EU countries seek more cuts to deforestation rules, letter shows
From December, the deforestation law, a world first, will require operators placing goods including soy, beef and palm oil, onto the EU market to provide proof their products did not cause deforestation.
Felling CO2-storing forests is a major cause of climate change. But despite worsening extreme weather, political will to impose strict emissions-cutting policies has ebbed, as governments worry about the financial costs.
Brussels has already delayed its launch by a year and cut back reporting rules following criticism from trading partners, including the United States, as well as from EU countries.
Of the EU's 27 member countries, agriculture ministers from 18 wrote to the Commission on Monday, demanding the EU rules are not applied to countries deemed to have a low risk of deforestation. They should stick to national measures instead, they said.
"Excessive and redundant due diligence requirements should be removed in countries where agricultural expansion is not significantly reducing the forest area," the letter said.
It was signed by Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and Sweden.
The deforestation law also applies to EU exports, prompting the 18 countries to voice concern that European producers would relocate abroad to avoid the additional cost of complying with the rules.
"The full traceability within the EU-market required for all commodities by the regulation will be extremely difficult, if not impossible for some of them," the letter added.
The countries said Brussels should consider delaying the launch of the policy again, while it drafts proposals to simplify the rules further.
A Commission spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The EU policy aims to end the 10% of global deforestation linked to EU consumption of imported goods.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
23 minutes ago
- Times
EU has few cards with Donald Trump, and it's bad at playing them
Donald Trump is treating the European Union like a plaything. Over the past three months, the president has made repeated unilateral threats of tariffs against the bloc, moving deadlines and throwing negotiations into turmoil at the drop of a Truth Social post. The latest skirmish was over the weekend, when Trump derailed hopes of a tentative 'deal' with Brussels negotiators by threatening a sweeping 30 per cent levy on the bloc from August 1. That's down from the 50 per cent he threatened in May but above the 10 per cent minimum that the EU was hoping to land on and which the UK has already secured. • Trump slaps 30% tariff on EU and says trade deficit is 'threat to security' Trump's capriciousness towards the Continent is a reflection of the US's strong negotiating position vis-à-vis the EU, compared to China. The contrast in rhetoric and strategy from the White House on the two trade negotiations is stark. With Beijing, America's subservient dependence on China's raw materials export licences, and the fact that Beijing's mercantilist export model has continued unabashed this year, shows who holds most of the cards in US-China trade negotiations. So much so that the administration was quick to 'celebrate' a Geneva accord with Beijing that, a month on, no one knows the details of. Europe simply doesn't boast anywhere near the negotiating leverage over Trump that China wields. It cannot easily weaponise Americans' love for luxury clothing or German cars, and instead is hampered by economies such as Ireland — an open small trading nation — whose economic fortunes hinge on retaining giant American multinationals on its shores. Ireland would be hit by import taxes in areas like pharmaceuticals, and even more so if Trump's larger threats force 'repatriation' of US multinationals. • Ireland has most to lose if tariffs force companies back to US Europe's messy economic relationship with the US skews the tariff talks odds in favour of the other side. But so does the nature of the EU itself. Of all the US's major trade-negotiation partners, Brussels has been uniquely ill equipped to handle Trump. The bloc has approached the head-to-head with its quintessentially legal and technocratic set of asks just as it would a conventional trade agreement. The past week alone has underlined why the technicalities of tariff levels or goods trade simply don't matter to Trump. He is using tariffs, for example, to beat up the centre-left government of Brazil, which runs a trade surplus with the US, to defend his ally Jair Bolsonaro. The Europeans this month gave up their right to impose a 15 per cent tax on US tech giants, hoping it would help pave the wave for a 10 per cent tariff deal — to no avail. It's little surprise that Bernd Lange, a German MEP and head of the European parliament's trade committee, was incandescent at Trump's 'impertinent slap in the face'. This just isn't how Brussels is used to doing things. • Trump threatens Brazil with 50% tariffs 'over Bolsonaro witch hunt' Member states are also divided about what to do next. Brussels has said it will delay planned counter-tariffs on metals that were due to come into force this week, in order to try and placate Trump. A new round of counter-measures worth €72 billion was agreed by EU trade ministers yesterday, but there is no guarantee they will ever be used. A more aggressive move to prepare ways to hit the US with an anti-coercion instrument has been left in reserve. It's no surprise that Trump keeps moving the goalposts. • Trump's tariff may make normal trade impossible, says EU negotiator A 30 per cent minimum tariff, if it comes into force, would result in a 1.25 per cent hit to the bloc's GDP over the next 18 months, according to figures from Goldman Sachs. The other growing worry for some European companies is the strength of the euro, which has brought complaints from the Continent's exporters and has also depressed earnings valuations for its businesses in recent weeks. This is a 'triple whammy' of hits for some of the most export-oriented firms in the bloc, where trade with the rest of the world accounts for about a fifth of total GDP. The euro has gained 13 per cent against the dollar this year and is about 6 per cent stronger on a trade-weighted basis — a sustained and impressive appreciation for a currency that most thought was heading to below $1.00 at the start of the year. Similar to the 'should we or shouldn't we retaliate against Trump?' issue, Europeans are unsure how to feel about their rapidly strengthening currency. There is a reasonably simple mechanical relationship between a strong exchange rate and variables such as inflation. A rough rule of thumb for the euro is that a 1 per cent trade-weighted appreciation will lower average consumer prices by about 0.1 per cent. The pass-through is usually even higher when the euro's strength is down to 'external' factors — such as worries about the dollar — rather than internal factors such as improved growth. This means the eurozone's inflation target of 2 per cent is almost certain to undershoot to about 1.6 per cent next year and could fall even further in 2027. The European Central Bank will then find itself in the familiar position of having to cut interest rates to ultra-low levels to stimulate price growth — much as it has done for the past decade with the exception of 2022-2023. But the ECB and its president, Christine Lagarde, have also made it clear that they think the world is entering a 'global euro moment' where the single currency can benefit from the dollar's sustained decline and worries over its reserve status. This is an unusually pointed political intervention by the ECB, which has been historically 'neutral' on the reserve status of the euro. Previously, it has been the European Commission that has pushed the 'internationalisation' of the euro as an explicit stated aim — despite having no tools at its disposal to achieve this. A number of factors need to be in place before the euro can play a role anything like the dollar in the world's financial system; a likely eurozone safe asset through commonly issued debt is one of them. A reserve currency is also a strong, rather than undervalued one. The ECB should be careful what it wishes for.
The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump does deal with Nato allies to arm Ukraine and warns Russia of severe sanctions
Donald Trump has said he has sealed an agreement with Nato allies which will lead to large-scale arms deliveries to Ukraine, including Patriot missiles, and warned Russia that it will face severe sanctions if Moscow does not make peace within 50 days. After a meeting with the Nato secretary general, Mark Rutte, Trump said they had agreed 'a very big deal', in which 'billions of dollars' worth of military equipment is going to be purchased from the United States, going to Nato … And that's going to be quickly distributed to the battlefield.' Speaking in the White House alongside a clearly delighted Rutte, the US president said the arms deliveries would be comprehensive and would include the Patriot missile batteries that Ukraine desperately needs for its air defences against a daily Russian aerial onslaught. 'It's everything: It's Patriots. It's all of them. It's a full complement, with the batteries,' Trump said. He did not go into any more detail, but made clear the weapons would be entirely paid for by Washington's European allies, and that initial missile deliveries would come 'within days' from European stocks, on the understanding they would be replenished with US supplies. At a White House lunch with religious leaders later in the day, Trump said the deal was 'fully approved, fully done'. 'We'll send them a lot of weapons of all kinds and they're going to deliver those weapons immediately … and they're going to pay,' he said. At his meeting with Trump, Rutte said there was a significant number of Nato allies - including Germany, Finland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands and Canada – ready to rearm Ukraine as part of the deal. 'They all want to be part of this. And this is only the first wave. There will be more,' he said. The German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, said last week that Berlin was ready to acquire additional Patriot systems. Trump claimed there was one country, which he did not name, but which had '17 Patriots getting ready to be shipped'. Monday's deal would include that stockpile, or 'a big portion of the 17', he said. Such an arms delivery would represent a significant reinforcement of Ukraine's air defences. Kyiv is currently thought to have only six Patriot batteries, at a time it when is coming under frequent and intense Russian drone and missile bombardments. At the same time, Trump expressed increased frustration with Vladimir Putin, whom he accused of giving the impression of pursuing peace while intensifying attacks on Ukrainian cities. He gave the Russian president a new deadline of 50 days to end the fightingor face 100% tariffs on Russian goods, and more importantly, sweeping 'secondary tariffs', suggesting trade sanctions would be imposed on countries who continue to pay for Russian oil and other commodities. 'The secondary tariffs are very, very powerful,' the president said. The announcement marked a dramatic change for the administration, both in substance and tone. The Trump White House had not only made clear it would continue its predecessor's policy of continuing to supply Ukraine out of US stocks, but the president and his top officials have been derisive about Kyiv's chances of prevailing. On Monday, Trump delivered his most admiring language on Ukraine and its European backers to date, with Rutte on one side and the US vice-president, JD Vance, the administration's biggest sceptic on US involvement in Europe, on the other. 'They fought with tremendous courage, and they continue to fight with tremendous courage,' Trump said of the Ukrainians. 'Europe has a lot of spirit for this war,' he said, suggesting he had been taken by surprise by the level of commitment shown by European allies at the Nato summit in The Hague last month. 'The level of esprit de corps spirit that they have is amazing,' he said. 'They really think it's very, very important. 'Having a strong Europe is a very good thing. It's a very good thing. So I'm okay with it,' he said. Trump described his deepening disillusion with Putin, and suggested his wife, Melania, may have played a role in pointing out the Russian leader's duplicity in talks over a peace deal. 'My conversations with him are always very pleasant. I say, isn't that a very lovely conversation? And then the missiles go off that night,' Trump said. 'I go home, I tell the first lady: I spoke with Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation. She said: Really? Another city was just hit.' Ukrainian regional officials reported at least six civilians killed and 30 injured by Russian bombing in the past 24 hours. The country's air force said Moscow had attacked with 136 drones and four S-300 or S-400 missiles. 'Look, I don't want to say he's an assassin, but he's a tough guy. It's been proven over the years. He's fooled a lot of people,' Trump said, listing his predecessors in the White House. 'He didn't fool me. But what I do say is that at a certain point, ultimately talk doesn't talk. It's got to be action,' he said. Russian officials and pro-war bloggers on Monday largely shrugged off Trump's announcement, declaring it to be less significant than anticipated. Konstantin Kosachev, a senior Russian lawmaker, wrote on Telegram that it amounted to 'hot air'. It was broadly welcomed in Kyiv, where there has been longstanding and deep anxiety about Trump's intentions. Andrii Kovalenko, a member of Ukraine's national security and defence council, posted a one-word response: 'Cool'. There was still scepticism however, over whether even the promise of new weaponry for Ukraine combined with the threat of trade sanctions would be enough to halt Russia's offensive. Illia Ponomarenko, a Ukrainian journalist and blogger wrote: 'How many Ukrainian lives could have been saved if, from the very beginning, Trump had listened to wise and honest people about helping Ukraine, instead of the artful lies of that cannibal Putin on the phone?'.
Reuters
34 minutes ago
- Reuters
Architecture software developer Nemetschek sees potential for $2.9 billion in acquisitions
MUNICH, July 14 (Reuters) - The German architecture and construction software developer Nemetschek ( opens new tab sees potential for further acquisitions of up to 2.5 billion euros ($2.92 billion), its Chief Executive Officer Yves Padrines told Reuters on Monday. "With our balance sheet strength, and a possible capital increase if required, we would have the strength to invest between 2.0 and 2.5 billion euros in takeovers," Padrines said in an interview. "We are looking at everything in the Planning and Design and Build and Construct segments," he added, saying that the bigger acquisitions would fall under the latter, while Planning & Design would see smaller deals. Nemetschek generates around 42% of its revenue in the U.S. but Padrines played down worries over President Donald Trump's tariff and migration policies. "There are no tariffs on software," he said. In July last year, Nemetschek, which rivals NASDAQ-listed Autodesk (ADSK.O), opens new tab in architecture software, acquired U.S. software developer GoCanvas for around 700 million euros, the largest acquisition in its history. The purchase is still putting pressure on margins, but Padrines believes that is about to change: "GoCanvas will adjust to our margin level over the years, so we expect an EBITDA margin in the 30s in the coming years," said Padrines. Last year, it was at 30.2%. With its 14.6 billion euro market cap, the company is seen as a candidate for trading on the country's leading index DAX (.GDAXI), opens new tab. Padrines expects the company to grow sales at an average rate of around 15% in the coming years, more than the broader construction software market, which is expected to grow by just under double digits. "The construction industry offers huge potential. I used to say that only fishing and hunting are less digitalized than the construction industry. In the meantime, digitalization has even progressed in fishing," Padrines said. Architects and engineering firms are also conservative when it comes to switching software licenses to a subscription model, which Nemetschek is advancing, Padrines says. "The shift there will take another few more years," he said. ($1 = 0.8557 euros)
