Court rules against PAB again over its disciplinary powers
A New York Supreme Court judge ruled in favor of the Rochester Police Locust Club, saying the PAB does not have the authority to discipline Rochester police officers. The judge ordered the PAB to stop issuing subpoenas to officers for disciplinary hearings.
The PAB released a statement on Wednesday, saying they will review the judge's ruling and consult with their legal counsel to 'explore all available remedies on behalf of the citizens of Rochester.'
'The Police Accountability Board (PAB) will review the Judge's ruling and consult withour legal counsel to explore all available remedies on behalf of the citizens of Rochester.The PAB was established to review civilian complaints and strengthen police-communityrelations, and we remain committed to that mission. Rochester residents overwhelminglyvoted for independent review of police civilian complaints and we will work withRochester City Council to ensure that the will of the people is balanced within theconfines of the law.'
The New York Court of Appeals made a similar decision in 2023, saying the PAB's disciplinary powers violated the Taylor Law, which required collective bargaining over the terms and conditions of employment.
The City Council has tried to reinstate an amendment to allow the board to discipline officers, but the Locust Club claimed the amendment passed without negotiation.
E2024018465_Rochester_Police_Locus_v_Rochester_Police_Locus_DECISION_ORDER___JU_103Download
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ranked-choice voting: Let voters (not parties) rule
In Annapolis, voters may soon get a bigger say in city elections. Members of the Annapolis City Council are considering adopting ranked-choice voting. It may sound new and complicated but it's actually quite simple and has been around since the 1850s, first originating in Denmark. Under ranked choice, voters have the chance to not only pick their top pick for office but to essentially rank their runners-up. How does this make a difference? Imagine a crowded primary race for mayor, for example, where no candidate is likely to win an outright majority of votes. Under the current system, that doesn't matter. The candidate who garners a plurality of votes still wins. But under ranked-choice voting, voters list their second, third, fourth and so on choices, too. And if there's no majority winner, these rankings are factored in — by eliminating the lowest polling candidate and redistributing that individual's second-choice votes and so on. That continues with bottom-listers dropping out until a candidate racks up a clear majority. What's the impact? Potentially profound. Suddenly, there's much less incentive to bad-mouth opponents or to follow party orthodoxy. Getting a shoutout from an opponent is actually helpful. Maryland doesn't have much experience with the system. Currently, Takoma Park is the only municipality where it's in use. But the state sure has a lot of experience with the downside of single voting: electing candidates with as little as 36.2% of the vote (the share Sarah K. Elfreth won in a crowded 22-person primary for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives vacated by U.S. Rep. John Sarbanes last year). Party loyalists aren't wild about ranked choice. They complain it's involved, it only helps the opposing party (whichever one that is) and can even leave the winner of a plurality in the dust if he or she doesn't fare well as a second or third choice in a crowded field. But given ranked choice is in use for statewide races in red-state Alaska as well as Takoma Park (AKA the 'People's Republic of Takoma Park' for its left-leaning politics), you have to wonder if fears of partisan disadvantage are overblown. The New York City mayor's race had ranked choice. It helped New York State Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani win the primary, but he also had a plurality (43.5%), so it didn't change the outcome. What it did cause, observers say, was for Mamdani to 'cross-endorse' fellow progressive candidates. Such teamwork is uncommon but hardly undemocratic. New York didn't choose a socialist-leaning Democrat because of ranked-choice, but did it impact Mamdani's election strategy? Probably. Polls show it engaged his base and broadened participation. And that's somehow a bad thing? Peter Jensen is an editorial writer at The Baltimore Sun; he can be reached at pejensen@ Solve the daily Crossword
Los Angeles Times
3 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: L.A. City Council has proven it can't fix city's housing problem on its own
To the editor: When the Los Angeles City Council opposed Senate Bill 827 in 2018, the average rent for a two-bedroom was $1,663 and there were 31,285 homeless people in L.A. city. When the City Council opposed Senate Bill 50 in 2019, the average rent for a two-bedroom was $1,791 and there were 35,550 homeless people in L.A. city. The City Council opposed Senate Bill 79 this week ('Denser housing near transit stops? L.A. City Council opposes state bill,' Aug. 20). The average rent for a two-bedroom is $2,625 and there are currently 43,699 homeless people in L.A. city. Los Angeles has opposed every major bill that would build housing in crucial areas and decrease the number of homeless people in our city. And now we have Councilmembers Katy Yaroslavsky, Monica Rodriguez, Traci Park, Imelda Padilla, Tim McOsker, John Lee, Ysabel Jurado and Heather Hutt to blame for rising rents and the inevitable continuing rise of homelessness to follow. These council members have shown that they cannot fix L.A.'s housing problem on their own. This is exactly why the state needs to preempt local control from them and other cities like Los Angeles. Josh Albrektson, South Pasadena
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Thousands in Mobile to vote Tuesday in new city council districts
MOBILE, Ala. (WKRG) —Thousands of Mobilians will be voting in different city council districts when the municipal election takes place on Tuesday, Aug. 26. Mobile County Sheriff's Office responds to remarks on Paul Burch's Facebook page The city created a new district map two years ago that will be in effect for the first time. In addition, since the last election in 2021, the city has added 19,000 new residents through annexation. According to the City Clerk, 29,320 residents have shifted districts. There was no available information on how many registered voters there would be. District 6 saw an increase of over 7,500 residents. District 5 has over 7,100 new residents. District 4 has just over 4,000. There are more than 3,600 new residents in District 3. District 1 saw an increase of over 3,200 new residents. District 2 has close to 2,900 new residents, while District 7 has close to 900. Municipal elections use some, but not all the polling locations used in state elections. Therefore, many people could be voting on Tuesday at a different location from where they voted last November in the state and presidential election. Mobile woman accused of robbing gas station You can view the City of Mobile's interactive district map here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
