logo
Fiscal Court approves $46.3 million budget for upcoming fiscal year

Fiscal Court approves $46.3 million budget for upcoming fiscal year

Yahooa day ago

The Laurel County Fiscal Court approved a $46,345,254 budget for the 2025-2026 fiscal year Monday during its regular meeting that morning.
The court conducted the second reading and formally adopted Ordinance #222.96, finalizing allocations across several county funds. The breakdown of budgeted appropriations is as follows:
— General Fund: $17,277,585
— Road Fund: $5,698,780
— Jail Fund: $13,841,000
— Local Government Economic Assistance Fund: $37,020
— Forestry Fund: $9,003
— Occupational Tax Fund: $8,216,324
— Opioid Settlement Fund: $1,083,000
— LEPC (Local Emergency Planning Committee) Fund: $6,502
— County Clerk Storage Fees Fund: $176,080.
A first reading of Ordinance #231.4 — a personnel policy and procedures amendment — was also conducted. Judge-Executive David Westerfield said the policy will most notably change the county's starting pay from $14 an hour to $16.
Each of the items on Monday's agenda were approved, including multiple grant and application authorizations. There was no discussion surrounding the resolutions. These included:
— RES #2025-05: Extending utilities on Greta Lane
— RES #2025-06: KDPI (Kentucky Product Development Initiative) grant authorization
— RES #2025-07: EDF application for Durango One, LLC
Additionally, the court approved the appointment of Taylor McDaniel to the London-Laurel County 911 Board. McDaniel was appointed due to Robbie Grime's recent resignation with the Laurel County Sheriff's Office, meaning LCSO had no presence at the meetings.
Similarly, David Williams was also approved as trustee at the Bush Fire Department. The court also hired Kyle House to work with the Road Department.
Further, the court reviewed and approved the county's fiscal year-end audit for June 30, 2023, as well as the accounts payables.
The meeting adjourned with the adoption of the 2025-2026 budget.
Laurel County Fiscal Court regularly meets at 8:45 a.m. on the second Monday and 9:30 a.m. on the final Thursday of each month. The Fiscal Court's next meeting will take place Thursday, June 26.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Albuquerque RENT Ordinance fails in committee after landlord pushback
Albuquerque RENT Ordinance fails in committee after landlord pushback

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Albuquerque RENT Ordinance fails in committee after landlord pushback

Jun. 11—An Albuquerque City Council committee on Wednesday voted down a proposed set of regulations intended to increase the power of renters and comprehensively regulate landlords after the latter expressed concern that the bill was an overreach and would negatively affect the rental market. The bill died after 3-2 vote in the Land Use, Planning, and Zoning Committee. But Shanna Schultz, policy and government affairs administrator for the city, who wrote the bill on behalf of Mayor Tim Keller, left open the possibility of another similar bill in the future. "I understand the intent of this bill. But I also think there are a lot of unintended consequences," said Councilor Renée Grout. In its original form, the Renter's Empowerment and Neighborhood Transparency (RENT) Ordinance would've affected almost every element of the renting experience, from signing a lease to evictions and deposits. The RENT Ordinance sought to give renters more power over their landlords, according to Councilor Tammy Fiebelkorn, who sponsored the bill on behalf of the mayor's office. The measure, styled as a "Renters Bill of Rights," comes as the council has required landlords to provide cooling to tenants and created a code enforcement position dedicated to tenant-landlord issues. It also comes as the city faces an escalating housing crisis. Some of the bill's most notable changes aimed to enhance transparency. The RENT Ordinance would've required landlords to disclose all costs associated with a rental agreement in clear, straightforward language in their published listings. This included any information from a background check that might disqualify an applicant, as well as minimum credit score and income requirements. Another notable part of the RENT Ordinance would have eliminated pet rent. Landlords could accept a pet deposit of up to $150. The RENT Ordinance drew support from some renters and housing advocates, including OLÉ New Mexico. They said the ordinance would hold bad landlords accountable and improve the living conditions of renters, who make up about 44% of Albuquerque residents, according to U.S. Census Bureau data. The bill also drew concern from landlords, some realtors, and property management companies. They argued the ordinance infringed on property rights, increased their liability since tenants could deduct repair costs from rent payments in some instances, and would lead to higher rents. Ultimately, Fiebelkorn was joined by Councilor Nichole Rogers in trying to keep the bill alive. Councilors Dan Champine and Brook Bassan joined Grout in voting to end the bill.

Fiscal Court approves $46.3 million budget for upcoming fiscal year
Fiscal Court approves $46.3 million budget for upcoming fiscal year

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Fiscal Court approves $46.3 million budget for upcoming fiscal year

The Laurel County Fiscal Court approved a $46,345,254 budget for the 2025-2026 fiscal year Monday during its regular meeting that morning. The court conducted the second reading and formally adopted Ordinance #222.96, finalizing allocations across several county funds. The breakdown of budgeted appropriations is as follows: — General Fund: $17,277,585 — Road Fund: $5,698,780 — Jail Fund: $13,841,000 — Local Government Economic Assistance Fund: $37,020 — Forestry Fund: $9,003 — Occupational Tax Fund: $8,216,324 — Opioid Settlement Fund: $1,083,000 — LEPC (Local Emergency Planning Committee) Fund: $6,502 — County Clerk Storage Fees Fund: $176,080. A first reading of Ordinance #231.4 — a personnel policy and procedures amendment — was also conducted. Judge-Executive David Westerfield said the policy will most notably change the county's starting pay from $14 an hour to $16. Each of the items on Monday's agenda were approved, including multiple grant and application authorizations. There was no discussion surrounding the resolutions. These included: — RES #2025-05: Extending utilities on Greta Lane — RES #2025-06: KDPI (Kentucky Product Development Initiative) grant authorization — RES #2025-07: EDF application for Durango One, LLC Additionally, the court approved the appointment of Taylor McDaniel to the London-Laurel County 911 Board. McDaniel was appointed due to Robbie Grime's recent resignation with the Laurel County Sheriff's Office, meaning LCSO had no presence at the meetings. Similarly, David Williams was also approved as trustee at the Bush Fire Department. The court also hired Kyle House to work with the Road Department. Further, the court reviewed and approved the county's fiscal year-end audit for June 30, 2023, as well as the accounts payables. The meeting adjourned with the adoption of the 2025-2026 budget. Laurel County Fiscal Court regularly meets at 8:45 a.m. on the second Monday and 9:30 a.m. on the final Thursday of each month. The Fiscal Court's next meeting will take place Thursday, June 26.

San Jose leaders approve mayor's "Responsibility to Shelter" ordinance for unhoused
San Jose leaders approve mayor's "Responsibility to Shelter" ordinance for unhoused

CBS News

time2 days ago

  • CBS News

San Jose leaders approve mayor's "Responsibility to Shelter" ordinance for unhoused

The San Jose City Council approved a controversial ordinance on homelessness at its regular meeting on Tuesday. It's called the "Responsibility to Shelter". Critics say it criminalizes homelessness, while supporters say it finally gives the city the tools it needs to meaningfully address the crisis. The approval of the ordinance signifies a major shift in policy. "Over here in Columbus Park, yeah, I'm the longest tenured resident," says Eugene Blackwell. He's been at the city's largest encampment for the past five years and says he's gone to temporary shelters in the past. Blackwell was back on the streets after he was unable to get permanent housing. "You know it's a hard transition because you get used to being indoors and you get used to being in a hotel room, then all at once you have to come back to the streets," he told CBS News Bay Area. Residents living in RVs on the streets of San Jose as of June 2025. CBS His home is a box truck. Blackwell said if he were to go into a temporary shelter again, he's worried the city might tow it. "You know you already gave up everything, and lost everything out here, so when you come back out here, there's pretty much nothing to come back to," he says. The "Responsibility to Shelter" ordinance requires unhoused residents to accept the offer of shelter if the city provides it. For the first two refusals, the unhoused person could be cited - and if they refuse three times in 18 months, they could be arrested. "Our expectation is that there will be intervention, including law enforcement intervention, if you repeatedly refuse an appropriate shelter placement," San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan said Tuesday. Mahan said outreach workers would have discretion over whether to refer cases to police. The mayor said the idea isn't to criminalize homelessness, but instead use the tools at the city's disposal to get people the help they need. The ordinance has been endorsed by both the San Jose Police and Firefighters Unions as well as the Japantown Business Association. "The city is out of tools. We're asking our community to spend hundreds of millions of dollars building interim housing, converting motels, modular units. At some point we have to acknowledge that a small subset of folks on our streets simply are unable or unwilling to accept and benefit from what the city can do," Mahan said. For those like Eugene, the answer isn't that simple. "You know we didn't get out here alone, and we're not going to make it out of here alone. The mayor can't fix this problem alone, and neither can the citizens. We all have to work together," he said. The newly approved ordinance goes into effect on July 1st, but city staff said it could take anywhere from 60 to 90 days ramp up before any enforcement actions begin.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store