LambdaTest Announces Seamless Azure DevOps Integration for Effortless Test Management
SAN FRANCISCO, July 29, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--LambdaTest, a GenAI-powered quality engineering platform, is excited to announce the launch of its Azure DevOps App, designed to streamline test management within the Azure DevOps environment. The LambdaTest Azure DevOps App integrates directly with Azure DevOps through the Azure DevOps Marketplace, providing users with a powerful tool to manage and track their executions. They can also link test cases, track executions of those test cases, and create new test cases with AI or manually in a seamless manner, boosting workflow efficiency and fostering better collaboration across development teams.
The LambdaTest AI Test Manager, which is available through the Azure DevOps Marketplace, enhances the Azure DevOps interface by bringing test management functionalities right where teams are already working. This direct integration allows developers and testers to efficiently handle test cases, whether creating, linking, or tracking them, without switching between different tools or environments.
LambdaTest's Azure DevOps App offers effortless setup via the Azure DevOps Marketplace with simple authentication. It enables seamless linking of test cases to work items for clear traceability. Users can leverage AI to create contextual test cases by entering requirements or uploading files directly within Azure DevOps. The app provides detailed execution history for visibility into test results and supports easy sharing and review of test cases, enhancing collaboration. This integration streamlines workflows and strengthens coordination between development and testing teams.
"We believe that this integration will significantly enhance the development workflow for our users," said Mayank Bhola, Co-Founder & Head of Products of LambdaTest. "By bringing together test management and Azure DevOps in one platform, teams can now test more efficiently and deliver high-quality products faster. This is yet another step in our mission to streamline the testing process and support seamless CI/CD pipelines across organizations."
LambdaTest's integration with Azure DevOps is a game changer for organizations looking to enhance their testing workflow. By reducing friction between development and testing, this integration allows teams to accelerate releases while maintaining high-quality standards.
The LambdaTest Azure DevOps App is available now in the Azure DevOps Marketplace, providing teams with an intuitive, all-in-one solution for managing tests within their existing DevOps workflow.
For more information on LambdaTest Azure DevOps App, please visit https://www.lambdatest.com/blog/ai-test-manager-azure-devops-extension/
About LambdaTest
LambdaTest is a GenAI-powered Quality Engineering Platform that empowers teams to test intelligently, smarter, and ship faster. Built for scale, it offers a full-stack testing cloud with 10K+ real devices and 3,000+ browsers.
With AI-native test management, MCP servers, and agent-based automation, LambdaTest supports Selenium, Appium, Playwright, and all major frameworks. AI Agents like HyperExecute and KaneAI bring the power of AI and cloud into your software testing workflow, enabling seamless automation testing with 120+ integrations.
LambdaTest Agents accelerate your testing throughout the entire SDLC, from test planning and authoring to automation, infrastructure, execution, RCA, and reporting.
For more information, please visit https://lambdatest.com
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250729099836/en/
Contacts
press@lambdatest.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Wire
3 hours ago
- Business Wire
LINEAGE INVESTOR ALERT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Lineage, Inc. and Announces Opportunity for Investors with Substantial Losses to Lead the Lineage Class Action Lawsuit
SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers of Lineage, Inc. (NASDAQ: LINE) common stock in or traceable to the registration statement used in connection with Lineage's July 2024 initial public offering (the 'IPO'), have until September 30, 2025 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Lineage class action lawsuit. Captioned City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System v. Lineage, Inc., No. 25-cv-12383 (E.D. Mich.), the Lineage class action lawsuit charges Lineage and certain of its top executives, directors, IPO underwriters, and IPO sponsor with violations of the Securities Act of 1933. If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Lineage class action lawsuit, please provide your information here: CASE ALLEGATIONS: Lineage is a Maryland REIT focused on temperature-controlled cold-storage facilities. In the July 2024 IPO, Lineage sold over 65 million shares of Lineage common stock to investors at $78 per share, raising more than $5 billion in gross offering proceeds. The Lineage class action lawsuit alleges that the registration statement was false and/or misleading and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Lineage was then experiencing sustained weakening in customer demand, as additional cold-storage supply had come on line, Lineage's customers destocked a glut of excessive inventory built up during the COVID-19 pandemic, and Lineage's customers shifted to maintaining leaner cold-storage inventories on a go-forward basis in response to changed consumer trends; (ii) Lineage had implemented price increases in the lead-up to the IPO that could not be sustained in light of the weakening demand environment facing Lineage; (iii) Lineage was unable to effectively counteract the adverse trends listed above through the use of minimum storage guarantees or as a result of operational efficiencies, technological improvements, or its purported competitive advantages; (iv) as a result, rather than enjoying stable revenue growth, high occupancy rates, and steady rent escalation as represented in the registration statement, Lineage was in fact suffering from stagnant or falling revenue, occupancy rates, and rent prices; and (v) consequently, Lineage's financial results, business operations, and prospects were materially impaired. Since the IPO, the price of Lineage stock has fallen to lows near $40 per share. The price of Lineage stock has remained substantially below the IPO price at the time of the filing of the complaint. The plaintiff is represented by Robbins Geller, which has extensive experience in prosecuting investor class actions including actions involving financial fraud. You can view a copy of the complaint by clicking here. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased Lineage common stock in or traceable to the registration statement issued in connection with Lineage's IPO to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Lineage class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Lineage class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Lineage class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Lineage class action lawsuit. ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices.
Forbes
6 hours ago
- Forbes
Engineering Excellence In The Age Of AI
Abhi Shimpi is the Vice President of Software Engineering in a Financial Services organization. As engineering leaders, many of us are racing to integrate GenAI into our development life cycles. The tools are powerful, the potential is massive, but amid all the buzz about velocity and automation, I believe we're overlooking a critical element: Engineering Excellence. If we don't start reshaping our engineering culture for AI, AI will reshape it for us, and it might not be in our favor. I don't mean just a technical shift, but also a cultural one. If we lose sight of the foundational practices that make engineering sustainable, secure and scalable, then we're moving forward recklessly. What Engineering Excellence Used To Mean Before GenAI entered the scene, engineering excellence had a clear definition. We talked about code quality, test automation, secure development practices, peer reviews, resiliency, architecture rigor and continuous delivery. We had internal maturity models to measure and reinforce those principles. Those models gave teams an understanding of what 'good' looked like and how to build clean, maintainable and trustworthy software at scale. It was about process and discipline. We created feedback loops, fostered coaching and mentorship and we made space for design thinking and technical judgment. Now, GenAI is rewriting the rules, and we need to make sure we don't allow it to erase those fundamentals along the way. Speed Without Discipline AI has transformed the developer experience. Tools like GitHub Copilot, Google Gemini and Microsoft Copilot can generate code for entire functions or workflows in seconds. Non-technical users can build apps using natural language prompts. In theory, this is empowerment. In practice, it's often chaos. I've seen firsthand how easy it is to bypass core engineering principles in the rush to adopt GenAI and ship faster. A developer asks Copilot for a script, drops it into a PowerApps and deploys. No design review, no security scan and no consideration given to how security is handled or data is managed. It works, but it doesn't scale. It creates anti-patterns that violate the architectural standards we've spent years putting in place. And it's not just developers; citizen developers (those with minimal technical training) are building and deploying internal applications without understanding the implications. What kind of data are they handling? What access are they exposing? What guardrails are missing? And it's happening across industries. The real risk isn't that GenAI makes mistakes, it's that we stop asking questions. FOMO Is Not A Strategy Let's be honest: A lot of organizations are embracing GenAI out of fear of missing out. Once the floodgates opened, everyone rushed in. The intent was good, but the pace? Unsustainable. There's nothing wrong with moving fast if you're moving with intention, but if you don't know what you're measuring, you're just reacting. And when you prioritize output over outcome, you miss the real opportunity. This is why I keep emphasizing outcome over output. GenAI can help you generate more code. That doesn't mean it's better code. We need to slow down just enough to ask: Does this solution create long-term value? Is it secure? Is it explainable? Is it maintainable? Rebuilding Development Culture For AI Embedding AI into our workflows is not enough. We have to embed engineering judgment alongside it. That means reinvesting in the things that made us strong in the first place: coaching, mentorship, engineering excellence and craftsmanship. Peer reviews still matter, clean architecture still matters, release/maintenance still matters and code design is not optional. In one example from my experience, developers unfamiliar with a programming language were able to deliver time-sensitive solutions using GenAI tools faster. We layered in strong governance: design reviews, peer oversight, security assessment and architectural alignment. Without those guardrails, the same project could have introduced serious risks. Hence, AI doesn't eliminate the need for engineering culture. It amplifies the consequences of not having one. Redefining Maturity For An AI-First World We used to measure engineering maturity using KPIs like velocity, defect rates, time to market and code coverage. Those still matter, but they're no longer enough. Now we need to measure how efficiently and responsibly we're using AI. That includes measuring aspects, such as: • How much human oversight is required? • Are AI outputs explainable? • Are they aligned with our architectural patterns? • Do we trust the AI engine's recommendations? And if not, why? If we allow AI to review our code, we must also define a trust framework. What is the trust score? What patterns is the AI referencing? Do those patterns match what we've codified as best practice? Which LLM should be used? The maturity model must evolve and be assessed continuously. Otherwise, we're shooting in the dark. Psychological Safety And Performance In A Machine-Driven World There's another piece to this puzzle—psychological safety. When we're using AI, safety is about trust in systems. We need to build environments where developers feel safe questioning AI outputs, rejecting them when necessary and adding human judgment. Blind faith in GenAI is just as dangerous as blind rejection. At the same time, we need to hold teams accountable for performance and outcomes. The tools may change, but excellence still requires clarity, consistency and commitment. What Good Looks Like So, what does success look like? From our experience, it includes: • Less rework • Fewer defects • Lower tech debt • Faster and more efficient onboarding, even for junior engineers • Enhanced developer productivity and satisfaction In the example I shared earlier, we saw measurable gains using GenAI. Faster delivery, broader developer capacity and successful outcomes even when teams were new to the tech stack. But those benefits only came after we added extra oversight to ensure architectural compliance and secure development practices. Over time, that governance load decreased because the cultural foundation was strong. That's the path forward. Short-term governance for long-term gain. Shape Or Be Shaped The real test of GenAI is cultural. Tools will continue to evolve. But if we fail to adapt our engineering practices and mindsets, those tools will define our future for us. The future is about moving with purpose. If we can redefine our maturity models, enforce meaningful guardrails and keep engineering excellence at the center, AI will be a powerful ally. If we don't, it will become a force we no longer control. And by then, it might be too late. Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Business Wire
6 hours ago
- Business Wire
General American Investors Files Certified Shareholder Report for Period Ended June 30, 2025
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--General American Investors Company, Inc., a closed-end investment company listed on the New York Stock Exchange (GAM), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) its Certified Shareholder Report (Form N-CSR) for the six-month period ended June 30, 2025. The Form N-CSR contains the Company's June 30, 2025 Semi-Annual Report and is available at the SEC's website: and the Company's website: The Semi-Annual Report is expected to be mailed to stockholders shortly. The Semi-Annual Report indicates that as of or for the six months ended: * After a distribution of $4.07 per share from net long-term capital gains and a dividend of $0.43 per share paid in December 2024 and a distribution of $0.25 per share from long-term capital gains paid in March 2025. Expand The largest stock holdings in the Company's portfolio as of June 30, 2025, included: Microsoft, Republic Services, Berkshire Hathaway, TJX Companies, and Amazon.
