King Charles' shoemaker awarded royal warrant
A Northamptonshire-based shoemaker which made the shoes King Charles III wore at his Coronation has received a royal warrant.
Gaziano and Girling, based in Kettering, also provided a number of bespoke shoes to the King, who made an official visit to the firm's factory in 2019.
The warrants were granted as a mark of recognition to people or companies who have regularly supplied goods or services to the royal household.
Dean Girling, who founded the business with Tony Gaziano, said it was "an honour" to be able to display the royal crest on its products.
Shoemaking has been taking place in Northamptonshire for hundreds of years, but Gaziano and Girling was founded in a garage in 2006.
It specialised in bespoke shoes, which can range in price from £2,500 up to £20,000 a pair, with its products particularly popular with customers in the United States and Asia.
The company said each pair of shoes it made involved 96 hours of labour to create, with the King's shoes for his 2023 Coronation costing about £3,500.
According to the royal family, there were currently more than 800 royal warrant holders.
Mr Girling said the King had been "very interested" in how shoes were made during his 2019 visit and displayed a real interest in "keeping the craft alive".
He said: "You have to be seen to be offering a product for five years before you can apply for it [a royal warrant]. Now we're able to put the full crest up and put it on our product stationery.
"We're still relatively new kids on the block. People said we were crazy for setting up our business in 2006, but here we are, and we're still going strong."
Chelise Porter, an assistant supervisor who has been with the firm for 11 years, said: "We're all really proud about it [the royal warrant].
"Just to be recognised in this way is an honour really. We all work really hard to make the best shoes that we can."
Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
'Amazing' to make shoes for King's 'delicate' feet
Gaziano & Girling
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How many Legal & General shares must an investor buy to earn £1k of monthly passive income?
The FTSE 100 is a brilliant source of passive income. Today, it's packed with dividend-paying blue-chip stocks including one of my favourites, Legal & General Group (LSE: LGEN). This is a share I hold myself, and I'm dazzled by how much income it pays. It currently yields a stunning 8.45% – more than twice a best-buy savings account rate. Even better, that figure should rise over time as Legal & General increases its shareholder payouts. It hiked its dividend by 5% to 21.36p per share in 2024 and now plans to lift it by 2% annually going forward. That's a more modest increase – and below today's inflation rate – but it should help keep payouts sustainable. When yields get this high, there's always a risk the business can't maintain them. By contrast, savings rates look set to fall, with central bankers expecting the Bank of England to cut base rates once or twice this year. So the income gap between shares and cash could widen. Another benefit of investing in Legal & General is the chance of capital growth, if the share price rises. That's not guaranteed though. Shares can fall, unlike cash. Capital is at risk. But it's a potential bonus for those willing to take the risk. Legal & General shares have underperformed overall. They're up just 12% over five years. However, in the last 12 months they've risen 13%. Add the yield and total one-year return hits 22%. What happens next? Nobody knows. Analysts are guessing, though, with forecasts from 13 suggesting the share price could hit 267.8p within a year. That's an increase of 6% from today's 252.3p. In 2024, core operating profits rose a solid but unspectacular 6% to £1.62bn. Analysts aren't expecting fireworks in 2025, and neither am I. Another year of steady growth would be fine by me, given that ultra-high income. I think Legal & General shares are worth considering. Especially since the board is planning to return more than £5bn to shareholders over the next three years, through a mix of dividends and share buybacks. Of course, there are no guarantees. Geopolitical tensions, like Israel and Iran's conflict, could spook markets. Trade tariffs could hurt too. With more than £1trn under management, Legal & General could see customer inflows and profits take a hit. The board also needs to find new areas of revenue. While bulk annuities and infrastructure offer some hope, this is a mature and competitive market. Growth won't come easy. Still, it's hard to ignore that income. So what if an investor took a big punt on Legal & General in a bid to generate £1,000 a month – £12,000 a year? This year's dividend is forecast at 21.9p a share. To hit that income, they'd need 54,795 shares. At 252.3p each, that would cost roughly £138,702. That's a huge amount to put into one stock. Unless our investor has a huge portfolio, it will break every diversification rule in the book. I wouldn't do it myself. On the other hand, £12k a year is a lot of income. It's a fraction more than the new State Pension, which pays a maximum £11,973 a year. But my figures show just how powerful FTSE 100 shares can be when chasing long-term passive income. The post How many Legal & General shares must an investor buy to earn £1k of monthly passive income? appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Harvey Jones has positions in Legal & General Group Plc. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Reeves: UK urges de-escalation in Middle East crisis
Chancellor Rachel Reeves says the UK is deploying jets and other assets to the Middle East to protect British and allied interests, while urging calm amid rising tensions between Israel and Iran. She stresses the PM is working with G7 allies to avoid wider conflict. .
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
More jets does not mean UK ‘at war' says Reeves, amid Israel-Iran conflict
Sending more jets to the Middle East 'does not mean' that the UK is at war, Rachel Reeves has said, as she warned of rising oil and gas prices amid the conflict between Israel and Iran. The Chancellor also indicated that the UK could 'potentially' support Israel, but declined to comment on 'what might happen in the future'. The two nations continued to exchange fire overnight, as the region braced for a protracted conflict. Sir Keir Starmer confirmed on Saturday that more RAF planes are being deployed, amid the escalating hostilities between Israel and Iran. Additional refuelling aircraft have been deployed from UK bases and more fast Typhoon jets will be sent over, it is understood. Asked whether the announcement from the Prime Minister means the UK is at war, Ms Reeves told Sky News: 'No, it does not mean that we are at war. 'And we have not been involved in these strikes or this conflict, but we do have important assets in the region and it is right that we send jets to protect them and that's what we've done. 'It's a precautionary move.' Oil prices surged surged on Friday after Israel's initial strikes against Iran's nuclear programme, sparking fears of increasing prices in the UK. The Chancellor told the BBC that there is 'no complacency' from the Treasury on the issue and 'we're obviously, monitoring this very closely as a government'. Sir Keir has declined to rule out the possibility of intervening in the conflict entirely, and the Chancellor indicated on Sunday that the UK could 'potentially' support Israel in the future. Britain last announced it had deployed fighter jets in the region in last year, when the Government said British aircraft had played a part in efforts to prevent further escalation. Asked whether the UK would come to Israel's aid if asked, the Chancellor told Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips: 'We have, in the past, supported Israel when there have been missiles coming in. 'I'm not going to comment on what might happen in the future, but so far, we haven't been involved, and we're sending in assets to both protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies.' Pushed again on whether the UK would deploy assets in support of Israel if asked, she said: 'What we've done in the past (…) is help protect Israel from incoming strikes. 'So a defensive activity.' She added: 'I'm not going to rule anything out at this stage (…) it's a fast moving situation, a very volatile situation.' It comes after Iranian state media said Tehran had warned it would target US, UK and French bases in the region if the countries help Israel thwart Iran's strikes, according to reports on Saturday. Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride has backed the Government's decision to send further RAF jets to the region, telling the BBC it is the 'right thing' to do. He told the BBC: 'We've got assets out there in the UAE, Oman, Cyprus, they need to be protected given that Iran has suggested they may be under threat.'
