logo
US supreme court blocks religious charter school in split ruling

US supreme court blocks religious charter school in split ruling

The Guardian22-05-2025

The US supreme court on Thursday blocked a bid led by two Catholic dioceses to establish in Oklahoma the nation's first taxpayer-funded religious charter school in a major case involving religious rights in American education.
The 4-4 ruling left intact a lower court's decision that blocked the establishment of St Isidore of Seville Catholic virtual school. The lower court found that the proposed school would violate the US constitution's first amendment limits on government involvement in religion.
Conservative justice Amy Coney Barrett recused herself from the case, leaving eight justices rather than the full slate of nine to decide the outcome. Barrett is a former professor at Notre Dame Law School, which represents the school's organizers.
When the supreme court is evenly divided, the lower court's decision stands. The justices did not provide a rationale for their action in the unsigned ruling.
Set up as alternatives to traditional public schools, charter schools typically operate under private management and often feature small class sizes, innovative teaching styles or a particular academic focus. Charter schools are considered public schools under Oklahoma law and draw funding from the state government.
St Isidore, planned as a joint effort by the Catholic Archdiocese of Oklahoma City and Diocese of Tulsa, would offer virtual learning from kindergarten through high school. Its plan to integrate religion into its curriculum would make it the first religious charter school in the United States. The proposed school has never been operational amid legal challenges to its establishment.
The case explored the tension between the two religion clauses of the US constitution's first amendment. Its 'establishment clause' prohibits the government from establishing or endorsing any particular religion or promoting religion over nonreligion. Its 'free exercise' clause protects the right to practice one's religion freely, without government interference.
Oklahoma's Republican attorney general, Gentner Drummond, sued in October 2023 to block St Isidore in a legal action filed at the Oklahoma supreme court, saying he was duty bound to 'prevent the type of state-funded religion that Oklahoma's constitutional framers and the founders of our country sought to prevent.' Republican Oklahoma governor Kevin Stitt backed the proposed school, as did Donald Trump's administration.
Opponents have said religious charter schools would force taxpayers to support religious indoctrination. Establishing them also could undermine nondiscrimination principles, they argued, because religious charter schools might seek to bar employees who do not adhere to doctrinal teachings.
Organizers estimated in 2023 that St Isidore would cost Oklahoma taxpayers up to $25.7m over its first five years in operation.
The Oklahoma charter school board in June 2023 approved the plan to create St Isidore in a 3-2 vote.
Oklahoma's top court in a 6-2 ruling last year blocked the school. It classified St Isidore as a 'governmental entity' that would act as 'a surrogate of the state in providing free public education as any other state-sponsored charter school'.
That court decided that the proposal ran afoul of the establishment clause. The first amendment generally constrains the government but not private entities.
St Isidore, the court wrote, would 'require students to spend time in religious instruction and activities, as well as permit state spending in direct support of the religious curriculum and activities within St Isidore – all in violation of the establishment clause'.
School board officials and St Isidore argued in supreme court papers that the Oklahoma court erred by deeming St Isidore an arm of the government rather than a private organization. They argued that the government had not delegated a state duty to St Isidore merely by contracting with it, and that the school would function largely independently of the government.
They also argued that Oklahoma's refusal to establish St Isidore as a charter school solely because it is religious is discrimination under the first amendment's free exercise clause.
The supreme court has recognized broader religious rights in a series of rulings in recent years.
It ruled in a Missouri case in 2017 that churches and other religious entities cannot be flatly denied public money based on their religious status – even in states whose constitutions explicitly ban such funding.
In 2020, it endorsed Montana tax credits that helped pay for students to attend religious schools. In 2022, it backed two Christian families in their challenge to Maine's tuition-assistance program that had excluded private religious schools.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's tax bill is undermining the foundations of global finance
Trump's tax bill is undermining the foundations of global finance

Telegraph

time27 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Trump's tax bill is undermining the foundations of global finance

For decades, investors have been able to rely on a simple truth: the US bond market is a safe place to put money. When wars broke out, economies crashed or other calamities struck, money flowed into US Treasuries, as Washington's bonds are known, to protect wealth. As a result, the US has been able to rely on a ready supply of investors willing to fund the country's ever-increasing appetite for tax cuts and public spending. Investors wanted US debt and the federal government was only too happy to provide it. Not even half a year into Donald Trump's presidential term, however, decades of orthodoxy are being turned on their head. 'The US has generally benefited from demand for Treasuries from overseas investors. It's viewed as the global risk-free asset,' says John Stopford, a fund manager at Ninety One. 'The concern is that a lot of those beliefs or tenets about the US are being called into question, in terms of how reliable, how safe an investment are US Treasuries?' Offshore investors, battered by volatility and bewildered by uncertainty since Trump took office, are becoming increasingly wary of the US bond market. Returns have suffered as Trump's trade policies have weakened the dollar and the president's planned debt splurge has raised questions about just how sustainable US borrowing really is. The latest flash point is Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax and spending bill, which the Congressional Budget Office said would add $2.4 trillion (£1.8 trillion) to the deficit over the next decade. Elon Musk might have hogged the headlines this week with his outbursts against the bill but investors and traders are airing the same concerns, especially as higher deficits mean the US treasury will be asking them to buy more and more of its bonds. 'We're seeing it in the asset management community, some insurance funds, some pension funds, and foreign investors overall as well. It's just more caution in the buying, rather than a full-blown 'sell everything',' says Gennadiy Goldberg, head of US rates strategy at TD Securities. A crisis in the US bond market, or even just a slow ebbing of investor confidence and faith, could be the most profound and revolutionary legacy of Trump's second term. The US market and its currency might no longer offer the safe haven against risk, nor the anchor for markets worldwide. An end of this financial exceptionalism would mean higher borrowing costs for the US and pose a challenge to the entire American economy model. Moody's became the last major credit rating agency to strip the US of its gold-plated borrower status last month and analysts have raised the prospect of Trump facing his own ' Liz Truss moment ' as investors baulk at his spending plans. For now, concern is centred around where all this fiscal ill-discipline will leave the US in the 2030s and beyond. So investors are shying away from longer-dated Treasuries with terms such as 10, 20 or 30 years, and parking their money in shorter-term bonds that mature in one or two years. 'I see investors who are even cautious about the five to 10-year space,' Goldberg says. If this caution turns to panic, then a meltdown – with worldwide consequences – isn't out of the question. 'If there was a big deleveraging that happened – and there was a big source of selling, whether it's from foreign investors or hedge funds or levered investors or basis investors – it could potentially overwhelm the system,' Goldberg says. Foreign investors are also having to contend with a big drop in the US dollar, which is reducing their returns. 'It's fine to see bond yields rise if the currency is stable or appreciating. That's not what we're seeing at the moment. We're seeing bond yields rise in the US, and actually the currency, on a broad basket, is about 10pc down from its highs last year,' says James Ringer, a Schroders fund manager. The lack of buyers and the potential glut of bonds raises the possibility, or 'tail risk', that the market could cease to function properly. 'That would mean sellers overwhelming buyers,' says Goldberg. This could drive a sharp surge in rates and force an emergency intervention from the Federal Reserve. 'That is the risk going forward – that the system is unable to function if something goes wrong,' he adds. At the moment, there's little prospect of a panicked sell-off – mainly because investors have so few genuine alternatives. America's star may be on the wane but it is still the brightest light in the sky. 'The US is absolutely a mass market in terms of marketable debt. The second and third closest markets are an order of magnitude smaller, so that makes it really difficult for a lot of these investors to really get away from dollars,' says Goldberg. 'There's just no place for them to go.' But equally, with Trump at the helm, nobody is ruling anything out. 'Even if it's a tail risk or something that's unlikely, because it's there at the back of people's minds, potentially they do begin to change their behaviour,' Stopford says. 'They do begin to think, 'OK, well, I should have less exposure to the US, I should have less exposure to the dollar, I should be looking for alternatives that are safer, more reliable.' 'That's not bond vigilantes speculating. That's just people making rational decisions based on concerns about risk.' Scott Bessent began the week by telling the world: 'The United States of America is never going to default. That is never going to happen.' were meant to reassure. But the sheer fact that the US treasury secretary had to spell out something that has been taken for granted for decades highlights the fact that the fundamentals of the US financial system have been shaken. Whether they go on to crumble depends on what Trump does next.

Karoline Leavitt weighs in on the Trump-Musk feud
Karoline Leavitt weighs in on the Trump-Musk feud

Daily Mail​

time36 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Karoline Leavitt weighs in on the Trump-Musk feud

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt made it clear that she's team Trump amid the president's nasty public break-up with Elon Musk. One week before, she and longtime Trump aide Margo Martin had posed in the Tesla that's parked outside the White House, which the president said he was purchasing as Musk's electric car company was taking a hit over his MAGA ties and work at DOGE. But on Thursday Leavitt shared one of Trump's Truth Social messages the president dished out about Musk - after first taking on the Tesla and SpaceX CEO in an Oval Office meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Trump had written, 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago.' 'This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that,' Trump wrote. 'I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' the president added. Musk's spat with Trump got so brutal on Thursday that he claimed that the president 'is in the Epstein files' - attempting to connect the commander-in-chief with the serial [expletive] who died in prison in 2019. Leavitt pushed back on that too, telling the Daily Mail in a statement: 'This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted. The President is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again,' Leavitt added. Trump didn't directly respond to Musk's Epstein charge, instead posting the Truth Social message that Leavitt shared. Later Trump ignored shouted questions from reporters on Musk's Epstein charge as he hosted the National Fraternal Order of Police executive board in the State Dining Room. A source familiar pointed out to the Daily Mail that 'everyone knows President Trump kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of his Palm Beach Golf Club.' 'The Administration itself released Epstein files with the President's name included. This is not a new surprise Elon is uncovering. Everyone already knew this,' the source continued. The source also mused, 'If Elon truly thought the President was more deeply involved with Epstein, why did he hangout with him for 6 months and say he "loves him as much as a straight man can love a straight man?"' The Musk-Trump break-up had started over the bill, which is now going through the U.S. Senate, which Musk complained added to the deficit and reversed the work he had done leading DOGE, the Trump-created Department of Government Efficiency. But it quickly turned personal once Trump floated that he wasn't sure the relationship between the two billionaires could be saved. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more, I was surprised,' Trump told reporters as he was seated alongside Germany's leader. The president suggested that Musk was angry - not over the bill ballooning the deficit - but because the Trump administration has pulled back on electric vehicle mandates, which negatively impacted Tesla , and replaced the Musk-approved nominee to lead NASA , which could hinder SpaceX's government contracts. Musk then posted that Trump would have lost the 2024 election had it not been for the world's richest man - him. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk claimed. 'Such ingratitude,' the billionaire added. After the Oval Office meeting Trump took to Truth Social Thursday afternoon and asserted that he had asked Musk to leave his administration and said the billionaire went 'CRAZY!' 'Elon was "wearing thin," I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote. The president then threatened to pull SpaceX and Tesla's government contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Trump wrote. It ratcheted up even more, with Musk saying he could decommission the only rocket ships that are currently hauling U.S. astronauts and their supplies to the International Space Station. Musk also made the Epstein charge and later said he would back Trump's impeachment, saying he was for Vice President J.D. Vance taking the president's place. Steve Bannon, a longtime adviser of Trump and a leader of the MAGA movement, pushed that the South African-born Musk be investigated - and maybe even deported. Last Friday, Trump had heralded Musk in the Oval Office, gifting him a golden key and giving him a send-off from DOGE, as the billionaire headed back into the private sector. As Thursday evening approached, Trump's Tesla remained parked on West Executive Avenue, just steps away from the West Wing.

Trump organises olive-branch call with Musk
Trump organises olive-branch call with Musk

Telegraph

time41 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Trump organises olive-branch call with Musk

06 June 2025 12:08pm 12:06PM Musk's DOGE threaten global aid and shifts geopolitical balance Sweeping cuts introduced by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) will have a lasting impact on foreign aid, global health, and development programmes. The end of dozens of USAID projects has limited the resources it will spend on disaster relief, food security, and refugee support, worsening crises in vulnerable regions. Cuts to funding for initiatives like the Global Fund or pandemic preparedness set back efforts to combat infectious diseases, including malaria, tuberculosis, and Covid-19. The US is also said to be proposing cuts to its flagship anti-HIV programme by almost 40 per cent next year. The long-running programme is estimated to have saved more than 20 million lives in the past two decades, and is often cited as one of the world's most successful public health schemes. Experts worry reduced US aid could open the door for rival powers - including China and Russia - to increase their influence through their own investments and aid, reshaping global alliances. 11:54AM Musk leaves behind a complicated legacy Elon Musk's legal 130-day term as a 'special government employee' is set to expire today after a controversial stint that will have a lasting impact both in the US and across the world. Mr Musk's stated goal as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) was to slash spending across the board, saving American taxpayers money by ending 'waste, fraud, and abuse'. He claimed he could cut $1 trillion from the federal budget before September 30, but the reported toll is far off that figure. As of May 26, DOGE's online 'wall of receipts' claims estimated savings of $175 billion since the start of Mr Trump's term, averaging $1,086.96 saved per taxpayer. But analysis by the New York Times has spotted gaping holes in those claims. This includes counting government contracts not yet awarded, contracts that ended years ago, triple-counting the same savings, and confusing 'million' with 'billion'. DOGE has since corrected some of those errors, but many remain, leaving Mr Musk's governmental legacy in murky waters. 11:41AM Steve Bannon hits out at Musk Republicans with close ties to Donald Trump might not be as willing to forget Elon Musk's series of sensationalist social media posts against the US president. Leading figures have pitched in their thoughts in the hours since the spat began. 'The president treated him almost like a son,' Steve Bannon, a long-time antagonist of Mr Musk, told Playbook yesterday. 'He invited his family to Christmas dinner. He let him sleep over. He let him walk in and out of meetings. The president went to the max informality to welcome this guy.' Bannon added: 'You're going to tell me we should allow some fucking punk to sit there and say he should be impeached and JD (Vance) should step in? F--- you, dude. We're going to go to f------ war, and I'm going to rip your f------ face off.' 11:36AM Trump and Epstein: the history of their messy friendship In one of his controversial posts on X, Elon Musk hit out at Donald Trump's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Ever since Epstein's crimes first came to light, the internet has been filled with conspiracy theories about Mr Trump's relationship with the convicted paedophile. Mr Trump and Epstein's friendship stretched back decades: In 1997, the US smiled as he posed for a photograph with his old friend in Palm Beach. At the time, the pair, who moved in the same wealthy social circles and bonded over their love of beautiful women, had been friends for years. But when did their friendship begin and what are the finer details? Read the full story here. 11:28AM Kremlin 'will not get involved' in Musk vs Trump row The Kremlin has said it would not get involved in Donald Trump's row with Elon Musk, but was confident that Mr Trump would deal with the situation. The quarrel between the two was an internal US matter, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said this morning. 11:15AM How Musk boosted Trump's presidential campaign Elon Musk's high-profile support of Donald Trump during his election campaign undoubtedly gave him a boost. Early on, Mr Musk offered his support for Mr Trump's policies on business deregulation, space exploration, and economic growth. He generated high-profile endorsements, leveraging his influence in tech and media circles. Public comments and interviews saw Mr Musk praise aspects of Mr Trump's agenda, lending credibility to the campaign among voters interested in innovation, space, and technology. 10:58AM How the White House grew tired of 'petulant' Musk The once-strong alliance between President Trump and Mr Musk is unravelling, with insiders suggesting a breakup is imminent. Mr Musk's explosive rift with the White House stems from longstanding tensions about his libertarian policies and his unpredictable behaviour, according to sources close to the president. Interviews with a string of insiders reveal months of concern at Mr Musk's grandstanding behaviour and philosophical differences with people at the heart of the Trump administration. Our Chief US Correspondent, Rob Crilley, has the full story here. 10:48AM What provisions does Trump's new bill include? Mr Trump's new bill marks a major legislative move by the US president. Named the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act', it encompasses significant tax reforms, spending cuts, and defence allocations. The bill is the root of the tensions between Mr Musk and Mr Trump, with the Tesla boss claiming it will undo all of the cost-cutting he has initiated during his tenure at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Key provisions include: Tax reforms: The bill proposes extending the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act provisions, which benefit upper-income earners. It would also increase the state and local tax deduction cap from $10,000 to $40,000. Spending cuts: It aims to reduce non-military government spending, cutting funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Medicaid through stricter eligibility requirements. Defence spending: The legislation allocates an extra $150 billion for defence expenditures. Energy policy: It would scale back many clean-energy tax credits from the Inflation Reduction Act, including the $7,500 federal tax credit for electric vehicles. 10:32AM Merz has 'absolutely no doubt' that Trump will stick with Nato German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said today that he had 'absolutely no doubt' that Mr Trump would keep the United States within the Nato military alliance. 'I have absolutely no doubt that the American government is sticking with Nato,' Mr Merz said in a speech at an entrepreneurs' event just hours after returning from his inaugural trip to Washington.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store