How North Korea is giving Russia an edge in the war on Ukraine
North Korea has likely received military aid in return, increasing the threat posed by the isolated nation to the US and its allies in East Asia.
Russian President Vladimir Putin long treated North Korea with ambivalence, maintaining relations while viewing Pyongyang as a potentially destabilising influence in Russia's vast backyard. But the alliance they struck up in recent years is proving to be an effective riposte to the sanctions imposed on both nations by Western powers.
The partnership is deepening as a result, with North Korea now providing a significant proportion of the weapons being hurled at Ukrainian towns and cities. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has described the involvement of North Korean soldiers in thwarting a Ukrainian incursion into Russia's Kursk region as a symbol of 'invincible brotherhood' between the two nations.
What does Kim have that Putin wants?
North Korea holds some of the largest stores of artillery shells and rockets that are compatible with the Soviet-era armaments that Russia has been burning through in Ukraine. North Korea is producing new weapons around the clock, and has been supplying as much as 40 per cent of Russia's ammunition for the war, Mr Kyrylo Budanov, head of Ukrainian military intelligence, told Bloomberg News in an interview.
North Korea is also one of the few countries with ample stocks of tanks similar to those that Moscow has deployed in Ukraine, such as the T-54 and T-62, meaning it could supply spare parts. And it's been busy churning out short-range ballistic missiles similar to some of the rockets Russia has used on Ukraine.
South Korean officials estimate as many as 15,000 North Korean troops have been deployed to fight in Russia, though estimates vary and some reports suggest that hundreds of them may have been killed. In June, top Putin security aide and former Russian defence minister Sergei Shoigu said North Korea would send 5,000 military construction workers and 1,000 sappers to assist with the rebuilding of Kursk.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Las Vegas Sands' new development part of S'pore's broader, more ambitious transformation: PM Wong
Singapore 'Kpods broke our marriage, shattered our children': Woman on husband's vape addiction
Business US tariffs may last well after Trump; crucial for countries to deepen trade ties: SM Lee
World Trump says Indonesia to face 19% tariff under trade deal
Multimedia Telling the Singapore story for 180 years
Life Walking for exercise? Here are tips on how to do it properly
Singapore CDL's long-time director Philip Yeo to depart after boardroom feud
Singapore 'Nobody deserves to be alone': Why Mummy and Acha have fostered over 20 children in the past 22 years
What's in it for North Korea?
First off, North Korea gets a powerful military ally. When Mr Putin visited Mr Kim in Pyongyang in June 2024 – his first trip there in 24 years – the two reached a deal to come to each other's defence if either was ever attacked.
Two North Korean destroyers, one of which was refloated after a failed launch attempt, are also believed to have been built with help from Russia, experts say. And Russia has helped North Korea to upgrade its electronic warfare systems, including jamming equipment, a report showed.
Russia's support represents the biggest jolt to North Korea's economy since Mr Kim took power after the death of his father in 2011. North Korea is one of the world's most impoverished countries and desperately needs food, energy, and raw materials, all of which Russia can supply.
North Korea is set to receive around US$20 billion (S$25.7 billion) in cash or goods in return for its military assistance, according to an April estimate from the Korea Institute for Defence Analyses, which is funded by the South Korean government.
That would represent a massive boost for the North Korean economy, which had an estimated GDP of about US$24.5 billion in 2022. The materials and cash from Russia help to keep Mr Kim in power by expanding his military, stabilising prices of consumer goods and supporting the construction of new factories and housing.
Furthermore, deploying troops to Ukraine gives North Korea an opportunity to test its military strategies and equipment against a combatant that uses weapons similar to those deployed by its foe, South Korea.
Since the Korean War wound down in 1953, North Korea has rarely sent its troops abroad. On the occasions when it has, it generally dispatched small forces – for example, when it sent an estimated 3,000 military personnel to Angola to take part in its civil war in the late 1970s and early 1980s.
Mr Kim's regime sent about 800 military personnel and laborers to aid Syria's government in 2019, according to Seoul-based specialist news service NK News, citing a United Nations document. North Korea also conducted limited flying missions during the Vietnam War to assist in the fight against US and South Vietnamese forces.
A former commander of US Army Pacific, Charles Flynn, has said Russia's use of North Korean missiles is giving Pyongyang a rare chance to test its weapons in combat and perhaps improve their performance.
How could this go wrong for Pyongyang and Moscow?
No North Korean leader has ever faced a situation in which the country's troops suffered mass casualties fighting in a war abroad. US officials said in December that around 1,000 North Korean soldiers had been killed or injured in the Kursk region, while Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky put the total at around 4,000 in early January, an estimate that hasn't been independently verified.
One of North Korea's guiding policies is putting the military first. The armed forces permeate almost all aspects of society. If North Korean losses in Ukraine were to mount, Mr Kim could face rare scrutiny by the military brass that underpins his authority. He'd also risk stirring discontent among the country's citizens, for whom it's the norm to have personal connections to the armed forces.
In a sign of caution, North Korea acknowledged deployment of soldiers to support Russia's war on Ukraine only months after initial reports of the troops dispatch, saying the country's military had helped Moscow retake control of the border region of Kursk. Mr Kim was later seen kneeling beside coffins of soldiers killed in the war in an apparent bid to highlight the sacrifice North Korea has made for Russia.
Mr Kim's budding friendship with Putin may also irritate North Korea's biggest traditional benefactor, China. Chinese President Xi Jinping has projected a neutral stance over the war in Ukraine, and the Kim-Putin partnership potentially undermines this position. Bloomberg
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
13 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump says he is not seeking summit with Xi, but may visit China
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump attends a bilateral meeting with China's President Xi Jinping during the G20 leaders summit in Osaka, Japan, June 29, 2019. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that he was not seeking a summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping, but added that he may visit China at Xi's invitation, which Trump said had been extended. "I may go to China, but it would only be at the invitation of President Xi, which has been extended. Otherwise, no interest!," Trump said on Truth Social. Aides to Trump and Xi have discussed a potential meeting between the leaders during a trip by the U.S. president to Asia later this year, sources previously told Reuters. A trip would be the first face-to-face encounter between the men since Trump's second term in office, at a time when trade and security tensions between the two superpower rivals remain elevated. While plans for a meeting have not been finalized, discussions on both sides of the Pacific have included a possible Trump stopover around the time of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in South Korea or talks on the sidelines of the October 30-November 1 event, the people said. The third round of U.S.-China trade talks taking place in Stockholm this week may lay the groundwork ahead of a leaders' summit in the autumn, analysts say. A new flare-up of tariffs and export controls would likely impact any plans for a meeting with Xi. REUTERS

Straits Times
43 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Taiwan President Lai calls off US transit as Trump seeks Xi summit
Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te had intended to stop in New York on Aug 4 and then Dallas 10 days later. TAIPEI – Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te called off an overseas trip planned for next week after the Trump administration failed to greenlight his stopover in the US, amid concerns it could derail trade talks with China. Taiwan's leader isn't planning any overseas travel in the near future, given the need for typhoon recovery work in southern Taiwan and tariff negotiations with the US, the Presidential Office in Taipei said in a statement late on July 28. Mr Lai had intended to stop in New York on Aug 4 and then Dallas 10 days later as part of a trip to diplomatic allies Paraguay, Guatemala and Belize, Bloomberg reported earlier in July. Planning for that trip was thrown into flux late last week when Taiwanese officials couldn't get their US counterparts to give the go ahead, according to people familiar with the matter. The US had mounting concerns Mr Lai's visit could disrupt trade negotiations with China and a potential summit with President Xi Jinping, the people said. The hesitation over Mr Lai's trip unnerved some officials in the US, as well as in Taipei, who fear President Donald Trump may concede too much to China as he seeks a meeting with Mr Xi, according to the people. Bloomberg reported earlier that Mr Trump's team was reaching out to CEOs to join him on a possible trip to Beijing in 2025. While Mr Lai's trip was never formally announced, officials in Paraguay and Guatemala had been expecting him to arrive in August, but no longer do so, according to people familiar with the preparations for his visit. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Asia Thirty dead, over 80,000 evacuated, following heavy rain in Beijing Asia Thai army accuses Cambodia of violating truce World Trump says many are starving in Gaza, vows to set up food centres Business Crypto's comeback: Should Bitcoin and other digital assets be in your portfolio now? Sport World Cup winner Fabio Cannavaro among list of top names for Singapore football coach Business BYD tops Singapore car sales in first half of 2025 with almost one-fifth of the market Asia Giant algal bloom off South Australia devastates marine life, threatens seafood exports Singapore ST Explains: What we know about the Tanjong Katong sinkhole so far Trump officials denied Mr Lai permission to transit through New York after China raised objections with Washington about the visit, the Financial Times reported, citing people familiar with the decision. It was unclear whether he was also blocked from stopping over in Dallas, the newspaper added. The rebuke will fan concerns that Washington's position on the self-ruled democracy, which Beijing considers a part of its territory, is becoming a trade war bargaining chip. In an abrupt policy reversal, Mr Trump already put on the negotiating table some tech curbs imposed on China over national security concerns. 'Trump's decision to deny permission for President Lai to visit New York sends a dangerous signal: that the United States can be bullied by Beijing into silence on Taiwan,' said former US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, whose 2022 visit to Taipei sparked uproar. 'This is a victory for Xi,' she wrote on X. 'Let us hope it is not indicative of a dangerous change in US policy.' The White House didn't reply to a request for comment. A State Department official said transits by high-level Taiwanese officials, including presidents, were fully consistent with longstanding US policy and practice, which hasn't changed. The US could yet suggest an alternative timeframe and layover locations. In 2024, the Taiwanese president pushed back a planned transit through Hawaii and Guam by several months following a Biden administration request to wait until after the US election, according to a person familiar with the matter. Mr Lai is planning to go ahead with his trip later in 2025, according to one person familiar with the plans. His planned visit came at a delicate diplomatic moment. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng on July 28 met in Stockholm for talks aimed at advancing a trade deal with ramifications for global markets. An extension of a tariff truce reached between both sides is expected and would help pave the way for a Trump-Xi meeting. China, which has branded Mr Lai a 'separatist' and 'parasite,' views Taiwan as the most sensitive issue in relations with other countries. It has increasingly opposed US interactions with Taiwanese leaders, often by staging large-scale military exercises surrounding the island following Mrs Pelosi's trip to Taipei. Linking Taiwan to trade with China 'sends a dangerous message to Beijing,' said Ms Laura Rosenberger, a former US diplomat who also chaired the American Institute in Taiwan until 2025. 'At a time when Beijing is engaging in increasingly coercive behavior toward Taipei, the US needs to be sending a clear message of commitment to longstanding precedents, not allowing Beijing to once again move the goalposts,' she added. Embattled leader Mr Lai, who won the 2024 presidential election with the lowest winning percentage since 2000, now risks looking weak at home and abroad. Last weekend, a failed attempt to unseat lawmakers handed the opposition more ammunition for its agenda, which includes forging closer ties with Beijing. Adding to the uncertainty, Taiwan's trade officials are currently in Washington for talks aimed at clinching a deal to avert a threatened 32 per cent tariff. All of Taiwan's sitting presidents since the 1990s have traveled to the US on stopovers en route to other destinations. While most visits passed without triggering heightened tensions, a trip by then-leader Lee Teng-hui to speak at Cornell University in 1995 sparked the so-called Third Strait Crisis, with China firing missiles into waters near the main island of Taiwan. Stopover requests, on occasion, have been used as a way for US leaders to signal displeasure with Taiwan's policy. The most prominent example of that came in 2006, when then-US President George W. Bush scuttled Chen Shui-bian's request to transit to Paraguay via either New York or San Francisco. That snub was taken as a sign his unofficial relationship with Washington had suffered a serious blow, after Mr Chen upset the Bush administration with a series of pro-independence policies that risked provoking China. Mr Lai's New York and Dallas stops would have been his first to continental US soil since he became president and Mr Trump took power in January. His transits in Hawaii and Guam last December were followed by what Taipei described as China's largest naval deployment in years along the first island chain, which also includes Japan and the Philippines. BLOOMBERG


AsiaOne
43 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
Defence minister denies India bowed to pressure to end fighting with Pakistan, Asia News
NEW DELHI — India's defence minister said on Monday (July 28) that New Delhi had ended its military conflict with Pakistan in May as it had met all its objectives and had not responded to pressure, rejecting US President Donald Trump's claim that he brokered the truce. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh was speaking at the opening of a discussion in parliament on the April 22 attack on Hindu tourists in Indian Kashmir in which 26 men were killed. The attack led to a fierce, four-day military conflict with Pakistan in May, the worst between the nuclear-armed neighbours in nearly three decades. "India halted its operation because all the political and military objectives studied before and during the conflict had been fully achieved," Singh said. "To suggest that the operation was called off under pressure is baseless and entirely incorrect," he said. Singh's comments came as the Indian Army said that it had killed "three terrorists" in an intense gun battle in Indian Kashmir on Monday. Indian TV channels said the three were suspected to be behind the April attack. Reuters could not immediately verify the information and security officials did not respond to requests for comment. The Kashmir attack was the worst assault on civilians in the country since the 2008 Mumbai attacks. New Delhi said Pakistani nationals were involved in the killings and blamed Islamabad for backing them. Pakistan denied involvement and sought an independent investigation. In the latest conflict, the two sides used fighter jets, missiles, drones and other munitions, killing dozens of people, before Trump announced they had agreed to a ceasefire. Pakistan thanked Trump for brokering the agreement but India said Washington had no hand in it and that New Delhi and Islamabad had agreed between themselves to end the fighting. "At no stage, in any conversation with the United States, was there any linkage with trade and what was going on," Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said, referring to Trump's repeated remarks that he had used the prospect of trade deals between Washington and the two countries as leverage to broker peace. There was also no conversation between Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi between the day of the Kashmir attack when Trump called to convey his sympathy and June 17 when Modi was in Canada for the G-7 summit, Jaishankar told parliament. Indian opposition groups have questioned what they say is the intelligence failure behind the Kashmir attack and the government's inability to capture the assailants - issues they are expected to raise during the parliament discussion. They have also criticised Modi for coming under pressure from Trump and agreeing to end the fighting, along with reports that Indian jets were shot down during the fighting. Pakistan claimed it downed five Indian planes in combat, and India's highest ranking general told Reuters that India suffered initial losses in the air, but declined to give details. The Himalayan region of Kashmir has been at the heart of the hostility between old rivals India and Pakistan, both of whom claim the region in full but rule it in part, and have fought two of their three wars over it. India accuses Pakistan of helping Islamist separatists in its part of Kashmir, but Pakistan denies this and says it only provides diplomatic and moral support to Kashmiris seeking self-determination. [[nid:720717]]