The Stock Split Announcement All of Wall Street Is Waiting for Is Back on the Table -- and It's Not Netflix or Costco!
Investors typically gravitate toward companies announcing and completing forward stock splits.
Three brand-name, non-tech stocks have completed forward splits in 2025 -- and there's more to picking out which company is next to split than a high share price.
The logical candidate to split its stock next is a cash cow with a sustainable moat whose shares are, once again, within a stone's throw of an all-time high.
10 stocks we like better than Meta Platforms ›
Although the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has been the premier attention-grabber for investors on Wall Street over the last two-plus years, it's far from the only trend responsible for lifting the broader market to new heights.
Since 2024 began, the market's major stock indexes have been propelled by some of the most influential businesses announcing and completing stock splits.
A stock split allows a publicly traded company the opportunity to cosmetically adjust its share price and outstanding share count by the same factor. These changes are superficial in the sense that they don't affect a company's market cap or in any way impact its underlying operating performance.
Splits can move a company's share price up or down, but there's a sizable variance in how these two types of splits are perceived by the investing community. Reverse splits, which increase a company's share price, are normally shunned by investors. Reverse splits are often enacted by struggling companies that are attempting to avoid being delisted from a major stock exchange.
In comparison, investors typically love public companies that complete forward splits, which are designed to lower a company's share price to make it more nominally affordable for investors who can't buy fractional shares through their brokers. The businesses undertaking forward splits usually have rich histories of recurring profitability.
While three brand-name businesses have taken the plunge and become the latest stock-split stocks this year, the split announcement that all of Wall Street is waiting for is officially back on the table.
Last year, more than a dozen high-profile companies announced a split, and a number of these companies were high-growth AI stocks, including Nvidia, Broadcom, Super Micro Computer, and Palo Alto Networks.
The "Class of 2025" stock-split stocks all come from outside the tech sector.
Wholesale industrial and construction supplies company Fastenal (NASDAQ: FAST) was the first to cross the proverbial finish line by completing a 2-for-1 forward split after the close of trading on May 21. This was the ninth time since Fastenal's initial public offering in 1987 that it's completed a forward split, and it's a clear indication that the company's strong cyclical ties and on-site innovations are helping to strengthen its relationship with core clients.
Following in Fastenal's footsteps was auto parts supplier O'Reilly Automotive (NASDAQ: ORLY), which effected a 15-for-1 forward split after trading ended on June 9. O'Reilly's stock has soared on the heels of a mammoth share-repurchase program that's seen the company buy back close to 60% of its outstanding shares since the start of 2011. O'Reilly's hub-and-spoke distribution model, which ensures that more than 153,000 stock keeping units (SKUs) can reach drivers and mechanics the same day or on an overnight basis, has also been a boon to sales.
The third premier non-tech stock-split stock this year is automated electronic brokerage firm Interactive Brokers Group (NASDAQ: IBKR), which completed its first-ever forward split (4-for-1) after trading wrapped up on June 17. Interactive Brokers' investments in technology and automation, coupled with continued optimistic investor sentiment, have increased aggregate accounts and equity held on its platform, as well as the total number of trades being completed on a quarterly basis.
Aside from forward stock-split stocks (often) out-innovating and out-executing their peers, companies completing forward splits have a knack for outperforming Wall Street's benchmark index, the S&P 500.
Based on an analysis by Bank of America Global Research, since 1980, companies have gained an average of 25.4% in the 12 months following their initial forward split announcement. In comparison, the S&P 500 has averaged an 11.9% increase over these same 12-month periods. This historical outperformance is why investors gravitate toward stock-split stocks and often try to guess which brand-name company will announce a split next.
But keep in mind that there's more to picking out Wall Street's next stock-split stock than locating a company with a high share price.
Some companies with a high share price have demonstrated no interest in conducting a split. For instance, Costco Wholesale's (NASDAQ: COST) board of directors feels confident that its shareholders have access to fractional-share purchasing through online brokers.
Even though its stock is hovering around $975 per share, as of this writing on June 19, Costco's board is in no rush to announce a split. Given Costco's inherent competitive size advantage, as well as its membership-based model that keeps customers loyal to the brand, we're likely to see its share price extend well past $1,000.
The composition of a company's shareholder base matters, too. If an overwhelming percentage of a company's shares are owned by institutional investors, there's not much of an incentive to conduct a split. Money managers aren't in need of a lower share price to purchase stock.
Even though streaming services provider Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX) is trading more than $500 higher than it was the last time it completed a forward split, less than 20% of the company's shares are owned by non-institutional investors. Despite Netflix's growing streaming subscriber count and $1,200-plus share price, there's no immediate need to conduct a split, given its low retail investor ownership.
While Fastenal, O'Reilly Automotive, and Interactive Brokers making their shares more accessible to everyday investors is a welcome sight, there's another highly influential company that appears primed for a stock split -- and the catch is it's never announced one before.
Whereas every member of the "Magnificent Seven" has completed at least one split since going public, social media titan Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) has not. But with its share price rebounding to $700 following the stock market's tariff-induced swoon in April, the possibility of a stock-split announcement is very much back on the table.
Unlike Netflix, more than 27% of Meta's shares are held by everyday investors. This is a large enough percentage that a split would make sense.
A forward split would also be a logical choice, given the strong likelihood of Meta's stock heading even higher.
In March, Meta had an average of 3.43 billion people visiting its family of apps daily. This "family" includes social destinations like Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, Threads, and Facebook Messenger, among others. With no other social media destination offering as many eyeballs as Meta, advertisers are willing to pony up a premium to get their message(s) in front of users. More often than not, Meta is going to benefit from its strong ad-pricing power.
Furthermore, CEO Mark Zuckerberg's company is sitting on a mountain of cash. It closed out the first quarter with more than $70 billion in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities and is pacing $96 billion in annual run-rate net cash from operations through the first three months of the year. Being a cash cow affords Meta the opportunity to aggressively invest in its AI-driven future, as well as to support its shareholders via a dividend and share buybacks.
Best of all, Meta Platforms' stock remains reasonably inexpensive despite its run-up to nearly $700 per share. A sustained growth rate in the mid-teens, coupled with the company's historically conservative profit forecast, points to its forward price-to-earnings ratio of 24 being a bargain.
Wall Street is waiting for Meta Platforms to take the plunge and become the highlight stock-split stock of 2025. The case for that happening arguably grows stronger with each passing day.
Before you buy stock in Meta Platforms, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Meta Platforms wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Sean Williams has positions in Bank of America and Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bank of America, Costco Wholesale, Interactive Brokers Group, Meta Platforms, Netflix, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and Palo Alto Networks and recommends the following options: long January 2027 $175 calls on Interactive Brokers Group and short January 2027 $185 calls on Interactive Brokers Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Stock Split Announcement All of Wall Street Is Waiting for Is Back on the Table -- and It's Not Netflix or Costco! was originally published by The Motley Fool
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former Washington minority owner Fred Smith dies at 80
Fred Smith, a towering figure in American business, has died. He was 80. While in most contexts he will be remembered first and foremost as the founder of FedEx, Smith had a significant impact on the NFL. Advertisement He was the father of former Falcons coach and current Steelers offensive coordinator Arthur Smith. Fred Smith also was a long-time minority owner of the Washington Commanders, and FedEx for many years held the naming rights to the stadium where the team plays. Beyond his company expressly requesting that the team abandon its former nickname in July 2020, Smith's efforts to extricate himself from the team placed significant pressure on former principal owner Daniel Snyder. Along with Robert Rothman and Dwight Schar, Smith worked to find a way out of their partnership with Snyder, culminating in Snyder buying their stakes in the franchise in early 2021. The unrest sparked by Smith and the other minority partners contributed to the focus on the business activities of the franchise as led by Snyder. There is an unmistakable link between the Smith/Rothman/Schar situation and the ultimate ouster of Snyder in 2023. Smith first acquired his interest in the team in 2003. He had attempted to secure an expansion franchise in Memphis in the 1990s, when the Panthers and Jaguars joined the NFL. With Elvis Presley's estate involved in the bid, the team would have been known as the Memphis Hound Dogs.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
With 66% ownership of the shares, FS Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:FSBW) is heavily dominated by institutional owners
Institutions' substantial holdings in FS Bancorp implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price The top 9 shareholders own 50% of the company Insider ownership in FS Bancorp is 11% This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. To get a sense of who is truly in control of FS Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:FSBW), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 66% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future. In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of FS Bancorp. See our latest analysis for FS Bancorp Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. We can see that FS Bancorp does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at FS Bancorp's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in FS Bancorp. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.8% and 6.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Joseph Adams directly holds 2.0% of the total shares outstanding. We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily. The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of FS Bancorp, Inc.. Insiders have a US$32m stake in this US$290m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling. With a 17% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over FS Bancorp. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand FS Bancorp better, we need to consider many other factors. I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph. But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. — Investing narratives with Fair Values Vita Life Sciences Set for a 12.72% Revenue Growth While Tackling Operational Challenges By Robbo – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: A$2.42 · 0.1% Overvalued Vossloh rides a €500 billion wave to boost growth and earnings in the next decade By Chris1 – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: €78.41 · 0.1% Overvalued Intuitive Surgical Will Transform Healthcare with 12% Revenue Growth By Unike – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $325.55 · 0.6% Undervalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.


Fox News
11 minutes ago
- Fox News
What the US did will 'serve the interests of the free democratic world for years to come': Gilad Erdan
All times eastern THE CLAMAN COUNTDOWN: POWER PLAYERS Maria Bartiromo's Wall Street FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage