logo
US FDA Vaccine Chief Vinay Prasad Leaves Agency 3 Months After Appointment

US FDA Vaccine Chief Vinay Prasad Leaves Agency 3 Months After Appointment

NDTV6 days ago
Washington:
The Food and Drug Administration's polarizing vaccine chief is leaving the agency after a brief tenure that drew the ire of biotech executives, patient groups and conservative allies of President Donald Trump.
Dr. Vinay Prasad 'did not want to be a distraction' and was stepping down from his role as the FDA's top vaccine regulator 'to spend more time with his family,' a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services said in a statement late Tuesday.
Two people familiar with the situation told The Associated Press that Prasad was ousted following several recent controversies. They spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal personnel matters. Prasad did not immediately respond to requests for comment Wednesday morning.
FDA's drug center director, Dr. George Tidmarsh, will take over Prasad's job in an acting role, according to an agency email shared with the AP. Tidmarsh started at the FDA last week after a decades-long career as a pharmaceutical executive and adjunct professor.
Prasad joined the FDA in May from the University of California San Francisco, where he frequently criticized the FDA's approach to drug approvals and COVID-19 vaccines.
His contrarian approach appeared to match that of his boss FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, who repeatedly praised Prasad's work and intellect.
But in recent weeks Prasad became a target of right-wing activists, including Laura Loomer, who flagged Prasad's past statements criticizing Trump and praising liberal independent Senator Bernie Sanders.
'How did this Trump-hating Bernie Bro get into the Trump admin???' Loomer posted on X last week.
Trump previously fired several national security officials a day after Loomer raised concerns about their loyalty.
Prasad also attracted scrutiny for his handling of a recent safety issue surrounding the only approved gene therapy for Duchenne's muscular dystrophy.
Under his direction, shipments of the therapy were briefly halted after a series of patient deaths, then resumed late Monday following vocal pushback from families of boys with the fatal muscle-wasting disorder.
Prasad has long been skeptical of the therapy and other muscular dystrophy drugs sold by the drugmaker, Sarepta Therapeutics. As an academic, Prasad gained prominence by attacking the FDA for being too lenient in its standards for approving cancer drugs and other new therapies.
That approach is at odds with Trump's Republican supporters, who generally favor speedier approvals and unfettered access to experimental treatments. During Trump's first term he signed the ' Right to Try ' law, a largely symbolic piece of legislation that won popular support from conservatives seeking to give terminal patients expanded access to unproven drugs.
Prasad's decision to pause Sarepta's therapy was criticized last week by a columnist and the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal.
Separately, Prasad's division issued three rejection letters this month to small biotech firms seeking approval for new gene therapies.
Those drugs have been vigorously embraced by many of the anti-abortion groups in Trump's base for their potential to address intractable diseases that sometimes lead parents to terminate pregnancies.
Prasad's predecessor in at FDA, Dr. Peter Marks, oversaw a dramatic rise in approvals for new gene therapies, which aim to treat or prevent disease by replacing or modifying a portion of patients' genetic code.
Prasad has been an outspoken critic of Marks' leadership at FDA, which included overseeing the approval of the first COVID vaccines and therapies.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Agriculture a stumbling block in talks, but India-US trade in sector sees surge
Agriculture a stumbling block in talks, but India-US trade in sector sees surge

Indian Express

time7 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Agriculture a stumbling block in talks, but India-US trade in sector sees surge

Even as agriculture, along with purchase of Russian oil, has emerged as a key sticking point in the trade talks between India and the United States, here's an interesting fact: Trade in farm produce between the two countries is actually booming and poised to touch a new record this year. During January-June 2025, India's imports of agricultural products from the US were, at $1,693.2 million, a whopping 49.1% more than the $1,135.8 million for the same six months of the last calendar year. India's agricultural exports to the US, too, were up 24.1%, from $2,798.9 million in January-June 2024 to $3,472.7 million in January-June 2025 (see chart). With US President Donald Trump doubling the tariff on import of goods from India to 50 per cent on Wednesday, the impact remains to be seen, but the trends so far suggest two-way farm trade at least surpassing previous highs. If the current growth rates hold, India's agricultural exports to the US could top $7.7 billion, and that of the US to India could be over $3.5 billion in 2025. The US's exports to India have been led by tree nuts — mainly almonds and pistachios — which were valued at $1.1 billion-plus in 2024, and registering further 42.8% annual growth during the first six months of this year. The other three big-ticket items are ethanol, soyabean oil and cotton. Ethanol exports from the US to India, worth over $420 million last year, are basically for manufacturing alcohol-based chemicals, medicines and other industrial uses. The US wants India to open up imports of ethanol also for fuel use, i.e. blending with petrol and diesel. India has been resisting that, just as much as it is not allowing imports of genetically modified (GM) maize and soyabean. US farmers mostly grow only GM maize (corn) and soyabean. India currently permits imports of non-fuel ethanol and oil, produced from GM corn and soyabean respectively, but not the whole grain and oilseed as such. Although the trade negotiations between the two sides are stuck due to India not yielding on GM crops, US exports of both corn-derived ethanol and soyabean oil to India have posted strong growth. The huge jump in soyabean oil exports from the US this year is likely to be sustained by India's move, on May 31, to slash its import duty from 27.5% to 16.5%. Cotton exports from the US have also been growing on the back of India turning into a net importer of the natural fibre. India's agricultural exports to the US are somewhat more diversified. While seafood (primarily frozen shrimp) has been the top item, there are others as well — from spices and essential oils to basmati rice, processed fruits & vegetables and baked foods — that have been doing well, with annual shipment value exceeding $200 million each. It's not clear how much of all these exports would be affected, especially with the new Trump tariff. Take seafood, where India's exports of $2,483.8 million in 2024 was just behind Canada ($3,956.9 million) and Chile ($3,030.1 million), and ahead of Indonesia ($1,907.9 million), Vietnam ($1,790.4 million) and Ecuador ($1,616.4 million). As of now, the 50% tariff on India is above that of all these competitors: Chile (10%), Ecuador (15%), Indonesia (19%), Vietnam (20%) and Canada (35%). While seafood exports from India have remained buoyant, growing by 32.5% year-on-year in January-June, sustaining that may not be easy as the tariff differentials bite. But the fact that agriculture trade per se between India and the US is booming should be some consolation in the present situation where talks are at a standstill.

Trump and Putin meet in person soon? White House signals fresh push from US to end Russia-Ukraine conflict amid tariff threats
Trump and Putin meet in person soon? White House signals fresh push from US to end Russia-Ukraine conflict amid tariff threats

Economic Times

time7 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Trump and Putin meet in person soon? White House signals fresh push from US to end Russia-Ukraine conflict amid tariff threats

Donald Trump is trying to end the Russia-Ukraine war. He might meet Vladimir Putin next week. A White House official says the meeting's schedule and location are not yet fixed. Trump is also open to meeting Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The US may impose sanctions against Russia. Marco Rubio says much needs to happen before a Trump-Putin meeting. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Threat of US sanctions Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Rubio lowers expectations for a meeting Would work toward an end to the Russia-Ukraine war, says Trump As US President Donald Trump seeks to end the Russia-Ukraine war, he could meet in person with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin as soon as next week, a White House official said Wednesday (August 6, 2025). The White House official, however, did not confirm the schedule of the meeting yet and cautioned that no location has been official was not authorized to speak publicly and spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity to discuss internal plans. The White House said Trump was also open to a meeting with both Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. If Trump meets Putin, it would be their first meeting since he returned to office in 2025 after winning the presidential polls in 2024. The meeting of two leaders would be a significant milestone in the 3-year-old war, though there's no promise that such a meeting would lead to the end of the fighting since Russia and Ukraine remain far apart on their who appeared before reporters later at the White House, didn't answer questions about a potential location for a meeting, but when asked about a summit with Putin and Zelenskyy, said, 'There's a very good prospect that they will' meet. The president declined to predict how close he was to reaching a deal to end the fighting, saying, 'I've been disappointed before with this one.'Earlier on Wednesday, the same White House official said the U.S. was still expected to impose secondary sanctions against Russia on Friday, after a 10-day deadline that Trump imposed was to expire. The White House has not yet released details about the has threatened 'severe tariffs' and other economic penalties if the killing doesn't stop. Trump has also threatened to slap tariffs on nations that buy Russian oil, which could increase import taxes dramatically on China and India. He said Tuesday he hadn't publicly committed to any particular tariff rate and indicated that his decision could depend on an outcome of the meeting with has expressed increasing frustration with Putin over Russia's escalating strikes on civilian areas of Ukraine, intended to erode morale and public appetite for the war. The intensified attacks have occurred even as Trump has urged the Russian leader in recent months to to a query on a potential Trump-Putin meeting in an interview with Fox Business, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said, 'A lot has to happen before that can occur.' Rubio said Washington would be having talks with its European allies and the Ukrainians over the next few days. He said a Trump meeting directly with the leaders of Russia and Ukraine would help close an agreement, but said, 'We've got to get close enough to that point so that a meeting like that will be productive and worth doing.' 'Today was a good day, but we've got a lot of work ahead," he said. "There are still many impediments to overcome.'News of a potential meeting with Putin, which was first reported by The New York Times, came hours after Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff met with Putin in Moscow. Trump had posted earlier on Truth Social that Witkoff 'had a highly productive meeting' with Putin in which 'great progress was made.'Trump said earlier Wednesday that he had updated America's allies in Europe and that they would work toward an end to the war 'in the days and weeks to come.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement that the 'Russians had expressed their desire' to meet with Trump. The Kremlin has not yet commented on any potential meetings with met with Putin days before the White House's deadline for Russia to reach a peace deal with Ukraine or potentially face severe economic penalties that could also hit countries buying its oil. The meeting between Putin and Witkoff lasted about three hours, the Kremlin foreign affairs adviser, Yuri Ushakov, said Putin and Witkoff had a 'useful and constructive conversation' that focused on the Ukrainian crisis and, in a nod toward improving relations between Washington and Moscow, 'prospects for possible development of strategic cooperation" between the United States and Russia.

Won't be Trumped
Won't be Trumped

Time of India

time7 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Won't be Trumped

GOI has called out Trump's extra tariffs for what they are. He was wrong to think hegemony will work Three weeks from now, India will be the most heavily tariffed seller in the US market besides Brazil. Yesterday, through an executive order, Trump imposed an additional ad valorem duty of 25% on India for 'directly or indirectly importing Russian Federation oil', taking the total to 50%. GOI probably saw this coming from the time Trump's tone changed from friendly to brusque a week ago. Where he had talked up the chances of a trade deal with India on July 8 – 'We are close to making a deal with India' – on July 30 he slapped a 25% import duty along with the threat of an unspecified penalty. Now, the suspense is over. It's impossible to fathom Trump's logic. From the start, China was the presumed target of his tariff war. US runs its largest goods trade deficit with Beijing – worth $295bn in 2024. At one point, Trump raised tariffs on China to 145%, but China's retaliation with a rare earths supply freeze made him see reason. Now, China is tariffed at 30%. If Russian oil triggers Trump, China and Türkiye are also big buyers, yet they have not been 'penalised'. It may be that Trump's acting in frustration. He had boasted he would end the Ukraine war within 24 hours of taking office, but six months have passed and Putin remains defiant. Perhaps, Trump believes stopping oil revenues will bring Putin to the table. And since he seems unable to touch China for now, India possibly seems like a softer target to him. But this is a huge mistake. For almost 80 years, India has refused to be cowed by hegemons. Yesterday, it termed Trump's action 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable' and made it clear it will 'take all actions necessary to protect its national interests'. As TOI has said before, the current discount on Russian oil is so little that India saves not more than $2bn a year. It could easily pivot to West Asian oil, but the resultant increase in crude prices would hurt all. Besides, if India chooses to pivot, it won't be on Trump's terms. While negotiations with US will continue, Indian exporters are under pressure, so deals with other countries must be prioritised. India should also look beyond goods exports – tourism, for instance – to increase forex earnings. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store