Water did not come to Earth from asteroids, Oxford study suggests
Many scientists believe that life began on Earth following bombardment by asteroids or comets containing life-giving ingredients including hydrogen which reacted with oxygen to form water.
But Oxford scientists have used ultra-powerful x-rays to peer inside space rocks, which date from the same time as the formation of the Earth around 4.5 billion years ago.
The rocks represent leftover material from when the planets were forming in the Solar System, and so offer a snapshot of what the early Earth looked like.
The research showed a significant amount of hydrogen sulphide, which was part of the asteroid itself rather than later contamination from falling on to the planet.
Dr James Bryson, an associate professor at the Department of Earth Sciences, said: 'A fundamental question for planetary scientists is how Earth came to look like it does today.
'We now think that the material that built our planet – which we can study using these rare meteorites – was far richer in hydrogen than we thought previously. This finding supports the idea that the formation of water on Earth was a natural process, rather than a fluke of hydrated asteroids bombarding our planet after it formed.'
It has been suggested that water was created in the early Earth when hydrogen dissolved into the magma oceans, where it reacted with oxygen-containing compounds, forming water.
The team looked at a rare type of meteorite known as an enstatite chondrite, which was found in Antarctica, and has a composition like that of the early Earth.
A previous study led by a French team had originally identified traces of hydrogen within the meteorite but it was not known if it had acquired them after crashing to Earth.
But the new research found that in places in the asteroid that showed signs of cracks in the rusting, there was little or no hydrogen present. All the hydrogen was locked deep within the asteroid, forming an intrinsic part of its makeup.
Tom Barrett, a doctoral student in the Department of Earth Sciences, who led the study, said: 'We were incredibly excited when the analysis told us the sample contained hydrogen sulphide – just not where we expected.
'Because the likelihood of this hydrogen sulphide originating from terrestrial contamination is very low, this research provides vital evidence to support the theory that water on Earth is native – that it is a natural outcome of what our planet is made of.'
In 2022, a meteorite that fell on a driveway in Gloucestershire was found to contain water that resembles water on Earth. It was the best evidence yet that asteroids delivered water to the planet.
But the new study suggests that by the time the early Earth had become large enough to be struck by asteroids, it would have already amassed enough reserves of hydrogen to explain Earth's present-day water abundance. It suggests habitable conditions do not rely on space rocks and could have implications for searching for life on other planets.
The research was published in the journal Icarus.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
a day ago
- Medscape
ATOMIC Backs Atezolizumab+FOLFOX in dMMR Colon Cancer
This transcript has been edited for clarity. Hello. I'm David Kerr, professor of cancer medicine at University of Oxford. I'd like to talk about the ATOMIC trial that was presented recently at ASCO by a good pal of mine, Frank Sinicrope, from the Mayo Clinic. We don't often talk about the latest ASCO results on these Medscape videos, just because we get so much information. Those of us who are ASCO/ESMO members get bombarded — I think, appropriately — from these fantastic societies. I thought this was worthwhile given the fact that it's potentially practice changing. The ATOMIC study was of standard adjuvant chemotherapy for [patients with] stage III colon cancer, who had deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite unstable or MSI high tumors — those which we know are responsive to immunotherapy in the advanced setting. They were randomized to either chemotherapy alone for 6 months, 12 cycles of FOLFOX infusion (5-FU oxaliplatin chemotherapy), or the same chemotherapy plus the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab. The atezolizumab was given in combination with FOLFOX for the first 6 months and then continued as monotherapy for a further 6 months. It's an NCI-sponsored trial from a fantastic collaborative group, and they managed to randomize 712 patients over 6 years. The trial started in 2017, and the last patient was recruited early in 2023. During that period of time, practices changed somewhat. We tend, by and large, to give 3 months rather than 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy. The trial was of its time, though, and it was well designed. Disease-free survival was a primary outcome. They demonstrated that, in the atezolizumab arm, the disease-free survival was 86.4% compared with 76.6% in the FOLFOX arm, showing a very high P value and a very decent hazard ratio, as one would expect. Frank and colleagues concluded that, given the advantages accrued by the addition of atezolizumab to FOLFOX, in terms of disease-free survival, this should be considered a new adjuvant standard of care for patients with mismatch repair-deficient colon cancer. Yes, but no. Yes, but as I said, we tend to give 3 rather than 6 months adjuvant chemotherapy. Do we need to give chemotherapy for that long? We would argue probably not. What about atezolizumab on its own? Could that be as effective as in combination with chemotherapy? One wonders. For atezolizumab, should it be 12 months or 6 months or 24 months? There's something very interesting about the duration of exposure to atezolizumab, and of course, we'd have to look at the cost effectiveness of how we do that. Well done, Frank and team, and to the ATOMIC study group. These are very provocative data and a highly significant finding in terms of disease-free survival. Let's see what happens with more follow-up on overall survival, that will be an important additional set of secondary endpoints. There are still a number of important questions to ask in terms of toxicity of the combination, duration of therapy, and possibly financial toxicity given the cost of an immune checkpoint inhibitor. This was an important study and possibly a landmark in terms of how we treat this. It's relatively rare. Remember, only about 10% of our colon cancers will be mismatch repair deficient. It was a good trial and well run. I'd be really interested in your comments. Am I being too hard? Or should we just accept this as a new gold standard? Thanks for listening, Medscapers. For the time being, over and out. Thank you.
CBS News
a day ago
- CBS News
Former University of Michigan president picked for education role in United Kingdom
Former University of Michigan president Santa Ono has found a new role at the Ellison Institute of Technology's Oxford campus in the United Kingdom. The Ellison Institute of Technology announced Monday that Ono will be its new global president, working with others to develop and expand the school's science programs. The school focuses on topics such as health, medical science, sustainable agriculture, clean energy and artificial intelligence. "I look forward to collaborating with EIT's leadership teams worldwide to advance Larry Ellison's bold vision," Ono said in his statement. "I believe this innovative approach represents the most exciting investment in fundamental and applied research globally, and I am thrilled to be part of this collective effort to create solutions to humanity's most pressing challenges." Ono was named president of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor in July 2022. At the time, he planned to stay for five years. This appointment came after the university's removal of former President Mark Schlissel, with Mary Sue Coleman serving as interim president. His career path took a twist when he announced his intention in May 2025 to become the president at the University of Florida. He was the sole finalist and earned approval from the school's board of trustees, pending approval from the Florida Board of Governors. That's when the bid stalled out. Ono's proposed contract included a number of stipulations and requirements, and some prominent conservatives raised questions about pro-Palestinian protests, climate change efforts and programs that focused on diversity, equity and inclusion at his former workplaces. The Florida Board of Governors then rejected his pending hire. The University of Michigan in the meantime said Ono would not be on its faculty and has begun the search process for its next president. Before taking the Michigan job, Ono was president and vice chancellor of University of British Columbia. He also had served as president at University of Cincinnati. His work in academic leadership spun out of his previous work in biomedical research and immunology. The above video originally aired June 20, 2025.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Homeowner's camera captures rare footage of unexpected visitors playing in creek: 'For me, it was very exciting'
Homeowner's camera captures rare footage of unexpected visitors playing in creek: 'For me, it was very exciting' Habitat loss and trapping slashed the common river otter's population in the late 1800s, according to the Ohio Department of Natural Resources. The mammal was hunted to extremes during the Fur Trade Era (1600 to 1850) but was reintroduced in Ohio from 1986 to 1993. Because of this reintroduction, the presence of river otters has been confirmed in 86 of 88 Ohio counties as of 2020. As these animals thrive, biodiversity is reinstated in areas where the river otter once ruled. Oxford, Ohio, resident Jim Hermann captured images on his trail cameras of river otters playing on his property, per The Miami Student. Hermann told the newspaper: "For me, it was very exciting. … I wouldn't have expected them here." While Hermann set up his trail cameras to watch the beavers that were chewing on his trees, he was treated to a rare sight. Trail cameras are good for this. Researchers use them to watch animals in their natural habitats and track the populations of endangered species. For instance, Galápagos Conservancy uses trail cameras to classify native animals and track their behaviors and population changes. It then uses this data to determine what a species may need to be better served by conservationists. Of course, these devices are not just used by conservation organizations. Anyone can set them up to spy on animals at play with the added possibility of surprise appearances of rare critters. When these sightings are reported, as they are encouraged to be, officials can add data to their studies on animal population changes and track the results of rehabilitation efforts. Organizations such as Otter Watch and the River Otter Ecology Project ask people to report sightings of otters in nature. Hermann's sighting in a town not used to seeing river otters gives hope to biologists, conservationists, and animal lovers alike. Do you think America is in a housing crisis? Definitely Not sure No way Only in some cities Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. "We want to have a healthy population that can sustain itself and provide resources," Miami University student Aiden Schmeling said to The Miami Student. "They are a mid-upper level predator on fish and aquatic life, so that indicates there's adequate water quality for our fish. It tells us that we have a big enough ecosystem to support a predator." Hermann told the newspaper: "There are bright spots. One of those bright spots is the reappearance of these big mammal and bird species that have come back to Ohio." Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword



