NC House OKs expanding Republican auditor's powers to hire, fire and investigate
'It ensures the state auditor can do the job the voters elected him to do: protecting taxpayers, detecting fraud and holding public spending to account,' House Majority Leader Brenden Jones, the bill's sponsor, said.
House Bill 549, which passed along party lines, would empower Auditor Dave Boliek to investigate any non-governmental organization that receives public funds, and would greatly expand his office's access to state databases. The bill would also give him more flexibility over hiring and firing staff in his office — a move critics warned could turn merit-based state jobs into political appointments.
Starting July 1, the bill would exempt new hires in the auditor's office from the State Human Resources Act — a broad law which establishes protections for state employees. It would give current employees the choice to exempt themselves from the act.
'What you're saying, if you are seeking to make these positions exempt, is that political preferences should take precedent over merit — but for the employees in this office only,' Rep. Tim Longest, a Wake County Democrat, said.
Longest attempted to amend the bill to remove the HR exemptions, but Republicans blocked that change.
The State Employees Association of North Carolina also came out strongly against the bill's HR changes.
'I can think of no agency where it's more important that someone be impartial, nonpolitical — that somebody be a professional employee,' SEANC Executive Director Ardis Watkins told reporters last week. 'We want the best, not the best connected, working for the state of North Carolina.'
Jones acknowledged the bill may require changes, but said they just needed to pass it before Thursday — which marks an important legislative deadline — and that they could make changes once it got to the Senate.
'This is not a bogeyman bill, as it's being presented,' he said. 'There's some issues on it and it's going to be worked through ... We all believe in our state employees, we all want to do what's right for the state employees — no one's trying to deny that.'
Democrats also raised concerns about a portion of the bill that would give the auditor 'continuous and unrestricted view of databases, datasets, and digital records necessary for any purpose within the authority of the auditor.'
House Democratic Leader Robert Reives questioned what could happen if a political appointee in the auditor's office were to investigate a business and had 'an ax to grind.'
'That's a lot of sensitive information that is suddenly available that has never been available before to anybody at any time under these type of circumstances,' he said. 'And that really makes me uncomfortable.'
Wednesday's vote comes after Senate Republicans advanced their own proposal to expand the auditor's powers with a bill called The DAVE Act — a reference to Boliek's first name.
It would give Boliek more power to recommend job cuts or the complete elimination of state agencies — though the legislature would still have the final say.
The DAVE Act passed the Senate earlier this month almost entirely along party lines, with former Senate Democratic leader Dan Blue being the only member of his party to vote in favor of it.
Last year, Republican lawmakers passed a bill stripping the governor of his appointments to the State Board of Elections and transferring them to the auditor instead. That bill, which the Court of Appeals allowed to take effect last week after a lower court had blocked it, makes Boliek the only auditor in the country with election oversight powers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Nevada Supreme Court approves Jon Gruden appeal in NFL lawsuit, blocks arbitration
The Nevada Supreme Court has sided with Jon Gruden in an appeal, marking the latest victory in his ongoing lawsuit against the NFL. The decision, which was made official on Monday, blocks the NFL from sending the case into arbitration. One of the issues at hand was an arbitration clause in the NFL's constitution, which the league argued kept Gruden from being able to make the lawsuit public. But on Monday, the Nevada Supreme Court ruled 5-2 in favor of the former Las Vegas Raiders coach, finding that the clause is "unconscionable" and does not apply to Gruden, as he is a former employee, via NBC's Mike Florio. Gruden sued the NFL shortly after resigning from the Raiders in 2021, but his latest legal battles have been around the manner of the lawsuit. Gruden has wanted his trial to be public, as part of a quest to expose what he believes were deliberate leaks in the NFL; the league, meanwhile, wanted a closed-door arbitration. Gruden originally won before a trial court, but a Nevada Supreme Court panel overturned the ruling in May 2024 as part of a lengthy appeal. Per court documents, Gruden's lawyers filed for a rehearing on the appeal last summer, which was denied. A month later, they filed for an en banc reconsideration, which was granted in October. The panel officially sided with Gruden on Monday. The NFL has yet to comment on Gruden's latest legal victory, but it is likely that the league will appeal the ruling in the U.S. Supreme Court, which may or may not decide to hear the case. Gruden sought public lawsuit in court to expose 'the truth' Gruden resigned from his job as Raiders head coach in 2021 after a New York Times report exposed his email exchanges with former Washington Football Team executive Bruce Allen, among others, that showed his use of racist, anti-gay and misogynistic language. Gruden sued the NFL and commissioner Roger Goodell in 2021, accusing them of plotting to destroy his career via a "malicious and orchestrated campaign" by leaking those emails. The emails surfaced from an investigation into the Washington Commanders and then-team owner Dan Snyder. The lawsuit argues that Gruden was targeted in the alleged leaks and that "there is no explanation or justification" for why the correspondence of others in the league was not exposed. Gruden had previously vowed that "the truth will come out" regarding unnamed others around the NFL. NFL sought closed-door arbitration The NFL has since made multiple attempts to strike down the lawsuit, arguing that a clause in Gruden's contract with the Raiders requires him to seek dispute settlement via arbitration. Gruden's attorneys have argued that the clause doesn't apply since he his no longer an employee of the Raiders and that his dispute is with the NFL, not the Raiders. In 2022, Nevada 8th Judicial District Court Judge Nancy Allf denied the NFL's effort to dismiss the lawsuit and ruled that the case could continue in open court. NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy dismissed Gruden's lawsuit as meritless after the district court ruling and vowed to appeal. 'The allegations are entirely meritless and the NFL will vigorously defend against these claims,' McCarthy's 2022 statement reads.
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Trump meets with Intel CEO after demanding he resign
US President Donald Trump on Monday said he had a "very interesting" meeting with the chief of US chip maker Intel, just days after calling for his resignation. Trump said on his Truth Social platform that he met with Lip-Bu Tan along with Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick and Secretary of Treasury Scott Bessent. "The meeting was a very interesting one," Trump said in the post. "His success and rise is an amazing story." Trump added that members of his cabinet are going to spend time with Tan and bring the president "suggestions" next week. Intel did not respond to a request for comment. Trump demanded last week that the recently-hired boss of Intel resign "immediately," after a Republican senator raised national security concerns over his links to firms in China. "The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem," Trump posted on Truth Social last Thursday. Tan released a statement at the time saying that the company was engaged with the Trump administration to address the concerns raised and ensure officials "have the facts." Intel is one of Silicon Valley's most iconic companies but its fortunes have been dwarfed by Asian powerhouses TSMC and Samsung, which dominate the made-to-order semiconductor business. In a statement, Tan said there has been "a lot of misinformation circulating" about his past roles at Walden International and Cadence Design Systems. "I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards," Tan said. The Malaysia-born tech industry veteran took the helm at struggling Intel in March, announcing layoffs as White House tariffs and export restrictions muddied the market. Intel's niche has been chips used in traditional computing processes, which are steadily being eclipsed by the AI revolution. gc/bjt Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Texas businessmen indicted for allegedly bribing officials at Mexico's Pemex
By Stefanie Eschenbacher MEXICO CITY (Reuters) -Two Texas businessmen were indicted for allegedly bribing officials at Mexico's state energy company Pemex with $150,000 and luxury items to secure contracts, the U.S. Justice Department announced on Monday. Between 2019 and 2021, Ramon Rovirosa and Mario Avila, both Mexican citizens and U.S. lawful permanent residents, conspired to pay bribes to officials at Pemex and its exploration and production arm, known as PEP, according to an indictment unsealed in the Southern District of Texas. Rovirosa is also alleged to have ties to Mexican cartel members, the Department of Justice said in a statement. Rovirosa, 46, was arraigned while Avila, 61, remains at large. Reuters was unable to immediately contact the lawyers for Rovirosa and Avila. Pemex did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Together with co-conspirators, Rovirosa and Avila allegedly paid bribes in the form of cash and luxury goods, including from Louis Vuitton and Hublot, to at least three Pemex and PEP officials. In exchange, those Pemex officials are accused of helping companies associated with Rovirosa obtain contracts worth at least $2.5 million, the statement said. Mexico and its ailing state company Pemex have for decades been awash with corruption, with several former senior officials facing charges, including former Chief Executive Officer Emilio Lozoya. Lozoya, in turn, has accused ex-presidents Felipe Calderon and Carlos Salinas of corruption, along with former President Enrique Pena Nieto, his ex-finance minister, Luis Videgaray, and more than a dozen others. Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who was Mexican president during the time covered in the indictment, had vowed to root out the corruption that had plagued the country and its most important company for decades. Even so, Mexico's corruption ranking slipped. Rovirosa and Avila are each charged with one count of conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and three substantive violations of it. The act makes it illegal for citizens, U.S. companies, or foreign persons and businesses in the United States to pay foreign officials to win business. Sign in to access your portfolio