logo
Trump's tax bill is undermining the foundations of global finance

Trump's tax bill is undermining the foundations of global finance

Telegraph11 hours ago

For decades, investors have been able to rely on a simple truth: the US bond market is a safe place to put money.
When wars broke out, economies crashed or other calamities struck, money flowed into US Treasuries, as Washington's bonds are known, to protect wealth.
As a result, the US has been able to rely on a ready supply of investors willing to fund the country's ever-increasing appetite for tax cuts and public spending. Investors wanted US debt and the federal government was only too happy to provide it.
Not even half a year into Donald Trump's presidential term, however, decades of orthodoxy are being turned on their head.
'The US has generally benefited from demand for Treasuries from overseas investors. It's viewed as the global risk-free asset,' says John Stopford, a fund manager at Ninety One.
'The concern is that a lot of those beliefs or tenets about the US are being called into question, in terms of how reliable, how safe an investment are US Treasuries?'
Offshore investors, battered by volatility and bewildered by uncertainty since Trump took office, are becoming increasingly wary of the US bond market. Returns have suffered as Trump's trade policies have weakened the dollar and the president's planned debt splurge has raised questions about just how sustainable US borrowing really is.
The latest flash point is Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax and spending bill, which the Congressional Budget Office said would add $2.4 trillion (£1.8 trillion) to the deficit over the next decade.
Elon Musk might have hogged the headlines this week with his outbursts against the bill but investors and traders are airing the same concerns, especially as higher deficits mean the US treasury will be asking them to buy more and more of its bonds.
'We're seeing it in the asset management community, some insurance funds, some pension funds, and foreign investors overall as well. It's just more caution in the buying, rather than a full-blown 'sell everything',' says Gennadiy Goldberg, head of US rates strategy at TD Securities.
A crisis in the US bond market, or even just a slow ebbing of investor confidence and faith, could be the most profound and revolutionary legacy of Trump's second term.
The US market and its currency might no longer offer the safe haven against risk, nor the anchor for markets worldwide. An end of this financial exceptionalism would mean higher borrowing costs for the US and pose a challenge to the entire American economy model.
Moody's became the last major credit rating agency to strip the US of its gold-plated borrower status last month and analysts have raised the prospect of Trump facing his own ' Liz Truss moment ' as investors baulk at his spending plans.
For now, concern is centred around where all this fiscal ill-discipline will leave the US in the 2030s and beyond. So investors are shying away from longer-dated Treasuries with terms such as 10, 20 or 30 years, and parking their money in shorter-term bonds that mature in one or two years.
'I see investors who are even cautious about the five to 10-year space,' Goldberg says.
If this caution turns to panic, then a meltdown – with worldwide consequences – isn't out of the question.
'If there was a big deleveraging that happened – and there was a big source of selling, whether it's from foreign investors or hedge funds or levered investors or basis investors – it could potentially overwhelm the system,' Goldberg says.
Foreign investors are also having to contend with a big drop in the US dollar, which is reducing their returns.
'It's fine to see bond yields rise if the currency is stable or appreciating. That's not what we're seeing at the moment. We're seeing bond yields rise in the US, and actually the currency, on a broad basket, is about 10pc down from its highs last year,' says James Ringer, a Schroders fund manager.
The lack of buyers and the potential glut of bonds raises the possibility, or 'tail risk', that the market could cease to function properly.
'That would mean sellers overwhelming buyers,' says Goldberg. This could drive a sharp surge in rates and force an emergency intervention from the Federal Reserve.
'That is the risk going forward – that the system is unable to function if something goes wrong,' he adds.
At the moment, there's little prospect of a panicked sell-off – mainly because investors have so few genuine alternatives. America's star may be on the wane but it is still the brightest light in the sky.
'The US is absolutely a mass market in terms of marketable debt. The second and third closest markets are an order of magnitude smaller, so that makes it really difficult for a lot of these investors to really get away from dollars,' says Goldberg.
'There's just no place for them to go.'
But equally, with Trump at the helm, nobody is ruling anything out.
'Even if it's a tail risk or something that's unlikely, because it's there at the back of people's minds, potentially they do begin to change their behaviour,' Stopford says.
'They do begin to think, 'OK, well, I should have less exposure to the US, I should have less exposure to the dollar, I should be looking for alternatives that are safer, more reliable.'
'That's not bond vigilantes speculating. That's just people making rational decisions based on concerns about risk.'
Scott Bessent began the week by telling the world: 'The United States of America is never going to default. That is never going to happen.'
were meant to reassure. But the sheer fact that the US treasury secretary had to spell out something that has been taken for granted for decades highlights the fact that the fundamentals of the US financial system have been shaken.
Whether they go on to crumble depends on what Trump does next.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

WTI-Brent spread at narrowest in almost two years as US prices rise
WTI-Brent spread at narrowest in almost two years as US prices rise

Reuters

time30 minutes ago

  • Reuters

WTI-Brent spread at narrowest in almost two years as US prices rise

HOUSTON, June 6 (Reuters) - The spread between U.S. West Texas Intermediate and Brent crude futures narrowed to its tightest level since September 2023 on Friday as U.S. prices rose on a sliding rig count and Canadian wildfires that cut supplies, analysts and traders said. U.S. futures ended the week 4.9% higher, while Brent futures rose 2.75%, as OPEC+ output increases put a cap on gains. A narrower spread indicates a closed arbitrage window for traders and weaker shipping economics to Europe and Asia. The tighter spread can act as an early indicator that U.S. crude exports will likely fall in the next few weeks, assuming the premium for Brent crude remains weak. The inclusion of WTI-Midland crude in the dated Brent index has meant that the spread between the two is increasingly correlated to freight rates, as the price of Dated Brent is set by WTI Midland on many trading days. The spread between the two crude benchmarks narrowed to as little as $2.78 a barrel during the session on Friday. A discount of $4 per barrel is typically considered the level that encourages U.S. exports to Europe, as traders see an open arbitrage route. The spread has remained narrower than $4 a barrel since May 1, according to data from LSEG, partly due to concerns around U.S. production, helping keep more barrels onshore, according to Phil Flynn, senior analyst with Price Futures Group. Since April, OPEC+ countries including Saudi Arabia and Russia have made or announced increases totaling 1.37 million barrels per day, or 62% of the 2.2 million bpd they aim to add back to the market. Meanwhile the U.S. oil and gas rig count, an early indicator of future output, fell by four to 559 in the week to June 6, the lowest since November 2021, energy services firm Baker Hughes (BKR.O), opens new tab said in its closely followed report on Friday, stoking some concerns around future U.S. production. This has helped create pricing that encourages U.S. oil to remain in the domestic market, traders and analysts said. Wildfires burning in Canada's oil-producing province of Alberta have further buoyed U.S. crude futures, analysts said, with Canadian daily crude production down by about 7%. "With Canadian wildfire season underway, further disruption could push the WTI/Brent spread below $3 this summer," said analysts at Sparta Commodities. "When you look at the WTI/Brent spread, you can see the concerns a little bit around leveling off U.S. production and concerns about export barrels tightening up," said Price Futures Group's Flynn.

Donald Trump says Elon Musk ‘has lost his mind'
Donald Trump says Elon Musk ‘has lost his mind'

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Donald Trump says Elon Musk ‘has lost his mind'

Donald Trump has escalated his public feud with Elon Musk, stating he is "not even thinking about" him and suggesting he may sell his Tesla Model S. The renewed hostility follows a social media spat where Musk criticised Trump's tax-cut and spending bill, complicating its passage in Congress. On Friday in Washington, Trump was asked about reports of a peacemaking phone call with Musk, to which he responded: 'You mean the man who has lost his mind? Shares in Tesla have dropped 14% after Trump threatened to cut off government contracts with Musk's companies, leading to a $150 billion loss in value. A prolonged feud could impact Republican control of Congress in the midterm elections if Musk withholds financial support, though Musk has indicated he plans to curtail his political spending.

Exclusive: US mulls giving millions to controversial Gaza aid foundation, sources say
Exclusive: US mulls giving millions to controversial Gaza aid foundation, sources say

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Exclusive: US mulls giving millions to controversial Gaza aid foundation, sources say

WASHINGTON, June 6 (Reuters) - The State Department is weighing giving $500 million to the new foundation providing aid to war-shattered Gaza, according to two knowledgeable sources and two former U.S. officials, a move that would involve the U.S. more deeply in a controversial aid effort that has been beset by violence and chaos. The sources and former U.S. officials, all of whom requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said that money for Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) would come from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which is being folded into the U.S. State Department. The plan has met resistance from some U.S. officials concerned with the deadly shootings of Palestinians near aid distribution sites and the competence of the GHF, the two sources said. The GHF, which has been fiercely criticized by humanitarian organizations, including the United Nations, for an alleged lack of neutrality, began distributing aid last week amid warnings that most of Gaza's 2.3 million population is at risk of famine after an 11-week Israeli aid blockade, which was lifted on May 19 when limited deliveries were allowed to resume. The foundation has seen senior personnel quit and had to pause handouts twice this week after crowds overwhelmed its distribution hubs. The State Department and GHF did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Reuters has been unable to establish who is currently funding the GHF operations, which began in Gaza last week. The GHF uses private U.S. security and logistics companies to transport aid into Gaza for distribution at so-called secure distribution sites. On Thursday, Reuters reported that a Chicago-based private equity firm, McNally Capital, has an "economic interest" in the for-profit U.S. contractor overseeing the logistics and security of GHF's aid distribution hubs in the enclave. While U.S. President Donald Trump's administration and Israel say they don't finance the GHF operation, both have been pressing the United Nations and international aid groups to work with it. The U.S. and Israel argue that aid distributed by a long-established U.N. aid network was diverted to Hamas. Hamas has denied that. USAID has been all but dismantled. Some 80 percent of its programs have been canceled and its staff face termination as part of President Donald Trump's drive to align U.S. foreign policy with his "America First" agenda. One source with knowledge of the matter and one former senior official said the proposal to give the $500 million to GHF has been championed by acting deputy USAID Administrator Ken Jackson, who has helped oversee the agency's dismemberment. The source said that Israel requested the funds to underwrite GHF's operations for 180 days. The Israeli government did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The two sources said that some U.S. officials have concerns with the plan because of the overcrowding that has affected the aid distribution hubs run by GHF's contractor, and violence nearby. Those officials also want well-established non-governmental organizations experienced in running aid operations in Gaza and elsewhere to be involved in the operation if the State Department approves the funds for GHF, a position that Israel likely will oppose, the sources said. Gaza hospital officials have said more than 80 people had been shot dead and hundreds wounded near GHF's distribution points between June 1-3. Since launching its operation, the GHF has opened three hubs, but over the past two days, only two of them have been functioning. Witnesses blamed Israeli soldiers for the killings. The Israeli military said it fired warning shots on two days, while on Tuesday it said soldiers had fired at Palestinian "suspects" advancing towards their positions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store