logo
Conspiracy theories have leached into public life. Is it scepticism towards power or a complete worldview?

Conspiracy theories have leached into public life. Is it scepticism towards power or a complete worldview?

The Guardian4 days ago
On the edge of George Street in Sydney, a woman is wrapped in an upside-down Australian flag. She holds one side of a large banner that reads 'GROOM DOGS NOT KIDS', showing pictures of poodles with ears dyed rainbow and pink.
There are young people, people in their sixties and seventies, parents with children in prams. There are t-shirts imploring you to 'think while it's still legal'. Another person holds a sign declaring their staunch opposition to a town planning initiative that's been erroneously linked to the rollout of a new surveillance regime, 'Aussies SAY NO to 15 minute cities. FREEDOM'.
It is May 2023 and almost everyone has a smartphone in hand. They are live streaming, posting on the messaging app Telegram and waiting for the start of what is alternatively called the We Are Ready march or the Worldwide Rally for Freedom. What the crowd shares is a belief that something is very wrong. The sorry state of the world has an explanation both attractively simple and entirely complex: there are powerful and nefarious forces working secretly against us. Nothing is as it seems. Everything is connected.
Did Australian prime minister Harold Holt drown at sea or was he kidnapped and taken away in a Chinese or Soviet submarine? Are Masonic symbols hidden among landmarks in Canberra? Is the government hiding UFOs at Pine Gap?
These aren't just questions that interest people at events like the Worldwide Rally. We're all primed to dabble in these kinds of stories, the clues and coincidences that add up to something altogether fascinating. They can simply be a fun group activity on the internet. For most people they won't become an all-consuming worldview or a call to action – for others, they do.
There isn't a great deal of available research about who believes in conspiracy theories in Australia and why – it's a difficult concept to measure. Based on our reporting, believers defy a neat categorisation of interest or class, even as members of these groups fear 'elites' who are conspiring against them, or categories of 'outsiders' taking what they deserve. It's hard to say whether one country's population is more conspiratorial than another but there are conditions that often correlate with conspiracy belief, including perceptions of inequality and corruption.
Some research suggests Australians aren't more conspiracy theory-prone compared with other countries. A 2019 survey found a majority of the Australians surveyed endorsed at least one of the conspiracy theories included by the researchers, ranging from Holt being kidnapped by a Chinese submarine to the claim the Australian racehorse Phar Lap was poisoned by American gangsters. Others were more sinister. There were those who believed the Port Arthur massacre was orchestrated by the government as a cover to disarm the nation. Or that fluoride in the water is part of a plot to make Australians docile and easier to control.
What did people mean when they said they agreed with these ideas? Was it a playful scepticism towards power or a complete worldview? Should we call them all conspiracy theorists? Clearly not.
Conspiracy theories are not just for the 'fringe dwellers of society', the study concluded. 'Our results suggest that basic human motives may give rise to extraordinary beliefs for many ordinary people.'
Sign up for a weekly email featuring our best reads
Many people are suspicious about how power works, and they are right to be. In the United States, it's been argued that conspiracy theories about the 'deep state' – claims that there is a 'shadow government' in control no matter who is voted in – partly emerged from 'excessive state secrecy and official deception'. Australia's institutions, too, are notoriously secretive and insular. The revolving door between politics and lobbying is well known. Anyone with even the most passing familiarity with our history knows how cruel the state can be, how it was built on violence and displacement, and how it can organise itself against the interests of the people it claims to protect.
But when this suspicion tips into an unyielding dedication to stories that can rationally be disproven, when grievance is nursed and monetised, when fear becomes an end in itself, common ground rapidly disappears, and any evidence that does not align with these beliefs, no matter how compelling, is rejected. Conspiracy theories point the finger at groups operating in secret against the people. They operate as 'accusatory and suspect, rather than as accepted knowledge', as author Joseph Uscinski writes. As we and others have found, conspiracy theories are often as much about creating enemies as unveiling some hidden truth.
Sign up to Five Great Reads
Each week our editors select five of the most interesting, entertaining and thoughtful reads published by Guardian Australia and our international colleagues. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Saturday morning
after newsletter promotion
Whatever their prevalence or how deeply these beliefs are held, there's something disturbing at work here. We've watched closely as once-fringe ideas and the language of conspiracy have become increasingly part of Australian public life, egged on by politicians and influencers in search of an audience, and by irresponsible journalism and new ways of communicating online. Terms such as 'QAnon' and 'sovereign citizens' have gone from internet jargon to common parlance. They are monetised and made into elaborate cover for racism. Believers harass nurses and election workers, clog up the courts, infiltrate councils and even get elected to parliament. In some cases, we see them take up weapons.
Certainly, there are those whose experiences of living in Australia – a nation with a documented history of profound brutality to First Nations people, immigrants and other vulnerable groups – have created justifiable suspicion of those in power. Many of those we've spoken to have turned to these ideas after moments of profound disruption and tragedy, after they've fallen through the cracks. For others, it goes beyond scepticism into fantasy that does not lead anywhere useful.
As the march crosses the Pyrmont Bridge, the crowd spots a drone filming the protests. 'How long before they put an AK-47 on it?' one man jokes.
The march reaches a small stage near the Google offices. A grey-haired man materialises and tells the crowd to put aside their differences. 'Doesn't matter if you're . . . anti-vaccine or even, God forbid, pro-vaccine . . . as long as you're for freedom,' he says.
It seems increasingly as though conspiracy theories are not about a singular event but an overarching interpretation of how the world works. They can create a sense of identity and group membership. At the Worldwide Rally for Freedom in 2023, like so many of the events we attended, no one seemed as if they were a single-issue protester – it was vaccines and child-predator cabals and a one-world government that would take all our freedoms one by one. If they hadn't personally lost something, they were about to.
This is a feeling ripe for exploitation. Despite the appearance of standing up in the face of power, conspiratorial tropes are also useful to those with political, economic and social status because they are typically about something happening to 'us' because of an elusive 'them' – 'a virtuous group under threat from a nefarious enemy'. You can take on the position of victim without losing much of anything, and direct the vitriol in another direction.
We're living in an era where conspiratorial ideas have leached into public life thanks to politicians and the media. They help make them mainstream for political purposes, from fake claims about climate science, to raising doubts about the safety of vaccines. Rather than reflecting a diffuse style of political paranoia, as historian Richard Hofstadter famously wrote about the United States in 1964, contemporary conspiracy theories in Australia are often used by those with power as a political weapon against vulnerable groups – a cynical inversion of the power structure they supposedly reveal.
This is an edited extract from Conspiracy Nation by Ariel Bogle and Cam Wilson, out now through Ultimo Press (A$36.99).
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Victorians could soon have the right to work from home two days a week under Australian-first laws
Victorians could soon have the right to work from home two days a week under Australian-first laws

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Victorians could soon have the right to work from home two days a week under Australian-first laws

Victorians could soon have a legal right to work from home two days a week, under proposed Australian-first laws to be introduced to parliament by the state Labor government in 2026. The Victorian premier, Jacinta Allan, will use Labor's state conference on Saturday to announce the proposal, which, if passed by parliament, would make the state the first in the country to legislate the right to work remotely. Allan will tell party faithful if a job can reasonably be done from home, employees would have the legal right to do so for at least two days a week. The law would apply to both public and private sector workers, though how it would be enforced and other specifics were not outlined ahead of her speech. In a statement, the premier said that working from home was popular, it saved families money, cut congestion and allowed greater workforce participation, particularly among women with children, carers and people with a disability. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'Work from home works for families and it's good for the economy,' Allan said. 'Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit.' The announcement sets the stage for a political fight in the lead-up to the November 2026 state election, given the Coalition opposition has previously signalled plans to return the public service to the office full-time. The shadow treasurer, James Newbury, told the Herald Sun in February that the government 'should be requiring public servants to work from the office' but stopped short of confirming whether the Coalition would enforce a mandate. The issue was also a flashpoint at the recent federal election, with Peter Dutton forced mid-campaign to reverse a policy to restrict work from home arrangements for public servants due to public backlash. Allan's statement said consultation on the legislation would be led by the Department of Premier and Cabinet and would cover the types of businesses and the size of businesses that would be included, as well as the definition of remote work and who was able to do it. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion It stressed the consultation process 'won't determine whether working from home should be a right' as that position had already been decided. Instead, it would focus on 'the appropriate laws to reflect it'. It said 'several legislative options were available'. Allan will be left to rally the room of 600 Victorian Labor delegates, with the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, unable to attend as he will be at the Garma festival in the Northern Territory. It will mean the deputy prime minister, Richard Marles, will be the most senior party figure at the two-day event and placed in an uncomfortable position as delegates vote on a review of the Aukus submarine deal he has strongly backed. Other urgency resolutions up for debate include a call for the federal government to immediately recognise a Palestinian state and impose sanctions on Israel, rejection of the Allan government's proposed protest laws – described as 'anti-democratic and regressive' – and for all 44 public housing tower sites slated for redevelopment to remain in public hands.

Scot accused of his wife's murder had joked to friend about killing her, court told
Scot accused of his wife's murder had joked to friend about killing her, court told

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Scot accused of his wife's murder had joked to friend about killing her, court told

A Scot accused of murdering his wife while kayaking in Australia previously made a 'quip' about how he would 'kill her and move to Thailand ' if she left him and took half his pension, a court heard. Former Army major Graeme Davidson, who is originally from Glasgow, was charged over the 2020 death of wife Jacqueline in May. Her death at Lake Samsonvale in Queensland was initially put down to accidental drowning but a homicide investigation was launched 18 months later after detectives deemed it to be suspicious. The 56-year-old's lawyers have now applied for his bail in the Supreme Court in Brisbane, claiming the prosecution's case is 'fundamentally weak'. And yesterday the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) reported how his lawyer Craig Ederhardt told the court the only piece of evidence the prosecution could refer to in its case was the statement of one of Davidson's friends, relating to an alleged conversation in July 2017. It is reported that Mr Eberhardt said they were talking about another friend, whose wife had left him on the day of his retirement, took half of his pension and one of them had moved to Thailand. Davidson is alleged to have replied, saying, 'oh s*** yeah, I'd kill her and move to Thailand too'. But his lawyer told the court it was 'just a quip' and when put in context is 'not nearly as sinister as it sounds'. He is reported as saying: 'That [statement is] not recorded until eight years after the event. 'One wonders firstly whether it's reliable, secondly whether it's even admissible.' Mr Eberhardt also argued there was no evidence to suggest Mrs Davidson had told her husband she intended to leave him or take half his pension. Australian media reported that his wife had raised the 'idea' of divorce, after she learned her husband had an affair with a local woman during an army posting in Papua New Guinea, which caused 'significant matrimonial upset'. But Mr Eberhardt said this was different to her indicating that 'she was intending on leaving the marriage'. He told the court that Mrs Davidson later told friends that she intended to stay to try and make the marriage work. Police allege Davidson, who moved to Thailand several months after his wife's death and married a local resident, was involved in her drowning while they were kayaking. The court heard how bystanders at the scene allegedly asked Davidson if his wife had any diseases, to which he is said to have replied: 'Unless death is contagious'. His lawyer said his client immediately realised this statement was in 'bad taste' and he should not have said it, telling the court it was a 'distressing' incident involving the death of his wife of 35 years. In an affidavit filed as part of his bail application, Davidson is reported to have described how he began to 'show' off by standing up on his kayak when he and his wife were about 10 metres apart on the water. Mrs Davidson allegedly became 'distressed' and 'used the 'safe word' … designed to let him know that she was concerned about what he was doing'. The court was told Davidson saw his wife 'fall off the kayak' and he went into the water to find her but could not see because of the 'murky' water and grass weeds. Mr Eberhardt said: 'He managed to find her after some period of time, and he dragged her out.' Efforts were made to revive her, but she could not be saved. Davidson is also charged with fraud and attempted fraud relating to allegations he tried to claim almost £500,00 [$1million] in life insurance payouts following his wife's death. The defence is set to continue its submissions next week, when prosecutors are expected to refuse Davidson's application for bail.

Trump breaks silence on 'burn bags' claim
Trump breaks silence on 'burn bags' claim

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump breaks silence on 'burn bags' claim

President Donald Trump continues to vent at top Democrats he claims carried out the Russia 'hoax,' calling it it a 'crime' after his FBI Director Kash Patel said he uncovered a trove of classified material in agency 'burn bags.' 'They must pay for the crime of the Century!' Trump wrote Thursday night, reposting a clip by conservative commentator Victor Davis Hanson. The clip has Hanson saying the nation's intel agencies 'knew' that there was no Trump campaign collusion with Russia and calling out a conspiracy of the 'top people' in U.S. intelligence 'conspiring with a sitting president of the United States to destroy Donald J. Trump' – and pictures grainy video clips of Barack Obama . Members of Trump's national security team are overseeing declassification of material from the Russia probe dating to Trump's 2016 campaign against Democrat Hillary Clinton . A series of explosive headlines have followed. The effort to put new and sensational information into the public sphere comes as Trump continues to beat back questions about the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, fueled by his own recent comments that the sexual offender 'took' staff from his spa at Mar-a-Lago . On Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired by Iowa Republican Charles Grassley, 91, released a bombshell 29-page classified file related to the Russia probe. The annex from former Special Counsel John Durham 's report contains emails and other documents purporting to show a Clinton plan to link the Trump campaign to Russia. One such email, purporting to come from Leonard Benardo of the George Soros-backed Open Society Foundations states: 'Julie [Clinton Campaign Advisor] says it will be a long-term affair to demonize Putin and Trump,' one of his emails disclosed in the Durham annex states. 'Now it is good for a post-convention bounce. Later the FBI will put more oil into the fire.' However Benardo told investigators he hadn't seen seen the July 25, 2016 email, didn't know who Julie was, and wouldn't have used that concluding phrase. The partly-redacted documents says some analysts noted that Benardo's emails appeared authentic and he had been hacked by the Russians, but others noted it was possible they were 'fabricated or altered,' undermining the central claim that there was a coordinated plot to destroy Trump's presidency. Investigators couldn't find the specific emails in question, but they did uncover messages that used the exact same language. Special Counsel John Durham later wrote that Clinton campaign advisor Julianne Smith 'was, at minimum, playing a role in the campaign's efforts to link Trump to Russia.' Durham said the emails gave 'at least some credence' to the idea that such a plan existed. He was appointed during Trump's first term to investigate the origins of the Russia probe. Durham also noted that regardless of whether the so-called 'Clinton Plan' was true or based on unreliable intelligence, investigators should have been more skeptical about politically charged information. Notably, the Clinton campaign helped fund the now-debunked Steele dossier, classifying the expense as legal services. Clinton herself told investigators is 'looked like Russian disinformation to [her].' Trump dove into the 'burn bag' story despite a day earlier not initially catching the drift of a question about it. Trump, who has accused former President Barack Obama of 'treason' over recent disclosures by his Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, kept up the drum beat on Truth Social. 'The Russia, Russia, Russia hoax is now totally undisputed! The facts are all there, in black and white,' he wrote, sprinkling in all-caps. 'It is the biggest scandal in American History. The perpetrators of this crime must pay a big price. This can never be allowed to happen in our Country again!' Trump also posted a video clip by Devin Nunes, the former California GOP lawmakers who oversaw a report released by Gabbard. Trump quotes Nunes, who now runs his media company in his TV appearance, writing: 'What we now know for sure is not only was this a plan by Hillary Clinton, but this is also a plan of the Soros Society…the same people doing the same nonsense—from 2016 all the way up until the raid at Mar-a-Lago.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store