Jimmy Lai: Landmark trial of Hong Kong's rebel mogul resumes
Closing arguments begin on Thursday for Lai, who is accused of colluding with foreign forces under a Beijing-imposed national security law.
The trial has drawn international attention, with UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer calling for Lai's release. The 77-year-old has British as well as Chinese citizenship - though China does not recognise dual nationality, and therefore considers Lai to be exclusively Chinese.
Lai has been detained since December 2020 and faces a maximum sentence of life imprisonment if he is convicted.
Critics say Lai's case shows how Hong Kong's legal system has been weaponised to silence political opposition.
Lai has been a persistent thorn in China's side. Unlike other tycoons who rose to the top in Hong Kong, Mr Lai became one of the fiercest critics of the Chinese state and a leading figure advocating democracy in the former British territory.
"I'm a born rebel," he told the BBC in an interview in 2020, hours before he was charged. "I have a very rebellious character."
What a defiant mogul's trial says about Hong Kong
Hong Kong's year under China's controversial law
He is the most prominent person charged under the controversial national security law which China introduced in 2020, in response to massive protests which erupted in Hong Kong the year before.
The legislation criminalises a wider range of dissenting acts which Beijing considers subversion and secession, among other things.
Beijing says the national security law is necessary to maintain stability in Hong Kong but critics say it has effectively outlawed dissent.
Over the years, Lai's son Sebastien has called for his release. In February, the younger Lai urged Starmer and US President Donald Trump to take urgent action, adding that his father's "body is breaking down".
Rags to riches
Lai was born in Guangzhou, a city in southern China, to a wealthy family that lost everything when the communists took power in 1949.
He was 12 years old when he fled his village in mainland China, arriving in Hong Kong as a stowaway on a fishing boat.
While working odd jobs and knitting in a small clothing shop he taught himself English. He went from a menial role to eventually founding a multi-million dollar empire including the international clothing brand Giordano.
The chain was a huge success. But when China sent in tanks to crush pro-democracy protests in Beijing's Tiananmen Square in 1989, Lai began a new journey as a vocal democracy activist as well as an entrepreneur.
He started writing columns criticising the massacre that followed the demonstrations in Beijing and established a publishing house that went on to become one of Hong Kong's most influential.
As China responded by threatening to shut his stores on the mainland, leading him to sell the company, Lai launched a string of popular pro-democracy titles that included Next, a digital magazine, and the widely read Apple Daily newspaper.
In a local media landscape increasingly fearful of Beijing, Lai had been a persistent critic of Chinese authorities both through his publications and writing.
This has seen him become a hero for many in Hong Kong, who view him as a man of courage who took great risks to defend the freedoms of the city.
But on the mainland he is viewed as a "traitor" who threatens Chinese national security.
In recent years, masked attackers firebombed Lai's house and company headquarters. He was also the target of an assassination plot.
But none of the threats stopped him from airing his views robustly. He was a prominent part of the city's pro-democracy demonstrations and was arrested twice in 2021 on illegal assembly charges.
When China passed Hong Kong's new national security law in June 2020, Lai told the BBC it sounded the "death knell" for the territory.
The influential entrepreneur also warned that Hong Kong would become as corrupt as China. Without the rule of law, he said, its coveted status as a global financial hub would be "totally destroyed".
The media mogul is known for his frankness and acts of flamboyance.
In 2021, he urged Donald Trump to help the territory, saying he was "the only one who can save us" from China. His newspaper, Apple Daily, published a front-page letter that finished: "Mr President, please help us."
For Lai, such acts were necessary to defend the city which had taken him in and fuelled his success.
He once told news agency AFP: "I came here with nothing, the freedom of this place has given me everything... Maybe it's time I paid back for that freedom by fighting for it."
Lai has been slapped with various charges - including unauthorised assembly and fraud - since 2020.
He has been in custody since December of that year.
The prosecution of Lai has captured international attention, with rights groups and foreign governments urging his release.
Over the years, Sebastien Lai has travelled the world to denounce his father's arrest and condemn Hong Kong for punishing "characteristics that should be celebrated".
"My father is in jail for the truth on his lips, courage in his heart, and freedom in his soul," he had said.
Silenced and erased, Hong Kong's decade of protest is now a defiant memory
Hong Kong pro-China informer: 'Why I've reported dozens of people to police'
One of Hong Kong's last major pro-democracy parties disbands
'Never': Jimmy Lai denies foreign collusion in landmark trial
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Fact File: No truth to online claims of dramatic drop in potato exports to U.S.
While Canadians wait for news of an improved trade situation with the United States, false reports about quiet deals with other countries have begun to fill the void. Recently, unfounded claims have spread online that Canada has slashed potato exports to the United States in response to tariffs, and struck a $1.6 billion trade deal with "Asian markets." THE CLAIM "Canada Cuts Potato Exports to U.S. – PM Carney signs $1.6B deal with Asia," reads an Aug. 6 post on the X platform, formerly X platform, formerly known as Twitter. "In just four months, over 140,000 tons of Canadian potatoes have disappeared from U.S. shelves." The claims were shared on Facebook, Threads and TikTok, the last of which tied a supposed 41 per cent drop in exports to the United States to 35 per cent tariffs placed on Canadian potatoes by Washington. Multiple YouTube channels shared the claims in videos (archived video) stylized as news reports, racking up hundreds of thousands of views. THE FACTS There is no evidence of a recent $1.6 billion deal with any Asian country or of increased potato exports to markets in Asia. "Canadian agri-food exporters base their decisions on market needs and dynamics, and available data for 2025 does not show an overall increase in shipments to Asian markets," Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada spokeswoman Stéphanie Blais told The Canadian Press in a statement. Canada has been in talks for a free trade deal with the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN), a 10-member bloc that includes Indonesia and the Philippines, since 2021, but negotiations are ongoing. Several of the YouTube videos mention Indonesia and the Philippines as new destinations for Canadian potatoes. In December, a delegation of P.E.I. potato growers visited the countries in a bid to expand exports to the region, a report from P.E.I.-based agriculture publication Island Farmer says. The trip came as Canada finished negotiations on the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement with Indonesia, with the pact set to be signed some time this year. There is no dollar figure attached to the deal, but in its statement about the completed negotiations in November, the Prime Minister's Office noted merchandise trade between the two countries totalled $5.1 billion in 2023. Indonesia's only imports of Canadian potatoes in 2025 came in April, with Statistics Canada data recording 980 tonnes of fresh or chilled spuds sent to the country. NO BIG CUTS TO U.S. EXPORTS The United States is the largest market for Canadian-grown potatoes, representing 96 per cent for seed, 93 per cent for fresh and 91 per cent for French fry exports in the 2023/2024 production year, which runs from Aug. 1 to July 31, according to a report from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Blais from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada said that while exports to the United States decreased between the first and second quarters of 2025, that's happened in previous years when tariffs were not in place. "Fluctuation in trade occurs for various reasons. More time is needed to understand the true impact of the U.S. administration's tariff policy," Blais said. This year, Canada exported 427,467 tonnes of potatoes, in all varieties, to the United States from April to June, according to a Canadian Press analysis of Statistics Canada data. That compares with 512,621 tonnes from January to March, a difference of 85,154 tonnes. That represents a 17 per cent drop in exports, not the 41 per cent claimed in some social media posts. Potato exports are covered by Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement, or CUSMA, and so long as they meet the deal's rules of origin, do not face the 35 per cent tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump on Aug. 1. CLICKBAIT VIDEOS A Google search for "US tariffs on potatoes" brought up dozens of clickbait videos promoting the same story from channels ranging from the vaguely legitimate-sounding "Economic info" to the dubious "Bitcoin Timez." What appears to be the oldest version comes from a channel called U.S. Retail Check, published July 27. The video comes with a disclaimer that the makers "do not guarantee complete accuracy, nor do we claim to provide official, exhaustive, or professional advice." It also features a warning that the video contains "altered or synthetic content." The Canadian Press has previously debunked similar fake reports, generated with the help of artificial intelligence, of a trade deal being struck with Mexico. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 14, 2025. Colleen Hale-Hodgson, The Canadian Press Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
White House's Navarro says pharma tariffs likely under Section 232 probe
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said on Thursday that the Trump administration is likely to levy tariffs on pharmaceutical imports under a "Section 232" trade investigation because it's "very clear that we have a national security crisis" due to U.S. reliance on foreign producers in the sector. In an televised interview with CNBC, Navarro did not provide any details on the timing of the Section 232 probe. He said that President Donald Trump's executive order to shore up supply chains will provide price floors for domestic producers of drug ingredients through long-term strategic contracts that will ensure sufficient demand. At the same time, tariffs will deter dumping of pharma precursors from India and China, he added.
Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
Why Nvidia and AMD's China pay-to-play deal with Trump could backfire
Welcome to AI Decoded, Fast Company 's weekly newsletter that breaks down the most important news in the world of AI. You can sign up to receive this newsletter every week via email here. Why Nvidia's and AMD's China deal with Trump could backfire The companies making the most money from the AI boom are the ones selling the processors, such as Nvidia and AMD. On Monday those two chip giants cut a deal with the Trump administration that will allow them to sell their products into the China market. For Nvidia—the dominant provider of AI chips powering the generative AI boom—the agreement means that it can once again sell its H20 chip to Chinese developers. It's the latest chapter in a long saga. The Biden administration blocked the sale of Nvidia's most powerful AI chips to China in 2022, but deemed the sale of the less powerful H20 chip an acceptable national security risk. The Trump administration continued blocking sales of Nvidia's H200 and Blackwell chips. But in April, it went a step further by effectively blocking the sale of the H20 chips, too. The new deal shows that Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang's charm offensive in Washington, D.C., convinced the Trump administration that the U.S.'s technological, economic, and national security goals are best served when the world's AI models and apps are built to run on chips made by U.S.-based companies (like Nvidia). Or maybe the Trump Administration just wanted a piece of the action all along. The administration exploited its jurisdiction over export policy to extract a percentage of Nvidia and AMD's Chinese sales payable to the U.S. Treasury. 'I said, 'Listen, I want 20% if I'm going to approve this for you, for the country,'' Trump said during a press conference on August 12, describing his negotiation with Nvidia's Huang. He added that Nvidia negotiated the percentage down to 15%. That cut could amount to as much as $3 billion this year, given the high demand for the H20 chips. Trump's demand for 15% is something new in U.S. trade policy. 'The 15% take indeed sets a precedent,' Columbia Business School professor Lori Yue tells Fast Company. 'It may encourage other companies to adopt similar strategies, viewing profit-sharing as a work-around to government bans.' This could lead to a pay‑to‑play arrangement where only the richest corporations can afford to pay the government for permission to sell into a foreign market. Indeed, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent hinted during a TV interview that the approach could spread to other products in other industries. The administration's tax will very likely translate into higher chip prices for Nvidia and AMD's Chinese customers, such as Tencent. The Chinese government has recently blasted Nvidia's H20 chips over security concerns, and the new 15% tax is likely to rankle Beijing even more. The Chinese government would like to see AI developers building their models and apps on top of AI chips from China-based Huawei. The Trump aAdministration may be driving some of Nvidia's Chinese customers to do just that, even if it requires rebuilding their infrastructure and tech stacks. Musk's Grok chatbot is making noise but falling behind Grok, xAI's chatbot, has had a rough week. The model that powers the Grok chatbot on X is Grok 4, which was announced July 9. At the time, xAI said the new model was the most intelligent one in the world. And the model did achieve state-of-the-art performance on several benchmark tests, including the superhard Humanity's Last Exam, on which it scored 25.4%, three points higher than Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro. As of August 11, the Grok chatbot is available free to all X users, even those on the free tier. In one sense, it marked an immediate improvement. The social platform's permissive environment has made it a clearinghouse for all kinds of misinformation and unsupported claims. Now far more people are using Grok to quickly fact-check those statements. But on August 7 OpenAI released its new GPT-5 model, which outperforms the Grok 4 models on many independent benchmarks. GPT‑5 shows state-of-the-art reasoning, math and coding skills, visual understanding, creative writing, and health-related question performance. However, GPT‑5 scored poorly on SimpleBench, ranking 5th behind Grok 4 and others in humanlike reasoning and social intelligence. While the benchmark results were circulating—and a GPT-5 backlash was growing—xAI CEO Elon Musk threatened to sue Apple for giving OpenAI's ChatGPT app the top ranking among free apps in the App Store (the Grok app ranks fifth). Must presented no evidence, appearing to simply be lashing out. And to make matters worse, Grok's problems with inappropriate content resurfaced this week. After being taken offline for spewing antisemitic rhetoric in July, the chatbot was again briefly taken offline Monday—this time for reasons not divulged by X. The chatbot had an opinion, however, telling one user that it had been taken offline after angrily stating that the U.S. and Israel's war on Gaza was a 'genocide.' One user demonstrated that after Grok had been turned on again, it no longer stated that Gaza should be classified as a genocide. During the 2024 presidential campaign, Donald Trump won the support of some tech billionaires, such as Marc Andreessen and Elon Musk, by promising to use a light-touch approach to regulating tech companies, including AI companies. Now Public Citizen is out with a report detailing the extent to which the administration has dialed back oversight and enforcement actions on the tech industry. In just six months with Trump in the Oval Office, the U.S. government has withdrawn or halted 47 of 143 federal enforcement actions against tech companies, the report states. At the start of Trump's second term, 104 technology companies faced 143 federal investigations and enforcement actions. The administration has withdrawn 38 actions and halted 9 others against 45 companies. Beneficiaries include eBay, Meta, Microsoft, PayPal, SpaceX, and Tesla. The report suggests that political spending generated returns through dropped prosecutions and policy changes. Tech corporations, executives, and investors spent $1.2 billion during the 2024 election cycle, including $863 million in donations to super PACs, $222 million in payments to Trump businesses, $76 million in lobbying efforts, and $25 million in inauguration donations, Public Citizen reports.
