
Warning over fake Scottish Labubus that could pose risk to children
They added: "We understand these dolls are a much sought-after item, however, they pose a potential safety risk to young children.
"As safety checks are not carried out on these items, there is a choking hazard as small parts can easily be detached.
The doll in the picture below is an example of one of the dolls seized by this department. Officers easily detached the Coca-Cola can, one of the feet and the eyes. The eyes pop out by simply squeezing the sides of the doll's head.
We strongly suggest you do not purchase a Labubu doll from anywhere other than official stockists.
"If you or your child has bought one of these products from a South Lanarkshire trader, you should return the item for a full refund or dispose of it."
(Image: Newsquest/Colin Mearns)
READ NEXT: Warning to North Lanarkshire residents over 'fake' Labubu Dolls
What are Labubu Dolls? The Pop Mart toys taking over
One resident said: "My little girl and her friend bought three and they were all the same colour, so they are also scamming the kids, thinking they're going to get different colours.
"They actually tried to take them back because of this and got told no."
Another added: "Anyone buying these probably needs to take a long, hard look at themselves.
"Of course, counterfeit stuff is potentially dangerous. How much needless landfill are we generating from this rubbish?"
We previously reported that officers at North Lanarkshire Council's (NLC) trading standards department say they have received complaints from residents regarding 'fake' Labubu dolls on sale in the area.
Complaints included the toys reportedly coming apart and creating a choking hazard.
Labubus first originated in Hong Kong and shot to fame on TikTok, becoming a global phenomenon with eager fans queuing for hours to get their hands on them.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Labour plot to silence migrant hotel critics EXPOSED – ‘spy unit' crack down on social posts slamming ‘2-tier' policing
A GOVERNMENT "spy unit" has been used by Labour in a plot to crack down on social media critics. Whitehall officials have allegedly been flagging posts which criticise migrant hotels, immigration and "two-tier" policing. 6 6 Emails from last August - during the height of the Southport riots - have exposed exchanges between civil servants and major tech firms, including TikTok. Conversations show members of the Government's National Security and Online Information Team calling on the social media giants to "assess" certain videos and content online. The same team also enforced lockdown rules during the Covid pandemic. One particular post, revealed by The Telegraph, called for greater transparency on the location of migrant hotels. Another highlighted post pointed to "two-tier policing", accusing cops of treating white protesters more harshly than others during last year's riots. It comes as protests outside asylum hotels are continuing to heat up, with crowds gathering in the likes of Norwich, Leeds and Bournemouth. A Government spokesman said: 'Free speech is a cornerstone of our democracy. The Online Safety Act protects it. "Platforms have a duty to uphold freedom of expression, and the Act places no curbs whatsoever on what adults can say and see on the internet - unless it is something that would already be illegal, offline. 'The Government has no role in deciding what actions platforms take on legal content for adults – that is a matter for them, according to their own rules. 'However we make no apologies for flagging to platforms content which is contrary to their own terms of service and which can result in violent disorder on our streets, as we saw in the wake of the horrific Southport attack.' Deputy PM Angela Rayner warned the Cabinet last week that the Government must step in to address "real concerns" about immigration. And plans for a new elite team of cops tasked with monitoring social media for anti-migrant posts emerged earlier this week. They were spotted in a letter to MPs by Dame Diana Johnson, policing minister. Detectives would be handpicked from forces across the UK to take part in the new programme amid fears of rioting as the small boats crisis escalates. The division, overseen by the Home Office, would look to "maximise social media intelligence" gathering after multiple forces were slammed for their response to last year's migrant unrest. The National Internet Intelligence Investigations team would work out of the National Police Coordination Centre (NPoCC) in Westminster. The NPoCC provides the central planning for forces across the UK in terms of "nationally significant protests" and civil disorder. However, critics have labelled the social media policing as "disturbing" and questioned if they further restrict freedom of speech. Speaking on the plans, Dame Diana Johnson said the Government was "carefully considering recommendations" made by the Commons home affairs committee. 'This team will provide a national capability to monitor social media intelligence and advise on its use to inform local operational decision-making," she added. Dame Diana was responding to an inquiry by the committee into cops' handling of riots last summer. It had recommended setting up a new policing system with 'enhanced capacity to monitor and respond to social media at the national level'. Tory councillor Raymond Connolly's wife Lucy was jailed for 31 months last October after posting comments on her X account. The posts were made just hours after evil Axel Rudakubana murdered three girls in the Merseyside town on July 29 last year. Ms Connolly shared a call to arms following the deaths of Bebe King, six, nine-year-old Alice Dasilva Aguiar and Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, last July. The 41-year-old childminder wrote: "Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the b******* for all I care... "If that makes me racist, so be it." Posts wrongly claimed monster Rudakubana was a Muslim asylum seeker when he was actually born in Cardiff and raised Christian. Ms Connelly's punishment sparked fury across the political divide. Furious Brits noted that despite the former child minder quickly deleting her post, she remains in prison while paedos such as Hugh Edwards escaped jail time. A record number 25,000 people have come to the UK on small boats this year, with 898 arriving on just Wednesday alone. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage slammed the fresh data, saying: "This means more hotels, costs and more people who should not be here. "The public have had enough." The figure is up 51 per cent on this point last year, and is 73 per cent higher than in 2023. 6 6 6


Telegraph
16 hours ago
- Telegraph
It's time Labour told us: whose side are they on?
There are two ways the Government could have chosen to deal with the mass migration crisis (and it is a crisis). It could have taken voters' concerns seriously. It could have tried to understand and empathise with the concerns of those who are angry at the use of local hotels for housing asylum seekers who should surely have claimed asylum in France when they had the chance. It could even have shared the anger of parents in Southport last summer – not the anger displayed in response to the riots or the demonstrations. Rather, ministers could have echoed the rage felt by residents who had just been told about the murders of three young girls. Instead, ministers adopted a different approach. As revealed by The Telegraph, the focus of government activity was apparently less about addressing the public's concern over immigration and more about targeting social media posts that criticised migrant hotels or complained of 'two-tier policing'. It has been revealed – courtesy of a US congressional committee rather than Whitehall sources – that civil servants working for the technology secretary, Peter Kyle, flagged videos with 'concerning narratives' to social media giants including TikTok, warning that they were 'exacerbating tensions' on the streets. But you know what is even more likely to exacerbate tensions on Britain's streets than a TikTok video? The maintained presence of 'asylum seekers' from developing countries whose cultural values are sometimes at odds with Western liberal values. Which is more damaging to the fabric of our society, the accusation on social media that police officers deal more harshly with some protesters than others, even if their actions are the same, or the Afghan rapist who blamed cultural and language differences between him and his victim? The leaked emails from the Government's National Security and Online Information Team (NSOIT) were centred on last year's protests following the killings in Southport. It's possible the same unit was back on the case during the recent demonstrations at an asylum hotel in Epping, around which police had to erect a ring of steel in order to protect guests from the anger of protesters. But to what extent did ministers seek to understand the rage felt by parents following the revelation that an Ethiopian asylum seeker at the hotel had been reportedly charged with sexually assaulting a schoolgirl just days after arriving in the UK? Were they more concerned about the damaging narrative of the event as portrayed on social media? Ministers still seem not to have got the message. When foreign, undocumented, unvetted young men are placed in any local community, residents' fear and suspicion is an inevitable consequence that must be acknowledged and addressed, not suppressed. Where evidence emerges of sexual assault by one of those young men, public outrage is a natural response. The days of not looking back in anger are far behind us. Silencing critical voices is not only anti-democratic, it is positively harmful and destructive to the social contract. Rather than risk its total destruction, the Government needs to repair it. It could start by reassuring the country whose side it is actually on.


BBC News
19 hours ago
- BBC News
Northamptonshire police officer messaged teen on social media
A police officer who asked to meet a vulnerable teenage girl after first contacting her on social media has been found to have committed gross Police said it would have dismissed Mitchell Shorley without notice if he had not already resigned two weeks before his hearing.A misconduct disciplinary hearing on Wednesday heard that Mr Shorley, who joined the force in March 2022, started messaging the 16-year-old via TikTok on 12 June Constable Ivan Balhatchet said he was "appalled" by the "abhorrent behaviour", adding: "This is a serious case of an officer using his position to attempt to exploit a vulnerable young woman." The girl, known as person A, regularly posted videos about mental health and welfare on her TikTok account. She was a "looked after child" in the care of the local authority, and her social media posts reflected her personal Shorley messaged her and introduced himself as a police officer and began a series of communications, the hearing was there was a break in contact, it was the police officer who started messaging again, often under the pretext of checking the teenager was was willing to communicate with Mr Shorely but later told police she felt he had groomed her. Inappropriate purpose On 6 July 2024, he suggested moving the conversation to the social media app Snapchat, which does not retain message history and allows users to share hearing was told there was no suggestion that any sexual images were sent, but that Mr Shorley sent photos of himself while on A reported feeling "spammed" by more frequent messages once they moved to Snapchat, saying the messages also became suggestive and 13 August Mr Shorley allegedly told the teenager, "You'd look good with a police officer boyfriend", and admitted to having a crush on suggested meeting in person, which made the teenager feel uncomfortable, at which she pointed she spoke to a member of staff at her home who reported the case to police. Mr Shorley did not attend the misconduct Constable Balhatchet added: "I believe that on the balance of probabilities, the evidence proves that the former officer's conduct was cynical, manipulative and that this was an abuse of his position for an inappropriate sexual purpose."The public need to know that there is no place in the police service for people that abuse their position for their own ends or exploit the vulnerable."My decision is therefore that the former officer would have been dismissed had he not resigned." Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.