Consultation launched on plans to reduce staffing levels at fire station
Currently the station has two fire engines which are continually crewed, but the consultation on SFRS website, which is open until September, contains two options for Lanarkshire both of which propose the same outcome for Cumbernauld.
This would involve the second appliance instead being crewed by firefighters during the day shift hours of 8am-6pm Monday to Friday, but switching to an on-call basis outside of those times. Operation of the first appliance would remain unaltered.
This is just a small part of the overall review, which carries 23 options for almost half of the council areas in Scotland, including proposals to close eight rural stations which have been dormant for a long time with five others earmarked for potential closure.
Information provided by SFRS states that although the latest Scottish Government budget increased capital funding to £47 million, it would cost more than £800m to bring all 356 fire stations up to standard.
Some stations have sub-par accommodation and facilities while others, like many public buildings, are deteriorating due to the use of Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) in their construction.
A public meeting has been organised in Cumbernauld, to be held in Greenfaulds Community Facility from 6-8pm on Wednesday, August 6, where a senior officer will outline the proposals and the reasons for change. To book a place email SFRS.publicinvolvement@firescotland.gov.uk.
The consultation can also be contributed to via the SFRS website.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Petition launched against proposed changes to Helensburgh Fire Station staffing levels
Plans by the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service would see Helensburgh's full-time facility switch to a "day crewing" model. A petition has been launched against proposals to change staffing levels at Helensburgh Fire Station. The Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) Service Delivery Review is reviewing a proposal that could see the full-time station in Helensburgh adopt a "day crewing" system, meaning crews would be based at the station only from 8am to 6pm. Under the new model, on-call crews would then respond to emergencies during the night. Dumbarton MSP Jackie Baillie has launched an online petition to challenge the proposed changes, calling on locals to express their opinions and pushing for a re-think of the plans. She has also expressed safety concerns due to the proximity of Faslane Naval Base and RNAD Coulport. The Labour MSP for Dumbarton, who is also the Deputy Leader of Scottish Labour, has teamed up with local fire service staff to ensure community voices are heard. Ms Baillie staffed a stall at Helensburgh's Market in the Square on Saturday, where she briefed residents about the potential changes and encouraged them to support her petition. She expressed her worries, saying: "I have real concerns over these cuts and what it would mean for Helensburgh and Lomond residents should they go ahead. "The SFRS have admitted that an increase in response times can be expected outwith core dayshift hours. "It's unacceptable to place residents at increased risk and I'm opposed to these plans." Currently, Helensburgh operates two fire engines, one manned by full-time firefighters and the other by an on-call team. The station currently operates with a full-time crew of five firefighters, primed for immediate response. They are bolstered by an on-call appliance, manned by 10 personnel equipped with pagers, ready to respond to emergencies. The status of the second on-call appliance will remain unchanged. Ms Baillie is also behind a leaflet campaign, encouraging community members to voice their opinions. SFRS chiefs have arranged a public meeting to discuss the proposals, scheduled at the Victoria Halls on Tuesday, August 26, at 6pm. In June, Area Commander Joe McKay, the Local Senior Officer for Argyll and Bute, told the Lennox: "We are currently in the midst of a service delivery review, which aims to ensure that our resources – our staff, stations and appliances – are matched to operational risk and demand across Scotland. "We also must address urgent property issues including stations affected by Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC), which includes Helensburgh Community Fire Station." He added: "Helensburgh is one of a number of change options that have been recommended to progress to public consultation, which is launching later this month. "Any permanent changes to our station footprint or how we deliver our services will only come after the public consultation process and a final decision has been made by the SFRS Board." To view Ms Baillie's petition, click here.
BBC News
8 hours ago
- BBC News
Highland Council to make £100,000 upgrades to play parks
Highland Council is set to make improvements to a number of children's playparks across the Black Isle and Cromarty Firth areas.A total of just over £100,00 has been awarded to improve play equipment and safety in Alness, Invergordon, Evanton, Munlochy, Cromarty, Culbokie, Rosemarkie and Fortrose are set to council said these sites were chosen following local feedback and condition surveys. Money for the upgrade has been allocated through the local authority's Capital Programme, as well as other key sources including the Scottish government play park renewal will include the installation of new swings, seesaws and ziplines in some of the parks, and the creation of a sensory garden in Evanton.
The Herald Scotland
8 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scotland's grouse moor licensing scheme is a farce
No matter what your views are about killing an animal for fun, recent research has revealed the circle of destruction that surrounds grouse shooting in Scotland. This circle of destruction isn't just a catchy phrase, it's a systematic assault on natural ecosystems where each destructive practice enables the next, creating an interconnected web of environmental damage that stretches across the grouse moors that, in total, comprise around 12% of Scotland's land. Read More: On this land, hundreds of thousands of grouse are shot in a 'good year'. A good year means there's a high density of grouse on the moor, allowing substantial numbers of birds to be shot while still ensuring a sustainable breeding stock. To achieve a 'good year' then, that population of grouse needs to be 'managed' by the shooting estates to be unnaturally high. Population sizes are naturally increased by access to food and shelter and are decreased by exposure to disease and predators, what is commonly understood to be 'the balance of nature'. The balance of nature ensures a sustainable ecosystem that looks after itself. But a balanced ecosystem obviously doesn't produce an over-abundance of grouse that can produce a 'good year' for the annual shooting season. To achieve that 'good year' an imbalance needs to be created, the balance of nature is turned on its head. Extra food and shelter are provided by burning heather in the winter months. This provides new green shoots for the birds in the spring. It also releases CO2 into the atmosphere, encourages wildfires and stops trees from growing. This systematic burning creates the artificial habitat foundation upon which the entire circle of destruction depends. Birds of prey perch in trees. Of course, birds of prey are protected species, but breeding pairs are mysteriously absent from many Scottish grouse moors. Their natural diet includes grouse. Foxes, stoats, weasels and crows also naturally control the numbers of grouse. But as they have no legal protection, they can be killed to ensure there are more grouse to shoot. The largest scientific assessment so far revealed that around 200,000 foxes, stoats and weasels are killed by gamekeepers each year in Scotland to ensure artificially high numbers of grouse. There are compelling reasons why estates invest so heavily in maintaining those high populations of grouse. A report to the Scottish Government from the independent Grouse Moor Management Group revealed the capital value of an estate can be increased by £5,000 for every pair of grouse shot. Economic rewards such as these may go some way to explain why landowners will go to such lengths to maintain this artificially imbalanced system. The natural balance of ecosystems isn't entirely dependent on predation. A disease that regularly reduces grouse numbers is carried by a small worm, the strongyle worm. To reduce its impact, shooting estates deploy tens of thousands of grit-filled trays medicated with flubendazole in an attempt to kill the worms in the guts of the grouse. This is despite the medical and veterinary industry's concerns about the over prescription of such chemicals. This mass chemical medication completes the circle of destruction. The inflated grouse populations created by habitat manipulation and predator slaughter then require pharmaceutical intervention to remain viable, yet this intensive management system operates without meaningful oversight. Scotland introduced grouse moor licensing in 2024 under the Wildlife Management & Muirburn Act, supposedly to deter wildlife crime and ensure sustainable management. The reality has proven farcical. The grouse shooting industry threatened legal action against NatureScot's interpretation of the legislation. Rather than stand firm, NatureScot capitulated, weakening the licenses by changing coverage from entire estates to tiny areas around shooting butts. It's still unclear how this mess will be resolved. Polling shows that 60% of Scots oppose grouse shooting, with 76% against the predator control that kills hundreds of thousands of mammals annually. Even in the most remote rural areas - the supposed heartland of shooting support - opposition still outweighs support. Turning the balance of nature on its head goes on year in, year out on Scottish shooting estates. But 'good grouse years' do not. When you look at historical trends, the last time there was a 'good grouse year' was 2018. Predictions, in Scotland, for 2025 suggest that too will be a 'bad year'. That means, even if you think it's ok to kill a bird for fun, over that period of time more than a million foxes, stoats, weasels and crows will have been killed for nothing. Thousands of square miles of heather will have been needlessly burned and tons upon tons of chemicals will have been ineffectively strewn across the countryside. The economic incentives that drive this destruction continue to operate regardless of whether or not a 'good year' for grouse emerges. The circle of destruction surrounding grouse shooting reveals the true cost of allowing privileged minorities to treat Scotland's land as their private playground. Until we break this interconnected system of destruction entirely, Scotland's uplands will continue to serve private interests rather than the public good, and our wildlife will continue to pay the price for a democracy that has forgotten who it's supposed to serve. Meanwhile, the circle of destruction grinds on, crushing Scotland's wildlife and ecosystems beneath the weight of economic interests that benefit the few while imposing costs on the many. For those of us who think it's unethical and cruel to shoot a bird out of the sky - it's always a crying shame. Robbie Marsland is the director of Scotland and Northern Ireland League Against Cruel Sports
