Farmed salmon called into question - so is it safe to eat?
But switching to wild caught alternatives in Australia isn't an option for most, because it's not locally produced. The large foreign-owned aquaculture ventures around Tasmania's coastline supply around 90 per cent of the Atlantic salmon consumed across the nation.
Very little wild Atlantic or Pacific salmon is imported fresh from its native ranges around North America, Europe and Russia. But is wild salmon more nutritious or environmentally superior?
According to Melbourne University seafood expert Professor Giovanni Turchini, the answer is complicated. He is privy to the most up to date research on the seafood and aquaculture industries, and heads the multidisciplinary research team at AquaS, the Aquaculture Sustainability laboratory.
Related: 'Disgusting' photos of popular Aussie food spark furious debate
When it comes to Omega 3, then farmed fish generally have more of the most beneficial long-chain fatty acids EPA and DHA per milligram, and these are thought to be most beneficial to human health. But the reason farmed fish have more is that they're much fatter than their leaner wild cousins.
'It's important to educate the consumer that there's no good or bad. What is good for one person may be not good for another,' he said.
'For example, a nice fresh salad with a lot of vegetables is good for us when compared to a burger. But if you go to Central Africa where they lack protein, a burger is much better than a salad.
When it comes to contaminants and pollutants being absorbed by salmon from the water they inhabit, Turchini notes they both have 'very small' risks.
'Wild salmon might have the risk of more contaminants. You don't know where they grow, so there could be environmental contaminants like PCBs, mercury, or dioxins, which in farm fish, you don't find it because typically there's a lot of environmental control of the quality of the water and the food,' he said.
'However, in farmed fish you could have other contaminants like antibiotics if they're not used properly.'
Similar to most other fish, salmon flesh is naturally white. But like flamingos, its flesh turns pink due to the consumption of small crustaceans which contain astaxanthin, a carotenoid molecule similar to what we find in carrots.
Farmed fish are mostly fed on a diet of pellets. 'With chickens, they use these molecules that increase the color of the yolk. The same happens in fish. Astaxanthin is a powerful antioxidant that's similar to Vitamin A and is very good for our health and good for the fish because it helps them cope with environmental stress or heatwaves,' Turchini said.
And the pellets can contain either natural shrimp astaxanthin or a synthetic alternative.
'Some consumers are worried about this synthetic astaxanthin, but it's exactly like all the multivitamins they buy – all are synthetic. They are chemically identical to the natural one, and it's the reality in all food systems, not just salmon,' Turchini said.
😳 Mammoth de-extinction team produces 'groundbreaking' new creature
🚨 Aussie residents fearful as 50-metre 'toxic' towers built over community
☠️ Call for answers after poison found buried in rare predator's habitat
While the scale of the recent fish deaths in Tasmania is unprecedented, but Tasmania's $1 billion salmon-farming industry has been controversial.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton are diehard supporters of the industries, but there have been ongoing concerns about pollution from the farms. In Macquarie Harbour, the resulting lower oxygen levels have led to the near extinction of a native fish, the maugean skate, that inhabits the same waters.
There have also been ongoing concerns about salmon farmers deterring seals away from the salmon with explosives and rubber bullets.
Turchini believes another problem with farmed salmon is that farmers need to capture and grow food to feed the salmon, including chicken, grain and soy. But he believes it takes the pressure off wild populations, some of which have been over-fished.
'There's also the issue of bycatch – catching additional species we don't want. And then with trawling there's habitat destruction,' he said.
'But then with farmed fish there is the risk of escape. And those salmon could have an impact on the wild populations of fish.'
According to Turchini, the main difference between salmon raised in Australia and New Zealand is the species. Most fish produced at home is Atlantic salmon while across the ditch it's King salmon, but they are farmed in a very similar way.
'Nutritionally they are similar on all aspects, as they are very similar species, and they are fed with basically the same feed and farmed in similar high-quality waters, with the only difference being that New Zealand king salmon contains more fat, and thus also more Omega 3. For that it is particularly appreciated on some markets, and less on others,' he said.
Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Invasive weed killing hundreds of animals as $100,000 Aussie problem worsens: 'It's everywhere'
WARNING – DISTRESSING PHOTOS AND VIDEO: Hundreds of kangaroos have suffered a slow, painful death in recent months as an invasive weed wreaks havoc in one Aussie state, pushing wildlife rescuers to the brink as they fork out thousands of dollars to try and curb the growing problem. While it may look somewhat harmless, Phalaris aquatica — a tall, dry grass you've likely seen growing on rural roadsides — has a devastating impact on kangaroos. After consuming the toxic plant, which is commonly used as a pasture crop to feed livestock, roos develop what's known as the 'phalaris stagger', a neurological condition that makes them lose their balance and collapse, leaving them so ill they need to be euthanised. The imported species can also affect farm animals. Giving them cobalt or spraying it on the grass helps to protect them from the effects of the toxins. Cases can occur around the country, but they are particularly common in the southeast where the weed grows rampantly in late autumn and winter — and this year appears to be one of the worst yet. Invasive weed toxic to roos is 'everywhere', rescuers say Numerous wildlife rescuers across Victoria have been inundated with calls to help kangaroos seen suffering on roadsides and in paddocks. 'Phalaris is back with a vengeance this year… it's everywhere,' Walk On The Wild Side, a non-profit shelter, recently posted online after volunteers discovered a mob of roos showing 'odd behaviour' near a construction site. Some of the sick animals were seen standing with their 'heads pressed against cement walls', while others just sat on the ground, unable to move. 'Knowing there's nothing we can do for these precious souls is truly heart-wrenching. All we can do is give them the respect and dignity they deserve and send them off peacefully,' the group said. Luckily, in this instance, rescuers were able to save four young joeys from their mother's pouches. Several other organisations and concerned farmers have posted grim videos and photos in recent weeks of the devastating toll the 'cruel condition' is taking on the iconic animals in the hope of spreading awareness. Wildlife Victoria grapples with 'unprecedented' increase in cases In July, Wildlife Victoria recorded a staggering 433 per cent increase in kangaroo phalaris poisoning cases — a total of 485 — compared to the same month last year. 'Many of the cases we have dealt with so far in 2025 have spanned more than one animal, and in some cases entire mobs,' a spokesperson told Yahoo News, describing the increase as 'unprecedented'. 'This is a rapidly escalating wildlife crisis driven by prolonged drought, farming practices and extensive spread of the invasive weed with severe implications for native species,' they explained, noting the 'impact on rescuers has been major'. 'Most cases are untreatable. Humane euthanasia is often the only option to prevent suffering which is a heavy burden for our rescuers, both emotionally and physically.' Common roadside plant wreaking havoc in Australia: 'Shocking way to die' Sad reality of new 2.6km fence along busy Aussie road Aussies warned over 'nasty' common plant causing 'horrific' deaths Non-profit spends $100,000 on sedation, euthanasia in two months It's also taking a big toll on the finances of those trying to treat roos affected by the grass. In the last two months, Wildlife Victoria has spent $100,000 on sedation and euthanasia alone, plus additional staffing costs to manage the growing case load. The organisation is calling for greater awareness among farmers, communities and policymakers and has sought 'urgent' financial assistance from the state government. 'We are working through the operational response to some specific cases of impacted kangaroos on public land with both Parks Victoria and the Department of Energy Environment and Climate Action (DEECA). No one wants to see these kangaroos suffering,' the spokesperson told Yahoo, while also calling for 'better land management practices, regulatory measures, and stronger support for wildlife protection'. 'An easy fix would be to change the grazing grass to something that is not toxic to wildlife, and undertake an extensive program of eradication of the invasive weed across the landscape more broadly to enable the propagation of native grasses.' DEECA works with a number of agencies across the state, like VicRoads, Parks Victoria and local councils to help control phalaris. However, getting rid of the invasive species entirely may prove quite difficult. Weed science professor at the University of Queensland, Bhagirath Chauhan, previously told Yahoo phalaris is a fast-growing, resilient plant with seeds that can take a long time to germinate. 'So it means even if you can stop the seed production in this season, you will get these plants in the next three to four years, definitely,' he said. To donate to Wildlife Victoria, click here. Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
Yahoo
06-08-2025
- Yahoo
Cause of Death Revealed for Woman, 57, Who Refused Medical Care for Nearly 4 Decades
Patricia Iliev, 57, weighed just 42 lbs. when she died at her home in Tasmania, Australia in March 2021NEED TO KNOW The cause of death for a woman who refused medical attention for close to four decades has been confirmed at an inquest in Tasmania, Australia Patricia Iliev died at age 57 at her home in the town of Sheffield in March 2021, from starvation, coroner Olivia McTaggart stated in an Aug. 5 report Coroner Olivia McTaggart concluded that Iliev could have likely benefited from medical treatment, adding that it could have saved her life, even in the later stagesThe cause of death for a woman who refused medical attention for close to four decades has been confirmed at an inquest in Australia. Patricia Iliev, from Tasmania, died at age 57 at her home in the town of Sheffield in March 2021, from starvation, coroner Olivia McTaggart stated in an official report dated Tuesday, Aug. 5. During an inquest at the Coroners Court in Hobart, the court heard that Iliev weighed around 42 lbs. when she died after being immobile on her couch in the months before her death and stopping eating during that time, the coroner stated. An autopsy was conducted by Dr. Donald Ritchey, who identified starvation as the primary cause of death, adding that Iliev had less than half the normal body mass index and "no subcutaneous body fat stores." A gastrointestinal stromal tumour of the stomach and advanced lung disease, caused by smoking, were listed as secondary causes of death. Per the Mayo Clinic, a "gastrointestinal stromal tumor, also called a GIST, is a type of cancer that begins in the digestive system. GISTs happen most often in the stomach and small intestine." "A GIST is a growth of cells that's thought to form from nerve cells in the walls of the digestive organs. The nerve cells play a part in the process that moves food through the body," the site adds. A pathology report cited that it was likely the tumor contributed to Iliev having a "depressed appetite." It stated that due to her battling an advanced diagnosis of the chronic lung condition emphysema, this meant she was "also at risk of wasting syndrome in which there may be severe weight loss." Multiple hearings into Iliev's death were previously held in the Tasmanian cities of Devonport and Launceston between May 2022 and September 2024, before findings were handed down in August 2025, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) stated. A previously released Magistrates Court of Tasmania Coronial Division filing regarding the inquest into Iliev's death, said that she'd "last received professional medical attention in 1988." "Since that time she had been well until several years ago when her back began giving her some pain and her mobility became increasingly restricted," the December 2023 document added. Iliev had been being cared for by her partner Philip Adams since 2020, and she hadn't left her home since late that year, the ABC reported, adding that this was due to her suffering "multiple painful back injuries." The inquest explored whether Adams' care could have contributed to Iliev's death, however, the coroner found that although he could have done more, ultimately he "did not do any act to maliciously" result in her dying, per the official report. Adams had given evidence stating that he'd found Iliev deceased on the couch after he'd spent a couple of hours in the garden, before he spent time mourning, as well as cleaning and dressing his partner before contacting a telephone health service. After authorities arrived at the scene in March 2021, Iliev was found to have a "severely emaciated and pallid appearance," the official report stated. During the inquest, Adams stated that Iliev was a very light eater and had never weighed more than around 77 lbs. since he'd known her, the report noted. He claimed she became "pretty much confined to the couch" as she found it easier to use a bedpan and bottle there instead of getting up and going to the restroom. In the six months before Iliev's death, she gradually decreased her food intake, the inquest heard, eventually having just one meal a day to limit the amount she'd have to use the bedpan or a plastic bag. Adams stated that his partner — who had previously fasted throughout her life — had told him in her final week, "Philip, I've decided to stop eating," adding that she'd said "I'll let you know" when questioned when she would eat again. Two to three days before her death, Iliev slipped into a deep sleep and was not responsive, per the report. Adams insisted he chose to follow his partner's wishes by not getting medical treatment for her, despite considering it. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Coroner Olivia McTaggart concluded that Iliev could have likely benefited from medical treatment, adding that it could have saved her life, even in the later stages. "Despite the difficulty in determining the facts surrounding Ms. Iliev's death, I am satisfied that Mr. Adams did not do any act to maliciously cause her death," the coroner said, per the report. "He clearly had affection for her, respected her wishes (or what he believed to be her wishes) and provided her food, water and assistance on the occasions she made requests," McTaggart went on, stating that it's possible mental illness played a part in Iliev's decision-making. The Coroners Court in Hobart didn't immediately respond when contacted by PEOPLE for additional information. If you or someone you know needs mental health help, text "STRENGTH" to the Crisis Text Line at 741-741 to be connected to a certified crisis the original article on People
Yahoo
02-07-2025
- Yahoo
Huge change coming to Pepsi drink
A huge change is being rolled out to Pepsi drinks in Australia - with the company behind the popular beverage confirming the product will now contain about a third of its original sugar content. PepsiCo has reduced the amount of sugar in its Pepsi and Mountain Dew brands - with each now containing about 35 and 40 per cent less sugar. The sugar content has been replaced with artificial sweeteners instead. Popular Aussie food influencer Russ Eats first noticed the change on Pepsi's packaging after its health star rating went from 0.5 stars to 1.5 stars and shared the news on his social media page. He said the packaging still looked the same, with the only notable difference being the nutritional ranking. 'Full sugar Pepsi and Mountain Dew are gone,' he said in a TikTok. 'Now the packaging looks the same, that's what's so sneaky, but the health star went up, and guess what? 'They've taken out some of the sugar and added … sweetener. 'Have a look at the Mountain Dew, there was sugar now there's sweetener.' PepsiCo have been contacted for comment but in a statement confirmed they reduced the sugar content in Pepsi and Mountain Dew in response to consumers who were looking for products with less sugar. 'The new formulas contain low-calorie sweeteners and a lower sugar content,' a spokesman told 9honey Kitchen. 'We've also undertaken extensive sensory research to ensure we're still delivering the same great taste consumers know and love.' The news has outraged some social media users, who quickly shared their disappointment online. 'Daughter is a type 1 diabetic. Mountain Dew literally saved her life a number of times,' one commented. Another said her friend relied on the sugar content in Pepsi as she was allergic to sweeteners, while another said the company needed to put out a warning the new product was 'dangerous for diabetics'. A third said: 'I'm outraged! I'd get angry and riot but my energy levels have dropped.'