Pakistan says it will nominate Donald Trump for Nobel Peace Prize for resolving its conflict with India
Pakistan has said it would recommend Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his work in helping to resolve the recent conflict between India and Pakistan.
Some analysts in Pakistan have suggested the move might persuade the US president to reconsider potentially joining Israel in striking Iran's nuclear facilities.
Pakistan has condemned Israel's attack on Iran as a violation of international law and said it threatens regional stability.
1:57
Last month a surprise announcement by Mr Trump of a ceasefire brought an end to a four-day conflict between India and Pakistan, two nuclear-armed states.
The US president has repeatedly boasted of averting a nuclear war and saving millions of lives, and has complained about not getting enough credit.
While Pakistan agrees US diplomatic intervention brought the fighting to an end, India has disputed that, saying it was a bilateral agreement between the two militaries.
"President Trump demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship through robust diplomatic engagement with both Islamabad and New Delhi, which de-escalated a rapidly deteriorating situation," Pakistan said.
"This intervention stands as a testament to his role as a genuine peacemaker."
Mr Trump has long craved the Nobel Peace Prize, claiming he should have been awarded it for a variety of reasons.
In a post on his Truth Social platform on Friday, the president gave a long list of conflicts he claimed he had resolved, including Pakistan and India and the Abraham accords in his first term between Israel and some Muslim-majority countries.
"I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do," he added.
Pakistan's announcement it would nominate Mr Trump comes in the same week as its army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, met the US president for lunch.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economist
25 minutes ago
- Economist
Europe wants to show it's ready for war. Would anyone show up to fight?
Nice tanks you got there, Europe—got anyone to drive 'em? Such are the taunts the continent's generals might have to endure following the announcement of a splurge in defence spending expected from the NATO summit in The Hague on June 24th-25th. Assuming European governments don't bin their commitments to bigger defence budgets once some kind of peace is agreed to in Ukraine—or Donald Trump leaves the White House—spending on their armed forces will roughly double within a decade. A disproportionate slug of the jump from a 2% of GDP spending target to 3.5% will go towards purchasing equipment. But armies are about people, too. Attracting youngsters to a career that involves getting shot at has never been easy; a bit of forceful nagging (known in military jargon as 'conscription') is already on the cards in some countries. Even dragooning recalcitrant teens into uniform will not solve a problem that is lurking deep in the continent's psyche. Europeans are proud of their peaceful ways. If war breaks out there, will anybody be there to fight it?
Economist
40 minutes ago
- Economist
An explosive moment of truth for Iran and Israel
THE SECOND week of Israel's war on Iran may be even more dangerous than the first. In Iran the destruction is relentless: on June 21st there were strikes on its Isfahan nuclear facility and more assassinations. For Israel, after a dazzling display of prowess, the coming days threaten to expose horribly the limits of its military power, with a long-distance air campaign suffering diminishing returns and Iran's regime recovering its poise. A war that peters out would leave the regime intact and with greater incentives to race for a bomb. That nightmarish prospect may lead Israel to escalate in the pursuit of a knock-out blow or to draw in America. President Donald Trump was due to meet his national security team on June 21st and B-2 stealth bombers are being moved out of America. Iran is ramping-up threats. On June 21st it warned American involvemen t would be 'very, very dangerous for everybody'.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Pakistan to recommend Donald Trump for Nobel peace prize
Pakistan has announced that it will formally recommend President Trump as a nominee for the Nobel peace prize for his 'great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship' in securing a ceasefire its recent conflict with India. The announcement came on Saturday, hours after Trump took credit for a peace deal negotiated in Washington between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda, and at a time the US leader is considering potential intervention in the Middle East. • US moves B-2 stealth bombers as Israel-Iran conflict continues 'The government of Pakistan has decided to formally recommend President Donald J Trump for the 2026 Nobel peace prize,' the Pakistani government wrote on social media. It said the decision was taken 'in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis'. It comes after Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, had an unprecedented one-on-one meeting with Trump on Wednesday at the White House, during which they engaged in discussions for more than two hours. Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), the media wing of the Pakistan Armed Forces, reported that Munir conveyed his 'deep appreciation' for Trump's role in brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after a four-day conflict in May between the two nuclear-armed nations. Last month, Trump recounted his memory of the conflict while speaking to reporters. 'I said, 'Come on, we're going to do a lot of trade with you guys [India and Pakistan]. Let's stop it. Let's stop it. If you stop it, we'll do a trade. If you don't stop it, we're not going to do any trade.'' India, meanwhile, denied that the US president had any role in its ceasefire with Pakistan. 'The talks regarding cessation of military action were held directly between India and Pakistan under the existing channels established between both militaries,' India's foreign secretary, Vikram Misri, said in a press release on Wednesday. Some analysts have said Pakistan's nomination is absurd. Maleeha Lodhi, a former Pakistani ambassador to the US and UN, said: 'Ingratiation cannot serve as policy. It is unfortunate that the government is recommending Trump for a Nobel peace prize. 'A man who has backed Israel's genocidal war in Gaza and called Israel's attack on Iran as 'excellent'. This move does not reflect the views of the people of Pakistan.' Despite concerns in Washington about Pakistan's close alignment with Beijing, Pakistan remains significant to the US. Islamabad has not alleviated these worries, particularly as it seeks new deals for advanced weaponry and technology from China, its primary arms supplier. Amit Ranjan, a research fellow at the Institute of South Asian Studies at the National University of Singapore, told The Sunday Times: 'Trump's lunch with Field Marshal Munir suggests a growing closeness between Pakistan and the US. However, the nature of this relationship will depend on how China looks at it. 'The nomination is Pakistan's way to thank Trump for his role in the ceasefire during military confrontation with India.' Pakistan has had a complicated security relationship with the US, collaborating with Washington while also supporting militants opposing Nato forces in Afghanistan. General Michael Kurilla, the head of US Central Command, recently commended Pakistan's military, describing their collaboration as a 'phenomenal partnership' in the fight against Afghanistan-based militant Islamist group Isis-K. Trump expressed gratitude to Pakistan for handing over an Isis-K member suspected of involvement in a bombing that killed 13 American troops during the withdrawal from Afghanistan. In the past, Trump has received several Nobel peace prize nominations from his supporters, and is said to crave the award. However, on Friday he posted on social media to lament he will probably never win the accolade. 'No, I won't get a Nobel peace prize no matter what I do … whatever those outcomes may be, but the people know, and that's all that matters to me!' he wrote.
