Report reveals ‘toxic culture' among consultants at CHI hospital
A 'negative and toxic' work culture at a hospital run by
Children's Health Ireland
(CHI), in which multiple staff complained of 'unprofessional and disruptive behaviour from consultants', contributed to the undermining of care and treatment for sick children, an internal report has found.
The CHI report also noted one consultant had taken a legal action for defamation against another.
The report, which also revealed possible misuse of the
National Treatment Purchase Fund
, was compiled in 2021-2022 but was only given to the
Department of Health
last Monday.
It paints an astonishing picture of the work culture in parts of one of the best-known hospitals in the country, where relations between some staff and between some staff and management had deteriorated to the point where 'challenging behaviour appears to be the norm'.
READ MORE
'Numerous participants expressed concern for the emotional and physical wellbeing of colleagues working in the service,' it said.
In some cases, it identified where the work culture and the interpersonal difficulties which characterised some key relationships had led to shortcomings in the case of patients.
'Dysfunctional relationships played a significant part in leading to two ... cases both of which led to surgeries evolving with complications and ultimately children having prolonged recoveries,' it said.
'Feedback from participants all describing an environment and working life that is adversely impacted by the 'negative' and 'toxic' culture that exists in the department.'
[
Revelations show appalling personal behaviour among some CHI medics
Opens in new window
]
While the report did not identify the staff members involved by name, it laid out in detail how a small number of people were involved.
'Across multiple participants there was one consultant identified consistently as creating a psychologically unsafe environment not conducive to learning,' it said. 'Two specific examples where this consultant's behaviour and actions reportedly had a significant impact on trainee careers and/or wellbeing were staunchly brought to the attention of this examination through participant interviews.'
In some cases, the behaviour led to the departure of other staff members.
Three members of staff who left one department in the hospital all said they left 'for one reason only – bullying'.
Staff members – including some highly skilled medical professionals who were training for senior roles – said one consultant would 'punish and exclude you, belittle you and say you were no good. I felt fearful, felt unsafe to ask [the consultant] for help.'
'There's a lot of people who have come across [the consultant's] path and it has had a detrimental impact on their lives,' said another.
After giving examples of one consultant's behaviour, the report noted: 'The above reflections from very personal experiences appear to highlight a pattern of abrupt, unprofessional, intimidating and volatile behaviour.
'Behaviours displayed by this consultant appear to be consistent with and reflective of conduct that has been identified as leading to and creating a psychologically unsafe environment, that is an environment where an individual feels they may be punished or humiliated for speaking up with ideas, questions, concerns or mistakes.'
The effect on trainees was especially acute, the report said, quoting one member of staff who said: 'Since I started I have been experiencing a lot of bullying/harassment mainly from two consultants ... I feel that I am working in a hostile environment, waiting to be victimised. I am subjected to humiliating and intimidating experiences. They are always undervaluing my performance.
'It has reached a stage that it is affecting my self-esteem, confidence and performance at work in hospital and also at home affecting my family life. The thought of doing on call with these consultants makes me so nervous and stressful.'
CHI did not respond to a request for comment yesterday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
18 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Trump's Taco trade is a major headache for ECB rate setters
The so-called 'Taco trade' has been a boon for a certain cohort of Wall Street investors but a headache for almost everyone else, businesses and policymakers in particular. The acronym – short for 'Trump Always Chickens Out' – refers to the US president's habit of making tariff threats, resulting in a drop in markets, before walking back on the threat (in response to market pressure), causing markets to rebound. It was coined after Trump's so-called 'Liberation Day' tariff announcement in April which triggered a major market wobble followed by a 90-day pause one week later, followed by a market rally. The impact of tariffs is one thing but Trump's increasingly erratic pronouncements and the general uncertainty surrounding US trade policy poses quite a different proposition, one that can't be planned for. READ MORE [ Irish exports surged ahead of Trump's 'liberation day' tariffs Opens in new window ] Precedent tells us that uncertainty stops consumers making big purchase decisions and stops businesses investing, hence economic forecasts are being pared back. But the uncertainty also, from the European Central Bank's (ECB) perspective, complicates the path for interest rates. There is lag between the monetary policy changes and the effect of these changes on the real economy (days, weeks, months, even years – it is still debated). So not knowing where consumers and businesses will be in six months makes rate setting something of a stab in the dark. If ECB policymakers keep rates at relatively restrictive levels and Europe is enveloped in a nasty trade war with the US, they will be caught out. Conversely, if the ECB lowers rates quickly in response to tariff threats and Brussels and Washington agree a trade deal, they will similarly be caught out, particularly with massive defence spending plans – in Germany and elsewhere – likely to add to inflationary pressure in the coming months. 'While the uncertainty surrounding trade policies is expected to weigh on business investment and exports, especially in the short term, rising government investment in defence and infrastructure will increasingly support growth over the medium term.' That is how the ECB characterised its current predicament in a statement accompanying its latest rate decision on Thursday. The central bank reduced its headline deposit rate by a further quarter point to 2 per cent, a move that had been seemingly locked in by the latest inflation data for the bloc, which put headline price growth at 1.9 per cent below the bank's target rate of 2 per cent. The ECB's latest rate reduction, the eighth in the current cycle, came with a fresh set of forecasts for the euro zone economy. The ECB now thinks inflation will be below target in 2026, at 1.6 per cent, with the economy expanding at a slower-than-expected rate of 1.1 per cent. Despite strong labour markets, rising real incomes and easier financing conditions, ECB president Christine Lagarde warned that risks to growth were still skewed to the downside. 'A further escalation in global trade tensions, and associated uncertainties, could lower euro area growth by dampening exports and dragging down investment and consumption,' she said. Most EU exports currently face a 10 per cent levy in the US, though that risks rising to 50 per cent in July if negotiations fail. The relationship between Washington and Beijing also remains uncertain even after both sides lowered their tariffs from prohibitive levels. Even Lagarde's tenure as head of the ECB is now subject to a downside risk. According to World Economic Forum (WEF) founder Klaus Schwab, arrangements for Lagarde to take over the organisation before her tenure at the ECB ends in 2027 are in train. Lagarde made something of a feeble attempt to scotch this speculation with an insistence that she was determined 'to deliver' on her mission and complete her term.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Corporate tax receipts drop 30% as Trump's tariffs bite
Corporate tax receipts fell by 30 per cent in May, amounting to a loss of over €1.1 billion when compared to the same month last year, amid signs US tariffs may be denting the profitability of multinationals in Ireland. The latest exchequer returns for May, published by the Department of Finance, indicated that the Government collected just under €2.5 billion in corporate taxes last month, compared to almost €3.6 billion in May last year. The department insisted, however, that 'once-off factors' had boosted receipts in May last year which distorted the year-on-year comparison. Nonetheless with most EU exports currently facing a 10 per cent levy in the US, possibly rising to 50 per cent if negotiations between Brussels and Washington fail, exporting companies here may be predicting lower earnings READ MORE [ Subscriber Only Opinion Ireland cannot base its economic strategy on the 'Taco' theory – Trump Always Chickens Out Opens in new window ] On a cumulative basis, receipts from the business tax were up by €1.1 billion at €7.4 billion but this reflects once-off revenues from the EU court ruling against Apple. When they are removed, corporate tax receipts to the end of May were down 9.4 per cent at €5.7 billion. Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe said: ' May is one of the more important months for tax revenues, and the steady growth in most tax headings points to an economy that is in a relatively good position." 'The most notable feature of the May exchequer returns was in respect of corporation tax, which saw a marked year-on-year drop,' he said. 'While this reflects once-off factors last year, it nonetheless highlights the degree of concentration in the corporate tax base, wherein a small number of multinational firms can significantly impact on the overall tax yield,' Mr Donohoe said. 'In a context of unprecedented uncertainty in the international economic landscape, this serves as a timely reminder of Ireland's exposure to changes in the global trading environment, and of the vital importance of adhering to a sensible and sustainable budgetary strategy,' he said. Overall the latest exchequer data show the Government collected €38.2 billion in tax revenue during the first five months of the year. This was up nearly €3 billion or 8.5 per cent on the same period last year aided by positive increases in income tax and VAT. Income tax receipts, the Government's largest tax channel, generated €14.5 billion, €630 million more than last year, reflecting the State's strong labour market. Separate figures, published on Thursday, put the headline rate of unemployment near a historic low of 4 per cent. VAT receipts for the year so far were also up by €600 million at €11.4 billion. The sales tax reflects consumer activity. On the spending side, total gross voted expenditure for the five-month period amounted to just under €42 billion, up by €3.1 billion (8.1 per cent) on last year and €37 million (0.1 per cent) behind profile. At a headline level, an exchequer surplus of €4 billion was recorded compared to a surplus of €0.8 billion last year, an improvement of €3.2 billion. Excluding the once-off receipts arising from the Apple tax case, the underlying surplus was €0.7 billion.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Suspended solicitor's appeal over professional misconduct finding to be heard in July
A date has been fixed next month for an appeal by suspended solicitor Declan O'Callaghan over findings of professional misconduct in connection with his handling of a land deal in Co Mayo. On Friday, the president of the High Court, Mr Justice David Barniville, set a provisional hearing date of July 23rd for the appeal. Barrister Michael Mullooly, for Mr O'Callaghan, said he expected it to run for two days and Mr O'Callaghan would be among his side's witnesses. Barrister Ruadhán Ó Ciaráin, for Nirvanna, the concrete products manufacturer that brought the complaint against Mr O'Callaghan over the 2007 land deal to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, said it is expected to call two witnesses at most. READ MORE Last month, Mr Justice Barniville rejected a challenge by Mr O'Callaghan over the procedures adopted by the tribunal in reaching its findings last year of professional misconduct over the 2007 deal. On Friday, he made an order requiring Mr O'Callaghan to pay Nirvanna's costs in opposing that application. The rejection of Mr O'Callaghan's judicial review-type challenge cleared the way for the hearing of his full appeal. If he loses that appeal, the High Court will then consider whether or not to grant an application by the Law Society to strike him off. The society has agreed with the tribunal recommendation that Mr O'Callaghan be struck off, but the final decision on whether or not to grant a strike-off order must be made by the High Court president. The three-member tribunal last summer found Mr O'Callaghan guilty of four counts of professional misconduct over his handling of the 2007 land deal involving Nirvanna, a company of Co Mayo businessman Tom Fleming. [ Declan O'Callaghan: No end in sight as saga of suspended solicitor continues Opens in new window ] Now aged 80, Mr Fleming claimed Nirvanna never received €250,000 for selling the land to a now-deceased businessman. Mr O'Callaghan denied the sum was owed, and disputed the transaction was for 'sale' of the lands. The tribunal upheld the Nirvanna complaint, finding professional misconduct on grounds Mr O'Callaghan breached his duty of care to the company, provided inadequate professional services, and purported to act for vendor and purchaser in a transaction where there was 'a clear conflict of interest'. In recommending strike-off, it had regard to two findings of professional misconduct previously made by it in 1990 and 2019 against Mr O'Callaghan. He has been suspended as a solicitor since 2018 arising from a separate Law Society investigation into matters at his now-defunct practice Kilrane O'Callaghan & Co, which was based in Ballaghaderreen, Co Roscommon. The suspension was imposed pending a tribunal hearing of the society's application for an inquiry into matters arising from its investigation. Concerns raised in an independent solicitor's report for that investigation included that Mr O'Callaghan withdrew substantial fees from the estate of a bereaved child.
