Macau's exposure to US trade war limited, but economy must diversify: leader
The US trade war has not had a significant impact on
Macau , but the city will explore more business opportunities in Southeast Asian countries to diversify its economy, its leader has said.
Advertisement
Macau Chief Executive Sam Hou-fai said in a media briefing on Sunday that while the city would inevitably be affected by the US tariffs targeting China, the impact would be small.
'The city will be indirectly affected by the trade war,' he said, adding the impact of the tariffs on other countries could affect tourism in Macau, driving down visitor spending.
He noted the government had some investments in US dollar assets and was highly concerned about the associated risks.
But the government had diversified the risks, and the value of Macau's annual exports to the United States, primarily consisting of souvenirs, was about 300 million patacas, he said.
Advertisement
'It indicates that the city's dependence on the country is not strong and the direct impact is minimal,' Sam said.
Sam also said Macau would collaborate with industries in Southeast Asian countries to develop tourism markets.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
HKFP
4 days ago
- HKFP
Hong Kong's John Lee compares city's int'l trade drive to attracting women
Chief Executive John Lee has compared Hong Kong's economic outreach efforts to attracting women. Amid strong competition, Lee said he was seeking economies that find Hong Kong mutually attractive, with Southeast Asian neighbours being a priority for bolstering trade ties. 'It's like me chasing a girl – you have to ensure there's some kind of attraction between us. So I think ASEAN [Association of Southeast Asian Nations] is our second-largest partner after the mainland the mutual attraction is already there – strengthen it,' the city's leader told SCMP on Sunday. SCMP Managing Editor Yonden Lhatoo took the analogy further, suggesting that girls' families may be focused on preventing such relationships, in an apparent reference to US trade turmoil. 'But there are a lot of girls,' Lee said, adding there are many options such as the Middle East. 'We've already decided to not just singly focus on the US market.' The dating analogy has been employed by senior officials repeatedly over the past year. Last June, Lee said that attracting large-scale events to the city was akin to 'chasing good women.' This March, talent matching efforts were compared to dating by the labour chief. Weeks later, the justice chief said national security education was an ongoing process, comparable to how one treats their spouse beyond Valentine's Day. 'That is Hong Kong' Lee said that there were no plans to enter a tit-for-tat trade war with the US following the imposition of tariffs by US President Donald Trump. Instead, the city would remain a free port, he said. Hong Kong had to primarily focus on national development, but will also foster international connectivity through the One Country, Two Systems framework. 'We continue to be bilingual – and, hopefully multilingual – we continue to maintain our way of life, we continue to maintain zero customs, our own law and also openness.' 'There is no control on capital, no control on people, no control on data – that is Hong Kong.' It comes weeks after it emerged that multiple independent media outlets were facing simultaneous tax audits. Hong Kong has been seeking to reboot its economy after registering annual deficits in three of the past four years. Its economic growth slowed to 2.5 percent last year.
RTHK
5 days ago
- RTHK
China export growth slows on plunge in US shipments
China export growth slows on plunge in US shipments While Chinese exports to the United States plunged, they spiked to regions such as Asean, Europe and Africa. Photo: Xinhua China's export growth slowed in May while imports also dropped more than expected, as trade tensions remain high between Beijing and Washington despite the tariff truce they reached last month. Official figures released by the General Administration of Customs on Monday showed that exports rose by 4.8 percent year on year to US$316.1 billion last month. That growth rate fell short of estimates of a 5 percent jump in a Reuters' poll and was notably lower than the 8.1 percent annual rise seen in April despite US President Donald Trump's 145 percent tariffs on Chinese goods taking effect that month. Imports, meanwhile, decreased by 3.4 percent to US$212.9 billion, compared with a 0.2 percent decline in April, and was also much steeper than the 0.9 percent fall that economists had estimated. Those figures left the country with a trade surplus of US$103.2 billion for the month, up from US$96.18 billion in April. The latest fall in exports were visibly dragged down by shipments to the United States, which plunged 34.4 percent last month. That was much sharper than the 21 percent annual decline registered in April and marked the sharpest monthly drop in more than five years – since February 2020. And the export decline came despite Beijing's reaching a tariff agreement with Washington on May 12, which saw the two sides roll back most of the sweeping tariffs imposed on each other's goods for 90 days. Shipments to the Southeast Asian bloc, Asean, however, continued to rise, jumping nearly 15 percent, while those to European Union nations and Africa rose 12 percent and over 33 percent, respectively. The latest agreement by China and the United States, two of the world's economic superpowers, has set the additional US levies on Chinese goods to 30 percent and countervailing Chinese duties on US imports to 10 percent, on top of some retaliatory tariffs imposed earlier on certain American goods. But despite the tariff truce, the two superpowers are still locked in disputes over key trade issues, such as Chinese export controls on rare earth minerals and US curbs on chip-related exports to China. Leaders of the two nations have agreed to further talks, with a new round of high-level bilateral trade meeting set to take place in London later today, led by Premier He Lifeng and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, along with two other US officials. For the first five months of the year, China's exports grew by 6 percent year on year while imports declined 4.9 percent. Exports to the United States retreated 9.7 percent while those to Asean members grew by 12.2 percent.
Asia Times
04-06-2025
- Asia Times
The hard road to a clean and profitable Danantara
The recent inauguration of Danantara, Indonesia's new sovereign wealth fund, marks a remarkable development in the Southeast Asian nation's economic strategy. Established through amendment to the State-Owned Enterprises Law (Law No. 1), Danantara's creation has sparked significant discussion, often drawing comparisons with regional giants such as Singapore's Temasek Holdings and Malaysia's Khazanah Nasional. Yet, a critical aspect often overlooked is the profound disparity in legal frameworks that govern these entities and the implications for Indonesian state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Indonesia's legal framework for managing SOEs has traditionally been rigid and risk-averse. Under the former SOE Law, boards of directors were perpetually at dual risks: navigating business losses and evading potential corruption charges. This ambiguity often stemmed from the blurred legal lines that failed to distinguish between genuine business losses and misappropriation of public funds. Consequently, SOEs were involved in a stringent compliance framework that stifled innovation, promoted bureaucratic conservatism and hindered the development of a dynamic and competitive economy. The reformed SOE Law attempts to mitigate these challenges by reclassifying business losses as corporate losses instead of losses to state finances, significantly reducing the criminal liability under Indonesia's principal anti-corruption law (UU Tipikor). However, a more detailed review of UU Tipikor—particularly Articles 2 and 3—suggests that corruption may still be conducted based on two criteria: losses to state finances ( keuangan negara ) and harm to the state economy ( perekonomian negara ). While the new SOE Law narrows the risk associated with state financial losses, the interpretation of 'harm to the state economy' remains nebulous and broad. Unlike financial losses, which are measurable and direct, harm to the state economy is a much broader notion. It could be interpreted to include impacts on the country's investment climate, economic system stability or other material adverse effects. Governance and oversight weaknesses pose the most immediate risk to Danantara's mission. Unlike well-established funds such as Temasek or Khazanah, which are overseen by independent boards with rigorous checks, Danantara is ultimately controlled by the Executive Office of the President. Its enabling law (Law No. 1 of 2025) places the fund under the president, delegated via the SOE Ministry. This centralized control has raised alarms that Danantara could become a vehicle for political patronage rather than objective investment management. Worryingly, Indonesia's national audit body (BPK) currently lacks a clear mandate to scrutinize SOEs' books at this stage, removing a critical layer of independent oversight. The exclusion of the state audit agency from the fund's oversight framework means billions in public assets could be managed with limited external accountability, a structural flaw that undermines transparency and investor trust. If the foundation of this institution is built on insufficient checks, the door opens to mismanagement or worse. Closely intertwined is the risk of political interference. By design, Danantara's management answers to political authorities, which heightens the possibility of government directives influencing investment decisions. Past governance issues in Indonesian SOEs often stemmed from political interest superseding commercial logic, and Danantara's current setup may not fully solve this. Analysts note that the fund remains 'inherently tied to the government and political influence' under the present structure. That has manifested in market fears, despite presidential assurances of open audits ; there are persistent concerns that the fund could be misused for short-term political goals or the benefit of cronies . Such interference would erode not only Danantara's profitability but also its reputation. The first week of trading after Danantara's launch vividly illustrated this: mere speculation about heavy state control was enough to send Indonesian stocks tumbling and investors fleeing. Legal and structural uncertainties add another layer of risk. Danantara represents a radical reorganization of state assets, and not all roles and responsibilities have been clearly delineated. Tension could emerge between Danantara and existing institutions like the Finance Ministry or the SOE Ministry over who ultimately calls the shots on strategy and budgets. Some experts warn of a potential conflict of authority that could create bureaucratic bottlenecks and confusion in managing the fund's portfolio. Unless comprehensive legal alignment is achieved, Indonesia risks undermining the very goal of creating a more dynamic, innovative and business-friendly SOE sector. To secure Danantara's success and allay early concerns, Indonesia should swiftly implement a set of governance and integrity reforms. First, establish independent oversight by creating a truly independent supervisory board or council for Danantara composed of reputable professionals (including international experts and domestic technocrats) who are not beholden to the current administration. This body should have the authority to oversee the fund's strategy and audit its finances as well as provide checks and balances. Second, strengthen corporate governance and integrity to ensure Danantara and its portfolio SOEs adopt the highest standards of corporate governance, clear performance benchmarks, risk management frameworks, and zero-tolerance policies on corruption. The executives running the fund and the companies under it must be selected based on merit and insulated from political pressure. A code of conduct should bar political office-holders from interfering in day-to-day decisions. Over time, consider partial listings or independent trustees for some holdings to introduce market discipline. These steps will professionalize operations and guard against the fund becoming a 'vehicle for political patronage.' Finally, legally guarantee non-interference by enshrining in law the operational autonomy of Danantara's management. The government should explicitly limit its role to a shareholders-like function, setting broad objectives and risk appetite but not micromanaging investments. Fixed terms for the fund's CEO and directors, removable only for cause, could help shield them from political turnover. Clarify the legal framework to resolve any overlaps; for instance, formalize how the Finance Ministry supports the funds or handles any needed capital injections, to remove uncertainty. Clear, stable regulations will provide the legal certainty global investors need to partner with Danantara. We hope that the government will uphold public trust by strengthening oversight, depoliticizing management, tightening compliance and committing to transparency. If governed with integrity, Danantara can indeed be a powerful engine of growth and a legacy-building institution for Indonesia. But if mismanaged, it risks becoming a US$900 billion liability. We should remain optimistic yet vigilant, ensuring that the government actively mitigates all risks and takes necessary precautions. Ahmad Novindri Aji Sukma is a PhD researcher at the University of Cambridge, specializing in criminology. Arfian Setiaji is a senior legal officer and a University of Washington alumnus specializing in corporate and tech law.
