logo
‘Not foes': China to Aus amid nuclear build-up

‘Not foes': China to Aus amid nuclear build-up

Perth Now13 hours ago

Xi Jinping's envoy in Canberra says China and Australia are 'not foes', despite being embroiled in a regional rivalry and Beijing rapidly building up conventional and nuclear military capabilities.
Anthony Albanese has been facing domestic and international calls to boost the defence budget, with the US warning of a potentially 'imminent' threat from China in the Indo Pacific.
But the Prime Minister has resisted, making Australia an outlier in the West – a position highlighted by NATO's decision last week to dramatically hike military spending to 5 per cent of GDP.
Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian on Monday urged Mr Albanese to stay the course. Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian says Australia and China are 'not foes'. Martin Ollman / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia
'Recently, some countries hyped up the so-called China threat narrative on occasions such as the Shangri-La Dialogue, G7 summit and NATO summit, proclaiming to significantly increase defence expenditures, and even incited Australia to follow suit,' Mr Xiao wrote in The Australian.
'Such rhetoric and actions are steeped in Cold War mentality, blatantly creating division, fuelling a global arms race as well as threatening world peace and stability, which warrants our high vigilance.
'By playing up international and regional tensions and slandering China's normal military build-up, these countries are merely seeking nothing but excuses to drastically grow their military spending, even arbitrarily reaching beyond its geographical scope and mandate.'
He accused 'certain countries' of trying to contain China because they 'fear fair competition' and 'cannot tolerate other countries from making progress'.
Mr Xiao's piece comes as Foreign Minister Penny Wong heads to Washington for a second meeting with her Quad counterparts within six months.
The Quad, made up of Australia, India, Japan and the US, is a partnership broadly seen as a check on China's economic and military might. Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian is urging the Albanese government to continue resisting domestic and international calls to boost Australia's defence budget. Martin Ollman / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia
Earlier this month, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth warned China could invade the democratically self-governed island of Taiwan as early as 2027.
Such a move would deal a major blow to global supply of semiconductors – crucial components in modern tech – and massively disrupt vital trade routes.
'Let me be clear, any attempt by Communist China to conquer Taiwan by force would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world,' Mr Hegseth told the Shangri La Dialogue.
'There's no reason to sugar-coat it. The threat China poses is real and it could be imminent.
'We hope not but certainly could be.'
Meeting with Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles on the sidelines of the conference, he directly asked Australia to boost the defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP.
The Albanese government was quick to brush off the request, saying Australia would set its own military budget.
But days later, Mr Marles, who is also defence minister, admitted China's growing nuclear arsenal was driving 'security anxiety'. Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles says China's military build-up is driving 'security anxiety' in Australia. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia
'I mean, we've made no secret of the fact that we have a security anxiety in relation to China that's principally driven by the very significant conventional military build-up that China is engaging in, and, for that matter, a nuclear build-up that China is engaging in,' he told reporters.
'We've made that clear to China itself.'
As of mid-2024, China's operational nuclear warheads exceeded 600, according to the US Department of Defence.
That was nearly triple what the country was estimated to have in 2020.
More recently, Mr Marles refused to say whether three Chinese warships that circumnavigated Australia earlier this year targeted cities when they carried out exercises off the country's vast coastline.
Appearing at New Corp's Defending Australia Summit, he said was asked point blank if the ships rehearsed strikes on Australian cities or onshore facilities.
'Look, I do know the answer to the question,' he said.
'I don't think it's appropriate or helpful for me in this situation to speculate about it for a range of reasons … and the most significant being what we did with the Chinese task group was to engage in an unprecedented level of surveillance on that task group.
'So we do know exactly what they were doing and exactly what they're rehearsing.
'For me to start talking about that obviously reveals our surveillance capabilities, which is why I'm reluctant to.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia's lawsuit over rare minerals is a geopolitical litmus test
Australia's lawsuit over rare minerals is a geopolitical litmus test

Sydney Morning Herald

timean hour ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Australia's lawsuit over rare minerals is a geopolitical litmus test

In a move that would have been unthinkable a decade ago, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has launched a Federal Court lawsuit to force Chinese-linked entities to divest from a key rare earth miner. This isn't just a legal dispute; it's a test of whether Australia is willing to enforce its sovereignty in the face of economic intimidation and strategic competition. The test is one of enforcing set red lines or, in Seinfeld parlance, not just knowing how to make a reservation but knowing how to hold a reservation. That's why, if we're serious about holding onto the strategic advantages of our critical minerals sector and not just making short-term profits, this is a moment for resolve. At the heart of the matter is Northern Minerals, an Australian company developing the Browns Range heavy rare earths project in WA. It is an operation that could become one of the first non-Chinese sources of the critical minerals essential for advanced military systems, clean energy technologies and high-end electronics. Despite a clear directive from Chalmers last year for five Chinese-linked entities to divest their stakes in Northern Minerals, at least one, Indian Ocean International Shipping and Service Company Ltd, allegedly failed to comply. Now, in a move that's both unprecedented and essential, the Commonwealth is suing. Yes, we are dealing with companies but there really is no such thing as the Chinese private sector. As much as the Australian government will rightly make the case for this being about a commercial matter, this is all about the threat from the Chinese government and its objective of controlling critical minerals not just as economic leverage but as a strategic weapon. Loading It's deeply concerning that foreign investors have openly defied a directive from the Australian government. That would never be tolerated by Beijing. In China, foreign companies must abide by a highly restrictive, state-controlled investment environment or risk being expelled immediately. Yet in Australia, even after years of intensifying economic coercion and evidence of strategic interference, certain state-linked actors have come to believe that our foreign investment laws are optional or that the fear of retaliatory action by Beijing would result in Australian inaction. To the credit of the government, this lawsuit challenges that dangerous assumption head-on. Chalmers' statement was unequivocal: 'Foreign investors in Australia are required to follow Australian law.' What is at stake isn't just legal precedent – it's Australia's ability to protect the integrity of its critical minerals sector. These minerals – such as dysprosium, terbium and neodymium – are the foundational inputs for technologies ranging from F-35 fighter jets and hypersonic missiles to electric vehicles and offshore wind turbines.

Australia's lawsuit over rare minerals is a geopolitical litmus test
Australia's lawsuit over rare minerals is a geopolitical litmus test

The Age

timean hour ago

  • The Age

Australia's lawsuit over rare minerals is a geopolitical litmus test

In a move that would have been unthinkable a decade ago, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has launched a Federal Court lawsuit to force Chinese-linked entities to divest from a key rare earth miner. This isn't just a legal dispute; it's a test of whether Australia is willing to enforce its sovereignty in the face of economic intimidation and strategic competition. The test is one of enforcing set red lines or, in Seinfeld parlance, not just knowing how to make a reservation but knowing how to hold a reservation. That's why, if we're serious about holding onto the strategic advantages of our critical minerals sector and not just making short-term profits, this is a moment for resolve. At the heart of the matter is Northern Minerals, an Australian company developing the Browns Range heavy rare earths project in WA. It is an operation that could become one of the first non-Chinese sources of the critical minerals essential for advanced military systems, clean energy technologies and high-end electronics. Despite a clear directive from Chalmers last year for five Chinese-linked entities to divest their stakes in Northern Minerals, at least one, Indian Ocean International Shipping and Service Company Ltd, allegedly failed to comply. Now, in a move that's both unprecedented and essential, the Commonwealth is suing. Yes, we are dealing with companies but there really is no such thing as the Chinese private sector. As much as the Australian government will rightly make the case for this being about a commercial matter, this is all about the threat from the Chinese government and its objective of controlling critical minerals not just as economic leverage but as a strategic weapon. Loading It's deeply concerning that foreign investors have openly defied a directive from the Australian government. That would never be tolerated by Beijing. In China, foreign companies must abide by a highly restrictive, state-controlled investment environment or risk being expelled immediately. Yet in Australia, even after years of intensifying economic coercion and evidence of strategic interference, certain state-linked actors have come to believe that our foreign investment laws are optional or that the fear of retaliatory action by Beijing would result in Australian inaction. To the credit of the government, this lawsuit challenges that dangerous assumption head-on. Chalmers' statement was unequivocal: 'Foreign investors in Australia are required to follow Australian law.' What is at stake isn't just legal precedent – it's Australia's ability to protect the integrity of its critical minerals sector. These minerals – such as dysprosium, terbium and neodymium – are the foundational inputs for technologies ranging from F-35 fighter jets and hypersonic missiles to electric vehicles and offshore wind turbines.

Trump-Albanese meeting could happen in India
Trump-Albanese meeting could happen in India

Sydney Morning Herald

timean hour ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Trump-Albanese meeting could happen in India

Anthony Albanese has signalled he could use a gathering of world leaders in India to meet Donald Trump as he justifies Australia's defence spending as more transparent than the measures used by other countries. Albanese is the only leader of the Quad grouping – India, the US, Japan and Australia – not to have met Trump in person and faces pressure from the White House to follow NATO and lift defence spending to at least 3.5 per cent of the nation's gross domestic product. Albanese has spoken with Trump on three occasions and was due to meet the president at the recent G7 meeting in Canada, but Trump cancelled his meetings that day and returned to Washington early to deal with events in the Middle East. Albanese told the ABC's Afternoon Briefing that he was ready to meet Trump 'when a suitable time can be organised' and noted the Quad meeting was in coming months. 'So these things are being organised, and I look forward to having a meeting and continuing the constructive dialogue that I've had with President Trump up to now,' he said. Loading The Quad has the stated goal of defending a free and open Indo-Pacific, but is widely seen as a forum for containing China. The date for the 2025 Quad leaders meeting has not yet been set, but the four nations' foreign ministers are meeting in Washington and, according to a report in Times of India earlier this month, that get-together is likely to set a date for the leaders' meeting. Albanese also plans to attend the UN leader's week in September and deliver his first address to that forum, and a possible meeting in the White House afterwards could occur after that event.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store