Baghdad International Dialogue: Al-Halboosi critiques PMF, urges state-controlled weapons
Shafaq News / On Saturday, former Iraqi Parliament Speaker Mohammed al-Halboosi noted that some wings of the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) do not operate under the command of Prime Minister and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces Mohammed Shia al-Sudani.
Speaking at the seventh Baghdad International Dialogue Conference, Taqaddum (Progress) Party leader al-Halboosi stressed the need for a political agreement to serve as a constitutional counterbalance, defining Iraq's key challenges and committing all political, social, and civil forces to a fixed timeline. 'While some provisions of the 2022 Political Paper for government formation have been implemented, others remain pending."
Iraq's government, led by Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani, was formed in October 2022 based on a Political Agreement Paper, outlining commitments from Shiite, Sunni, and Kurdish blocs. The paper included key provisions such as amending the General Amnesty Law, ensuring the return of displaced persons, and withdrawing armed factions from cities like Jurf al-Sakhar, Al-Awja, and Al-Owaisat. It also called for compensation for destroyed properties, resolving cases of forcibly disappeared persons, and dissolving the de-Baathification Commission. Additionally, it emphasized balanced representation in state institutions, including security forces.
Regarding the issue of weapons, al-Halboosi noted that the Iraqi constitution prohibits political parties from having armed wings, emphasizing that weapons must be solely in the hands of the state. 'The PMF was established to counter a significant security threat posed by ISIS, but not all of its wings today follow the Commander-in-Chief's orders,' he affirmed.
Iraq's PMF was established in 2014 following a fatwa by top Shiite cleric Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani to combat ISIS. They fought alongside the Iraqi army and the Global Coalition. its membership is around 200,000, comprising around 70 factions from various religious and ethnic backgrounds, though it remains predominantly Shiite.
"If Iraq faces a security or terrorist threat, all citizens, including various forces, will be mobilized…However, under current conditions, no factions should exist outside the state framework, nor should they receive directives from entities beyond official state institutions."
As for Iraq's relationship with Iran, al-Halboosi confirmed that his country 'is not concerned with Iran's actions, and any pressure on Iran should be kept away from Iraq,' highlighting a conflict between US policy in the Middle East and Iran's actions in the region.
"Iraq should not bear the burden for others... It must achieve political and economic independence and stability, and stay out of conflicts and power struggles."
On the Syrian side, he claimed that Bashar al-Assad's regime was 'unable' to manage the state effectively, as signs of poverty were evident among the Syrian people during his visit. 'Syria has undergone rapid and unexpected changes, including the fall of al-Assad's regime and the reduction of Iran's influence in the country, prompting the international community to engage with the current Syrian administration on a temporary basis.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Shafaq News
an hour ago
- Shafaq News
US hails Syrian Fatwa banning extrajudicial killings as "Step Toward Justice"
Shafaq News / US Special Envoy for Syria Tom Barrack has welcomed a new religious edict from Syria's Supreme Council of Fatwa, which prohibits all forms of extrajudicial killing, praising the move as a step toward justice through lawful means. Great first steps for a new Syrian Government on the move towards a new Syria. — Ambassador Tom Barrack (@USAMBTurkiye) June 6, 2025 'It is forbidden for individuals to impose punishments or carry out retribution without recourse to official or religious courts,' the council stated, emphasizing that such acts undermine social stability and create a climate of violence and disorder. The statement also condemned any form of incitement to violence, saying it fuels division and hatred within the country. 'The council called on Syrian authorities to treat the issue of justice with utmost seriousness and urgency, ensuring the swift restoration of rights and preventing instigators and mercenaries from exploiting the situation to sow discord.'
Shafaq News
2 hours ago
- Shafaq News
SDF revives crude, gas transfers to Damascus
Shafaq News/ The Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) have resumed daily oil and gas shipments to government-held areas, fulfilling terms of the March 2025 agreement, Syrian media reported. The deal, signed by transitional President Ahmad al-Sharaa and SDF commander Mazloum Abdi, grants Damascus oversight over SDF-controlled territories and paves the way for integrating SDF fighters into the national army. Under the accord, the SDF delivers between 10,000 and 15,000 barrels of crude oil per day from fields in Deir ez-Zor and al-Hasakah to refineries in Homs and Baniyas, in addition to over 1 million cubic meters of natural gas piped daily from al-Hasakah to the Rayyan power station near Homs. Petroleum engineer Osama al-Salem estimated current output from SDF-controlled fields at around 75,000 barrels per day—well below Syria's pre-war average of 400,000 barrels. 'Production remains unstable due to sabotage threats, frequent breakdowns, and limited access to spare parts,' he explained. Years of conflict and international sanctions have severely damaged Syria's energy infrastructure. Pipelines and refineries across the country remain in disrepair, forcing operators to rely on improvised fixes and locally fabricated components. Despite the agreement, tensions persist. The SDF has continued independent recruitment and training activities, raising doubts over full military integration, although negotations are ongoing to clarify command structures and coordination with the Ministry of Defense.
Shafaq News
2 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Iraqi Turkmen factions vie for control in Kirkuk
Shafaq News/ Iraq's Turkmen minority, long sidelined in national politics, is heading into parliamentary elections divided and underrepresented—raising fears of further marginalization in key cities like Kirkuk. Turkmen, estimated at 2 to 3 million, are Iraq's third-largest ethnic group after Arabs and Kurds. While communities are spread across northern and central provinces—including Nineveh, Saladin, Diyala, and Baghdad—Kirkuk remains the focal point of their political struggle. The oil-rich city, also contested by Kurds and Arabs, is regarded by many Turkmen as their cultural and historical capital. This election cycle has deepened internal rifts. Mohammad Samaan Agha, head of the Unified Iraqi Turkmen Front, described his list as the 'sole legitimate Turkmen bloc' in Kirkuk, framing the vote as a test of unity. 'We are running with one list that truly represents the Turkmen community,' he told Shafaq News. Meanwhile, a new rival list—Al-Munqithoun (The Saviors)—has emerged under politician Ammar Kahya, backed by factions within the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF). Kahya described the alliance as an inclusive 'national project,' claiming it reflects the will of voters and those who defended Kirkuk. 'We formed this bloc because Turkmen lack real representation in local government,' he argued, emphasizing grassroots and federal support. The rivalry has reignited debate over who legitimately speaks for the community. Supporters of the Turkmen Front cite its decades-long political presence, while others view Al-Munqithoun as a necessary response to shifting power dynamics and years of exclusion from provincial leadership. In addition, Turkmen-majority towns like Tal Afar and Tuz Khurmatu have faced repeated attacks from extremist groups and militia clashes. Rights organizations report ongoing under-policing in key areas, and both campaigns have floated proposals for a dedicated Turkmen security force. Despite political fragmentation, both blocs stress that Turkmen identity, language, and security must remain central to future governance. However, what remains uncertain is whether voters will opt for historical continuity—or strategic adaptation at the ballot box.
