Ukraine has repressed Russian-speaking people: Envoy
R
ussian ambassador Denis Alipov responded to one story ('If you take a gun to culture, you kill human spirit', July 4) in TOI 's eight-part series on price of war and fight for peace.
Excerpts:
The piece "If you take a gun to culture, you kill the human spirit" reflects a misunderstanding of causes and consequences of the ongoing conflict. Portrayal of the war as a 'self-inflicted wound for Russian society' is misreading events. Efforts to 'cancel Russia' have been central to policy in Kiev's regime that came to power following the 2014 coup. It has sought to marginalise Russian language, repress Russian-speaking population, dismantle monuments commemorating shared history, and persecute Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
An example is the 2019 law that established Ukrainian as the sole state language, effectively outlawing official multilingualism in a country where Russian is the native tongue for at least one-third of the population. This was followed by the national minorities (communities) law that curtailed rights/ freedoms of ethnic Russians - this even drew UN's criticism.
'Derussification' includes demolition of monuments to figures like Alexander Pushkin and Catherine the Great, and repression of Ukrainian Orthodox Church including a de facto ban on its activities, and attempts to seize the sacred Kiev-Pechersk Lavra, a spiritual cornerstone in both countries.
It's imperative to confront Kiev and its international sponsors, who've played a role in provoking the deadliest conflict in Europe since WWII. Their campaign has shattered peace & stability and damaged culture, historical memory, and people-to-people relations. Indeed, "taking a gun to culture" does kill the human spirit. But it's Ukraine, not Russia, that led this assault -- Russia sought to stop it by force only after its words fell on deaf ears.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
a few seconds ago
- Business Standard
Israel mulls full Gaza control despite military and public concerns
Israel is weighing an expansion of its armed presence in Gaza, despite concern by military chiefs and a majority of the country's public that the move risks jeopardising the prospect of freeing the remaining hostages held by Hamas. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is considering whether to deploy the Israel Defense Forces into the 25 per cent of the Palestinian territory not already under its control, according to an Israeli official briefed on the matter, who asked not to be identified discussing sensitive information. Some Israeli military leaders have expressed reservations, the official said, while the plan would likely face considerable opposition by international governments fearful of the worsening humanitarian situation in the strip. A final decision hasn't been made, the official said, and Netanyahu plans to convene his decision-making Security Cabinet some time this week to finalize a strategy. The prime minister held a three-hour security consultation on Tuesday, during which the IDF's chief of staff 'presented the options for continuing the military campaign in Gaza,' according to a statement from Netanyahu's office. 'The IDF is prepared to implement any decision made by the security cabinet,' it said. The deliberations come with Israel under pressure both abroad and at home over its approach to the near two-year long war. Several international governments have spoken out against the spiraling humanitarian toll on Gaza's 2 million-plus population, with the United Nations warning of worsening starvation due to Israeli restrictions on food supplies and the devastation wrought by the conflict. Israel agreed to better facilitate aid distribution in Gaza by UN-affiliated agencies and NGOs at the end of July, and on Tuesday said it would further ease commercial access to boost deliveries of food and sanitary equipment, albeit under strict security vetting. Domestically, Netanyahu has lost majority public support for a war that has exhausted military reserves and failed to free all the Hamas-held hostages, according to an Institute of National Security Studies poll published Tuesday. The Islamist group still holds 50 of those kidnapped in the October 2023 attacks that triggered the war, of whom 20 are believed to be alive. The military's reservations on stepping up operations in Gaza, which local media including Ynet said are led by IDF Chief of the General Staff Eyal Zamir, has created tension in both Israel's government and the opposition. Defense Minister Israel Katz said the military should implement political policies and that he will make sure 'that is the case.' National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, a hard-liner member of Netanyahu's coalition, said on X that Zamir should be 'obliged to state clearly that he will fully comply with the directives of the political echelon.' Opposition leader Benny Gantz, a former IDF chief, called the attack on Zamir 'reckless.' So far, no date has been set for a security cabinet meeting. Science Minister Gila Gamliel, a member of the cabinet, said the discussion had originally been set for Tuesday but has been repeatedly deferred. She said there's still time to find an alternative diplomatic solution to ceasefire talks which stalled last month. 'At these very moments there's a chance, albeit not as good as before, of success in creating a different platform through the mediators,' Gamliel told Army Radio. US President Donald Trump, whose administration is working alongside Qatar and Egypt in the negotiations, has called for Hamas — designated a terrorist organization by Washington —- to surrender and return the hostages. But the Iran-backed group has shown no sign of capitulating, demanding a full Israeli withdrawal and refusing to disarm. Israel's Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories, known as COGAT, said the Tuesday move to ease the commercial passage of food and goods into Gaza was aimed at 'reducing dependence on the collection of aid by the UN and international organisations.' In practice, a limited number of local merchants will be able to import the aid into Gaza and offer it on sale in local markets. The average number of trucks collected by aid organizations has gone up from around 30 per day in mid July to 185 by August 2, COGAT said.
Mint
a few seconds ago
- Mint
Moscow backs Delhi as Trump warns of higher tariffs in 24 hours
In a sharp escalation of trade tensions, US president Donald Trump on Tuesday warned that he would impose higher tariffs on Indian goods within 24 hours, citing India's continued purchases of Russian oil. In an interview with CNBC, Trump accused India of fuelling Russia's war in Ukraine and labelled it the 'highest tariff nation," claiming that India benefits from US trade while not offering reciprocal access. 'With India… what people don't like to say is they have the highest tariff of anybody. We do very little business with them because their tariffs are so high," Trump said, adding, 'We settled on 25%, but I think I'm going to raise that very substantially over the next 24 hours, because they're buying Russian oil. They're fueling the war machine." Russia swiftly stepped up to India's support, denouncing the US stance as part of a 'neo-colonial agenda" aimed at arm-twisting sovereign nations. The spat comes amid ongoing trade negotiations between India and the US, and growing friction over Washington's tariff actions. Steel duty Earlier in the day, India's minister of state for commerce Jitin Prasada told Parliament that New Delhi has not received any response from Washington to its request for consultations under a WTO agreement regarding the steep 50% duty imposed by the US on Indian steel, aluminium, and related products. The US has cited national security concerns, a claim India disputes. 'India has accordingly reserved its right to suspend substantially equivalent concessions (right to impose equal trade measures in response) as the US has not complied with its obligations under the AoS," Prasada said, referring to the WTO's Agreement on Safeguards (AoS). While Prasada's statement was in the context of US tariffs on metals, it reflects a wider hardening of India's position as the US now threatens additional duties tied to geopolitical differences. India and the US have held five rounds of talks on a Bilateral Trade Agreement since March this year, the most recent in Washington from 14-18 July. Prasada also said, 'To safeguard the interests of farmers and domestic industry, international trade negotiations allow for inclusion of sensitive, negative or exclusion lists—categories of goods on which limited or no tariff concessions are granted." 'Intentional targeting' Trade analyst Ajay Srivastava, founder of the think tank Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), said the US is intentionally targeting India because New Delhi has refused to bring non-negotiable issues such as agriculture and dairy to the discussion table. 'It's a known fact that China imports far more oil from Russia than India does; yet, the US is silent on Beijing. This selective pressure on India reflects strategic targeting, not just trade concern," Srivastava said. In 2024, China imported $62.6 billion worth of Russian oil, compared to India's $52.7 billion, as per GTRI data. 'Even the US continues to import uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear sector, palladium for EVs, fertilizers and chemicals from Russia, and the European Union remains a key buyer of Russian crude oil, LNG, and petroleum products. Then why is India being singled out?", he asked. Russia's foreign ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova rebuked the US over the tariff measures, accusing Washington of 'pursuing a neocolonial agenda" and interfering in the internal affairs of sovereign nations. On the US raising tariff barriers against key Global South partners, Zakharova said such actions 'cannot halt the natural course of history." She added that sanctions and restrictions have become a defining feature of the current global order. 'Unable to accept the erosion of its dominance in an emerging multipolar world, Washington continues to impose politically motivated economic pressure on those choosing an independent path," she said. Indian action A day earlier, New Delhi had called the targeting of India 'unjustified and unreasonable." In a statement issued on late Monday, the Ministry of External Affairs had said that like any major economy, India would take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security. 'The US itself continues to import uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear sector, palladium for EVs, fertilizers and chemicals from Russia," the ministry had said. The statement noted that India's Russian oil purchases were driven by a need to secure affordable and reliable energy after traditional suppliers shifted exports to Europe at the start of the Ukraine conflict. 'At the time, the US had actively encouraged India's oil imports from Russia to help stabilize global markets," it added. India's energy imports are aimed at ensuring price stability for domestic consumers, the ministry said, contrasting this with continuing trade between Russia and its critics. 'Unlike India, such trade is not a national compulsion for them," it said. The European Union, it said, recorded €67.5 billion worth of goods trade with Russia in 2024, while services trade stood at €17.2 billion in 2023. Europe's LNG imports from Russia also hit a record 16.5 million tonnes in 2024, surpassing the previous peak of 15.21 million tonnes in 2022. EU-Russia trade also spans fertilizers, mining goods, chemicals, metals and machinery. Russian oil India's oil imports from Russia have declined recently. In May 2025, purchases fell 9.8% to $9.2 billion compared to a year ago, official data shows. In FY24, India exported about $70.1 billion worth of refined petroleum products globally. Europe emerged as the largest regional destination, with exports to the continent valued at $18.4 billion, according to data from the Ministry of Commerce. The Netherlands alone accounted for about $10.9 billion, representing nearly 25% of India's total petroleum product exports during this period—the highest share among European countries—highlighting its role as a key transit hub for Indian refined fuel entering the EU market. This trend has triggered concerns among Western nations that India's trade route could be serving as a backdoor for Russian oil entering the European market. In FY25, the value of India's crude oil imports from Russia stood at about $50.3 billion, making it the largest supplier of crude to India, surpassing traditional sources like Iraq and Saudi Arabia. India imported around 1.75 million barrels per day (bpd) of Russian oil between January and June 2025, making it the top supplier in that period. Mint reported on 2 August that India will continue to buy oil from Russia, notwithstanding the penal threat and public criticism from the US earlier this week. In fact, India is even reaping a bigger discount on these purchases. Crude cargoes State-owned refiners—Indian Oil Corp. Ltd (IOC), Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd (BPCL), and Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd (HPCL)—are continuing to procure oil from Russian suppliers. Negotiations are also underway for fresh spot deals, as reported by Mint. The last two or three cargoes have been booked at a discount of up to $3 a barrel, compared to about $1.7 in the earlier purchases, and it is likely to rise further, even if not significantly, after Trump's censure of India for its Russian energy purchases, Mint reported. The discounts on Russian oil have narrowed down to single-digit from the high of around $30 per barrel in 2022. India's state-run oil marketers are also in joint discussions with US firms to secure cooking gas supplies starting next year, signalling a potential deepening of energy ties. The companies are exploring long-term arrangements with American exporters. India traditionally imports most of its LPG from West Asian countries including Qatar, the UAE and Saudi Arabia through long-term contracts, while other major LPG importing countries source it from the US. The US so far has been supplying India LPG in small volumes through spot deals, and this is the first time the Indian companies may have a term deal with US suppliers. On the other hand, China has been a major buyer of LPG from the US.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
a few seconds ago
- First Post
India's NSA Doval in Russia as Trump threatens steep tariffs
India's NSA Ajit Doval is in Moscow to bolster ties with Russia amid growing US pressure over arms and oil imports. read more Ajit Doval, India's National Security Adviser, has arrived in Russia on a pivotal visit aimed at reinforcing the strategic alliance between Moscow and New Delhi. His presence comes amid rising tensions between Washington and New Delhi over India's continued purchases of Russian military equipment and oil. According to a report by The Times of India, although the visit had been scheduled in advance, Doval's time in Moscow has taken on added urgency due to the current strain in ties with Washington, sparked by President Donald Trump's scathing remarks regarding India's relationship with Russia. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The trip is expected to include closed-door meetings with senior Russian security and defence officials, as part of efforts to deepen cooperation in regional security, counterterrorism, and energy security. The visit follows closely on the heels of comments by US President Donald Trump, who stated that tariffs on Indian imports would be raised 'very substantially' from the current rate of 25% within the next 24 hours, in light of New Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil. He also criticised India's trade policy, saying a 'zero tariff' offer for imports of US goods into India was insufficient, and accused the country of 'fuelling the war' in Ukraine. Trump's threats regarding India's Russian oil imports began on 31 July, when he announced a 25% tariff on Indian goods, along with an unspecified penalty.
