Cambodia welcomes Japanese navy ships to naval base that US suspects is for China's special use
Two Japanese naval ships docked Saturday at Cambodia's Ream Naval Base, whose recently completed Chinese-funded upgrade has heightened U.S. concerns that it will be used as a strategic outpost for China's navy in the Gulf of Thailand.
The visit by the two minesweepers, the 141-meter (463-foot) -long Bungo and the 67-meter (219-foot) -long Etajima, part of the Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force, marks the first foreign navy visit since the base's expansion project was completed earlier this month.
Tokyo has developed increasingly close ties with Cambodia in recent years, seeking to offset China's influence in the region, and Cambodia invited it to make the renovated port's first port call, widely seen as an attempt to allay Washington's concerns.
Both Japanese ships, making a four-day port call with a total of 170 sailors, docked at the base's new pier, where Cambodian officials, including Rear Adm. Mean Savoeun, deputy commander of the base, held a welcome ceremony.
Concerns about China's activities at the Ream base emerged in 2019 following a Wall Street Journal report alleging a draft agreement that would grant China 30-year use of the base for military personnel, weapon storage, and warship berthing. The U.S. government has publicly and repeatedly aired its concerns.
China and Cambodia have close political, military, and economic ties. They commenced the port project in 2022, which included the demolition of previous naval structures built by the U.S. at the base.
Cambodia has stated that warships from all friendly countries are welcome to dock at the new pier, provided they meet certain conditions. When Japanese Defense Minister Gen. Nakatani announced the planned visit on Tuesday, he said Japan's port call symbolizes friendship with Cambodia and is key to regional stability and peace.
He stated that the visit would help ensure Cambodia has an open and transparent naval port, while noting the concerns over China's growing efforts to secure overseas outposts for military expansion.
The port call came just one day after Chinese President Xi Jinping concluded a two-day state visit to Cambodia aimed at further strengthening China's strong ties with its closest ally in Southeast Asia.
A statement on Saturday from Japan's embassy in Cambodia stated that the two vessels are on a mission that began in January to visit 11 countries across Africa, the Middle East, South and Southeast Asia. The port call in Cambodia is considered a 'historically significant event for Japan-Cambodia relations," it said.
The embassy emphasized that the journey of the Japanese vessels 'underlines the importance of freedom of navigation, free and open international order based on international law, and its development."
In December last year, a U.S. Navy warship called at the nearby civilian port of Sihanoukville on a five-day visit. The visit by the USS Savannah, carrying a crew of 103, was the first in eight years by a U.S. military vessel to Cambodia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economist
3 hours ago
- Economist
Can you pass the toughest tests in the world?
Civil-service exams in China and India are notoriously difficult. But they shape their countries' societies Max Weber, sensible German intellectual that he was, considered bureaucracy the best way to organise large societies. And societies don't come any larger than China and India, where the decisions of bureaucrats shape the lives of more than a quarter of the world's people. Even as the countries' private sectors have grown in recent decades, jobs in their civil services remain deeply coveted. Government jobs in India, especially in the federal services that run the country, remain a ticket to prosperity, prestige and better marriage prospects. In China, where the economy has slowed, securing a top-tier state job (known locally as 'landing ashore') is back in fashion—quite literally. Young people sometimes don 'cadre-style' attire—windbreakers in muted colours and high-waisted suit trousers—in order to emulate officials. But perhaps the biggest similarity between the two bureaucracies is the brutality of their selection processes, which hinge on a gruelling set of examinations. To give you a taste of the difficulty, The Economist has chosen some questions from the first part of recent exams. Have a go: Such questions are only a small part of a much larger process. In India those who pass the first exam in May or June must sit a second later in the year. This features nine papers taken over 27 hours. In China the written test takes place on one day in late November or early December. Candidates do a multiple-choice exam and then write a series of essays testing their understanding of policy, as well as their writing skills. Both countries hold in-person interviews as a final filter. Only a fraction survive the ordeal. Last year 1.1m people applied to join the top tier of India's civil service, but around 1,000 (0.2% of those who actually sat the first exam) were offered a spot. In China a record 3.41m people registered and passed the initial screening for the national civil-service exam last year—well over twice the number who did so in 2014. Just over 39,700 (1.5% of those who sat the exam) secured a job. In both countries the exams are considered the fairest way to filter candidates. Indeed, in India they were introduced by British colonial masters after Indians complained about the previous patronage-based system. In China, the guokao, as the exam is called, is modelled on the keju, which was instituted in 587 and was lauded for being relatively corruption-free and meritocratic. Candidates' ability to leapfrog social classes was so cherished that, say some academics, the riots that followed the exam's abolition in 1905 contributed to the toppling of the Qing dynasty, China's last imperial rulers, a few years later. The civil-service exam in China has shaped the country's evolution. The keju was the 'anchor of Chinese autocracy', according to Yasheng Huang, who has written a book about it. Mind-bogglingly difficult, it required total intellectual commitment, sometimes from the age of five, leaving the most talented and ambitious members of society no time to foment new ideas. Gui Youguang, a 16th-century writer, passed the exam's final stage aged 59, after decades of failed attempts, and died shortly after. The guokao, which can only be taken by those aged 35 or under, remains an important tool for the state. After China embarked on market reforms in the 1970s, the bureaucracy took on a more important role in a complex, open society. As a result, the guokao was tweaked to examine candidates' knowledge of laws and regulations. Over time the questions became more practical, testing common sense and numeracy. But in recent years the exam has also become a test of party loyalty, with ever more questions dedicated to Xi Jinping Thought. Chinese essay questions 'Dedicate yourself to your field, constantly 'refine' and 'repair', and silently contribute to a warm and steadfast order of life for the people, while progressing steadily.' Based on your understanding of this sentence, draw on real-life examples and experiences, choose your own angle and title, and write an essay. Write a report on the achievements, shortcomings and suggestions for improvement regarding the implementation of the Intangible Cultural Heritage Law. Conduct an in-depth analysis of the three dimensions of administrative law enforcement—'power' (力), 'reason' (理) and 'interest' (利). Draw on real-life examples and experiences, choose your own angle and title, and write an essay. India's civil service, in contrast, has remained relatively apolitical. After independence in 1947, leaders chose to retain the 'steel frame' of the Imperial Civil Service, but changed the role of the bureaucrats it hired from upholding colonial rule to ensuring development. By 1979 competition to enter the service was so fierce that a second set of exams was introduced to test candidates' breadth of knowledge. In 2012 a paper on ethics was added. India's civil service is associated with prestige—but also corruption. In a recent high-profile example, a young civil servant in the eastern state of Odisha was accused of accepting a bribe of 1m rupees ($11,683) from a businessman. Indian essay questions Is conscience a more reliable guide when compared to laws, rules and regulations in the context of ethical decision-making? Discuss. Child cuddling is now being replaced by mobile phones. Discuss its impact on the socialization of children. Thinking is like a game, it does not begin unless there is an opposite team. Discuss. Success in both exams requires immense toil. Many examinees do not work in the year, even years, leading up to the test; those holding down jobs end up studying early in the morning or late at night. Thousands seek the help of coaching centres; the best ones offer full-time training and board. Shikha Singh, for example, moved from a small town in central India to Delhi just to prepare for the exam surrounded by fellow aspirants. She has failed the test three times, but ramped up her efforts with each attempt. Ahead of her recent fourth try, Ms Singh put in ten-hour days, but worries that still might not be enough to cover the wide variety of subjects. In south-eastern China, Ms Zhong, a prospective civil servant from Jiangxi province, has put in similar shifts since quitting her job in 2023 and moving back in with her parents. Her concern is that preparation alone may not be enough in an exam that tests 'innate ability'. Even if they succeed, will their effort be worth it? Those who pass the exams reap instant and long-term benefits, such as housing and a pension (and often a job) for life. Once in their roles they are treated like royalty, with an army of staff to do their bidding and a special chair marked with a white towel. Research from India suggests some correlation between exam performance and effectiveness as a civil servant. But in both countries critics believe the exams filter candidates according to the wrong criteria. By screening for rote-learning and test-taking, they neglect to assess actual public-policy skills such as management, teamwork and communication. This contributes to the poor performance of the bureaucracy. On a measure of government effectiveness calculated by the World Bank, China and India rank in the 74th and 68th percentiles globally. In both countries efforts are under way to recruit people in other ways. China is experimenting with hiring some candidates for fixed terms according to their experience, rather than their exam performance. Similarly India has introduced a 'lateral-entry' scheme to allow private-sector specialists to join the public workforce. But these remain nascent initiatives. Exams will remain the backbone of public-sector recruitment. If the merits of this selection process are debatable, the costs—both human and economic—are more easily quantified. Aspirants who fail to meet the mark tend to try again. A cycle of application and rejection has an effect on morale: exam failure often pushes candidates to suicide in both countries. Ms Singh, the Indian candidate, feels she has lost social status because of her failed attempts. Her Chinese counterpart, Ms Zhong, is also weighed down by anxiety. 'Only a few people pass the exam,' she says. 'I wonder what those who fail do.' It is an important question. Years of youth spent in study, instead of work, are an economic loss. The exams force college graduates to delay employment, reducing their long-term consumption. And the subjects so feverishly swotted up late at night are not necessarily of use once the exams are over. Knowing big cats' biological intricacies or the details of Xi Jinping Thought might help candidates earn a civil servant's towel-covered chair—but perhaps not a place in the private sector.
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Inter Milan set to early repay bond as plans new debt deal
MILAN, June 13 (Reuters) - Champions League finalist Inter Milan is set to repay early a 415 million euro ($479.57 million) high-yield bond this month as the Italian soccer club prepares to secure funds from a new debt deal, it said in a statement on Friday. Inter Milan paid a 6.75% coupon to place a five-year bond in 2022 to refinance Italy's top-flight soccer club's debt. The debt facility was issued by the Serie A club's media company, which manages the broadcast and sponsorship business of Inter Milan. The company plans to redeem the bond on June 26, subject to securing funds from a debt financing transaction by the business day before the redemption date, it said in a statement. Companies typically repay debt early to secure better financial conditions. Controlled by U.S. investment fund Oaktree (OAK_pa.N), opens new tab, Inter Milan was reportedly tapping private debt investors to refinance the debt facility. Oaktree took over the club last year after a missed 395 million euro payment from the then majority shareholder, Chinese conglomerate Suning ( opens new tab. ($1 = 0.8654 euros) (This story has been refiled to fix typos in paragraphs 1 and 5)
NBC News
4 hours ago
- NBC News
Federal appeals court won't reconsider Trump's $5 million loss to E. Jean Carroll
President Donald Trump failed to persuade a federal appeals court to reconsider the $5 million verdict won by E. Jean Carroll after a jury found that he sexually abused and defamed the former magazine columnist in the 1990s. In an 8-2 vote, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan on Friday left intact its Dec. 30 decision by a three-judge panel upholding the jury award. Carroll, now 81, accused Trump of attacking her around 1996 in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in Manhattan, and defaming her in an October 2022 Truth Social post by denying her claim as a hoax. In his denial, which repeated a similar denial in June 2019, Trump said the former Elle columnist was 'not my type' and made up the rape claim to promote her memoir. Jurors decided in May 2023 that Trump had sexually assaulted Carroll and had defamed her by lying. They did not find that Trump raped Carroll, as she had claimed. The president, who turns 79 on Saturday, is separately asking the appeals court to throw out an $83 million jury verdict in January 2024 for defaming Carroll and damaging her reputation when the Republican first denied her rape claim. Oral arguments are scheduled for June 24. A further appeal of the $5 million verdict would go to the U.S. Supreme Court. A spokesman for Trump's lawyers said in a statement that Americans 'demand an immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and a swift dismissal of all of the Witch Hunts, including the Democrat-funded Carroll Hoax, which will continue to be appealed.' The $5 million verdict included $2.98 million for defamation and $2.02 million for sexual assault. Carroll is 'very pleased' with Friday's order, her lawyer Roberta Kaplan said in a statement. 'Although President Trump continues to try every possible maneuver to challenge the findings of two separate juries, those efforts have failed.' Circuit Judges Steven Menashi and Michael Park, both appointed by Trump, dissented from the order. Menashi wrote that evidence in the case 'makes it more likely that President Trump believed that the lawsuit had been concocted by his political opposition — and therefore that he was not speaking with actual malice.' The judge also said the panel also improperly allowed 'stale' trial testimony about Trump's alleged groping of businesswoman Jessica Leeds on a plane in the late 1970s. In seeking reconsideration, Trump maintained that the trial judge erred in letting jurors review a 2005 'Access Hollywood' video of him bragging about his sexual prowess. He also challenged a 'pile-on' of inflammatory evidence that he mistreated Leeds and former People magazine writer Natasha Stoynoff, who accused Trump of forcibly kissing her at his Mar-a-Lago estate in 2005. Trump has denied Leeds' and Stoynoff's claims. In seeking to overturn the $83.3 million verdict, Trump argued that the Supreme Court's decision last July providing him substantial criminal immunity shields him from liability in Carroll's civil case. The verdict included $18.3 million of damages for emotional and reputational harm, and $65 million of punitive damages.
