Europe seeks to stiffen Trump's spine against Russia
Fast-forward some three and a half decades, and this message rings similar to the one that the current generation of European leaders sought to share with US President Donald Trump on Monday (Aug 18).
The meeting at the White House represented an extraordinary counter-demonstration of Western diplomatic support for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was joined by the region's most powerful leaders.
These included Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, and Finnish President Alexander Stubb.
To be sure, there are multiple moments each year when world leaders gather en masse, mostly for pre-planned events such as Group of 20 or Nato summits. However, there may be no modern precedent for Monday's gathering, which was a hastily created wartime crisis summit, following last Friday's Alaska meeting between Trump and Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin.
Europe had one key message to Trump: The region, by and large, backs Zelensky 100 per cent, and has grave concerns about Putin's good faith in upcoming potential negotiations.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
This show of solidarity sought to prevent any repeat of February's awful White House meeting between Trump and Zelensky. Then, the Ukrainian president was shaken down not only by his US counterpart, but also Vice-President JD Vance.
' At the least, Trump's disruptive diplomacy, for all of its many shortcomings, is forcing Europe to take a clearer, coordinated approach if it is to have significant influence in the coming weeks. '
The latest meeting underlined that European leaders have gradually learnt how to best deal with Trump – that is, through flattery and persistence. Meloni told Trump that 'something has changed thanks to you'. Meanwhile, Merz praised the US president for creating a potential new pathway to ending the war.
Persistence was also key. Merz and Macron pushed again the idea that a ceasefire is a key necessity, and stressed that all leaders in the room supported this.
Monday's negotiations were the culmination of many months of hard work to foster a European-led initiative to try to end the conflict. This has been led primarily by Macron and Starmer, but involved multiple others, including Rutte and Dr von der Leyen.
The gathering was also a concerted attempt to strengthen Zelensky as much as possible in any forthcoming bilateral or trilateral talks with Russia. They asserted that Europe will continue to strengthen Ukraine's immediate military position, including with more financial aid, as fighting continues.
Post-war security guarantees
Another focal point was planning for post-war security guarantees. Every European leader spoke about the importance of such assurances from the US to keep the peace in Ukraine after any peace deal with Russia. A breakthrough may have been reached here with Trump. He reportedly told the European leaders that he was open to offering US security guarantees to Ukraine, which the Wall Street Journal called a 'significant shift in his stance' towards the US' role in ending the war.
While Kyiv's European allies are not expecting the US to commit ground troops, they are seeking US help, probably including air support, logistics and intelligence capabilities.
Starmer has repeatedly said that the Ukraine endgame 'is going to need a US backstop because I don't think it would be a guarantee without it, I don't think it would be a deterrent without it, so the two have to go together'.
Yet, despite the apparent success of these meetings, much uncertainty still remains about next steps. Trump's stunning U-turn last Friday on the necessity of a Russia-Ukraine ceasefire remains a case in point. He had also backtracked on his threat of greater sanctions on Russia unless the war ended by last week's deadline.
Could the ground now be shifting towards the beginnings of a potentially difficult, protracted negotiated settlement?
At the least, Trump's disruptive diplomacy, for all of its many shortcomings, is forcing Europe to take a clearer, coordinated approach if it is to have significant influence in the coming weeks.
The region's leaders know they now must rise to the occasion, especially given their conviction that any outcome in Ukraine that is perceived as a potentially big Russian victory may only embolden Putin and his allies across the world.
Darker scenarios
While Europe is still hopeful of keeping the Trump team on board, it is also continuing to prepare for darker scenarios. This includes the possibility that, if the war continues for months more, the US president might lose patience with the peace-seeking process.
The US might also stop, at some point in 2025 or beyond, any support for Ukraine. This would leave critical gaps in intelligence sharing, for instance, that only Europe and allies such as Canada, Japan and Australia can try to partially fill.
There are also concerns that Trump may ultimately blame Ukraine for any failure to reach a deal, which he appears to think must include Zelensky giving up land. Yet, Kyiv may refuse to capitulate, not least because of the Ukrainian constitutional challenge with ceding territory.
Now is therefore the time for Europe to double down with a clearer, multi-year grand strategy. The potential deeper political integration of Ukraine into the European Union may require a much faster pace for Kyiv's accession talks.
The writer is an associate at LSE IDEAS at the London School of Economics
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
18 minutes ago
- Straits Times
US trans woman challenges Dutch asylum rejection
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox AMSTERDAM - A 28-year-old transgender woman from the U.S. began a legal challenge on Wednesday to the rejection of her asylum application in the Netherlands where she had sought political asylum saying she no longer felt safe in the United States. Veronica Clifford-Carlos, a visual artist from California, came to the Netherlands - the first country to legalise same-sex marriage and known for its strong protections of LGBT rights - because the Trump administration's policies towards transgender people made her feel unsafe, her lawyer's office said. The case, the first of its kind in the Netherlands, will be heard in a court in Amsterdam starting Wednesday, with a ruling expected in four to six weeks. Since taking office in January, President Donald Trump has issued executive orders limiting transgender rights, banned transgender people from serving in the armed forces, and rescinded anti-discrimination policies for LGBTQ+ people. Dutch advocacy group LGBT Asylum Support, which backs the lawsuit, is currently assisting around 20 U.S. trans individuals with pending asylum claims. According to data from the Immigration and Naturalisation Service (IND), 29 Americans applied for asylum in the Netherlands during the first half of this year. In previous years there were between nine and 18 applicants per year, an IND spokesperson said. "The IND generally states that discrimination by authorities and fellow citizens can be considered an act of persecution if it is so severe that victims can no longer function socially and societally," LGBT Asylum Support said in a statement. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore 18 persons nabbed and 82 vapes seized in HSA ops in Raffles Place and Haji Lane Singapore Woman trapped between train doors: Judge rules SBS Transit '100% responsible' Singapore COE premiums up in all categories except motorcycles; Cat A price climbs 2.5% to $104,524 Singapore Grab users in Singapore shocked by fares of over $1,000 due to display glitch Singapore MyRepublic's policy of not imposing download speed limits to stay after takeover: Starhub Singapore Emergency broadcast system to alert S'pore public to disasters via their mobile phones: Edwin Tong Life S'pore bands mark milestones with gigs: Silver Strings at 60, Mel & Joe at 55 and Lovehunters at 40 Singapore Singapore indie cinema The Projector owes over $1.2m to creditors "But the IND maintains that there are no grounds for exceptional treatment of transgender and queer refugees from the U.S." REUTERS
Straits Times
18 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Belarus and Iran, both friends of Putin, plan to strengthen military and broader ties
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian shake hands during a meeting in Minsk, Belarus, August 20, 2025. Press Service of the President of the Republic of Belarus/Handout via REUTERS Belarus and Iran - two countries that have backed Russia's war in Ukraine - plan to deepen bilateral ties across all areas including defence, their presidents said at talks in Minsk on Wednesday. Belarusian state news agency Belta said presidents Alexander Lukashenko and Masoud Pezeshkian agreed to work on a strategic partnership treaty. "In conditions of geopolitical turbulence, Minsk and Tehran are undertaking consistent and balanced steps to further develop cooperation, and are working hard to turn each new challenge into a new opportunity," it quoted Lukashenko as saying. "We are ready to discuss any issues, we have no closed topics," Lukashenko said, adding that the two countries could partner across a range of areas including "military-technical cooperation". Lukashenko, a close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, allowed Russia to use Belarusian territory as a launchpad for its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, and later assented to hosting Russian tactical nuclear missiles. Iran has supplied drones to Russia for use in the war and Pezeshkian signed a strategic cooperation treaty with Putin in January, although it did not include a mutual defence clause. Both Iran and Belarus are under what Pezeshkian described as "illegal Western sanctions". Belta quoted him as saying Iran was ready to help Belarus "neutralise" such measures, noting that it had more than 40 years of experience in this area. Pezeshkian said the two countries needed to build their economic and other ties to a level that matched the high level of trust between them. "Of course, our common views should be implemented in the economic and cultural spheres, in the development of tourism between our countries, and also, as you noted, in the development of military-technical cooperation," Belta quoted him as telling Lukashenko. REUTERS
Business Times
18 minutes ago
- Business Times
Intel rescue will depend on Trump as investor — and pitchman
[WASHINGTON] A US government plan to take a stake in Intel would give the ailing chipmaker a powerful backer, even if a bigger challenge still lies ahead: finding enough paying customers. Wall Street analysts do not expect the money alone to turn around Intel's business, which has suffered from years of declining sales and the loss of market share. But there is a possibility that pressure from President Donald Trump will help the chipmaker line up more clients for its production arm – potentially justifying the cost of expanding domestic manufacturing. If the US ends up owning part of Intel, 'Trump kind of becomes your salesman,' said Dan Morgan, a senior portfolio manager at Synovus Trust who has covered the company since the 1990s. The president has this year secured trillions of US dollars' worth of pledges to invest in the US – even if some of those commitments are repackaged versions of existing plans. That includes a vow by Apple to spend US$600 billion on a domestic expansion. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), meanwhile, has pledged US$165 billion as part of a factory buildout in Arizona. This time around, the administration will need to pull off something with even longer odds: convincing sceptical prospective clients to use Intel for their manufacturing needs. The company has been trying to compete with TSMC in the so-called foundry business – manufacturing chips based on the designs of customers – but it has struggled to show it can match the industry leader's capabilities. 'Beside money, Intel needs customers,' Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon said in a note to clients. 'Is it conceivable that as part of something like this the administration might 'encourage' customers to use Intel's capacity (either directly, or indirectly through tariff policy or other regulation)? We don't know.' BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up SoftBank Group this week agreed to buy US$2 billion in Intel shares, raising the possibility that the Japanese conglomerate could use the company for chipmaking. Founder Masayoshi Son, who has forged a close relationship with Trump, has ambitions to develop AI chips that would compete with Nvidia. Investors cheered the idea, sending Intel shares up 7 per cent on Tuesday (Aug 19). The stock had rallied 23 per cent the previous week, when Bloomberg News first reported that the government was discussing the plan. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick confirmed this week that the government is discussing a plan to own part of Intel, casting the idea as a bid to convert Chips and Science Act grants into equity. The company had been poised to get about US$11 billion from that programme – initiated by a 2022 law signed by President Joe Biden – and the investment is expected to be roughly that same amount, people familiar with the deliberations have said. 'We need to make our own chips here,' Lutnick said. 'We cannot rely on Taiwan.' Intel, based in Santa Clara, California, declined to comment. It was a striking turnabout for Intel chief executive officer Tan Lip-Bu, whom Trump had criticised earlier this month. The US president had urged the executive to resign over his past ties to China, but Trump changed his stance after meeting Tan at the White House. It's an optimistic moment for a company plagued by upheaval and decline in recent years. Previous CEO Pat Gelsinger had bet that a factory expansion plan – centreed on an ambitious new facility in Ohio – would turn around Intel's fortunes. The aim was to transform Intel into a chip foundry and make semiconductors for outside clients, a growing business that turned TSMC into a trillion-US dollar company. The Chips Act money was meant to help make that vision come true. Biden and Gelsinger even held a groundbreaking ceremony for the Ohio site in 2022, promising 20,000 construction jobs and a fresh start for the domestic chip industry. But the economics of the plant don't work without big outside customers – especially because it's meant to feature cutting-edge technology that will be costly to adopt. Intel has repeatedly delayed the project, which isn't currently slated to be ready until the 2030s. Jay Goldberg, an analyst at Seaport Research Partners, estimates that it would take about US$20 billion for Intel to get its next-generation manufacturing technology online. Moreover, the government's cash-for-equity deal isn't necessarily a better arrangement than the original Chips Act grants, Rasgon said. 'Funding a buildout with no customers probably won't end well for shareholders, of whom the US government would be the largest under this situation,' he said. It also doesn't change Intel's standing in the technology industry. It has fallen behind in producing the kinds of chips most prized for AI tasks – an area now dominated by Nvidia. So-called hyperscalers – the largest data centre operators, like Alphabet's Google, which are now committing upwards of US$80 billion per year to buying new hardware – aren't going to settle for lesser chips because the government tells them to, Cowen analyst Joshua Buchalter said. It's not clear how the US investment fixes a problem that stems from a lack of competitiveness, he said. 'You can't force hyperscalers to use less performant processors or else you're inhibiting their competitiveness globally,' Buchalter said. TSMC is the go-to chip foundry for much of the tech industry, including Apple, Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. Intel, though, has yet to prove it can keep pace with global chip designers and manufacturers again – let alone act as the linchpin for a revival of domestic production. 'Intel still has to deliver,' Morgan said. 'Will this stake really make a whole lot of difference?' BLOOMBERG
