Safety fears mean 'cautious' 20mph reversal
A public consultation in Wrexham county, which concluded at the end of January, revealed most people wanted to see the 52 roads under consideration to revert back to 30mph.
Councils across Wales are reviewing their 20mph roads after almost half a million people petitioned the Welsh government calling for it to be scrapped.
The Welsh government said the main aim of the policy was to save lives and reduce casualties.
First 20mph year sees 100 fewer killed or badly hurt
Thousands give feedback over 20mph road changes
Over 8,000 caught breaking 20mph limit on one road
Dave Bithell, Wrexham council's strategic member for transport, said there were "safety concerns" over changes to the roads.
Although he has delegated powers to make the changes, he said the matter would now go before the executive board for a collective decision.
The council has never been in this position, he added.
"Whenever we have considered road speeds, it has always been to reduce them," he said.
"We have never increased speeds as a council."
Bithell said increasing speed upped the risk of harm if there was an accident, "so we need to get this right".
"I don't want it on my conscience – and I don't think the executive board want it on theirs either – if there is a fatality after the changes are made."
The Welsh government switched the default speed limit on mostly urban roads on 17 September 2023, and with some exemptions most 30mph roads became 20.
Data for the first year of the policy revealed there had been about 100 fewer people killed or seriously injured on 20 and 30mph roads.
The figures showed the number of people hurt fell by 28% compared with the same period the year before, with 10 fewer fatalities.
But the scheme, introduced while Mark Drakeford was first minister, has been one of the Welsh government's most controversial initiatives since devolution began.
The policy is now under review, and local authorities are considering whether more roads can be switched back to 30mph.
The leader of Wrexham council, councillor Mark Prichard, said the introduction of the 20mph policy had been "a mess" from the start.
"The Welsh government were told and no-one listened," he said.
"What I would say to any government, not just the Welsh government, is learn from this and don't do it again. The numbers on the petitions, the money that has been spent.
"It's millions upon millions at a time when local authorities are struggling for money."
Ken Skates, the cabinet secretary for transport and north Wales, said the main objective of the policy had been to save lives and reduce casualties.
"Building on the broad consensus that 20mph is right where people live, work and play, we want to ensure we have the right speeds on the right roads," he said.
"With Welsh government support, highway authorities have now started the formal process of reviewing their 20mph roads based on the revised guidance and the feedback they received."
Mr Skates said a number of local authorities have completed this process with more to follow in the coming weeks and months.
Wrexham council is aiming for a target date of May to complete to complete the roll-back.
While Bithell said the local authority hoped to work with road safety organisation Go Safe and North Wales Police on a campaign making people aware of the changes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
02-07-2025
- Yahoo
Tory conference to be held in ‘smallest house in the world', Welsh minister jokes
The Tories will be able to hold their first post-election conference in the 'smallest house in the world' due to their reduced numbers, a Welsh minister has joked. Ken Skates, the cabinet member for North Wales, has said the Welsh Conservatives will fit 'in the porchway' of The Smallest House after next May's Welsh parliament election, during questions in the Senedd on Wednesday. The home, which sits on Conwy's seafront in north Wales, is believed to be the smallest house in the United Kingdom. Measuring just 72 inches wide, the house, which has not been lived in for some time, has become a tourist destination. The minister's comments followed a question about the impact a proposed tourism levy would have on the north Wales economy from Gareth Davies, Tory MS for the Vale of Clwyd. The Visitor Levy Bill, which is going through the Senedd, will allow councils to charge up to £1.30 per person per night for staying in tourist accommodation, with the money going towards local infrastructure. Mr Skate's joke also comes 10 months ahead of the next Senedd election, where recent polls have put the Tories in a predicted fourth place. The Westminster party was also wiped out in Wales in the general election last year, going from 14 seats to zero. However, Labour is also expected to face a difficult battle in May's elections. Recent polling by Survation placed them at 27%, with Reform and Plaid Cymru close behind on 24% each, while previous YouGov polling had the incumbent party in third place. Mr Skates told Mr Davies he visited Conwy following the Welsh Labour Conference, which was held in Llandudno last weekend. Addressing Mr Davies, he said: 'At the end of the conference, I thought I'd just spend a little more time in the area. 'I actually went over to Conwy as well, which is a fabulous place too. 'You'll be aware that it has the smallest house in the world on the seafront there. 'I was told that your party is going to be holding your post-election conference in the porchway, in that particular tourist attraction next year.' Mr Skates added that he would be discussing the visitor levy with the north Wales business council on Friday, calling the fee an 'opportunity,' which he insisted had been welcomed in other areas like Manchester. Mr Davies said he 'appreciates the sharpness and the wit of the Cabinet Secretary' but argued the levy could lead to a decrease in people staying in Wales, with many councils having already ruled out implementing it.
Yahoo
24-06-2025
- Yahoo
Top civil servant told to ‘get on it' after Supreme Court ruling on gender
The Scottish Government is seeking to 'prepare the ground' to act when new guidance on gender is issued, the country's most senior civil servant has insisted. Permanent Secretary Joe Griffin came under fire from MSP Michelle Thomson, who told him it was a 'very poor look' that 10 weeks on from the landmark Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman, the government had 'not done anything about it'. Mr Griffin insisted the Scottish Government was 'taking action where we think that is appropriate and possible', pending a further update from regulators at the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC). But with two women's rights groups – For Women Scotland and Sex Matters – now threatening further legal action against the Scottish Government, Ms Thomson told the top civil servant he should 'get on it'. She challenged the Permanent Secretary on the issue in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling back in April that the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex. That judgment came about after a challenge to the Scottish Government by For Women Scotland – with ministers, including First Minister John Swinney, making clear that while they accept that, they are waiting for further guidance from the EHRC before acting. Ms Thomson however pointed out that at Holyrood the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body has ruled that the use of toilet facilities designated as either male or female will be based on biological sex – preventing trans people from using the toilet of their preferred gender. Mr Griffin insisted there is a 'range of action we have been taking already', adding that Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville had tasked him with leading a short life working group 'to take stock of the actions we need to take'. Speaking as he gave evidence to MSPs on the Finance and Public Administration Committee, Mr Griffin said: 'These are the actions we are taking while we wait for the end of the EHRC process to review their statutory guidance. 'Once that is finalised we will then be able to take a further series of actions.' He added: 'We are taking action where we think that is appropriate and possible, pending the finalisation of the EHRC guidance.' When Ms Thomson then demanded to know what action had been taken 'beyond talking about taking action', Mr Griffin told her: 'Specific actions, I can't give you that right now.' But he insisted the work being done was looking to 'prepare the ground' so that the government is ready to implement changes once the EHRC guidance is finalised. The Permanent Secretary said: 'We in the Scottish Government are in a very similar position to the UK Government and the Welsh Government in our understanding of our responsibility being we need to wait for the guidance for the implementation of some actions.' But with two potential further legal challenges that Ms Thomson said could potentially result in a 'significant loss of public money', the SNP MSP told him she was 'staggered why you are not acting now'. Mr Griffin said the advice he was given 'remains nevertheless that we should wait for the statutory regulator to finalise their guidance'. He added: 'I am assured that the advice that I've got is the correct advice. 'We find ourselves in a very similar position to our colleagues at Westminster and in Cardiff.' But Ms Thomson told him: 'I think my firm advice to you would be to look afresh at that. It is no justification under law, frankly, to say: 'Ah well, that's what everybody else was doing.' 'The Supreme Court judgment was compellingly clear, there is a threat of two further legal actions. My firm advice to you, Permanent Secretary, would be to get on it, because I think you are ultimately the accountable officer responsible for ensuring the Scottish Government upholds the law. 'And regardless of your view in this matter, I personally think it is a very poor look that we're 10 weeks later and we haven't done anything about it.'
Yahoo
17-06-2025
- Yahoo
Independent water commission chair denies probe into reforms is ‘tinkering'
The chair of the Independent Water Commission has defended his ongoing probe into the water sector reforms. Sir Jon Cunliffe addressed recent criticism that he has been 'tinkering' with the industry's deep-rooted issues as he was quizzed by MPs on Tuesday. The Independent Water Commission was tasked by the UK and Welsh governments to carry out the largest review of the sector since privatisation in the face of widespread public anger over pollution, bills and bosses' bonuses although ministers ruled out nationalising water companies. The final report is expected in mid-July but earlier this month, the commission published an interim report which said the industry needs a 'fundamental reset'. But this initial paper was criticised for not going far enough to deliver recommendations that would engender a complete industry overhaul. The Government outlined the scope of the probe to focus on what changes could be made within the current privatised regulated ownership model rather than considering a wholesale shift to other models such as not-for-profit or nationalisation. Giles Bristow, chief executive of Surfers Against Sewage, said the interim report was tinkering around the edges and he called for the commission's final recommendations to 'end pollution for profit' as well as 'reshape the water industry to put public health and environment first'. Asked by MPs if the review is 'tinkering' given the broken culture found across the sector, Sir Jon said: 'No I don't accept it at all. I just don't, I'm sorry. 'First of all, you wouldn't expect me to think, to accept, that this was a report that was tinkering. 'But just moving past that… I do not think the problems you see in the culture of the water companies that you've identified, and the problems we've seen in performance, are the inevitable consequence of the ownership model that we have.' Sir Jon continued to say the commission will look at other ownership models, such as not-for-profit, and make recommendations where companies are feasibly able to make a transition without public spending. Challenged on how he can assure MPs he will look at other models of ownership given the current failures, he said the commission could do so only in certain circumstances. 'But what we won't do is say: 'We need to move the whole sector to a different model' for two reasons,' he said. We've published our report on priorities for the water sector, calling on Sir Jon Cunliffe and the Water Commission not to shy away from 'root and branch' reforms. Read the report: — EFRA Committee (@CommonsEFRA) June 16, 2025 Sir Jon outlined that he is not sure how the sector can do this without large public spending to buy the assets but also that he has not found a 'strong correlation' between models and outcomes. 'It's not tinkering, it's trying to be evidence-based,' he said. His comments come after the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee released its own report into the sector on Tuesday morning, which concluded the industry is 'failing' while water firms are 'deaf to the crisis' it is facing. The MPs also argued the Government 'should feel able to use its temporary nationalisation powers' when needed. Sir Jon was also questioned about criticism that the review is not truly independent from the Government due to Environment Department staff helping to carry out the work. In response, he said: 'I'd like to put this on the record, if I can chair. 'I've been given a secretariat of high-quality Defra officials. 'I have not felt in any way that I am being channelled down any particular route outside of my terms of reference and I'd also say that they are incredibly hard-working, and they are in seeker after truth mode.' He added that while the commission has had to draw on some departmental expertise, the recommendations 'will be my own'.
