
Tesla Could Escape Brunt Of Trump's Tariffs While Other Brands Suffer
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Elon Musk's Tesla will remain largely unscathed from the expected negative impact of Donald Trump's tariffs on the U.S. and global car industry, experts have told Newsweek.
Digital insurance agent Insurify expects the billionaire's company to see a modest 5 percent increase on sales prices as a result of the Trump administration's policies, while car sales prices in the U.S., in general, face an average 15 percent increase.
Why It Matters
Tariffs imposed by the Trump administration have received significant backlash from the U.S. auto industry, to the point that the president announced a softening of the policies in late April.
While Trump has presented his tariffs as a way of helping American manufacturing thrive against global competitors, companies and dealerships have expressed concern over rising costs, which are expected to bring up prices for U.S. consumers in the short term.
What To Know
In April, the Trump administration introduced a 25 percent tax on cars imported into the U.S. Earlier this month, a 25 percent import tax on engines, transmissions, and other crucial car parts came into effect.
These levies are expected to have enormous consequences on the U.S. car market, considering that nearly half all vehicles sold in the country last year were imported from outside the nation. Additionally, many U.S. manufacturers rely on parts imported from abroad.
According to Insurify's early projections, new car sales prices in the U.S. will increase by about 15 percent as a result of Trump's tariffs on the U.S. trading partners, and insurance costs will rise by 6 percent. Some foreign-assembled models might see price hikes of up to 25 percent.
"About 75 percent of the materials used in vehicles purchased by Americans come from outside the U.S., according to the White House," Insurify's Matt Brannon told Newsweek. "Tariffs have raised the cost of those automobile imports and auto parts imports, which will in turn make car prices more expensive because they are pricier to produce."
People walk by a Tesla showroom on May 1, 2025, in San Diego, California.
People walk by a Tesla showroom on May 1, 2025, in San Diego, California.When it comes to insurance, carriers will be facing higher costs for repairs or replacements, and they are likely to take that into account when they set rates, transferring the financial burden to customers.
"Tariffs could increase car insurance rates for all models, but newer models are facing larger increases because more expensive cars are generally more costly to insure, and they may require more specific parts," Brannon said.
"Because of the auto parts cost increase, insurers will have to spend more money on repair claims, and the consensus is that to avoid excessive losses, insurers will pass those costs to policyholders through higher premiums."
Newsweek contacted Tesla for comment by email on Friday morning.
Modest Price Hikes for Tesla, While Buick and Hyundai Will See Massive Increases
Tesla will be among the least affected companies, Insurify experts found, with the company's sales prices expected to rise by only 5 percent and insurance costs by 3 percent—the lowest increases of the brands analyzed by the team.
"Tesla's most popular new models, the Model X and Model 3, are assembled in the U.S. with at least 60 percent domestic content," Brannon explained.
"So, compared to other popular models, these Teslas have a smaller share of foreign material that would be tariffed. Additionally, the Tesla content that is foreign is mainly sourced from Mexico, which faces lower tariff rates for autos compared to vehicle content from nations that aren't part of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA)," he added.
The Tesla Model 3 contains 73 percent of U.S. content, and the Model X is made up of 60 percent of U.S. content, according to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration data.
"While these vehicles would still see both cost and insurance rate increases, we expect those increases will be much smaller compared to models that have a higher percentage of foreign content," Brannon said.
Musk previously said that tariffs won't impact Tesla as much as other U.S. automakers, as the company has "localized supply chains" in North America, Europe, and China. The billionaire, who has recently taken a step back from his prominent role in the Trump administration, said that he opposes high or unpredictable tariffs, but stated that it is "entirely up to the president of the United States" to decide on them.
Buick and Hyundai, on the other hand, will face the highest price increases at 22 percent, according to Insurify's projections, followed by Kia at 21 percent. Another company that, like Tesla, will see only modest increases is Jeep, at a projected 6 percent.
Of the 100 bestselling new models analyzed by Insurify, 22 could face both a 25 percent increase in sales prices and a 9 percent increase in annual insurance costs—what Brannon said are the maximum potential increases according to their projections.
That includes seven of the top 50 bestselling new models of 2025: the Toyota RAV4, Chevrolet Trax, Subaru Forester, Mazda CX-5, Hyundai Elantra, Chevrolet Trailblazer, and Hyundai Palisade, Brannon explained.
Of the three most popular new car models in the U.S., the Toyota RAV4 would see the highest projected cost increase due to tariffs, at 25 percent, followed by the Chevrolet Silverado (12 percent) and Ford F-series (11 percent).
Risk Of Higher Insurance For Teslas
Widespread anger against Musk and his role in massive cuts to the federal workforce implemented by his Department of Government Efficiency has brewed across the country in recent months and exploded in acts of vandalism against Tesla cars and dealerships.
These incidents, should they continue, could fuel insurance rate hikes for Tesla vehicles, experts say.
"If rates of Tesla vandalism continue to rise and don't decrease, it is possible that we could see premiums for these vehicles rise in the future," Brannon said.
"However, it could take months before we have hard evidence of targeted Tesla vandalism raising rates for Tesla models in general—vehicles that haven't actually been vandalized," he added.
"If a Tesla owner has already had their vehicle vandalized, they are likely to pay more in premiums if they file a vandalism claim because insurers typically raise rates on individuals who file a claim, since the claim is evidence that the policyholder presents additional financial risk to the insurer," Brannon said.
What Happens Next
Tesla's resilience to the Trump administration's tariffs might help the company at a time of difficulties, though Musk himself said that the company won't be completely unscathed by tariffs and will still suffer their impact.
Last month, Tesla quarterly earnings and sales reported a 20 percent year-over-year fall in revenue and a 71 percent drop in net income.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans and Economists at Odds Over Whether Megabill Will Spur Growth Boom
WASHINGTON—Republicans see a golden age of prosperity ahead, driven by the tax-and-spending megabill they are trying to push through Congress by July 4. Nonpartisan experts project far more modest effects, forecasting a slight near-term economic expansion and larger federal budget deficits. The growth debate is at the core of this summer's fiscal fight. Republicans are trying to focus public attention on growth—from tax cuts, deregulation and fossil-fuel production—and play down the Congressional Budget Office estimate that the bill would increase budget deficits by $2.4 trillion through 2034. The White House highlights growth to bolster congressional support, countering claims from Elon Musk and others that the package irresponsibly darkens America's fiscal picture. 'Sextortion' Scams Involving Apple Messages Ended in Tragedy for These Boys The U.S. Economy Is Headed Toward an Uncomfortable Summer I Got Burned by the 401(k) 'Hierarchy Trap' Test Yourself Against These Teen Personal-Finance Whizzes, Round 2 Republicans and outside economists agree on the basic direction: tax cuts increase consumer spending and business investment, accelerating short-term growth. But they differ vastly on how large and meaningful that jump would be. The bill, according to public- and private-sector economists, would fall far short of Republicans' hoped-for boom. 'We would expect some dynamic revenue, some revenue feedback in that larger economy,' said Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the Tax Foundation, which favors lower tax rates and a simpler system. 'But it wouldn't come close to paying for itself.' President Trump said in a social-media post last month that the U.S. annual growth rate would triple or even quintuple the 1.8% in CBO's January forecast, which doesn't incorporate the effects of any GOP policies. Since 2005, real U.S. gross domestic product growth hit or exceeded 3% twice: in 2018 after the 2017 tax cuts, and in 2021 during the recovery from the pandemic. House Republicans assume a 2.6% growth rate, yielding enough revenue to cover the megabill's deficits. 'The economy is going to explode in capital formation. Jobs will increase. Wages will increase,' Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo (R., Idaho) said after meeting with Trump last week. 'We're going to see the kind of growth and strength that this country wants.' Broadly, economists across the political spectrum discount elected officials' predictions. Tax Foundation: The conservative-leaning group estimates that the bill would boost long-term GDP by 0.8%, generating enough revenue to cover about one-third of its costs. That is compared with doing nothing and letting tax cuts expire Dec. 31. The gain is like adding an average of 0.1 percentage point to the annual growth rate; reaching 3% would require much larger changes, Watson said. Penn Wharton: Its budget model projects a 0.4% increase in GDP over the first decade. That is equivalent to raising the annual growth rate to 1.85% from 1.8%. 'Basically, I would call this flat,' said Kent Smetters, who runs the Penn model. 'We all know this is all going to get swamped by all the randomness.' Joint Committee on Taxation: The nonpartisan congressional scorekeeper projected that the bill's tax components would produce short-run growth through increased labor supply and capital stock. That would be counteracted by rising budget deficits, with a net effect of taking 1.83% annual growth to 1.86%. JCT estimates that the bill's tax provisions would cover less than 3% of their costs with revenue from economic growth. Yale Budget Lab: The think tank says the bill would bump the growth rate roughly to 2% from 1.8% through 2027, before the drag of federal debt weakens and reverses that effect. Those all contrast with the view of the White House's Council of Economic Advisers, which has a far rosier scenario. It projects a 4.2% to 5.2% increase in short-term GDP and a long-term gain of 2.9% to 3.5%. That gain would be three to four times the Tax Foundation estimate, which itself is larger than Penn Wharton, Yale or JCT. Economists caution that tax policy can't move the needle much in the U.S. economy, particularly given higher costs and uncertainty caused by tariffs. Still, putting money in taxpayers' pockets could increase demand for goods and services. Lower business taxes—especially faster write-offs for equipment and factories—encourage investment and have the biggest bang for the buck. Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Stephen Miran said growth after 2017 demonstrates that the Republican formula can work. The economy and incomes grew solidly in 2018 and 2019 before the Covid-19 pandemic scrambled everything. 'When Americans elected President Trump, they did so knowing that he was a pro-growth president,' Miran said. 'The bill is going to create a vibrant, dynamic economy.' Miran added that federal taxes as a share of GDP was barely unchanged from fiscal 2017 to fiscal 2024. According to CBO, revenue was 17.3% of GDP in 2017 and 17.1% in 2024. 'There was no long-term hole in revenues,' Miran said. But before the tax cuts passed, CBO forecast revenue increasing to 18.3% in 2024, and the law changed that trajectory. One of the most thorough academic studies found that the 2017 law increased domestic business investment but didn't come close to paying for itself. The Tax Foundation's Watson said policymakers should expect a more muted response from extending the 2017 tax cuts than from creating them. The bill includes new and revived business incentives but schedules them to expire. 'It's pro-growth,' Watson said. 'The more you add in some of these gimmicks and temporary changes, the more watered-down it gets.' Senators including James Lankford (R., Okla.) and Steve Daines (R., Mont.) are seeking changes to encourage growth. They are particularly focused on making permanent some business-tax provisions such as immediate deductions for equipment purchases. 'If you have an expiration, you just don't get predictability,' Lankford said. Capital-investment incentives would be muted because tariff uncertainty complicates business planning, said Seth Carpenter, global chief economist at Morgan Stanley, which estimates that the bill would boost growth in 2026 before turning neutral and then negative. Some projects might make sense with high tariffs but not lower ones. Even with the bill's new deduction for factory expenses, without tariff certainty, Carpenter said, 'I don't think you're going to be in any sort of hurry to start breaking ground.' Kimberly Clausing, a former Biden administration economist now at the University of California, Los Angeles, said she worries about the drag from budget deficits. 'If they failed,' she said, 'I actually think that would be the best possible macroeconomic outcome.' Write to Richard Rubin at How Hydrogen, the Fuel of the Future, Got Bogged Down in the Bayou Chinese-Owned Company Halts Work on Factory to Make Batteries in U.S. It's the Republicans, Not Musk, Who Are Serious About Cutting Spending Trump's New Steel Tariffs Look Vulnerable to a Courtroom Challenge Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


Business of Fashion
18 minutes ago
- Business of Fashion
This Week: Are Tariff Price Hikes Finally Here?
What's Happening: On Wednesday, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics will release inflation data for May, the first inflation reading taken entirely after Trump's tariffs went into effect. In April, consumer prices rose 2.3 percent, just under the economists' consensus. Delayed Impact: Forecasters are calling for a mild uptick in prices, if that. Many fashion and beauty brands have announced price increases, often to be implemented on select products over the summer rather than right away. This gives consumers a bit of time to acclimate to their new, more expensive reality. And it builds in room to change course on the off chance Trump calls the whole trade war off in the meantime. Rock and a Hard Place: This strategic approach to price increases is savvy, but for many brands also borne out of a lack of options. After raising prices so much in the post-pandemic years, companies are worried they'll lose customers by hiking further, even if they have a good reason. Questioning Reality: Whether consumers believe prices are rising can have a big impact on inflation, so all those early warnings from brands may become a self-fulfilling prophecy even if Trump doesn't announce a single new tariff. There are also growing questions about the numbers themselves. Last week, economists raised questions in the financial press about whether inflation data could still be trusted, noting hiring freezes and layoffs had curtailed the government's ability to conduct its massive monthly survey of consumer prices. What to Expect at The Business of Beauty Global Forum 2025 What's Happening: On June 9 and 10, The Business of Beauty holds its third annual gathering in Napa Valley. A second class of entrepreneurs will also receive The Business of Beauty Global Awards. In the News: Speakers include Hailey Rhode Bieber, fresh off her $1 billion deal. Tracee Ellis Ross will share her observations on the needs of the Black and texturised hair community at a time when DEI is under siege. Global Perspective: Founders from international brands including Beauty of Joseon, Ultra Violette, Byoma and Nykaa will address challenges and opportunities in the global beauty market. Attorney Lindsay Toczylowski will speak on her efforts to help her client, Andry José Hernández Romero, the Venezuelan makeup artist currently detained in an El Salvador prison. See for Yourself: If you won't be in Napa Valley, catch these speakers and more on the livestream. The Week Ahead wants to hear from you! Send tips, suggestions, complaints and compliments to
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dow Jones Futures: Trump Warns Musk Of 'Serious Consequences'; China Trade Talks Loom
The S&P 500 is nearing recodr highs. Palantir is back in a buy area. Tesla investors should focus on this amid the Trump-Musk feud.