dasgupta Centre, who was among the organisers of the event. New Delhi: Often at the centre of controversies, West Bengal's Visva-Bharati university has once again made headlines – this time for disallowing a lecture on Nobel laureate Amartya Sen from being held in its library auditorium. The lecture was organised by a Bengali little Magazine, Anustup, and was scheduled to take place on August 14. The lecture was to be delivered by renowned economist Jean Dreze, the Hindu reported. The magazine had recently published a special issue on Sen in collaboration with the university's Department of Economics and Politics and the A.K. Dasgupta Centre for Planning and Development. After the university's refusal, the lecture was held on the scheduled date in a private auditorium, the report said. 'Amartya Sen is a child of the Santiniketan library and of India's most illustrious scholars. It is startling that an event celebrating his work had to be shifted from the library to a local hall in Bolpur. So much for the freedom of expression,' Dreze told The Hindu. While Visva-Bharati PRO Atig Ghosh said that the lecture was cancelled as it overlapped with another heritage event being held at the university, Visva-Bharati professors said that there was no such overlap. 'Nobody is given permission to hold an event in the university exactly at the same time as a heritage event is taking place in the university. In this case, the Rabindra Saptaha lecture was scheduled to take place at Lipika Auditorium from 7 p.m. and no other overlapping programme could be permitted,' Ghosh said. However, the Rabindra Saptaha (or Tagore Week) had begun on August 8 after inauguration by Union Minister of State for Education Sukanta Majumdar, Viswa-Bharati professors told the paper. 'The real reason for the refusal to grant the auditorium is that both Amartya Sen and Jean Drèze are regarded as eyesores by the BJP-led government at the Centre,' a professor, who did not want to be named, told the Hindu. It must be noted that right after Dreze's lecture, the university issued a notification removing the chairperson of the A.K. Dasgupta Centre, professor Apurba Kumar Chattopadhyay, who was among the organisers of the lecture. In 2023, the university had sent multiple notices to Sen, asking him to return a portion of land that the university claimed was illegally occupied by him. The university had also named him in a 2020 list of illegal plot holders within its premises. Sen had denied any wrong-doing and clarified that the land was leased out to his family for 100 years in the 1940s and some of it was also bought by his father from the market following all rules and regulations. 'I could not see any subtlety in their [university authorities'] thinking. I also do not understand the politics behind this attitude of Visva-Bharati University. This is my residence which was built on leased land from Visva-Bharati in the 1940s," Sen had said. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Advertisement
