
De Lima defends 4Ps, says beneficiaries are no freeloaders
De Lima, one of the authors of Republic Act 11310, the law that institutionalized 4Ps, issued the statement in response to the suggestion of Senator Erwin Tulfo that the 4Ps should be scrapped and should be replaced by livelihood assistance instead.
The 4Ps program provides cash to poorest households in exchange for complying with conditions promoting human development such as keeping kids in school, attending family development sessions, among others.
'Hindi palamunin ang mga benepisyaryo ng 4Ps. Hindi limos ang programang ito. May mga kondisyon ang programang ito para maipagkaloob sa mga benepisyaryo ang suporta ng gobyerno. Batay ito sa prinsipyo ng shared responsibility – sa pagitan ng pamahalaan at ng bawat pamilyang Pilipino na may hangaring makaahon sa kahirapan,' De Lima said.
(The 4Ps beneficiaries are not freeloaders. The program is not about almsgiving. There are conditions that they should meet to secure the benefit. This is about shared responsibility between the government and the beneficiaries.)
While the program is not perfect, De Lima said that it cannot be resolved with a 'burn the whole house down' solution.
'Yes, there are gaps in implementation. Yes, some abuses have been reported. But that's precisely why we must strengthen, not scrap, the program. The answer is better targeting, better monitoring, and better support systems, not abandoning millions of families who have long relied on this program to survive, recover, and rebuild,' she said.
'Over 1.5 million households have already graduated from poverty under the 4Ps framework, according to the President's own State of the Nation Address. That is not a failure. That is progress that must be sustained,' she added.
De Lima then said that if any, the 4Ps program should be expanded as provided under her proposed House Bill 1434 which seeks to include adult education, livelihood training, employment facilitation, at entrepreneurship development.
'Our goal here is a sustainable program to alleviate their plight, not just to tide them over,' de Lima said.
'Ito ang hinaharap na gusto nating ihatid: kung saan ang tulong ng gobyerno ay hindi nakakababa ng dignidad, kundi nagbibigay-lakas. Hindi perpekto ang 4Ps. Pero huwag nating sirain ang isang programang may mabuting layunin at malinaw na tagumpay, lalo na't may mga kongkretong hakbang para mas mapabuti ito,' she added.
(This is the future that we want to achieve: where the government assistance does not degrade dignity but strengthens. 4Ps is not perfect but let us not destroy a program with a noble aim and clear victory, especially if there are concrete ways to improve it.) —AOL, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


GMA Network
14 hours ago
- GMA Network
Marcos: Executive tasked to submit budget plan, make sure funds are secure
It's the job of the executive branch to come up with a spending plan and make sure that government funds are allocated to that program, and neither wasted nor stolen, President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. has said. In an interview with GMA Integrated News' Ivan Mayrina, Marcos was asked to react to Senate President Francis ''Chiz'' Escudero, who said that the National Expenditure Program submitted by the executive to Congress was subject to changes by the legislature. Marcos, in his State of the Nation Address, said that he was prepared to veto a General Appropriations Bill crafted by Congress but not in line with the NEP. He said he was ready for the reenactment of the 2025 national budget if next year's proposed allocations were not in harmony with the expenditure program. ''Trabaho naman talaga ng Congress 'yung gagawin nila 'yung budget. Ngunit trabaho naman namin na magbigay ng plano at humingi ng pondo sa Kongreso para lahat ng ating mga gustong gawin ay ating magagawa. At hindi nawawala, nawawaldas, nananakaw ang pera ng tao. Iyon lang naman ang habol namin,'' Marcos said. (It's the job of Congress to craft the budget. But it's our job to provide a plan and ask for funds from Congress so that we can accomplish what we set out to do, and that the public funds would neither be lost nor stolen. That's what we want.) He also mentioned that those foreign-assisted projects have encountered problems when it came to the budget allocation. ''Oo, 'yung pinakamalaking naging problema 'yung foreign-assisted projects, tinanggal halos lahat nung funding. Kailangan natin ibalik 'yun dahil importante 'yung mga foreign-assisted projects. At saka sinisira pati 'yan ang reputation natin,'' Marcos said. (Yes, that's the biggest problem, the funding for foreign-assisted projects was removed. We need to return that because foreign-assisted projects are important. Also, they are destroying our reputation.) ''And the worst part of this all, 'yung napupunta kung minsan 'yung mga project na hindi maganda, napupunta sa unappropriated. Ano 'yun, utang 'yun. Nangungutang tayo para mangurakot itong mga ito,'' he added. (And the worst part of this all, the fund will be allotted for projects that are not good, or those which are unappropriated. That's considered debt. We seem to be borrowing funds so that they can misuse them.) The DBM defines unprogrammed appropriations as those that provide standby authority to incur additional agency obligations for priority programs or projects when revenue collection exceeds targets, and when additional grants or foreign funds are generated, while appropriations with definite/identified funding as of the time the budget is prepared. Marcos was asked if he is prepared for a reenacted budget even if this will not be ''responsive'' to the plans of his administration. ''Well, yes. I am willing to reenact the budget if that's what we'll have to do,'' Marcos said. ''Since I made it already – I made New Year's Day the hard deadline, I'm sure we will find a way. I'm sure we will find a way,'' he added. In his SONA, Marcos said, 'For the 2026 national budget, I will return any proposed Generation Appropriations bill that is not fully aligned with the National Expenditure Program.' The Department of Budget and Management (DBM) defines a reenacted budget as a situation where the previous year's General Appropriations Act (GAA) is extended and remains in effect for a preceding year until such time the Congress passes a budget bill into law. Marcos already approved the P6.793-trillion National Expenditure Program for Fiscal Year 2026. The NEP will then be submitted by the President to the Congress within 30 days after the opening of the regular session. –NB, GMA Integrated News


GMA Network
15 hours ago
- GMA Network
House appropriations committee forms budget amendments subpanel
The budget amendments review subcommittee "will be tasked with facilitating and deliberating on proposed amendments submitted by agencies and our colleagues in the House,' said House Appropriations Chair Rep. Mika Suansing in a press conference on Monday, Aug. 4, 2025. The House Committee on Appropriations on Monday said it has established a subcommittee to review budget amendments, with the stated aim of ensuring transparency and that amendments will be appropriately addressed. In a press conference, House appropriations panel chairperson and Nueva Ecija Rep. Mikaela Suansing said that the House subcommittee on Budget Amendments Review will replace the small committee—the tight-knit unit that used to collate proposed amendments of lawmakers after the House approved the proposed national budget on third and final reading. In contrast with the small committee, the budget amendments review subcommittee will be run in parallel with the Appropriations committee's discussions on the proposed national budget. "The first reform is that we will abolish the practice of forming a small committee to deliberate on institutional amendments. There are many departments, many agencies who advocate for changes to the budget. But at the same time, we have to navigate through 317 congressmen, each representing their particular districts. How do we address that?" Suansing said. The budget amendments review subcommittee "will be tasked with facilitating and deliberating on proposed amendments submitted by agencies and our colleagues in the House,' she added. 'Ngayon po, iba na. Sa simula pa ng po ng budget process, pagkatanggap namin ng NEP [National Expenditure Program] o di kaya pag nagsimula tayo sa mother committee [Appropriations] hearings, tumatakbo po 'yung subcommittee on budget amendments review. Tuloy-tuloy 'yung mga deliberasyon, at yung mga deliberasyon po, bukas sa publiko... nakikita ng ating mga kababayan ano 'yung mga pinapanukala na mga amendments, ano 'yung deliberasyon at higit sa lahat ano 'yung mga aaprobahan at ipapasok sa ating panukalang budget,' Suansing added. (It is different now. Right at the start of the budget process, upon receiving the proposed budget, the subcommittee will also start its deliberations and these deliberations will be publicly accessible. The public will be aware of the proposed amendments, what happened during deliberations, and most importantly, what are the approved amendments in the budget.) Suansing said that the budget amendments review subcommittee will vote on which amendments to accept, subject to the approval of its mother committee, Appropriations. 'Wala na pong tagong komite. Lahat ng deliberasyon ay isasapubliko na po natin. Tatanggalin na natin lahat ng kurtina para maalis na ang mga pangamba ng ating mga kababayan. From now on, the people will witness the process in real time because this is their budget,' she said. (There is no more secret committee. All deliberations will be publicly available. We will open all curtains so the public can be assured that public funds are well spent.) In addition, Suansing said that the creation of the House subcommittee on Budget Amendments Review which proceedings will be publicly accessible is in accordance with Speaker Martin Romualdez's call for opening the proposed budget deliberations to the public. 'This isn't about optics, it's about outcomes. These changes aren't just procedural. They are political, moral, and constitutional commitments to restore the Filipino people's faith in how public funds are handled,' she said. — BM, GMA Integrated News


GMA Network
15 hours ago
- GMA Network
Marcos to officials involved in corruption: I'm sorry, you're no longer my ally
Asked what if it was his allies who were at fault, Marcos said he no longer wants to be associated with them. 'Sorry na lang. Hindi na kita ka-alyado kung ganyan ang ginagawa mo, ayaw na kitang ka-alyado.' President Ferdinand ''Bongbong'' Marcos Jr.'s allies will not be spared if found to be involved in corruption on flood control projects. In an interview with GMA Integrated News, Marcos was asked if he would crack the whip on those responsible for the alleged corruption in flood control projects. He said that in solving issues, it would be better to ''fix the problem, not the blame.'' ''You cannot fix the problem without knowing who to blame. So one thing follows another. So for us to fix the problem, we have to know what happened and where did it go wrong. at sinong dapat managot? (Who should be held liable?) Mayroon dapat naman managot... dahil sa dinadaanan na hirap... na dinadanas ng ating mga kababayan (Someone should be held liable... because of the hardships of the citizens), they have to be told who is responsible and somebody has to answer for their suffering,'' Marcos explained. Asked what if it was his allies who were at fault, Marcos said he no longer wants to be associated with them. ''Sorry na lang. Hindi na kita ka-alyado kung ganyan ang ginagawa mo, ayaw na kitang ka-alyado,'' the President said. (I'm sorry. You are not my ally if you are doing that, I don't want you to be my ally.) To recall, Marcos in his fourth State of the Nation Address warned government personnel who steal public funds, such as those for flood control projects, that they will be dealt with under the law. Marcos tasked the Department of Public Works and Highways to submit a list of all flood control projects in the last three years and publish it in order for the public to know who should be held accountable. Still, the President ensured that the DPWH would not conduct the audit or review of the flood control projects. Opposition lawmakers have said that the Commission on Audit should be the one to probe and audit the flood control projects. ''Hindi talaga, hindi talaga DPWH... hiningi lang natin, hindi lang hiningi, kinuha na natin 'yung listahan, kaya 'yung mahalaga doon sa aming pinag-usapan, na isasapubliko natin,'' Marcos said. (It's not DPWH... we just asked for the list, we got the list, what's important is that we will disclose this to the public.) Among the names include contractors, which Marcos did not specify. If proven that they are involved in corruption, Marcos said they would be blacklisted from the government. ''We already have some names that are coming up that will be, first of all, corporations that are... mga contractor... na talagang kitang-kita na hindi magandang trabaho nila (it's obvious that they are doing something bad in their jobs). So, we will put them on a blacklist, hindi na sila pwedeng magkontrata sa gobyerno (they will no longer be allowed to be contractors of the government),'' he said. Marcos said those involved know who they are, adding that some of them have been involved in corruption for a long time. ''They know who they are. They know who they are. Mayroon naman diyan talagang mga notorious, matagal nang ganito ang ginagawa. I'm sorry but they will have to account for their actions and they will have to account for the expenditures that they have made na hindi natin nakikita kung ano 'yung naging resulta,'' he said. (Some were really notorious and they've been doing this for quite some time. I'm sorry but they will have to account for their actions and they will have to account for the expenditures that they have made including those we don't know the results.) Other government projects Meanwhile, Marcos said other government projects would also be audited, not just the flood control programs. ''It has to be evenly applied, hindi naman maaari dito lang tayo nag-audit, dito lang tayo naghahanap ng mananagot. Kailangan lahat, kung sino man may naging kasabwat dito sa ganyang klaseng pagtrabaho, sorry na lang... kagaya ng sabi ko, sorry na lang,'' Marcos said. (It has to be evenly applied, it's not proper that we will just audit the flood control projects. It should be all, whoever is involved in this kind of work, just like what I said, I'm sorry.) — RSJ, GMA Integrated News