5 Ways Jeff Bezos Could Put His Billions Toward Fighting Climate Change
There are worse things to be than one of the richest people in the world, but considering the flack that Jeff Bezos gets for his estimated net worth of $189.4 billion (which changes day to day), his therapist (or team of therapists?) might disagree. When you're the current second-wealthiest human ever — behind first-place Elon Musk — people tend to ask you, 'Hey, why not share the love and you know, save the world?'
Saving the world is too tall an order for even the richest person. However, around $200 billion from the Amazon founder could afford to solve — or at least make a serious dent in adjusting — a number of global crises.
See Next:
Read More:
Back in 2020, Bezos put forth the $10 billion Bezos Earth Fund which is still active and aims to disburse the funds by 2030 to address climate change and nature-related issues. To date, $2.3 billion has been funded so far, which may indicate it is behind schedule in 2025, the technical halfway point.
This fund serves as a commitment to fund scientists, activists, NGOs and other actors working to address climate change and protect nature. Here are a few ways Bezos is potentially putting billions to fight climate change.
There are 733 million people in the world suffering from chronic hunger — with roughly just under 50 million of those folks being in the U.S. How much money would it take to solve this global problem?
According to Global Giving, estimates range from $7 billion to $265 billion per year. Why such a wide range? Because every year brings its own diverse challenges from natural disasters to disease outbreaks and any one of them plays a chief role in the hunger crisis.
For the sake of argument, let's just say it's a 'good' year for hunger and the cost to solve it is on the lower end, let's say $10 billion. Bezos could pay and still have well over $150 billion to his name, despite his fluctuating net worth.
Find Out:
Hand-in-hand with hunger is extreme poverty, and it's on the rise. According to the World Bank, approximately 700 million people, or roughly 8.5% of the global population, live in extreme poverty, defined as surviving on less than $2.15 per day.
The math depends on location but to get out of being in what is considered extreme poverty, if 700 million people need a bump from $2.15 to $4, then $1.3 billion would be needed to close that gap. Bezos could front the cash and it would hardly affect his net worth at all.
Across the globe, over 4 billion people do not have access to safely managed drinking water services. WRI research estimates that resolving the clean water crisis by 2030 would cost just more than 1% of the global GDP, or roughly 29 cents per person daily, from 2015 to 2030. That number would surely exceed Bezos' worth.
However, for example, Bezos could manage the clean water crisis in the U.S. In Michigan, 140,000 Flint residents have been exposed to lead in their water supply. Replacing all lead pipes in municipal water systems across the country could cost somewhere between a few billion to $50 billion. Even if it cost him a full $50 billion to replace lead pipes and open up access to clean water in U.S. households, Bezos would still be one of the richest men in the world.
Assuming that the pattern for plastic pollution in the ocean holds, the world could see 600 million metric tons clogging seas by 2040. Research from Pew Charitable Trusts and SYSTEMIQ found that if we overhauled the global plastic industry — the best way to stem the flow of plastic waste into the oceans — plastic pollution could be reduced by 80% over the next 15 years.
The price tag on such an ambitious overhaul is an estimated $600 billion, which is actually $70 billion cheaper than not overhauling it, because of reduced use of virgin plastic according to some experts. It's too big a bill for even Bezos, but he could front a hefty deposit of say, $50 billion — or better yet, he could force Amazon to address its own plastics problem.
Many climate scientists estimate that global warming could be halted for a cool sum of over $275 trillion. Or more accurately, the cost of addressing climate change and transitioning to a net-zero economy would range widely anywhere from $275 trillion in total to $38 trillion annually. These scientists in particular were looking at tackling the agricultural aspect of climate change, chiefly desertification.
Not even Jeff Bezos can make much of a dent in that figure, so what could he do with his riches? Donating $10 billion toward climate action (as Bezos pledged via his Bezos Earth Fund initiative) is a good start, but how he spends the money is imperative. If he and some other uber-rich individuals like Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk and Larry Ellison teamed up on some of these issues, it could go a long way toward saving the planet.
Caitlyn Moorhead contributed to the reporting for this article.
More From GOBankingRates
Trump Tells Sean Hannity Why He Took Away One of America's Favorite Tax Cuts
7 Tax Loopholes the Rich Use To Pay Less and Build More Wealth
Salary Needed To Achieve the American Dream in the 50 Largest Cities
How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Every State?
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: 5 Ways Jeff Bezos Could Put His Billions Toward Fighting Climate Change

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Most Trump voters distrust Big Tech's efforts to suck up to president — with 63% finding Mark Zuckerberg ‘unlikeable': survey
Most of Donald Trump's supporters aren't buying Big Tech's attempts to suck up to the president, according to nationwide poll results exclusively obtained by The Post. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and other Big Tech bosses have launched a charm offensive since Trump won the White House – flocking to his January inauguration, making trips to the Oval Office and scrapping fact-checking operations that had been accused of anti-conservative censorship. However, 54% of Trump voters – and 70% of voters overall – believe the moves are part of a cynical ploy to sway the president to embrace Big Tech policy positions, according to a survey conducted by the watchdog group Tech Oversight Project and Public Policy Polling. As far as the tech CEOs themselves, Zuckerberg was deemed the most unlikeable, with 63% of Trump voters disapproving of him, versus 74% of voters overall. Amazon founder Jeff Bezos drew dislikes from 53% of Trump voters versus 67% overall. Google's Pichai drew a 52% disapproval rating from Trump voters (55% overall), while OpenAI's Sam Altman got 34% (50% overall) and Apple CEO Tim Cook 44% dislikes (33% overall), according to the poll. 'Not only are Americans consistently distrustful of Big Tech CEOs, but even Trump voters reject their new MAGA act – and in fact support policies like a Big Tech Tax to rein them in,' said Sacha Haworth, executive director of the Tech Oversight Project. When it comes to artificial intelligence, only 7% of respondents said they trust Big Tech CEOs to make decisions on policies likely to affect the everyday lives of Americans, while 52% of respondents said they trusted federal and state governments to take the lead on the issue. According to the survey, 72% of respondents support the concept of a 'Big Tech tax' aimed at ensuring the companies pay their fair share for initiatives that impact the public, such as increased strain on power grids from energy-guzzling AI data centers. 60% of Republicans support a Big Tech tax while just 21% are against it. Additionally, 86% of Democrats and 70% of independents were in favor. Big Tech's efforts to sway Trump have intensified during a time in which the companies are scrambling to shape federal AI regulations – and as several, including Google, Meta and Amazon, face antitrust lawsuits and congressional investigations with the potential to upend their businesses. 'Holding Big Tech companies accountable continues to be a political winner, and Congress should take note that the American people overwhelmingly support an agenda that stops Silicon Valley executives who are recklessly endangering kids, crushing small and innovative businesses, and skyrocketing home energy costs on families,' Haworth added. Trump has appointed antitrust hawks to lead key agencies — including Gail Slater as the DOJ's antitrust chief and Andrew Ferguson as chair of the Federal Trade Commission. The survey was conducted on June 3and 4 and polled a total of 541 voters.


CNBC
4 hours ago
- CNBC
Gold rises as US-China trade uncertainty persists, investors eye inflation data
Gold prices edged higher on Wednesday as uncertainty surrounding the finalization of a U.S.-China trade agreement weighed on sentiment and fueled some safe-haven buying, with investors awaiting key U.S. inflation data for further market direction. Spot gold rose 0.2% to $3,328.89 an ounce, as of 0153 GMT. U.S. gold futures were up 0.2% to $3,349.80. U.S. and Chinese officials agreed on a framework to put their trade truce back on track and resolve China's export restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Tuesday at the conclusion of two days of intense negotiations in London. Lutnick said that the U.S. team plans to present the framework to President Donald Trump for approval prior to implementation, while the Chinese delegation will similarly seek an endorsement from President Xi Jinping. "We know that U.S. and Chinese negotiators have agreed on a 'framework', but until Trump or Xi approves them, uncertainty lingers. And that uncertainty is supporting gold heading into the inflation figures," said Matt Simpson, a senior analyst at City Index. The U.S. and China had imposed tit-for-tat tariffs in April, sparking a trade war. Following talks in Geneva last month, both nations agreed to cut tariffs back from triple-digit levels. The World Bank on Tuesday slashed its global growth forecast for 2025 by four-tenths of a percentage point to 2.3%, saying that higher tariffs and heightened uncertainty posed a "significant headwind" for nearly all economies. The U.S. consumer price index (CPI) report due at 1230 GMT could give investors more guidance on the U.S. Federal Reserve's policy path. The Federal Reserve will keep interest rates on hold for at least another couple of months, according to most economists polled by Reuters, as risks linger that inflation may resurge due to Trump's tariff policies. Elsewhere, spot silver was unchanged at $36.53 per ounce, platinum fell 0.4% to $1,216.42, while palladium was up 0.3% to $1,063.62.

Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Natural Gas Boom to Heat Up in Texas
Texas is pumping natural gas out of the ground and exporting it at a record pace. It may only be the start of another energy boom for the Lone Star State because natural gas demand is growing both globally and at home. Texas produced 34.1 billion cu ft daily of natural gas in March, newly released figures from the Texas Oil and Gas Association showed this week. The association forecast that by May, this will have grown to 34.4 billion cu ft daily. More than half of the March total was exported, at 12.5 billion cu ft daily, with the rest being consumed domestically. More natural gas will need to be consumed domestically in the coming years, however, thanks to Big Tech's artificial intelligence ambitions. The topic is as hot as they come: AI data center operators are scrambling to find enough reliable electricity supply for their facilities. Wind and solar can't cut it, so the companies are going the nuclear path or, as it happens, the natural gas path. A senior Amazon executive admitted earlier this year the technology sector will continue needing hydrocarbon energy for a while yet. Meta essentially admitted that talk about buying electricity from wind and solar operators is cheap; reliably powering data centers requires baseload generation that gas and nuclear can generate—and nuclear takes ages to build. Despite the hype around small modular reactors, the world's nuclear energy currently comes from the large sort, and building a large-reactor nuclear facility takes a long time to construct. Gas-fired power plants, on the other hand, can be built rather quickly, which is going to drive natural gas demand further—and so will rising exports.A recent report from an outlet called the Center for Energy & Environmental Analysis found that the number of new natural gas pipelines being built in the United States was surging and that most of these—more than a 100—were export oriented, that is, geared towards feeding natgas to LNG plants. The number was 104 new pipelines, the CEEA said, which will bring online as much as 99 billion cu ft daily in transport capacity. With nine out of the ten biggest among these pipeline projects in Texas and Louisiana, most of the additional production will come from those two states. Some are already warning that natural gas prices are going to surge at home due to the booming exports and the insatiable thirst of data centers. There is only so much gas to go around, and with demand surging, prices will follow, the bullish argument goes. But there is a bearish argument as well. Natural gas reserves are still very much abundant in Texas—and more associated gas is coming out of the shale oil wells. Production of associated natural gas from the Permian, the Eagle Ford, and the Bakken oil wells has surged over the past decade, the EIA said earlier this year. In the Permian, the gas-to-oil ratio has risen steadily from 34% of total production in 2014 to 40% in 2024. The rise was a result of pressure within the reservoir declining over time, and as more oil is brought to the surface, which allows more natural gas to be released from the geologic formation. This is a prolonged process, and the current trend suggests it will continue just as demand for natural gas continues expanding. It might not be such good news for pure-play oil producers, but it's definitely good news for those in gas. The export outlook is just as bright as the outlook for domestic demand. The biggest export markets for Texas-made LNG are Europe and Asia. In fact, the United States as a whole is the biggest LNG supplier to Europe. This is not about to change soon and the volumes of these exports are unlikely to be going down in any consistent way anytime soon. Europe may refuse to face facts, but it still very much needs natural gas to power its economies—and it doesn't want Russian gas. The only other source of comparable volumes of gas is the United States. Texas is set to continue breaking records. By Irina Slav for More Top Reads From this article on