
Scientists sent beans into orbit and made ‘space miso.' Here's how it tasted
An experiment on board the International Space Station (ISS) has produced miso paste, thought to be the first food deliberately fermented outside Earth — a feat that scientists hope will shed light on the potential for life to exist in space, and broaden the culinary options for astronauts.
The 'space miso' had a similar umami, or savoriness, to miso made on Earth. But according to the researchers who sampled it, there was a key difference: a stronger roasted and nutty flavor.
Scientists Maggie Coblentz from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Joshua Evans from the Technical University of Denmark sent a small container of cooked soybean paste to the ISS in March 2020, where it was left to ferment for 30 days before returning to Earth as miso.
The miso was kept in a container with sensors, which closely monitored temperature, relative humidity, pressure, and radiation, according to the peer-reviewed paper released in the journal iScience on Wednesday.
As part of the experiment, two other miso batches were fermented on Earth for comparison — one in Cambridge, Massachusetts in the US and the other in Copenhagen, Denmark.
'We didn't know what to expect — fermentation had never been done before in space,' Evans, the co-lead author of the study, told CNN.
'The space miso one was darker and clearly more jostled—which makes sense, as it had traveled much more than either of the earth misos. It was exciting to smell and taste the first bite.'
He explained some environmental features in space, in particular microgravity and increased radiation, could have impacted how microbes grow and metabolize, and in turn how fermentation works.
'By bringing together microbiology, flavor chemistry, sensory science, and larger social and cultural considerations, our study opens up new directions to explore how life changes when it travels to new environments like space,' Evans said.
Furthermore, Evans said the research could 'enhance astronaut well-being and performance,' and 'invite new forms of culinary expression, expanding and diversifying culinary and cultural representation in space exploration as the field grows.'
Miso, the salty fermented bean paste, forms the base of many soups, sauces and marinades. Every region in Japan has its own special recipe.
It is traditionally made of soaked soybeans, water, salt and koji (a type of mold), and traditionally takes about six months to develop its distinct umami taste, with the flavors intensifying the longer it ferments.
Many fermented foods contain probiotics, live microorganisms that, when ingested, can work in conjunction with the existing good bacteria in the gut microbiome to help regulate the digestive system.
But Evans said the further analyses is still need to asses its nutritional value, including the macromolecular composition and bioactive compounds present in the space miso.
Coblentz, also a co-lead author of the study, said the miso fermentation on the ISS underlined 'the potential for life to exist in space' by showing how a microbial community could thrive.
Scientists have long experimented with growing and harvesting fresh produce in space, including various types of lettuce and radishes. In 2021, the ISS even hosted a taco party to celebrate the harvest of the first chile peppers in space.
One Japanese company is also making a special brew of sake fermented in space. Asahi Shuzo, the company behind the popular Dassai brand, has paid Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency for access to the Kibo experiment module, part of the ISS, to conduct tests.
The company is also developing space brewing equipment, with a planned launch date later in 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
SpaceX's Crew-10 astronauts return to Earth after nearly 5 months in space (video)
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. SpaceX's Crew-10 astronauts returned to Earth on Saturday (Aug. 9) after living on the International Space Station for nearly five months. The mission's Crew Dragon capsule, named Endurance, splashed down in the Pacific Ocean off the California coast at 11:33 a.m. EDT (1533 GMT; 8:33 a.m. local California time). "From the entire Crew-10, thank you," radioed Anne McClain, NASA astronaut and Dragon commander, soon after splashdown. "It was truly the ride of a lifetime." As its name suggests, Crew-10 was the 10th operational astronaut mission that SpaceX has flown to and from the International Space Station (ISS) for NASA, via the agency's Commercial Crew Program (CCP). The crewmembers were McClain and Nichole Ayers of NASA, Takuya Onishi of JAXA (the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency) and Kirill Peskov of Roscosmos, Russia's space agency. McClain commanded Crew-10, Ayers was the pilot and Onishi and Peskov were mission specialists. The flight launched atop a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket on March 14 and arrived at the orbiting lab two days later. Crew-10's four astronauts soon set to conducting science work, which consumed much of their time over the ensuing months. "During their stay in space, the crew studied space-caused mental and physical changes in astronauts, blood flow from the brain to the heart, future lunar navigation techniques and more," NASA officials wrote in a blog post on Monday (Aug. 4). The wheels for Crew-10's departure began turning last Saturday (Aug. 2), when SpaceX's four-person Crew-11 mission arrived at the ISS. The Crew-10 astronauts spent a few days advising their replacements, then set their minds to gearing up for the return to Earth — and reflecting on their orbital experience. "We got to accomplish a lot of really amazing operational things," Ayers said during a farewell ceremony on Tuesday (Aug. 5). "We got to see some amazing views, and we have had some really big belly laughs and a wonderful time together," she added. "I think that [we're] leaving with a heart full of gratitude, and [we're] excited to see where the International Space Station goes after we get home." Related Stories: — Meet the astronauts of the SpaceX Crew-10 mission — International Space Station: Everything you need to know about the orbital laboratory — SpaceX's Crew-11 astronauts arrive at the International Space Station (video) The hatches between Endurance and the ISS closed on Friday (Aug. 8) at 4:20 p.m. EDT (2020 GMT), and the capsule undocked about two hours later, at 6:15 p.m. EDT (2205 GMT). Endurance then began maneuvering its way back to Earth, setting up its splashdown today. It was the first Pacific Ocean return for a SpaceX CCP mission; all previous such flights have come down off the Florida coast. SpaceX recently shifted to West Coast reentries for all of its Dragon missions, both crewed and uncrewed, to minimize the chance that falling space debris could damage property or injure people. Crew-10 wasn't the first SpaceX astronaut mission of any type to land in the Pacific, however; the private Fram2 and Axiom 4 flights did so earlier this year. Crew-10 was the first spaceflight for Ayers and Peskov and the second for McClain and Onishi. Onishi served as commander of the ISS' current Expedition 73 from April until this past Tuesday, when he handed the reins over to cosmonaut Sergey Ryzhikov. Editor's note: This story was updated at noon ET on Aug. 9 with news of successful splashdown. Solve the daily Crossword


Atlantic
4 hours ago
- Atlantic
Give the Moon a Big, Beautiful Base
No one can say that the Trump administration is entirely against alternative energy. In his first bold policy stroke as NASA's interim head, Sean Duffy has directed the agency to put a 100-kilowatt nuclear reactor on the moon by decade's end. This is not a lark. If humanity means to establish a permanent settlement on the moon, nuclear power will almost certainly be essential to its operation. And a lunar base may well be the most wondrous achievement in space exploration that people reading this will see during their lifetime. The moon has gone unvisited, except by robots, for more than 50 years, and as of several months ago, it seemed as though Americans would be staying away from it for a good while longer. President Donald Trump was taking cues from Elon Musk, who seemed inclined to shelve the plan to put Americans back on the lunar surface and focus instead on an all-out sprint to Mars. But Musk has since fallen out of favor, and last month, congressional Republicans secured a funding boost for the moon program. NASA astronauts are now scheduled to return to the moon in 2027, and if all goes well, they will be landing on it regularly, starting in the early 2030s. Each crew will carry parts of a small base that can grow piece by piece into a living space for a few people. The astronauts will also take a pair of vehicles for expeditions—a little rover that they can use for local jaunts in their space suits, and a larger, pressurized one that will allow them to go on 500-mile regolith road trips in street clothes. A base on the moon would be more democratic than those that Musk and his acolytes have advocated building on Mars. Given shorter travel times, a greater number of people would be able to experience its otherworldly ashen plains. Their homesick calls to Earth would have only second-long delays, as opposed to minutes for a call from Mars. But even a small encampment on the lunar surface is going to require considerable energy. Temperatures dip to –410 degrees Fahrenheit in the shade, and human bodies will need to keep cozy amid that deep chill. The International Space Station runs on solar power, but that won't be enough on most of the moon, where nights last for 14 days. Some of the agency's other off-world projects are powered by raw plutonium. Hunks of it sit inside the Mars rovers, for instance, radiating heat that the wheeled robots convert into electricity. These hot rocks are also encased inside NASA's probes to the outer planets and their moons. Without plutonium, the two Voyager spacecrafts couldn't continue to send data back to Earth as they recede from the solar system. The moon base will need more than a radioactive rock. It will need a reactor that actually splits atoms, like the one that Duffy has proposed this week. Even if that reactor were to fail, the resulting meltdown wouldn't present the same risks to humans that it would on Earth. The moon is already a radiation-rich environment, and it has no wind to blow the reactor's most dangerous effluvia around; the material would simply fall to the ground. Duffy framed his push to get the reactor in place as a matter of national security. NASA's program to return to the moon, called Artemis, will be an international effort, with several countries contributing pieces of the final base. (Japan's space agency has tapped Toyota to design the large, pressurized lunar vehicle.) But when the United States invited Russia to join, Vladimir Putin declined. He has instead opted to help out with a larger Chinese lunar base, which is supposed to include a nuclear reactor 10 times as powerful as the one that Duffy announced. Last month, Bhavya Lal, who served as an associate administrator at NASA during the Biden administration and is now a professor at RAND, and her fellow aerospace expert Roger Myers released a report arguing that a county could sneakily establish a sovereign zone on the moon in defiance of the Outer Space Treaty just by building a reactor. For instance, the Chinese could insist on a buffer around theirs for the sake of nuclear safety, and use that to keep Americans away from desirable ice-rich craters nearby. Lal and Myers seem to have captured the new administration's attention: Duffy's new directive ordering the development of the reactor specifically mentioned this risk. If worry over Chinese lunar land grabs is the motivation for a moon base, so much the better. Space exploration often requires a geopolitical spur. And if NASA can build this first small lunar settlement, something grander could follow close behind. Once the agency has mastered the construction of a 100-kilowatt lunar nuclear reactor, it should have little trouble scaling up to larger ones that can support tens, or even hundreds, of people—in bases of the size that now exist on Antarctica. Some space agencies have reportedly discussed building hydroponic greenhouses and other elaborate structures inside the voluminous caves that run beneath the moon's Sea of Tranquility. All of this infrastructure could enable some serious lunar dystopias. The moon's surface could become an industrial hellscape, pocked with mining operations where robots and human serfs extract platinum and titanium for use in advanced electronics back on Earth. Or the Outer Space Treaty could break down and the moon could become a heavily militarized zone—even a staging ground for nuclear weapons. But an inhabited moon could also be a global commons for research. Both the U.S. and China have developed designs for large radio telescopes on the lunar dark side, where they'd be shielded from Earth's radio noise and would greatly aid the search for signals from distant civilizations. In one design, robots would spread a metal mesh from a crater's center to its rim, turning its concave surface into a natural radio dish. One can imagine an astronomer at a lunar base, peering out from a porthole, seeing the Earth shining in the sky, picking out its individual oceans and continents, and knowing that on the moon's opposite side, a giant ear would be listening for messages from other Earths and other moons, all across the Milky Way and far beyond.

Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
SpaceX Crew-10 makes splashdown return to Earth
ORLANDO, Fla. — The four members of the SpaceX Crew-10 mission climbed aboard the Crew Dragon Endurance and departed the International Space Station on Friday evening for an overnight trip and safe splashdown back on Earth. NASA astronauts Anne McClain and Nichole Ayers, JAXA astronaut Takuya Onishi and Roscosmos cosmonaut Kirill Peskov launched to the station back on March 14 from Kennedy Space Center. After four-and-a-half months on board, they undocked at 6:15 p.m. and completed a 17 1/2-hour trip home for a splashdown off the coast of San Diego at 11:33 a.m. Saturday. 'For the entire crew, thank you for that flight. Truly an honor of a lifetime,' Crew-10 commander McClain said after landing. 'I'd say take 20 minutes … get to the back of the line and then go again.' The Dragon completing its fourth trip to space broke through low cloud cover at the landing site near San Diego on a parachute-assisted, gentle descent of about 15 mph. The spacecraft had been going more than 16,500 mph an hour earlier before performing its deorbit burn during which it endured temperatures near 3,500 degrees Fahrenheit. Despite some choppy seas, SpaceX was able to haul it up onto a recovery vessel, crack open the side hatch and give its four passengers their first breaths of fresh air in nearly 148 days. 'Crew is ready to return to the atmosphere, ' McClain had said before reentry. All four were offloaded and helped onto stretchers for medical checkouts within an hour of splashing down. They will be flown back by helicopter to shore, then go by plane back to their homes in Houston, Japan and Russia. The undocking Friday went off on time as the space station population dropped from 11 to seven. 'It has been an absolute privilege to cross paths with you,' McClain said as the Dragon drifted away from the station. 'Godspeed.' She had also led the mission's farewell ceremony earlier in the week. 'We really want to lead with gratitude for the absolute privilege of getting to live and work aboard this amazing International Space Station,' she said. 'All of us are keenly aware that we may never get to do this again, and we've been very pensive over the last days of understanding what we have all got to be a part of.' Ayers was the first from her NASA astronaut class chosen in 2021, known as The Flies, to make it to space. 'We got to see some amazing views and we have had some really big belly laughs and a wonderful time together,' she said about her Crew-10 crewmates. 'Leaving with a heart full of gratitude and excited to see where the International Space Station goes after we get home.' While McClain is the Crew-10 commander, Onishi had been the Expedition 73 commander for the station. He handed over command to Roscosmos cosmonaut Sergey Ryzhikov during a ceremony Tuesday before departing. Ryzhikov is part of the Soyuz crew that flew up in April and won't leave until December. 'I wish we could spend more time together,' Onishi said about Crew-11 replacements that arrived last weekend. 'But you are in good hands. So I'm sure the second half of Expedition 73 will be even better. … Crew-10 is now leaving, but the science will continue here, because this place is the outpost for human beings to advance our technology and to explore further.' The California splashdown marks the first time a NASA mission with SpaceX has landed on the West Coast with 10 previous crewed missions for NASA (Demo-2 and Crew-1 through Crew-9) on SpaceX Crew Dragons having splashed down off the coast of Florida instead. It's the first time since the Apollo-Soyuz mission ended in 1975 that NASA astronauts have made a Pacific landing. SpaceX made the shift in coasts after several incidents of debris showing up on land around the world that turned out to be remnants of the Crew Dragon trunks, which had previously been discarded at higher altitudes during deorbit. Now the trunk is more safely discarded over the Pacific as it comes in for its landing. SpaceX has already knocked out two California landings this year on private missions Fram2 and Axiom Space's Ax-4. For Crew-10, the mission was the shortest so far for an operational flight under NASA's Commercial Crew Program. The longest has been Crew-8 from March-October 2024 at more than 235 days. Most have been around six months long. The reason Crew-10 was short was twofold. It was originally targeting a February liftoff, but a delay from SpaceX with its fifth and final Crew Dragon forced a shuffle so Crew-10 flew with Endurance and the private Ax-4 mission ended up with the new vehicle, which they named Grace. Its departure was also needed before the planned CRS-33 cargo Dragon mission slated to arrive later this month, as it would need somewhere to park, and the station has only two ports that can handle Dragon spacecraft. That cargo Dragon has a special reboost capacity built in that will be used to elevate the space station's altitude, a first for SpaceX. The Russian Progress spacecraft are usually the ones responsible for space station reboost, but NASA is trying to store up fuel reserves for the eventual need to bring the space station back down to burn up in Earth's atmosphere when it's decommissioned after 2030. Endurance debuted in 2021 on Crew-3 followed by the Crew-5 mission in 2022 and Crew-7 in 2023. It left behind the Crew-11 crew, who arrived last weekend in the fleet-leading Crew Dragon Endeavour. It was the first SpaceX Crew Dragon to fly with humans back in 2020 on the Demo-2 mission and is now amidst its sixth trip to space. The other Crew Dragons are Resilience, Freedom and Grace. Crew-11 is not slated to leave the station until next year after at least six months, although NASA and SpaceX are looking into potentially stretching that mission to eight months. Crew-10's arrival in March was part of the Starliner saga as it was the relief crew to the station that allowed for Boeing Starliner's two astronauts to finally come home after nearly 10 months in space. Starliner flew up to the station on the Crew Flight Test in June 2024, but the spacecraft suffered helium leaks and thruster failures on its propulsion system before docking. NASA ultimately chose to send Starliner home without crew in September — meaning NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams had to remain on board the station until SpaceX was able to fly up a Crew Dragon with a pair of open seats that would allow them to fly home. While Crew-9 arrived at the station in fall 2024, Williams and Wilmore had to remain on it until Crew-10 arrived and Crew-9 was able to make it home. The Commercial Crew Program originally contracted with Boeing and SpaceX to each build spacecraft to take over the responsibilities of shuttling astronauts on U.S.-based launches to and from the space station. NASA had to rely on Russia for rides to the station on Soyuz flights since the end of the Space Shuttle Program in 2011. Both SpaceX and Boeing faced issues getting their test flights up and running, but SpaceX eventually returned U.S.-based orbital flights nearly nine years later. Since Demo-2, SpaceX has flown its fleet of five Crew Dragons 19 times with 74 human passengers. Boeing suffered issues on its initial uncrewed Starliner flight in 2019 that forced a follow-up uncrewed flight that had its own issues to not fly until 2022. The CFT flight was supposed to open the door for NASA to trade off rotational flights between SpaceX and Boeing with each company flying once a year to support station operations. Boeing and NASA, though, are back to fixing the issues found on the CFT mission with its next flight potentially reverting to an uncrewed mission to the station to ensure its propulsion systems are safe. Then NASA could begin flying operational missions with Starliner. SpaceX, though, is likely to fly Crew-12 for the next rotational mission sometime early next year. NASA only needs enough flights from among the two companies to support staffing on the station until it's decommissioned. At most that would likely mean 10 more missions, but it might become less if stays on board get stretched. The Trump administration has recently pushed to pull back on the number of flights needed to the station before it's decommissioned as well as limiting the number of astronauts. This all falls within a larger plan to invest more in NASA's efforts to get back to the moon and onto Mars while relying instead on future commercial space stations from companies, like Axiom Space, Blue Origin and Vast, to satisfy any low-Earth orbit needs. Solve the daily Crossword