
Labour-run council ordering removal of St George's and Union Jack flags is too scared to take down Palestine flags without police protection, leaked email reveals
Bankrupt Birmingham City Council said hundreds of Union and St George's flags recently hung around the city 'could put lives at risk' by endangering motorists and pedestrians.
The flags had been strung up by a small, organised group of residents to 'show Birmingham and the rest of the country how proud we are of our history, freedoms and achievements'.
Their display of patriotism was met with a swift response from the city council, which vowed to immediately begin removing the flags due to 'safety concerns'.
The decision was blasted by shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick as 'blatant two-tier bias against the British people', after critics pointed out Palestine flags had been left to fly from lampposts across Birmingham for the past 18 months without the council tearing them down.
When the Mail visited the Sparkhill area, where around 80 per cent of the population is Muslim, there were no fewer than seven Palestine flags hanging from lampposts on a mile-long stretch of Stratford Road.
It can also be revealed that the crisis-crippled council has privately admitted it is too scared to try to remove the Palestine flags without police protection.
In a leaked email obtained by the Mail, council cabinet member Majid Mahmood said of the Palestine flags hanging from lampposts in February: 'We are taking these down, but we need the support of the police due to issues that have cropped (up) when we first tried to take them down.'
The backlash has only been intensified by the council simultaneously announcing this week it would light up the city's library in the colours of the Pakistan flag to mark the anniversary of the country's independence, followed by the Indian flag.
Mr Mahmood was among those happily posing for pictures this week as the flag of Pakistan was raised outside Council House in the city centre.
The council, which declared effective bankruptcy in 2023, is already facing intense criticism for its handling of a bin strike which has now lasted for seven months and seen the city's streets buried under mountains of fetid waste.
Mr Jenrick said: 'It is ridiculous that the council are taking down England flags and Union flags while Palestine flags are allowed to remain. It's blatant two-tier bias against the British people.
'Labour-run Birmingham council seem to be ashamed of our country - celebrating everyone other than ourselves. This pathetic self-loathing must end. We must be one country, united under one flag.
'It is a damning indictment of how bad things have become that the council appear too scared to take down unauthorised foreign flags without the police. The authorities cannot allow themselves to be intimidated into submission.'
Former Tory leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith said: 'The City Council piles bias and absurdity on top of their utter incompetence. After the chaos of the bin strike, where they can't find anyone to empty the bins, they somehow manage to find people to take down our national flag on the eve of VJ Day when British and Commonwealth soldiers lost their lives for our freedoms. Shameful.'
Tory MP Sir John Hayes said: 'Birmingham is a great city, the city of the Chamberlains. Joseph Chamberlain, who was a great patriot and the greatest son of Birmingham, would hang his head in shame.'
A group of residents calling themselves the Weoley Warriors began hanging hundreds of flags from lampposts in areas including Weoley Castle, Northfield, Selly Oak and Bartley Green earlier this week.
They have not revealed their identities but post pictures of their flags on a Facebook group, which says: 'A proud community is a strong community. No matter your background, race or religion we live side-by-side in this country together, so when you look up (and) see the flags fly, they fly for you.'
They have raised more than £4,000 to bankroll their efforts, describing themselves on their online fundraising page as 'a group of proud English men with a common goal'.
Many residents were quick to express enthusiasm for the flags.
Helen Ingram, a historian who lives in Northfield, said: 'Everyone I've spoken to loves them and there's a buzz in the air, an almost carnival-like atmosphere.
'Northfield was once a tight-knit community and it's heart-warming to get back that strong sense of community pride and unity.'
Palestine flags have been prominently displayed in parts of Birmingham with a large proportion of Muslim residents since the start of the recent war in Gaza
Yet the council claimed that the extra weight placed on the lampposts by the flags could 'potentially lead to collapse' and posed a possibly fatal risk to the men hanging the flags, as well as motorists and pedestrians - despite the flags being around 25ft above the ground.
Dr Ingram said residents had found the council's position particularly frustrating due to the number of Palestinian, Ukrainian and Pride flags which 'fly freely around the city every day without issue'.
She added: 'Flying a Union Jack or England flag aligns with this same spirit of being proud of your identity…that is surely a sentiment that a city council should be championing rather than condemning!'
One of the organisers of the Weoley Warriors group said: 'This is unfortunate and disappointing - Birmingham City Council cannot afford to take our bins, but can afford to take our flags.'
Other residents warned the removal of the flags could potentially lead to riots.
The decision was described as 'completely disgraceful' by Cllr Robert Alden, leader of its Conservative opposition.
'Frankly, for the last two years, the council has made little effort to remove Palestine flags and now, suddenly, residents are putting up the Union Jack and St George's Cross and they're saying it's a health and safety risk - it's madness,' he said.
'As a council overall, they are bankrupt. They have got themselves into a complete mess where they're slashing services and putting up council tax - to decide to pick a fight over residents wanting to fly our national flag is just perverse.'
A spokesman for Birmingham City Council said it had removed more than 200 attachments from 'street furniture' this year, including Palestinian flags, but some had been replaced after they had removed them.
The council was said to be planning to upgrade lampposts which meant they had to remain free from attachments so work can be carried out.
The spokesman added: 'People who attach unauthorised items to lampposts could be putting their lives and those of motorists and pedestrians at risk.
'We (are) continuing to do this every week and would ask that staff doing this work are allowed to continue this work unhindered.
'Placing unauthorised attachments on street furniture, particularly tall structures like lampposts, can be dangerous – that is why the council always has to 'stress test' assets around any formal events or celebrations.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


STV News
14 minutes ago
- STV News
Swinney calls on UK Government to enable Gaza students to travel to Scotland
Scotland's First Minister has called for 'urgent action' from the UK Government to ensure students from Gaza can take up their places at Scottish universities. John Swinney said that other countries have successfully evacuated Gazan students to enable them to continue their studies. And he called on the UK Government to do 'everything in its power' to enable students to travel from Gaza to Scotland. The UK Government has said it is doing everything it can to find a solution. Mr Swinney spoke out after the Sunday Mail reported on a Palestinian student who has a place at Edinburgh University, but has not been able to leave Gaza to start her course next month due to visa processing issues. Mr Swinney said: 'I am appalled at the situation the students from Gaza are facing. We must see urgent action from the UK Government to support them in taking up their university places in Scotland. 'The people of Gaza are already suffering unimaginably at the hands of the Israeli government – the idea that these students could also be denied the chance to take up the university places in Scotland they have worked so hard to attain is not acceptable to me. 'I am aware that other countries including France, Ireland and Italy have managed to successfully evacuate students, so the UK Government cannot simply duck its responsibilities here. 'Where there is a political will, a resolution can be found – and failure to act is quite literally putting these people's lives at risk.' Scotland's Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth has written to the UK Home Secretary and UK Secretary of State for Education calling for action to support the students impacted and for urgent discussions. Mr Swinney said: 'I am clear that the international community must put a stop to Israel's killing in Gaza and that we must see the immediate recognition of a sovereign, independent Palestine. 'But until that point, the UK Government must do everything it can to ensure ordinary Gazans are not punished further. 'Scotland looks forward to welcoming students from Gaza seeking to take their places at our universities – the UK Government must do the right thing and do everything in its power to allow them to get here.' A UK Government spokesperson said: 'We are aware of these students and are actively considering how we can best support. 'Of course, the situation on the ground in Gaza makes this extremely challenging but we are doing everything we can to find a solution.' The normal arrangements for non-British nationals requiring a visa are to make an online visa application and submit their biometrics at a Visa Application Centre, prior to travel to the UK. The UK Government said biometrics are an essential part of the immigration process as they enable it to confirm the identity of the person and assess whether they pose a risk to public safety. Where an applicant cannot travel to a Visa Application Centre (VAC) to enrol their biometrics, they can contact the UK Government to explain their circumstances, so it can consider all the options. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country


Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Salmond's family accuse Sturgeon of cashing in on smears against him
Alex Salmond's family has accused Nicola Sturgeon of using her memoir to 'cash in' with personal attacks against him. Christina Hendry, who is the late former first minister's niece, said the claims Ms Sturgeon made about Mr Salmond in her newly-published book were 'cruel' and 'distasteful'. Ms Sturgeon used the memoir, Frankly, to allege that Salmond could have been behind a leak to a tabloid newspaper that he was under investigation for sexual misconduct. She argued that the 2018 leak, which revealed the Scottish government's investigation into the claims, would have been 'classic Alex' as it would have allowed him to control the media narrative and 'cast himself as the victim of underhand dealing'. Pouring scorn on his claim that there was a conspiracy to imprison him, she said it was 'a fabrication, the invention of a man who wasn't prepared to reflect honestly on his own conduct'. Ms Sturgeon said the alleged conspirators were 'women who considered themselves victims of his behaviour' and were 'seeking support and comfort from each other'. She accused Salmond of trying to 'distort and weaponise' genuine shock or trauma in a way that was 'truly disgraceful', adding 'it strikes at the heart of why I find it so hard to forgive him'. Salmond was cleared of 13 sexual assault charges in a separate criminal trial in 2020, but his lawyer admitted his client could 'have been a better man'. Among the book's other claims were that Salmond had not bothered to read the White Paper on independence produced for the 2014 referendum, which was the prospectus for Scotland leaving the UK. Ms Hendry accused Ms Sturgeon of 'cowardice', saying she would not have made the claims while her uncle was still alive and argued 'she is using his name for relevance, to promote her book, to earn money'. The 30-year-old also attacked Ms Sturgeon for having 'such disregard for the family and their feelings', including the impact on Moira, Salmond's widow. Salmond's family broke its silence on the memoir as it emerged Mrs Salmond is 'reactivating' legal action against the SNP government, which he started before he died aged 69 last October. The Sunday Mail reported that a KC, two junior counsel and a lead investigator have been appointed in the case, which centres on the Scottish Government's botched investigation into sexual misconduct claims against him. Salmond alleged there was a conspiracy among senior SNP figures around Nicola Sturgeon to imprison him, which she has vigorously denied. At the time of his death the former first minister was seeking 'significant damages' and compensation for loss of earnings from the Scottish Government, totalling a reported £3 million. A family friend told the Sunday Mail: 'Her case against the Scottish Government is now live, the legal team is in place, the finance in place and this will be going ahead, no question of that. 'Alex may not be here to defend himself but his family are determined to stand up to those who continue to attack him.' 'An element of cowardice' Ms Hendry told the Scottish Sun on Sunday: 'She should not have to be going through this and neither should any of the family. I find it very distasteful. In some ways it is quite cruel. 'She is using his name for relevance, to promote her book, to earn money – she could have said these things in the past few years. 'She has chosen to wait until he is no longer here to defend himself. It's left to the family to deal with this and there's an element of cowardice to that.' Asked if she believed Ms Sturgeon was cashing in on her infamous fall-out with her uncle, Ms Hendry replied: 'Yes. I can't see any other reason. It seems quite a coincidence that the time she is saying this is the time she is selling her book.' Salmond won a judicial review in 2019 after a previous court case found that the way the Scottish Government investigation into the sexual misconduct allegations against him was handled was unlawful and 'tainted with apparent bias'. The Scottish Government only conceded the case at the 11th hour, resulting in Mr Salmond being handed £512,250 of taxpayers' money to cover his legal costs. Ms Sturgeon declined to comment on either the family's complaints about her book or the renewed legal action. The Scottish Government was approached for a response.


BBC News
15 minutes ago
- BBC News
Dudley sees hundreds protest over asylum seekers in hotels
Hundreds of people have joined an anti-immigration protest in Dudley in a demonstration over the use of hotels for asylum seekers.A small group of counter-protesters also gathered in Market Place on Council's Conservative leader Patrick Harley has instructed a legal team to see if he can mount a legal challenge against the Home Office to prevent asylum seekers being housed in hotels in the Home Office previously said it was working with communities who had concerns. West Midlands Police said a protest and counter-protest took place "without significant incident". A BBC reporter at the scene said there were about 200 anti-immigration protesters, many with union flags, and about 20 or 30 counter-protesters, some with Palestine flags. He said there were a few scuffles with police that quickly died protest later moved to the site of a hotel where protesters believed asylum seekers were staying. West Midlands Police said officers were present at the protest and no arrests were made.A spokesman said there was some temporary traffic disruption and he thanked people for their patience."Our priority is always to keep people safe and in every decision around policing, public order and protests we must balance the right to freedom of expression with the right to tackle crime so we can ensure public safety," he said."The right to peaceful and lawful protest is a fundamental element of any democracy, and we are committed to upholding and facilitating this." Before the protest took place, Harley claimed that his comments had "probably calmed things down".He said people were "seeing a council taking a tough stance", adding: "They're seeing Dudley Council does not have the same issues with asylum seekers in lots of hotels as other authorities do – we only have one in the authority." He said people were entitled to protest and were "very angry" about the said: "This is an issue that is very emotive, so I can understand why people want to protest."What we don't want to see is people breaking the law, damaging property, making threats and really not bringing a good look to our borough."What we want is a peaceful protest and if people can come and protest in a very peaceful and lawlike manner, then I welcome people making their feelings well-known."But it has to be a peaceful protest and not the scenes we've seen in other parts of the UK recently." Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.