
New Report, Same Result—High-Tax States Lose Residents, Low-Tax States Gain Them
Moving house. Family loading or unloading moving van.
The number of movers in the United States has been declining since the mid-1980s, but millions of people still move each year. A new report from the National Taxpayers Union Foundation shows that low-tax states have been gaining residents while high-tax states have been losing them, and that this migration is impacting state revenues.
According to the report by Andrew Wilford, from 2011 to 2021 Florida gained the most residents, adding 1,591,626 people from other states. Texas was second and added 1,268,227 new residents. These were the only states to gain more than one million people over this period.
Meanwhile, two states lost more than one million people: New York lost 1,757,720 and California lost 1,632,774. The map below shows the rank of each state according to the number of residents gained (or lost). Illinois, New Jersey, and Massachusetts also lost a substantial number of people, while North Carolina, Arizona, and South Carolina gained residents.
Map of population changes, 2011 - 2021
When people leave, they take their money with them. The nearly 1.6 million people who moved to Florida brought almost $196 billion of adjusted gross income (AGI) along with them. On the other hand, the 1.76 million people who left New York took just over $111 billion of AGI out of the state. The table below shows the top five and bottom five states in terms of net AGI and population growth from 2011 to 2021.
Net population and AGI
It is not a coincidence that on average the states that gained the most residents and AGI are lower tax states while those that lost residents and AGI are higher-tax states. The average top individual income tax rate in the top five gaining states was 4.1%. In the bottom five states it was 8.6%, or more than double. In the Tax Foundation's more comprehensive ranking of state tax climates, New York, New Jersey, California, and Massachusetts all rank in the bottom 10, while Illinois ranks 37th. Florida, Texas, North Carolina, and Arizona are all in the top 15. Among the top gainers, only South Carolina falls outside the top 15 at number 33. The states in the top five also have warmer weather than those in the bottom five, apart from California, and that certainly explains some of their appeal. But policies matter, too, and high taxes repel residents, especially higher earners.
State governments raise revenue through various taxes, including income taxes, sales taxes, and taxes on businesses. When money leaves the state, it cannot be taxed (for the most part, but more on that below), and all else equal this means less revenue for the government. Extrapolating from the migration data from 2011 to 2021, Wilford estimates the amount of revenue each state gains or loses due to residents coming or going. He estimates that outmigration from California costs the state $4.5 billion in revenue annually, while Florida gains $4.1 billion. Other Southern and Mountain states also gain revenue, as shown in the map below, while states on the West Coast and in the Midwest and Northeast regions of the country lose revenue.
Government Revenue Change
Some states understand that taxes matter. Since 2021, 27 states have reduced the rate of at least one major tax, including Georgia, Idaho, and Utah. This is smart, since the evidence clearly shows that taxpayers generally prefer states with lower taxes.
Other states, however, are not getting the message. New York and California refuse to implement broad tax relief despite losing residents. Instead, they routinely try to impose taxes on out-of-state taxpayers and businesses to fill holes in their budgets. A few years ago, California and New York tried to get around the Interstate Income Act of 1959 by imposing tax obligations on out-of-state businesses that simply offered post-sale customer service via their website. California legislators have also introduced a wealth tax that would apply to high-wealth taxpayers, even those who leave the state for lower tax jurisdictions.
Instead of levying more taxes, high-tax states should fix their tax codes. They can lower their top individual income tax rates to encourage work and reduce their business taxes to encourage entrepreneurs to start and grow businesses. Moving to a flat income tax with only one rate is one way to make it easier for people to comply with the tax code, saving them time and money. Indiana, for example, has a flat rate of 3.05% and it plans to lower it to 2.9% by 2027. Compare that to California, which has 10 income tax brackets and a top rate of 13.3%. Ouch.
NTUF's report is just the latest reminder that people do not like to pay taxes, especially when they do not see the benefits. States that keep taxes low while providing sufficient services and maintaining public safety will continue to attract residents. States that insist on high taxes will repel residents, especially wealthier ones who tend to be the most mobile. Losing people is bad—bad for growth, bad for government budgets, and bad for morale—and states that ignore the role taxes play in migration will find themselves in a bad place.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
SmartRent Enhances Its Platform with AI Intelligence and Energy-Saving Features
SmartRent, Inc. (NYSE:SMRT), a top provider of smart community and operations solutions for the rental housing sector, has announced a major upgrade to its platform by adding an AI-powered intelligence layer and improved energy management tools. These enhancements are designed to help operators make better decisions that reduce utility waste, lower costs, and support environmental, social, and governance (ESG) objectives. A builder wearing a hard hat admiring a newly constructed smart home. The latest innovation, SMRT IQ, uses real-time data from connected devices to give teams comprehensive insights across their entire property portfolio, enabling quicker and smarter operational decisions. This update represents a significant shift for SmartRent, Inc. (NYSE:SMRT), moving beyond simple automation to delivering intelligent solutions that simplify data access and interpretation, allowing operators to take immediate action. Isaiah DeRose-Wilson, Chief Technology Officer at SmartRent, Inc. (NYSE:SMRT), made the following comment: "SMRT IQ marks a significant milestone in SmartRent's evolution. It delivers constant, real-time IoT-device level data and visibility into all aspects of property performance, enabling the decision-making process with insights that just weren't possible before. By combining that data with conversational AI, we're helping teams make smarter decisions faster and act with confidence at scale. It's further connecting teams to their communities, saving them time and improving business agility across the board." Unlike others that offer partial solutions, SmartRent, Inc. (NYSE:SMRT) provides a complete property operations platform tailored for rental housing. It integrates connected hardware, digital workflows, and built-in intelligence to automate tasks for owners, operators, and site teams, helping reduce operating costs while enhancing the resident experience within one unified system. While we acknowledge the potential of SMRT as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure. None. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Florida Republican foresees Trump-Musk reconciliation
Rep. Jimmy Patronis (R-Fla.) said President Trump and Elon Musk's feud wouldn't last for long, noting that the Republican Party and the president's allies are all a part of 'one big family.' Musk in recent days has criticized the president's budget bill over its effects on the national debt, which the tech billionaire says 'undermines' the work he completed at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The fight reached a fever pitch this week, with the two exchanging harsh words on social media. But as the spat continues, Patronis said he believes the two will soon reconcile. 'I don't know how many times I've seen Donald Trump throw [Sen.] Lindsey Graham [(R-S.C.)] out by the side of the street and say the guy's crazy. But then you know what? The next week they're playing golf together. This is no different,' Patronis said during a Friday appearance on NewsNation's 'The Hill,' referencing the president's sometimes fraught relationship with the South Carolina lawmaker. 'Trump knows that sometimes you're going to have falling out with those that you trust, you like, that you're friends with. It happens with us in D.C. all the time. So again. Mark my words. About a month from now, these guys will be hanging around again,' he added. The Florida lawmaker also poured cold water on Musk's recent proposal to launch a third party to challenge. 'Elon Musk is not gonna create a new new political party,' he told NewsNation. On Friday, Musk floated 'The America Party' as a potential new political faction after posting a poll for his followers to weigh in on the social media platform X the day prior. 'I appreciate what Elon Musk has done with DOGE. He's brought things to light that we're going to act upon in Congress. But the end of the day, the only friends I look at making in Washington DC [are] probably my wife and my kids,' Patronis said. 'The friends I care about are the ones in Congressional District 1 … and they elected Donald Trump,' he added. 'They did not elect Elon Musk.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
James Carville addresses his comments on Jewish campaign donors
(NewsNation) — James Carville is taking heat for suggesting some Jewish campaign donors are turning their backs on Democrats — ostensibly because they fault the party for what they consider to be antisemitic protests at Columbia University but really because they're embracing President Trump's tax policy. On a recent episode of his podcast, Carville said many Jewish people see through that argument, while others 'just want your (expletive) tax cut.' Among critics who criticized Carville was U.S. Rep. Jake Auchincloss, D-Mass., who said on social media: 'I don't care whose campaign you ran thirty years ago, that's unacceptable.' ICE arrests Palestinian activist who helped lead Columbia protests The Democratic strategist joined 'CUOMO' on Friday in an attempt to explain himself. He noted that student protesters at Columbia were chanting for the ouster of then-President Joe Biden for his support of Israel during its escalating war with Hamas in Gaza. 'Students at Columbia were chanting, 'Hey, hey, ho, ho, 'Genocide Joe' must go,'' Carville said of claims that Democrats enabled anti-Israel protests. 'You might have many reasons to not want to vote for a Democrat, but the Columbia students is just not a valid reason. I do not believe you.' Carville said Democratic presidents have long supported Israel. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.