
Is it OK not to pee for 25 hours?
On Monday evening, Cory Booker, a Democratic senator for New Jersey, took the floor to denounce the harm he believes Donald Trump and his administration have inflicted on the United States. 'Our country is in crisis,' he said, decrying the economic chaos, mass layoffs and tyrannical acts of the administration's first 71 days. He stopped speaking 25 hours and five minutes later, making it the longest Senate speech in history.
Many praised Booker for the rousing political act. Some were also impressed by a particular physical feat: namely, he seemingly didn't pee once the whole time. (A rep for Booker confirmed to TMZ that he did not wear a diaper during his speech.)
Afterwards, Booker told reporters that he prepared for the speech by fasting for days and intentionally dehydrating himself.
'I think I stopped eating on Friday and then stopped drinking the night before I started on Monday,' Booker said, according to tweets from CNN's chief congressional correspondent, Manu Raju. 'It had its benefits and it really had its downsides.'
Booker's speech was a feat of stamina and determination. According to urologists, his no-pee marathon was also deeply unadvisable.
'I think [Booker] needs to see a urologist,' says Dr Rena Malik, urologist and pelvic surgeon. 'He probably has some real bladder dysfunction. That's not normal. A normal person can't do that.'
Most people pee on average about seven to eight times a day. And healthy adults typically produce about 800 to 2,000ml – or 0.8 to 2 liters – of urine a day, says Dr Seth D Cohen, a urologist at the Preston Robert Tisch Center for Men's Health.
Holding one's pee for too long can lead to urinary tract infections (UTIs) as well as bladder and kidney damage. 'Eventually, the body will contract the bladder involuntarily to empty its contents,' says Cohen. 'This is called incontinence.'
When urine sits in the bladder for too long (say, about 25 hours and 5 minutes) it is basically 'food for bacteria', Malik says. Contrary to popular belief, urine is not sterile, and if not flushed out, can cause UTIs.
Experts also expressed concern over Booker's decision to dehydrate himself.
'Dehydration can have serious consequences, particularly for older adults,' says Dr Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh, a urologist at Weill Cornell Medicine and New York Presbyterian. He adds that risks include fatigue, muscle cramps and dizziness when standing up.
Indeed, Booker said after his speech that he occasionally took small sips of water 'to stop my muscles from cramping'.
Sign up to Well Actually
Practical advice, expert insights and answers to your questions about how to live a good life
after newsletter promotion
Dehydration is 'not recommended', says Al Hussein Al Awamlh. While some people may limit their fluid intake when they will not have easy bathroom access, 'it's more effective to stay hydrated overall and avoid caffeine and alcohol, which act as diuretics and can increase the urge to urinate.'
Besides, dehydrating yourself doesn't prevent your body from producing urine. 'You're still processing bodily fluids,' says Malik. Additionally, when one is dehydrated, urine typically becomes more concentrated, and this highly concentrated urine can irritate the bladder lining, Malik says.
Booker's speech was not a filibuster – a procedure in which senators attempt to delay or block a vote by speaking indefinitely. During a filibuster, senators can't sit down or go to the bathroom, as that would be yielding the floor. ('These rules are not medically safe and need to be evaluated by a medical doctor,' Malik says.)
While not a filibuster, it was a piece of political theater, and Booker followed most filibuster rules, saying he rose with the 'intention of disrupting the normal business of the United States Senate for as long as I am physically able'.
As he neared the end of his speech, Booker said he would be leaving to 'deal with some of the biological urgencies I'm feeling.'
Democrats praised Booker for his speech. 'Do you know how proud America is of you?' the senator Chuck Schumer asked Booker.
Urologists were less delighted by the gesture.
'While it's possible to delay urination with careful planning, doing so repeatedly – or for symbolic reasons – can send the wrong message about listening to your body's needs,' says Dr Jason Kim, associate professor of urology at Stony Brook Medicine.
People should not aspire to go 25 hours without peeing, says Malik. 'It's not a good thing,' she said, reiterating: 'Cory Booker needs a urologist.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
'Incredibly petty': Sen. Rand Paul says he was 'uninvited' to White House picnic over breaks with Trump
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said he was "uninvited" to an annual White House picnic typically attended by members of Congress and their families, framing the move to reporters on Wednesday as retribution for his opposition to key components of President Donald Trump's agenda. 'They're afraid of what I'm saying, so they think they're going to punish me, I can't go to the picnic, as if somehow that's going to make me more conciliatory,' Paul said. 'So it's silly, in a way, but it's also just really sad that this is what it's come to. But petty vindictiveness like this, it makes you — it makes you wonder about the quality of people you're dealing with.' Paul, who said he attended picnics hosted by Presidents Biden and Obama, told reporters he called the White House earlier today to secure tickets to the annual picnic but was told he was not invited to the event. He said he had family members flying to Washington D.C. to attend the event, including son, daughter-in-law and six-month old grandson, whom he noted owns a "Make America Great Again" hat. 'I just find this incredibly petty,' Paul told reporters."I have been, I think, nothing but polite to the President. I have been an intellectual opponent, a public policy opponent, and he's chosen now to uninvite me from the picnic and to say my grandson can't come to the picnic." The White House did not immediately respond to a series of questions, including whether Paul was ever invited to the event and if Trump was directly involved in the decision to "uninvite" him. As Trump pushes Republicans to pass a package of measures to fund much of his domestic agenda by Independence Day, Paul is among the Senate Republicans poised to make that milestone unreachable, joining fiscal hawks in the party to balk at legislation the Congressional Budget Office estimates said would add $2.4 trillion to the national deficit. In addition to his belief that the funding package would "explode the debt," the three-term senator has criticized spending cuts in the bill as "wimpy and anemic," called planned Medicaid changes in the legislation "bad strategy" and proposed cutting billions in funding from the bill for Trump's border wall. 'In private, there's quite a few people in there who actually do think we could save some money and are open minded to it, and believe the administration should justify the numbers,' Paul told reporters after a two-hour meeting on the bill Wednesday. 'Even if you're supportive, and I am supportive of border security, but I'm just not supportive of a blank check.' Paul said this week he plans to vote "No" on the legislation and speculated today it may be among the reasons for the rescinded invitation. 'I'm arguing from a true belief and worry that our country is mired in debt and getting worse, and they choose to react by uninviting my grandson to the picnic,' Paul said. 'I don't know, I just think it really makes me lose a lot of respect I once had for Donald Trump.' Trump has frequently lashed out at Paul in response to the sustained opposition, deriding the senator on Truth Social for his criticisms. "Rand Paul has very little understanding of the BBB, especially the tremendous GROWTH that is coming. He loves voting 'NO' on everything, he thinks it's good politics, but it's not," Trump wrote last week. Paul has emerged as a chief critic to Trump's fiscal policy, and has intensely criticized his decision to place tariffs on major U.S. trading partners, arguing they will push the country into a recession. The libertarian conservative was one of four Republican senators to back a Democratic resolution to block the implementation of Trump's Canadian tariffs, predicting at the time that the import penalties would "threaten us with a recession" and calling Trump's decision to place tariffs on major U.S. trading partners "a terrible, terrible idea." The effort has so far stalled in the House. Paul also joined Democrats in introducing a bipartisan resolution to undo the reciprocal tariffs Trump placed on dozens of countries, this time by terminating the national emergency he declared to implement the global penalties, arguing that Trump had exceeded his presidential authority. 'Tariffs are taxes, and the power to tax belongs to Congress—not the president. Our Founders were clear: tax policy should never rest in the hands of one person,' Paul said in a statement on the bipartisan effort. 'Abusing emergency powers to impose blanket tariffs not only drives up costs for American families but also tramples on the Constitution. It's time Congress reasserts its authority and restores the balance of power.' That effort failed to pass the Senate. Paul's differences with Trump even extend to the military parade taking place on Saturday, which the lawmaker likened to parades in countries led by dictators. "I wouldn't have done it," Paul said on Tuesday. "The images you saw in the Soviet Union and North Korea. We were proud not to be that." But still, in the face of his criticisms of Trump, Paul appeared to view the rescinded invitation as a shock, noting that even Democratic lawmakers remain invited to the White House picnic. "I think I'm the first senator in the history of United States to be uninvited to the White House picnic,' Rand told reporters. "Literally, every Democrat is invited, every Republican is invited, and to say that my family is no longer welcome, kind of sad actually.'


Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
US Senate rejects bids to block arms sales to Qatar, UAE
WASHINGTON, June 11 (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate on Wednesday blocked resolutions that would have halted more than $3 billion in military sales to the governments of Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. The Senate voted 56-39 against considering legislation that would have blocked the $1.9 billion sale of armed drones and associated equipment to Qatar. The vote was largely along party lines, with Trump's fellow Republicans opposing the effort to stop the sale and most Democrats backing it. The 100-member chamber later voted by the same 56 to 39 margin against an effort to block a $1.6 billion sale to the UAE of helicopters and other equipment. Backers of the resolutions of disapproval said they opposed the sales for reasons including Qatar's offer of a luxury jet as a gift to Trump and an agreement for a firm backed by the Emiratis to use a stablecoin launched by Trump's World Liberty Financial crypto venture. Connecticut Democratic Senator Chris Murphy, a lead sponsor of the resolutions, called the agreements a corruption of U.S. foreign policy. The embassies of Qatar and the UAE did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Senator Jim Risch, the Idaho Republican who is chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, described both countries as reliable partners to the U.S. and dismissed the resolutions as partisan politics.


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
A bid for bail by former New Jersey US Sen. Menendez is rejected by appeals court as prison looms
A bid for bail by former U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez while he appeals his bribery conviction was rejected Wednesday by a federal appeals court, a week before the veteran New Jersey politician is scheduled to report to prison. Menendez, 71, was convicted last July of selling his clout for bribes. FBI agents who searched his home three years ago found $480,000, some of it stuffed inside boots and jacket pockets, gold bars worth an estimated $150,000 and a luxury convertible in the garage. Prosecutors said that in exchange, Menendez performed corrupt favors for the New Jersey business owners. They said he tried to protect the men and associates from criminal investigations, helped two in business deals with foreign powers and met with Egyptian intelligence officials before helping that country access $300 million in U.S. military aid. Menendez, a Democrat, has insisted that he is innocent and is seeking to overturn his conviction. He is scheduled to surrender to federal prison authorities on Tuesday. A three-judge panel on the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied his bail motion in a brief order issued Wednesday. The decision did not include a rationale, but it said one of the three judges would have granted the motion. An email seeking comment was sent to his attorneys. Menendez, who once served as chair of the influential Senate Foreign Relations Committee, resigned his seat a month after his conviction. He had been in the Senate since 2006. Two business owners also were convicted last year along with Menendez. His wife, Nadine Menendez, was convicted in April of teaming up with her husband to accept bribes from the business owners. Her trial was delayed after she was diagnosed with breast cancer and required surgery. Her sentencing has been set for Sept. 11.