Apple is ending support for all Intel-based Macs next year — here's what's getting cut
During Apple's Platforms State of the Union event, it announced that macOS Tahoe will be the final release for Intel Macs. When macOS 27 arrives next year, only Macs with Apple Silicon, its M-series chips, will get the update.
This was inevitable, as every annual macOS update has older Macs drop off, and they're all packed with Intel chips. This is across all of Apple's PCs, including MacBook, iMac, Mac mini, Mac Pro and Mac Studio.
"If you've not done so already, now is a great time to help your users migrate to the Apple Silicon versions of your apps," Apple's Senior Director of Developer Relations, Matthew Firlik, told developers.
Many Intel Macs are already getting left behind with macOS Tahoe, such as the 2020 MacBook Air and 2020 MacBook Pro with two Thunderbolt 3 ports. But there are still a few that are getting support (more on this later).
However, these Macs don't get the full breadth of features as those with Apple Silicon. As the Cupertino tech giant states in the small print, only Macs with M1 or later get access to all the latest Apple Intelligence features.
It's important to note that just because Intel Macs will stop getting support for macOS updates doesn't mean they'll be useless, as they will still get security updates.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Apple is dropping 7 Macs in the move to macOS Tahoe, meaning they'll be stuck in macOS Sequoia limbo. If you've got these PCs and want to get further updates, you'll want to think about grabbing one of the best MacBooks or others as an upgrade.
The rest of the Intel-based Macs won't see next year's macOS 27 update. This includes the following:
From 2027, Apple will transition away from its Intel offerings and focus on providing major updates to its suite of Apple Silicon-based Macs.
And, well, judging from the power that these chips deliver, and how MacBooks are some of the best laptops around, it isn't surprising for Apple to leave Intel behind.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-Three Intel senior executives to retire amid manufacturing shake up
By Max A. Cherney SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -Three senior executives in Intel's manufacturing operations are set to retire, Intel told Reuters on Thursday, as new CEO Lip-Bu Tan implements sweeping change to resuscitate the struggling U.S. chipmaker. Intel told staff on Tuesday that corporate vice presidents in the technology development group, Kaizad Mistry and Ryan Russell, would retire, as would Gary Patton, corporate vice president at its Design Technology Platform organization and a former IBM executive. Intel also discussed changes to the technology development group, which is responsible for creating manufacturing processes, said two people briefed on the matter. The chipmaker plans to reduce its manufacturing capacity planning team and cut a portion of its engineering team, the people said. Intel declined to comment on the changes. Manufacturing operations are led by former Micron Technology executive Naga Chandrasekaran, who was hired about a year ago by then-CEO Pat Gelsinger. Chandrasekaran's responsibility expanded in March as he took over technology development and manufacturing. He has since reorganized staff under him, including layoffs as part of global cutbacks. When Intel announced its quarterly financial results last week, CEO Tan, who assumed the role in March, set a goal of slashing the chipmaker's workforce to 75,000 people by year-end, a reduction of around 22%. Intel also vowed to take a more disciplined approach to manufacturing investment. Intel said its next-generation 14A manufacturing process depends on securing a new, significant customer, otherwise it could suspend or terminate development. "We're developing Intel 14A ... from the ground up in close partnership with large external customers," Tan said in a memo released with the financial results. "Going forward, our investment in Intel 14A will be based on confirmed customer commitments." Tan also told investors that Intel's 18A process could only generate a reasonable return if it is used for in-house products. Tan has debated whether to stop offering 18A technology to external customers to focus on 14A, Reuters reported in July. Intel plans to ramp to high-volume manufacturing its Panther Lake PC chips this year using its 18A manufacturing process.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Here's what Tim Cook thinks about AI replacing the iPhone
Apple CEO Tim Cook waved off concerns about advanced AI replacing the iPhone. Speaking on Thursday's earnings call, Cook said, "It's difficult to see a world" without iPhones. Apple has been slow to release AI features, leaving analysts mixed on its competitive edge. Apple CEO Tim Cook appears unfazed by concerns that advancements in AI could topple the iPhone's dominance. During Thursday's earnings call, Wamsi Moen, an analyst with Bank of America, asked Cook directly how Apple is preparing for a world where dependence on screen-based devices "significantly diminishes," thanks to advances in AI. Cook didn't seem to see an imminent threat to Apple's hero product. "When you when you think about all the things an iPhone can do, from connecting people to bringing app and game experiences to life, to taking photos and videos, to helping users explore the world and conduct their financial lives and pay for things and so much more, you know, it's difficult to see a world where iPhone's not living in it," Cook said. "And that doesn't mean that we are not thinking about other things as well," Cook added, "but I think that the devices are likely to be complementary devices, not substitution." While Cook didn't appear worried about advances in AI disrupting the tech giant's business, Apple has been slow to release new Apple Intelligence features, leaving analysts with mixed opinions about its competitive edge. EMARKETER analyst Jacob Bourne told Business Insider that, "while the AI arms race may pressure Apple toward bolder moves, including potential acquisitions, its disciplined approach to product quality over speed should help it maintain a competitive advantage in the premium market over the long haul, provided it makes the necessary R&D investments in AI." Wedbush analyst Dan Ives said in a research note after the call that the company's revenue beat was "a major step in the right direction," adding that "now it's time to address the elephant in the AI strategy, which remains absent while the rest of the tech world is laser focused on the AI Revolution at warp speed." Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘Only a Monopoly Can Pull That Off': Billionaire Grant Cardone Calls Apple's 30% App Store Fee 'Insane'
Grant Cardone, a prominent real estate investor, entrepreneur, and business educator, has publicly questioned the legitimacy of Apple's (AAPL) long-standing 30% commission on in-app purchases, describing it as 'insane' and suggesting it is only possible for companies with monopolistic power. 'The fact Apple charges developers 30% on in-app purchases is insane. No company should be able to make 30% of gross fees charged,' Cardone wrote on X in July. He continued, 'There's no justification for it & it cost the end user. Only a monopoly can pull that off.' More News from Barchart Morgan Stanley Says Nvidia Has 'Exceptional' Strength. Should You Buy NVDA Stock Here? Dear MicroStrategy Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for July 31 2 Growth Stocks Wall Street Predicts Will Soar 74% to 159% Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. Cardone's perspective is based on his extensive experience as both an entrepreneur and outspoken advocate for small businesses. Having built a multi-billion-dollar real estate portfolio and a portfolio of media and education businesses, Cardone frequently touts competitive openness and strategies to empower individuals and organizations in markets often dominated by major players. His business philosophy revolves around challenging industry norms and questioning practices that disadvantage smaller participants, as reflected in his criticism of Apple's fee structure. For more than a decade, Apple enforced a 30% commission on all revenue generated through in-app purchases on its App Store, a model that became a significant source of revenue for the company and an industry benchmark. Apple defended the fee as necessary to support platform maintenance, security, and distribution, yet many developers and business leaders argued it stifled competition, limited consumer choice, and cut deeply into the already narrow margins of app makers. Notably, Cardone's assertion that 'only a monopoly can pull that off' resonates with findings from recent regulatory battles. Criticism of Apple's approach has not only come from business figures like Cardone, but also from regulators in the United States and Europe. These authorities have found Apple's rules in violation of antitrust standards and, in some regions, forced the company to reduce its fee or permit alternative payment methods. A recent landmark federal court decision concluded that Apple must allow app developers to direct users to alternative payment systems outside of Apple's commission structure. The court criticized Apple's persistent efforts to shield its revenue even after initial legal interventions, highlighting how integral the fee had become to Apple's business model and how resistant the company was to outside scrutiny. The wide-reaching implications of these decisions support Cardone's view that such a sizable fee is unsustainable in a truly competitive environment. From a market dynamics perspective, Cardone's comments tie into ongoing concerns about digital platforms' gatekeeping power, and the negative impacts on both developers and consumers. As the global app economy evolves and as regulators increase pressure, Apple's decades-old commission policy is being dismantled. The shift is likely to encourage more competition, lower costs for developers, and potentially better pricing or innovation for end users — all outcomes Cardone has championed throughout his business career. In essence, Cardone's critique speaks to larger questions of what constitutes fair play in modern digital marketplaces and who ultimately bears the cost of entrenched market power. In that regard, his voice underscores a movement pushing for greater accountability and opportunity across the technology sector. On the date of publication, Caleb Naysmith did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
