Luxon talks up more united Pacific on PNG visit
Photo:
RNZ / Russell Palmer
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon is talking up a more united Pacific in Papua New Guinea, saying the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) should be the central way other countries engage.
Luxon's visit
this week has reinforced diplomatic, trade and defence
connections with Papua New Guinea
.
He returns home to New Zealand on Wednesday after a busy Tuesday schedule that saw him address the Papua New Guinean Parliament, only the second foreign leader to do so.
He met with Prime Minister James Marape behind closed doors on Tuesday afternoon, the pair fronting to media and answering questions about the Forum afterwards.
"I think there's huge opportunity for the Pacific Island Forum to become - and it is - the organising and the central organisation that actually, if you want to engage with the Pacific, you come through the Pacific Island Forum," Luxon said.
"There's more that sort of is uniting us around actually being Pacific nations, being a Pacific family and wanting to develop our own solutions to our own challenges - and making sure that anyone outside of the Pacific is actually engaging with us in a coherent way through the centrality of the PIF."
While the trip has seen Luxon warmly welcomed and reinforced ties with Papua New Guinea, it has also put other Pacific relationships in the spotlight.
Neither Prime Minister Luxon nor Foreign Minister Winston Peters flew to the Cook Islands for this week's celebration of 60 years of that country's constitution.
Instead, Peters delivered a speech in Auckland, highlighting that the "free" association meant Cook Islanders could choose to become fully independent should they wish.
The Cook Islands constitution set it up as a nation in "free association" with New Zealand, which enables the realm nation access to New Zealand citizenship, passports and currency while also placing certain responsibilities on New Zealand.
Papua New Guinea's prime minister James Marape gives a speech during celebrations of 50 years of diplomatic ties with New Zealand.
Photo:
RNZ / Russell Palmer
Peters maintains the relationship should have meant New Zealand would be consulted over the deals the Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown signed with China.
Asked about the dispute, Luxon said New Zealand had no problem with the Cook Islands people, but "we have a political issue to work through with the actual government of the Cook Islands".
"We've got some work to do, to make sure that we deal with the differences and the disagreements we have about the nature of our constitutional arrangements," he said.
Marape confirmed their meeting had included discussion of the "Pacific Island family".
With the Solomon Islands to host the next Forum Leaders meeting next month, he said he would be phoning his counterpart.
"I will be making a phone call to my colleague in Honiara to make sure that he gives respect to the spirit of the structure that has carried us thus far. That's ... all I can say.
"My call to him would be 'how's it going and is there anything you need from us' and to make sure that we don't shift away from the Pacific Island forum structure we have - without pre-empting my call, it's a call between me and him, I can't dive more into what level of conversation we'll have."
The Solomon Islands has also faced criticism for its dealings with China, and recent reporting has highlighted it could seek to prevent Taiwan's attendance at the forum.
Other reports have suggested one solution being considered would be to ban China and the United States from attending.
Winston Peters is attending the Forum next month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
30 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Auckland mayoral debate event stalls after candidates don't respond
The University of Auckland Debating Society is still hopeful mayor Wayne Brown (C) will respond to a debate invitation. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi Opportunities for Auckland voters to see democracy in action in this year's mayoral election might be few and far between. Incumbent Auckland mayor Wayne Brown is seeking re-election against 11 other contenders . But few mayoral debates are being lined up before voting opens on 9 September. In what is already a battle to draw interest to local body elections , which notoriously struggle to attract a strong turnout , one mayoral candidate is concerned a lacklustre campaign will ensure the vote remains low. The University of Auckland Debating Society told RNZ it had hoped to hold a mayoral debate on Tuesday, 5 August. External events manager Robert Hoskins said it invited three candidates: Kerrin Leoni, Ted Johnston and current mayor Wayne Brown, but only Leoni responded. He said the team had spoken to someone from the mayor's office last month, who said they would pass their request to the mayor's campaign team. The society's lively candidate debate in 2022 , hosted by broadcaster Jack Tame, attracted hundreds of students. It also held a debate in 2019. "In both cases, we had all major candidates willing to attend, though we ran our 2022 debate quite early, before Wayne Brown was considered a major candidate, and as such, we did not invite him," Hoskins said. He was still hopeful Brown might agree to participate. "Students appreciate getting direct engagement with candidates. These events are well attended. We sometimes get upwards of 500 students attending, and many more watch the livestream. "Students do care about what's going on in Auckland and their local wards. Not having any engagement with them is a real shame." The Auckland Business Chamber, which held a mayoral debate in 2022, told RNZ it would not have one this year, but did not elaborate why. The Penrose Business Association said it planned to hold a mayoral debate, but it had not come together yet. Leoni said she received debate invitations from the Auckland University Debating Society and the Institute of Directors. "It's unacceptable that they [the Debating Society] have not been able to go ahead with their event, knowing that the main person I'm up against, or he's up against me, has not even responded to the invite. "I'm still waiting to hear back from the Institute of Directors if we're going to go ahead. But from what I've heard, Wayne Brown is saying no to debates." She was eager to debate Brown and called on him to front up. "Organisations organising debates and events want to have the sitting mayor there, and so he should be. "I actually think it's quite arrogant. He's basically saying to Aucklanders, I'm better than anyone else, so why should I turn up. That's not good enough. "He should be fronting up to debate anyone else standing for mayor. "It's concerning for democracy, and I'm disappointed in Wayne Brown." Mayoral candidate Kerrin Leoni. Photo: Supplied/ Labour Party In the city's last local elections, just 405,149 votes were returned, 35.4 percent of enrolled voters. In 2019's election, the voter turnout was 35.3 percent. Leoni said debates were a way to bolster interest. "We have a responsibility as candidates to debate our policies in public so Aucklanders can hear our opinions and know what they're actually voting for." She said she had committed to a handful of meet the candidates events. Community Hub Future Whangaparāoa said Kerrin Leoni was the only mayoral candiate registered for its meet the candidates meeting on Sunday, 14 September. When contacted by RNZ, a spokesperson for Wayne Brown's campaign was non-committal about debates or panels. "Wayne has a very busy schedule as mayor across the city. He gets many requests from various groups across Auckland's many diverse communities and will be engaging with them as the election continues. "He will be strongly contesting this race against the 11 other candidates." RNZ asked all mayoral candidates who provided contact details if they wanted a debate. Rob Mcneil from the Animal Justice Party said he was "very interested to debate other mayoral candidates at any point". He said he had been invited to a debate in Warworth on 10 September, held by One Mahurangi Business Association. Johnston told RNZ he was also "quite willing to debate the other candidates". He said he had received four debate invitations. The Institute of Directors has been contacted for comment. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
30 minutes ago
- RNZ News
The people working for $10 - and less
Even with living wage employment opportunities, some only earn between $8.78 and $10.65 an hour for additional hours worked. Photo: RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King New Zealand needs to rethink how the welfare system interacts with tax - and how we approach "punishing" people who are on the benefit, a prominent economist says. Ganesh Ahirao said the marginal tax rates that people were earning when they shifted off income support, or took on more work at middle incomes, were much higher than those paid by higher-income people. He looked at a number of household scenarios to illustrate the point and said even with living wage employment opportunities available, people were only earning between $8.78 and $10.65 an hour for additional hours worked. Someone on a minimum wage would earn even less. The Living Wage is currently set at $27.80 per hour. In one case, a single person whom he referred to as Manaia, with no children, no student loan and paying rent of $415 a week for a one-bedroom flat in Wellington would receive the Jobseeker Support (JS) payment alongside Winter Energy Payment (WEP) and Accommodation Supplement (ASUP) totalling in the hand $592 per week. Six hours' work at the living wage would take income to just over $700 with those supports. "But thereafter, the reduction of JobSeeker - at the gut-punching rate of 70 cents for every extra dollar earned - slows in-the-hand increases to a snail's pace. Consequently, the effective marginal tax rate (EMTR) faced by Manaia soars into 80 percent-plus stratospheric territory," Ahirao said. In another case, a sole parent of two children paying $600 a week would receive the Sole Parent (SP) payment alongside WEP, the Family Tax Credit (FTC) component of Working for Families, and ASUP totalling $1047 per week. With six hours work at the living wage, the person's income would rise to nearly $1200. "But then the reductions in support payments brutally cut in. Firstly, the SP declines by 30 cents for every extra dollar earned and then after 10 hours per week by 70 cents per extra dollar earned. The resulting EMTR of 89.2 percent is pushed to 93.3 percent (after 14 hours per week) as FTC payments begin to decline at 27 cents for every dollar of other income. Another hit (at 24 hours per week) pushes the EMTR to 95 percent, as the ASUP also begins to decline (25 cents for every dollar of other income)," Ahirao said. If the person worked 40 hours a week they would receive $352 more than if they did not work at all. Ahirao said the tax and welfare systems needed to work together. "MSD does benefits and IRD does Working for Families and student loans… they have this separation there that needs opt brought together. "Abatement rates in the welfare system are not seen by the tax system. That's one element. "We also need to think seriously about our perspective on penalising people. It's a punitive-first approach welfare system. There is a belief out there that everyone should work, should be able to go to work and should take up work whenever they can. To a degree that's ok but then it goes to those who don't work are somehow at fault and should be penalised. That is the perspective to get past." He said many people out of work were not jobless by choice. There was little encouragement to work when the benefit was clawed back so quickly, he said. "You take away 70c in the dollar - there's a perspective that if we add on to their part-time income with jobseeker they're going to get too much, it's going to be too generous so we've got to claw it back… do we want to encourage people into the workforce or penalise people for not being in the workforce? "That's the mindset we need to get over before setting any other policies. That's a big shift in our thinking across the whole political spectrum." A universal basic income could be part of the conversation, he said. "I'm comfortable saying you have aright to an adequate income and that involves an obligation to contribute in society, make yourself available for work. You don't go from there to we're going to bash you with a whole lot of sanctions. You tweak the settings to make it as attractive as possible to contribute. A carrot rather than a stick approach." Ministry of Social Development general manager of welfare system and income support Fiona Carter-Giddings said the ministry's priority was getting people into work. "Between June 2024 and June 2025, 86,000 benefits were cancelled because the person found a job. "We're pleased New Zealanders continue to move off benefit and into work, despite challenging economic circumstances. When people are employed they have a higher income and more opportunities to improve their quality of life. "Government financial assistance generally reduces as other income increases, because New Zealand's welfare system targets support to people who need it the most. This is a long-standing principle of social security. "The ideal rate at which support should reduce involves trade-offs between income adequacy, incentives to work, and maintaining appropriate costs to the taxpayer. The welfare system is designed to balance these objectives, and it is an area of ongoing debate." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
30 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Marine and coastal rights law changes not justifiable, former United Future leader says
Peter Dunne, was leader of United Future in 2011 and voted in favour of the original Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act. Photo: RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King Former MPs who supported the National government's foreshore and seabed legislation back in 2011 are lambasting the coalition's move to make it harder for Māori to get customary rights. The government will amend the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act to toughen the customary rights test. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said the changes would restore Parliament's "original intent" for the law, after a 2023 Court of Appeal ruling made it easier for groups to win customary title. A Supreme Court ruling overturning that decision meant the government paused introducing the changes last December. But, on Tuesday, it announced it would push ahead with amending the law saying the Supreme Court decision was still "able to be interpreted in quite a broad way". The changes will mean those seeking title will need to prove they have had continuous exclusive use and ownership of the area since 1840. Former Attorney-General and National MP Chris Finlayson has condemned the move calling it foolish and saying it would "undermine" Parliament's original intention and be "extremely harmful" to race relations. There is a similar sentiment from Peter Dunne, who was leader of United Future in 2011 and voted in favour of the law. He told RNZ the original legislation was designed to sort out the public's access to the foreshore and seabed while also recognising customary rights of Māori, if they could prove a "continuous connection" to it. Proving that connection, Dunne said, was already "quite a high test". "It was set out to be relatively high for quite a specific purpose; to make sure that the claims that were being made were genuine and well founded and not frivolous or opportunistic... it was generally accepted there needed to be a high bar." The Supreme Court had already made the law's original intent clear and he did not know why the government wanted to make it "clear times two". "It seems to me that that's almost a way of saying 'we want to make it tougher than was originally intended' and I don't think that's correct or justifiable." The Marine and Coastal Area Act replaced the controversial Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004 , which had extinguished Māori customary rights in favour of Crown ownership, provoked widespread protest, and led to the formation of the Māori Party - now Te Pāti Māori. Dunne said the Supreme Court decision was definitive and if he were still in government he would lobby the government to "let sleeping dogs lie". "Uphold the spirit of the 2011 legislation [because] I don't think this issue, which has caused such controversy over the last nearly 30 years, needs to be reopened and all those old wounds brought to the surface again," he said. "It's time to now to move on, let the situation resolve itself according to that legislation, and do so without further provocation." Tau Henare was a member of the National Party at the time, and speaking at the bill's first reading, said the difference between the Marine Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act and its predecessor the Foreshore and Seabed Act, was access to the judiciary. "Everybody has a right, it does not matter whether they are black, white, red, or green; it does not matter, everybody has an absolute right to go to court to find out whether they are right or whether they are wrong." "This is about human rights, and that is what that whole debacle was about. Fifty thousand people were outside the front door of this place," he said at the time. Speaking to RNZ on Wednesday, Henare said Chris Finlayson was "absolutely right" and there was not "one person" in caucus who had any experience with "Treaty Jurisdiction Prudence". "It's a play for the dumb red neck vote. It shows how backward National have slipped. Be glad to see them go," he said. The law change is expected to pass before October. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
