
Britain's best and worst service stations revealed - including one that's so posh it boasts a cheese counter and deli
Which? has revealed the best service stations in the land - and the ones that motorists might do better to avoid.
The consumer champion asked 4,000 of its members to rate 90 of Britain's service stations, rating their experiences in eight categories including food prices, cleanliness and outside space.
Considered an integral part of any UK journey by car, service stations offer a brew, a bite and a toilet stop but, found the research, standards can vary wildly.
The bad news for British drivers? Which? reports that's it's still largely a bleak picture for travellers on long journeys, with facilities at many service stations described as often 'dirty, dated and inadequate'.
There are a few shining lights however, with Gloucester Services on the M5 receiving the highest customer survey score of 85 per cent, achieving five stars in almost all of the categories.
The luxurious service station boasts a farm shop and kitchen selling locally sourced produce - including gelato, cheese and patisserie - from 130 regional suppliers, as well as 24 fast charging points for electric vehicles, and a tranquil lake to sit by.
At the less glamorous end of the spectrum, Moto Bridgwater in Somerset, an hour south of Gloucester Services on the M5, fared the worst, placing bottom on the list - with one visitor saying Bridgwater's toilets 'smelt of stale urine'.
Other gripes included inadequate parking spaces, and cramped and overpriced facilities that 'look and feel filthy'.
Meanwhile, those surveyed about Gloucester Services offered glowing reviews about their time there, with one happy customer describing it as 'head and shoulders above all the others that I've used.'
Another who'd visited told Which?, which was conducting its first service station survey in four years: 'If all motorway service stations were like Gloucester I'd be delighted to spend time at any.
'Gloucester is a pleasure, has great staff, nice food, a farm shop, a garden with a lakeside walk and dog walking. They deserve every success.'
The eight categories the 4,000 members were asked to comment on included food/retail outlets, shops, food and drink selection, facilities, cleanliness, convenience and accessibility and outside space.
Gloucester Services is part of the Westmorland Family, which is no stranger to positive customer responses.
It had two other services in the top five, including Tebay M6 services in Cumbria, which had a 77 per cent score, and, north of the border, Cairn Lodge on the M74 in Lanarkshire, which received a score of 72 per cent.
Both might have challenged for the top spot but neither fared well on price.
Located on the M6 in Cumbria, just an hour south of the Scottish border, Tebay Services is frequently regarded as one of the country's best - and has been described by some on TikTok as 'proper boujee'.
Elsewhere, motorists in need of a breather on the M6 in Warwickshire should make for Rugby's Moto Services, which soared in the survey, with a 75 per cent score - and four stars across almost every category.
One traveller said 'Rugby is new and clean and on a nice day is perfect to break up your journey'.
Nationwide brand Moto had dismal responses generally but its success with Rugby - which opened its doors in April 2021 - means it's the first ever national company to rank so highly in a Which? survey.
Moto will still likely wince at its rankings though; the UK's largest service area operator filled nine of the ten spots at the bottom of the table.
Other services that didn't impress include Lancaster Services on the M6, which scored just 34 per cent in the survey.
Customers grumbled that a pedestrian bridge across the motorway, with facilities on either side meant the experience felt 'crowded' and with 'poor access'.
Moto Thurrock on the M25 has previously been voted the worst motorway service station in Britain, and Which?'s new research suggested that's still the case
One driver said being forced to trek over the bridge to get 'an underwhelming breakfast served in a cardboard box' wasn't ideal.
And Hilton Park, also on the M6, notched up the same score, with one motorist calling it 'dark and gloomy', while another said basic soap and hot water wasn't always available.
Rory Boland, Editor of Which? Travel said of the latest survey: 'The best service stations are a convenient pit stop with decent food and facilities, however our survey shows those are few and far between and that many services are not up to scratch.
He added: 'Poor facilities and extortionate prices for food and drink were widespread complaints, but most shocking of all was how drivers told us just how many services were unclean.
'To avoid disappointment, people should plan their route to avoid the worst service stations and look for alternative places to stop.'
The availability and number of EV charging points was also a major factor for the first time, with both Moto Rugby and Leeds Skelton Lake, run by Extra, deemed to have fast and plentiful places to charge electric vehicles.
Leeds Skelton Lake scored highly - 68% in total - across other areas too, with its RSPB viewing platform over Skelton Lake a particular highlight.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Quarter of drivers don't bother getting eyes checked
Almost a quarter of motorists have not had an eyesight test in the past two years, a survey suggests. The poll, commissioned by the insurer Churchill, revealed that 24 per cent of motorists had not had their vision checked by a professional optometrist within that period. Drivers must be able to read a number plate 20 metres away as part of the driving test, but that is the only time they are required to prove their sight is good enough for them to drive. It comes amid growing public concern that some drivers, especially older ones, have eyesight quality that is below the legal minimum. A senior coroner earlier this year said that ' self-reporting of visual conditions permits drivers to lie', while Heidi Alexander, the Transport Secretary, has said she was 'open to considering' mandatory eye tests. Nicholas Mantel, the head of motor insurance at Churchill, said: 'It seems surprising that UK drivers never need to prove that their eyesight is safe enough for driving once they have passed their driving test. 'What is even more remarkable is that some people continue to drive despite suspecting that their eyesight isn't good enough – or are doing so without wearing their prescription lenses or glasses. 'Our research suggests that there's overwhelming public support to make our roads safer by introducing compulsory eyesight tests for drivers.' Churchill's survey, carried out by Opinium, polled 2,000 adults, of whom just over 1,300 were drivers. Some 12 per cent of surveyed drivers admitted they either thought their sight was not road legal, or were unsure if it was. About 83 per cent of UK adults would support compulsory eye tests for drivers every decade, Churchill's poll revealed. That figure rose to 88 per cent for those who would be in favour of sight exams every three years once drivers reached the age of 70. The law says a licence holder must inform the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) if they are no longer fit to drive, which includes if their eyesight has deteriorated beyond the legal minimum. Ms Alexander received a prevention of future deaths report from the senior coroner for Lancashire in April after four pensioners were killed by drivers with failing eyesight. 'The motorists had ignored the advice of opticians that their sight had deteriorated to a level at which they should no longer be behind the wheel,' said Dr James Adeley. Department for Transport (DfT) figures show that, in 2023, 240 people were injured and seven killed in crashes in which defective eyesight was a factor. That was the most casualties since 2017, when the total was 262. A DfT spokesman said: 'Every death on our roads is a tragedy, and our thoughts remain with the families of everyone who has lost a loved one in this way. 'The NHS recommends adults should have their eyes tested every two years and drivers are legally required to inform the DVLA if they have a condition which affects their eyesight. We are committed to improving road safety and continue to explore ways to achieve this.'


The Sun
39 minutes ago
- The Sun
New EU rules mean Brits will now get LESS compensation if their flight is delayed
A CHANGE to a European travel rule will mean that Brits will get less compensation if their flight is delayed. Currently, legislation called EU261 means that European air passengers are entitled to compensation if their flight is delayed by over three hours or cancelled. 2 And despite leaving the European Union in 2020, the UK decided to adopt this regulation into law - meaning that British travellers benefit from the same rule as European travellers. The regulation however went under review in Brussels back in April and it has now been decided that the amount of time a flight is delayed by before getting compensation has increased. Currently, Brits can get compensation if their flight is delayed for three hours or more, for short-haul flights under 3,500km. However, the new rules mean this will be increased to four hours - so anything less than this won't be eligible for compensation. For longer flights (over 3,500km), airlines will now pay compensation if flights land at least six hours late - up from the current four-hour standard. And how much compensation can be given has changed as well. Under the new rules, €300 (£252.75) compensation will apply for delays of more than four hours, rather than €400. And €500 (£421.25) compensation will apply to delays of more than six hours involving flights of more than 3,500km, rather than €600. However, the agreement to extend delay times and cut compensation has been met with some opposition, including from Spain and Germany. Despite this, the Council bypassed discussions with the European Parliament and made its decision legally binding using a process that has not been used in more than a decade. Flight cancelled or delayed? Top tips for handling travel disruptions The European Parliament, however, can still make changes to the new rules. From now, it has four months to respond to the suggested new riles with a proposal that must be backed by a majority of 361 MEPS. If approved, the current EU Air Passenger Rights Regulation rules - where passengers can claim between €250 (£210.62) and €600 (£505.50) in compensation if a flight is delayed by at least three hours, if the delay is the fault of the airline - will be scrapped. Other compensation rules will remain unchanged. If the delay or cancellation is due to an 'extraordinary circumstance', compensation will not be paid. These circumstances usually include extreme weather, political instability, security risks or issues with air traffic control. Strikes are usually not considered to be extraordinary circumstances and the same with routine mechanical issues or staff shortages. Whilst this rule covers airlines that are registered in the EU or flights taking off from and EU or Schengen zone country, since Brexit the British government has pretty much copied the rules into UK legislation. This means, that if the new rules are also not opposed by European Parliament, it looks likely that the UK government would also enshrine it into legislation. This week, Brits have also been stranded in Spain as easyJet cancels scores of flights over ATC restrictions. Plus, an urgent summer holiday warning has been issued, as thousands of Brits brace for worst flight delays in 25 YEARS. 2


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Harston JCB crash leaves motorcyclist seriously injured
A motorcyclist was seriously injured after colliding with a JCB tractor, police services were called to the junction of London Road and Shelford Road, near Harston which is close to Cambridge, at about 17:00 BST on said the blue Honda NC750X motorbike was involved in the collision with the tractor which was heading in the opposite force said the rider, a 44-year-old man from Cambridge, suffered life-threatening injuries and was taken to Addenbrooke's Hospital. The driver of the JCB, a 29-year-old man from Newton, was uninjured and remained at the scene after the Dan Newton said: "I am appealing for anyone who may have witnessed the collision or has dashcam footage to get in touch with us." Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.